Off-Shore Windpark Projekt
Kaliningrad
The Squad
Prof. Andrey Nikishin
•
•
•
•
•
Gilbert Duee
•
Berno Hellauer
•
Max Mueller
•
Andreas Rembold •
Aurelio Schug
Abbas Seifeddine
Moritz Schneider
Kevin Weber
Sebastian Westphal
Table of contents
1 - Aims of the project
2 - What we did in the project
3 - Installation Site Selection
4 - Power production assessment
5 - Environmental Review
6 - Interconnection Studies
7 - Financial Aspects
8 – Conclusion and Proposals
1 - Aims of the Project
• convince Russia to build offshore
windfarms
• basic planning of 115/130MW windfarm in
Kaliningrad region
• feasibility study
2 - What we did in the project
Collect information:
- technical
- legislative
- financial aspects
Basic planning and feasibilty calculation of
offshore windfarms for Kaliningrad region
Conclusions and proposals
2 - What we did in the project
• Our project includes:
•
•
•
•
•
Installation Site Selection
Power production assessment
Environmental Review
Interconnection Studies
Financial Aspects
3 - Installation site selection
3 - Installation site selection
3 - Installation site selection
3 - Installation site selection
4 - Power production assessment
Мощность ВЭУ, кВт
Частота появления Рэйлиха, %
2500
P, kW
fy,i %
2000
1500
1000
500
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
5
10
15
20
Скорость
Wind
speed ветра,
m/s м/с
 z 
 av ( z )   0  
 z0 
25
10
15
Скорость
Annual
wind
ветра,
м/с
speed m/s

W W Farm  n  W W Tyear
5

f y ,i  e
W W Tyear 
Vср=6 м/с
Vср=7 м/с
Vср=9 м/с
  vi  0 ,5 
·
4 

i
v av
20



2

e
25
Vср=5 м/с
Vср=8 м/с
Vср=10 м/с
  vi  0 ,5 
·
4 
f y , i ·Pi ·T year
v av



2
5 - Environmental review
EIA and ecological assessment
EIA procedure promotes decision making on realization of planned
activity taking into account:
• possible adverse effects and environmental consequences;
• public opinion;
• working out measures of decreasing and prevention of effects
EIA is carried out in few steps.
1. Preliminary assessments for requirements specification development
of EIA.
2. Requirements specification making.
3. EIA investigations.
4. Preparation of preliminary EIA.
5. Public discussions.
6 - Interconnection studies
4 – Financial aspects
Pnom Ins. Cost Payback period –
Data
WF1
• Pnom: 115 MW
• n-ntur: 58
• Van: 9.2 m/s
• Ean: 489 GWh
• Total cost: 192 Mio €
• Paybackperiod:
• In Rus: ca. 8 Years
• In Ger: ca. 3 Years
• Ins. costs: 1717 €/kW
WF2
• Pnom: 130 MW
• n-ntur: 65
• Van: 8.5 m/s
• Ean: 562 GWh
• Total cost: 225 Mio €
• Paybackperiod:
• In Rus: ca. 7 Years
• In Ger: ca. 3 Years
• Ins. costs: 1718 €/kW
8 – Conclusions
•No offshore wind energy
development program;
•No standards for evaluation of
environmental and other
impacts;
•No other guiding documents;
•No stimulation for production of
wind electricity;
•No one-desk policy;
•Favorable wind conditions;
•Enough place in suitable depths
•Minimum environmental conflicts
•Economically feasible
•Growing interest by investors
•Possibilities for connection to the
grid
Kaliningrad region has a good perspectives for offshore wind power development
8 - Proposals
1. Use the experience of EU to prepare
normative documentation and standards.
2. Financial stimulation for green power in
Russia.
3. Encoureging the local people to accept
such projects.
4. Use the modern wind power technology