Designing for 20mph The purpose of this paper by Urban Design London is to summarise a range of traffic calming options available to street designers, by pulling together ideas and examples that have already been implemented in various parts of London and the UK. This paper is meant to be used as an aid memoir and is not meant to replace any literature published on this subject (DfT LTN 1/17, TRL report, etc). The paper will also provide some guidance regarding ‘issues to consider’ for each category of options listed. Research carried out by TRL suggests that 20 mph zones are an effective way to decrease the frequency and severity of road accidents, largely by reducing traffic speeds. The Mayor has set targets to substantially improve road safety and a number of 20mph zones are being rolled out beyond the typical residential setting, to major roads across London. 20 mph speed limits without self-enforcing features can be relatively inexpensive to implement. However, it has been suggested that where 85% of vehicles are travelling above 24 mph on a street before interventions, a 20 mph speed limit on its own would be insufficient without additional traffic calming measures provided (DfT 1 Traffic Advisory Leaflet 9/99). After an extensive area-wide 20mph zone was implemented in Portsmouth in 2007, it was found that average speed reduction on all roads was only 1.3%, though the number of recorded casualties fell by 22% after the implementation (compared to a 14% drop in the rest of the UK in comparable areas). Traffic calming measures can also help improve the overall character and feel of an area. This in turn can affect how pedestrians and cyclists use streets, therefore helping make a safer and more pleasant environment for all users. The paper is open to any comments, suggestions and examples on the options listed. 2 1. Carriageway widths - real and apparent Introduction Drivers may slow down when they feel the space they are travelling in is narrow or its width changes. This could be because they feel less sure of the space available to them and less confident of what they will encounter ahead. This could be due to the fact that pedestrians and other activity next to the carriageway is closer, more visible and more likely to encroach onto the carriageway or to the fact that the driver has to negotiate the road width with on coming traffic. Advice given by TfL and others suggest that carriageway widths should be below 3m or over 4.5m as widths in between can be very difficult for cyclists using the carriageway who can be squeezed by passing traffic. As widths over 4.5m may support faster driving speeds, some of the ideas described below can be very useful in meeting both speed reduction and cycling integration aims. 1.1 Gateway narrowing This can require cars to stop and give way to oncoming vehicles, helping mark a change in driving behaviour. Space should be left for cyclists on the kerbside and it should be ensured that they can rejoin the traffic flow safely. Example – Warrington (internet) 1.2 Pavement build-outs Space is reallocated from carriageway to pavement rebalancing the allocation of space between buildings. New pavement areas are often good spots for trees and planters as they are less likely to have services beneath them. Example – Camden High Street 3 1.3 Central median strip Carriageways are narrowed with the removed space used to create a central strip. Pedestrians standing on the strip, and crossing the narrower carriageways, may help drivers feel that they should be driving slower. The median strip is sometimes fully flush or flat in places to allow overrun as necessary and also to reduce maintenance costs. Example 1 – Oxford Street 1.4 Kerb/Gutter detailing The carriageway next to the kerb, the traditional gutter area, can be made of different materials, or coloured in a way that although flush and drivable, appears as part of the pavement or kerb so the carriageway looks narrower than it actually is. Example – Coventry City Centre Issues to consider: Can support informal pedestrian crossing Can channelise carriageways, giving less space for cyclists. It can also cause issues for buses manoeuvres around stops, which could cause delay to bus time reliability. Override areas can be provided for buses and loading vehicles (see Oxford Street) Can offer smooth flow of traffic if lane number is kept consistent Has a potential lack of resilience if a vehicle breaks down or there is an accident Can provide additional space for lighting, trees, bike parking etc. Kerb/gutter detailing (example 1.4) could provide more breathing space for cyclists and large vehicles Pavement build-outs can give more space for shops and pedestrians and less of a vehicle dominance in the area Gateway narrowing requires drivers to slow down in order to negotiate safety, but its effectiveness along a street may be short Can be problematic for parking and vehicle capacity Lack of separated space for cyclists Not suitable for distributor routes 4 2. Reduced delineation between carriageway and pavement areas Introduction Over the last few years there has been a lot of interest in shared space schemes. However most projects do not propose that all space is totally shared between vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists and people sitting, socialising or playing in an area. Designated areas for each use are still encouraged, but they encourage pedestrians and cyclists to feel safer, by slowing traffic speeds. Pedestrians are encouraged to negotiate carriageway area with vehicles in order to cross the carriageway. Shared space schemes are generally trying to make drivers feel that they are sharing space with more vulnerable users and modify their behaviour accordingly. The designs therefore rely on there being a significant amount on non vehicle activity to achieve this character. 2.1 Guardrail removal Removing guardrails can make drivers feel more connected with pavements and those using them which may encourage slower speeds. Un railed streets also feel less dominated by highway kit, again making drivers aware of other activities. An assessment should be made first in order to establish whether the guardrail can be removed safely. Example – Walworth Road 2.2 Carriageway Patterns and Materials Example 1 - Exhibition Road Example 2 – Mare Street, Hackney 5 Changes in materials, colours or finishes can be used to disrupt the linear appearance of a carriageway. These may be permanent or temporary. They can be carried across both vehicle and pedestrian areas to encourage shared behaviour. Consultation should be carried out to ensure the surface could be used safely by disabled people. 2.3 Dominant Footways Footway widening, decluttering, visual improvements (including trees) and visible pavement activities can change the feel of a street, making it less vehicle dominated. Therefore as well as narrowing carriageways, footway widening and encouraging pedestrian activity can help enforce the impression of what would be an appropriate slower speed to travel at. Example – Hornchurch (trees, planters and seating have been added to the pavement to emphasise and encourage pedestrian use) 2.4 Level Surfaces Kerb lines can be flush between pavement and carriageway. This can give a visual indication that people will walk or cycle across or within the carriageway. Care should be taken that safe and easy to use routes are available for those with sight impairments. Example - Venn Street Issues to consider: Increases usable pavement width Can dramatically change the appearance of the street and influence user behaviour Removing guardrails can improve visual impact and reduce clutter Allows for informal crossing and deliveries along pavement length Level surface can be difficult for those with sight impairments Level surface can be costly to lay and maintain, drainage needs careful consideration Level surface can be most appropriate in streets with high ped and low traffic flows Shared space can create a more adaptable space/surface to meet different demands (see 4.0 Elastic Streets) 6 3. Prominence and priority of non motor vehicles Introduction There are a variety of ways to indicate to road users that the priority lies with cyclists and/or pedestrian users and that they therefore may have to reduce their speed accordingly. Segregating or separating such users from vehicles may dilute their influence on driver behaviour. Therefore when thinking about designing for sub 20mph behaviours integration may be most relevant as discussed below. However we should keep in mind that when designing with cyclists in mind, we should consider their needs fully and work to ensure they are not obstructed or put at risk. 3.1 Creating cycle lanes Space reallocated to a highly visible cycle lane can make the street feel less vehicle dominated, as well as narrowing the carriageway for vehicles. However the way in which this is done may effect how it influences driver behaviour. If hard forms of segregation are used drivers may feel able to go faster without worrying about the cyclists. Example 1 Royal College Street, Camden. Light segregation and floating parking has been used so the whole carriageway, and its users, can be percieved as one Example 2 – Baylis Road, Southwark; the cycle lane is integrated into the carriageway and will therefore alert drivers that they need to be aware of cyclists around them. However cycling pushed to the side gives an apparent clear run for vehicles and so may not be an effective way of reducing speeds. 7 3.2 Closing routes to vehicles Preventing access and rat runs for vehicles while keeping routes open for pedestrians and cyclists can help reduce speeds on side streets. However care is needed to ensure drivers are not confused and end up driving down more streets trying to find a route through. Traffic flow studies and temporary closures can be implemented to check the effect the closure will have to general traffic in the area. Example – Hackney 3.3 Contraflow Cycling Allowing cycling in both directions on one way streets can slow driver behaviour. These usually have an ‘except cycling’ sign under the no entry signs and sometimes a cycle symbol on the tarmac in the opposite direction to vehicle use. They also sometimes have separated entry space for the cycles. Example – Holland Street, Kensington and Chelsea 3.4 Integrating cycling Integrating cyclists into narrower carriageways can encourage all road users to engage better with each other. This can also help with keeping a constant, but slower, traffic flow. This is shown with a bicycle sign painted on the carriageway. Care is needed at turings though to ensure cyclists are not invisible and ‘squeezed’ by tuening vehicles. Example – Hornchurch 8 3.4 Integrating Pedestrians Integrating pedestrians into new road layout schemes can help encourage more informal crossing and can therefore help reduce speeds. This can be achieved by providing larger footway areas for pedestrians, providing median strips and informal crossing opportunities, as well as more formal crossings. This can also help improve the general character and feel of an area/junction. Example – Piccadilly Circus Issues to consider: Visible presence and heightened importance given to cyclists when they appear to be primary and important users of carriageway When cycle lane is clearly separated from vehicle lane may not help to slow or moderate vehicle behaviour Junctions must be designed appropriately, taking cyclists and pedestrians into consideration Pedestrians should be incorporated into schemes and informal crossings should be encouraged where possible Consideration should be made for uses of the space/street during different times of day/year 4. Elastic Streets Introduction A term used in the Roads Task Force, elastic streets are low cost, temporary projects that change the character of a street. These changes, though temporary or low cost, can often impact upon the way vehicles use the street. Depending on whether the temporary changes are successful or not, they can then be implemented permanently. Cities around the world have implemented their own versions of Elastic streets, with Paris offering a ‘beach’ along the river Seine every summer since 2002 and New York promoting schemes such as ‘play streets’ and ‘Summer streets’ (For three consecutive Saturdays every summer, nearly seven miles of New York City’s streets are opened up for everyone to play, run, walk and bike). 9 4.1 Street Furniture Temporarily placing street furniture on strategic parts of a street can change its character and use and therefore reduce traffic speeds. Particular care has to be taken to make sure it does not negatively impact on mobility and visually impaired pedestrians. Example – Flat Iron Square 4.2 Freestanding carriageway planters Freestanding carriageway planters are a quick and cost effective way to change the layout of the road and also add some more greenery/character to the street (though they can be expensive to maintain). This will also reduce carriageway space for vehicles and therefore encourage the reduction of speed. Example – Narrow Way, Hackney 4.3 Temporary change of use This can give back part or the entire carriageway to the community and reduce or stop traffic running through a street at certain times. The change of use can be for markets on weekends or bank holidays, for Play Street schemes or other events. Vehicle users are then likely to slow down, when the street is open again, as there may be more ongoing pedestrian use of the street and drivers may associate pedestrian activities with the street. Example – Hackney Play Streets 10 4.4 Market Stalls The presence of market stalls on the side of the street or the street itself can alert drivers to reduce their speed significantly and take care of the pedestrians, shoppers and stall holders. Even in occasions when the market is not in use, if there are road markings showing the position for the market stalls, this can still inform drivers of the nature of the street. Example – Whitecross Street Market Issues to consider: Can create a close community feel and bring character/sense of place back to an area Can cause vehicular congestion at the times of use/closure Measures are temporary and can therefore be removed if necesarry Can be cheap to put in place Free standing carriageway planters can be expensive to maintain 5. Vertical Deflections Introduction Vertical deflections are often used to alert drivers of a change in road conditions and therefore assist with speed reduction. These are often used at junctions, crossings or road entry points, as these are areas where accidents are more common. They are also used along streets as cushions or humps to repeatedly slow vehicles. However this type of deflection are not a favoured option and as mentioned in the Local Implementation Plan 2014/2015 to 2016/2017 Delivery plan (p.24); ‘all other options should be exhausted before consideration is given by boroughs to the potential use of vertical deflections such as road humps and speed cushions.’. 11 5.1 Raised Entry Treatments The carriageway at a side road is raised to pavement level across its mouth. This can give an indication to drivers of change of condition and also emphasise that pedestrians may be crossing at that point. Example – Brixton 5.2 Raised crossings Raising the crossing to pavement height at formal or informal crossings can help alert vehicles to reduce their speed, even when there are no pedestrians waiting to cross. Example - Surbiton 5.3 Speed Cushions Speed cushions are placed in many residential streets to reduce vehicle speeds. These are not very popular and are little used now. DfT guidance includes details of hump proportions and H and S forms which help buses go over them. They can go across the whole width or sit alongside each other across the street as shown here. 5.4 Virtual humps Humps and other features can be painted onto the road to psychologically deter drivers from speeding, even though they are actually flat. Example – Philadelphia, USA. 12 5.5 Raised Junctions Raising a junction at the level of the pavement. This can raise people’s awareness of an impending change in condition and movement from different directions and should therefore reduce speed. Example – Camberwell Issues to consider: Can give informal indication that vehicles should slow down Visually highlights that different road conditions are coming up (pedestrians crossing/ different traffic movement) Can be a problem for buses if not correctly constructed Can give more importance for movement across main traffic route May give pedestrians a false sense of security/entitlement Raised entry treatment can widen area vehicles can run on, allowing some to take wider, faster corners (use of upstanding features to contain corner radi helps with this) Can potentially be expensive to build and maintain, with ramps often failing in areas of heavy use Wide areas of flat kerb can be confusing for those with site impairments, and/or lead to large areas of blister tactile Speed cushions can be used over large areas, but drivers may speed between them Speed cushions do not normally specifically relate to, or support pedestrian crossings Speed cushions can lead to drivers having to take certain wheel tracks so less ability to get out of the way in the case of an incident. 13 6. Geometries, junctions and turns Introduction Tight corners signal free junctions and decisions on which routes should have priority at junctions/roundabouts can make drivers more cautious and help reduce speeds. Priority between vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians has to then be negotiated between users. 6.1 Unconventional geometries Kerb lines and surfacing can create unusual and diverting shapes which may make drivers feel they are within a shared environment and help reduce speeds. Example - Coventry City Centre 6.2 Altering Large Gyratories or Roundabouts Altering the appearance and priority at large roundabouts can make drivers approach more cautiously and reduce their speeds. Vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians have to negotiate access which means that the speed is reduced throughout the area not just at specific points. It also allows for slower, but more consistent traffic flows. Example – Poynton 14 6.3 Turning Angles Small corner radii (tighter turning angles) make vehicles approach a junction with more caution and to slow down significantly to check it is safe to proceed. Small corner radii also help pedestrians cross at their desire lines. Wider, rounded corners can cause people with visual impairments problems, as the rounded sections of kerbing can disorientate them when it comes to crossing the street. Example – Elephant and Castle, South Roundabout Issues to consider: May alter the character of the area, due to the lower vehicle speeds Can make cycling safer on gyratory, roundabouts and junctions May confuse road users in the first instance May have impacts on traffic capacity Can be expensive to construct and maintain Can help all road users (pedestrians and vehicles) interact better, to establish priority and right of way Visually appealing, as has fewer road markings and less clutter Can be a radical option to plan and implement 7. Crossings Introduction There are a variety of different crossing types that prioritise pedestrians and cyclists over vehicle users. These are; zebra crossings (pedestrians), pelican crossings (pedestrians), puffin crossings (pedestrians) and toucan crossings( pedestrians and cyclists), as well as informal crossings. The positioning, number of crossings on a road and width may have an effect on vehicular speed. 15 7.1 Zebra Crossings Zebra crossings are not signalled and vehicles should stop as soon as a pedestrian is waiting. Vehicles approaching Zebra crossings often approach with caution and do slow down, in case they have to stop. 7.2 Pelican Crossings Pelican is the older type of crossing and will slowly be replaced by the puffin crossing. Pedestrians can push a button to cross (though if they move away, the traffic light will still change). Crossing times are not variable, though even when the light has gone red for pedestrians there is still time for pedestrians already on the crossing, as the vehicle traffic light flashes amber for several seconds. Vehicles approaching such crossings will not usually slow down, unless the light changes. 7.3 Puffin Crossings Puffin crossings are the latest pedestrian crossings controlled by signals. They have movement detectors, so they can allow for variable crossing times for pedestrians – depending on their needs. They can also detect if the pedestrian has walked away, after pushing the button and cancel the action automatically. 7.4 Toucan Crossings Toucan crossing signals operate in the same way that puffin crossings operate, but are used by both pedestrians and cyclists. This is the only crossing currently in use where cyclists are allowed to ride across on. 7.5 Informal Crossings Informal crossings can be provided by implementing some of the tools mentioned in this paper (unconventional road geometries, raised carriageway, central median strip, shared surface materials etc). These measures then allow for informal crossing points, as all road users are encouraged to interact and vehicles will reduce their speed. 16 Issues to consider: Vehicles have to prioritise pedestrians and cyclists Vehicles tend to slow down on approaching crossings The automated functions on Puffin and Toucan crossings can help reduce user’s frustration Pedestrians and cyclists may not use crossings, if these are not provided on the desired line of crossing Vehicular traffic can build up if the crossings are used too frequently Pelican crossings do not have movement detectors and can therefore stop traffic even when the pedestrian has moved away/crossed already Informal crossings can make pedestrian and vehicle users interact more, as longer stretches of road can be used to cross (and not just the designated crossing areas) Informal crossings can encourage of steady flow of slower moving traffic Pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles all have to concentrate more, when at informal crossings, in order to interact better and avoid any accidents 8. Signage and lines Introduction Minimal signage and road markings can often make vehicle users feel uneasy and therefore help reduce their speed. Fewer lines and markings also makes a space feel like it less designed for the vehicle and is therefore more balanced between users. 17 8.1 Minimalist streets Signs and markings are usually put in place to ensure safety. Their removal would need to be done with care and consideration for each specific scheme and with exceptions from the DfT. However, experience has shown that these can be very successful. Example – New Road, Brighton 8.2 Interactive Signs Variable Message Signs or other interactive signage can inform drivers of upcoming change of conditions or existing speed limits and ask them to reduce their speed. Variable message signs are often found on larger roads, but interactive signs are quite common in 20mph and 30mph zones . 8.3 Informal Signs Informal road signs (unofficial road signs that are not regulated by the Department for Transport) can inform drivers to slow down, for example if near a school. They can be prepared by an active local community or local schools, but as they are informal, they may be ignored by drivers and not have the desired effect. Example – Devon 18 8.4 Traffic Signals - Split Cycle Offset Optimisation Technique (SCOOT) SCOOT is a traffic control system used in urban areas that changes traffic signal timings automatically, based upon traffic demands at each time. It works in such a way as to manage traffic flow, stops, delay and improve journey time reliability. It can be used on busy stretches of road to help reduce speed but help with overall journey times. Example – Camden High Street Issues to consider: Can help reduce speeds in approaching vehicles SCOOT is automated and can change and adapt for each traffic situation SCOOT may frustrate road users if they have to keep stopping at consecutive signals SCOOT can be expensive to implement Informal signs and naked streets can give a street more character and encourage more interaction and eye contact between road users. Informal signs can cause road clutter if not placed carefully and also may be ignored by road users Interactive signs can convey different messages at different times 19 9. Parking and loading Introduction Allowing parking and loading on a street can increase drivers’ awareness that vehicles will be pulling in and out of parking bays. This, in turn, can help reduce vehicle speeds, though in some situations it can cause an unpleasant environment for pedestrians and cyclists using the road. 9.1 Diagonal or Central Parking Providing diagonal or central parking on a road can decrease the width of the carriageway and in turn force road users to reduce their speed. Example – Oxford. A neighbourhood in Oxford decided to implement a number of traffic calming measures in order to slow traffic. Parking cars diagonally reduces the available carriageway to passing traffic. 9.2 Pavement Level Pads Pavement level pads can be used for loading. The surface treatment is paved (though different treatment to the pavement), but the road markings make it clear that the space can be used by vehicles for loading, but also by pedestrians when it is empty. Example – Camden High Street 9.3 Parking on Outside of Cycle Lane Parking of the outside of the cycle lane can help narrow the carriage way, without putting cyclists at risk, or taking away space from them, though it does segregate users. A buffer door opening space is required between the parking and the cycling space. Example - Brighton 20 Issues to consider: Can help narrow the carriageway, though can also cause vehicle congestions in the instance of an accident/ difficulty for emergency vehicles to get through Can help local high streets recover and thrive, as more parking space may create more business for them Can cause a problem for cyclists, as vehicles enter and exit parking spaces Pavement level pads allow for loading vehicles, without prioritising them over pedestrians and give a consistent road width Parking on outside of cycle lane ensures that provision for cyclists in not compromised and makes for a more ‘human’ scale street 10. Character, appearance and use of area Introduction The character appearance and use of an area can often influence drivers’, cyclists’ and pedestrians’ behaviour on the streets. It is therefore important to design places and streets with an identifiable character, so that users can respond to the space accordingly. 10.1 Building Frontages The shape, position and upkeep of buildings containing the street, their facades, doors, windows signs and architectural details can have a great impact on the character of an area. Depending on the scale and condition of a building, a street may seem more appropriate for slower or faster vehicular speeds. Example 1 – Bexleyheath – prominent church at junction gives character and highlights town centre Example 2 – Chancery Lane – strong and consistent building lines contain the street and impose upon the driver. 21 10.2 Use of Retail forecourts A forecourt is a privately owned bit of space outside a shop and can be used for selling, seating, entertainment, displaying of goods etc. Such uses can also take place on highway land under licence. Active and well managed use of such areas can help make a street feel lively and can therefore give vehicle drivers a sign to slow down. Example – Exmouth Market 10.4 Street Art Placing street art on parts of the public realm can draw people’s attention to it and possibly help reduce the speed of vehicles. Example 1 – South East London Example 2 – Copenhagen 10.5 Lighting Placing interesting lighting on pavements, under bridges or by the street may make a street more identifiable and may encourage users to slow down. This is mostly effective at night, but a good lighting scheme can also encourage better pedestrian use, which can further help reduce the speed of traffic. Example - Southwark 22 Issues to consider: Helping create/add character to a street or area can support a community feel Can make pedestrians and cyclists feel more welcome and safer Can help with the economic development of an area or high street Retail forecourts and trees can take away footway space from pedestrians and can also cause problems in terms of cleaning, maintenance, deliveries, obstructions, lack of visibility etc Street art and lighting can create a focus for pedestrian users, but can also distract drivers’ attention away from the road Street lighting may encourage drivers to go faster, of they feel they can see better (depending on the scheme) 11. Enforcement Introduction Enforcement has no design input and can often require ongoing measures to stay in place. Enforcement can catch drivers out, but it does not necessarily alter their driving speed and behaviour outside of the enforcement areas, which are often limited. 11.1 Speed Limits Speed limit signs inform drivers what the maximum speed on that street is. They can only be enforceable if the police (or neighbourhood watch) is present. 11.2 Cameras Speed cameras are a reliable way of enforcing speed limits. Standard speed cameras can be effective on most streets, whereas average speed cameras are most appropriate over long stretches of carriageway without junctions. 11.3 Neighbourhood Watch Involving the local community and having neighbourhood watch in place in order to enforce speed limits locally. This requires local support and resources, which may not easily be available to local communities. It also means that a third party is assisting police with enforcements, which may not be seen as an ideal option. 23 Issues to consider: Makes drivers aware/reminds drivers what the speed limit is The presence of a speed camera/ active neighbourhood watch will make most drivers reduce their speed to the speed limit Hard to enforce outside the speed camera / neighbourhood watch catchment Speed cameras can be expensive to install and run Drivers frequently ignore speed limit signs, especially if they cannot see the reason to slow down Neighbourhood watch schemes are hard to keep running with limited community resources and also means that there is a third party assisting with police enforcement of speed limits 24