Analaysis of 100 Academic Articles from 2013-2015
Search Keywords: Ecosystems and Wellbeing
Using:
Science Direct, Scopus, GreenFILE, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index
(977 in total including many sources repeated)
Excluded: Only those that have a very specific focus
(e.g. on one species, one isolated micro-environment)
Main Themes in Titles
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Coal, mining, grasslands ecosystems, Mongolian herdsmen
Assessing human wellbeing in a socio-ecological context (Assessment A:1)
Marine ecosystem services, human wellbeing, Kenya (Marine M:1, Water W:1)
Ocean ecosystems, human health, environmental stressors (M:2, W:2)
Socioeconomic influences, biodiversity, ecosystem services, human wellbeing, China
(Biodiversity B:1)
6. Ecosystem service assessment, diverse landscapes, human wellbeing (A:2)
7. Ecosystem services spatial characteristics, reservoir, China, human wellbeing (W:3)
8. Subjective indicators assessing natural and social capital, residents’ quality of life,
small volcanic island (A:3)
9. Identifying indicators of ecosystem contributors to human wellbeing (A:4)
10. Ecosystem services, poverty alleviation, Himalayas (Poverty alleviation Po:1)
11. Index system of human dependence on ecosystem services (A:5)
12. Social processes, conservation, bioenergy (Bioenergy E:1)
13. Biodiversity, climate change, South America, South East Asia (B:2)
14. Air quality, climate change, urban forests, Spain (Climate change C:1, forest F:1,
urban: U:1)
15. Spatial planning, green infrastructure, European urban regions (U:2, Planning pl:1)
16. Social ecology, restoration (Restoration R:1)
17. Links between landscapes and human wellbeing (Landscape L:1)
18. Relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing, Spain
19. Landscape sustainability, human wellbeing (L:2, Sustainability S:1)
20. Natural environment, determinant of health (Nature N:1)
21. Land use changes, provisioning ecosystem services, human wellbeing (Land use LU:1)
22. Coastal wetland, earthquake, Chile (M:3, W:4)
23. Climate change, human wellbeing, ecosystem services U.S. (C:2)
24. Advances and challenges in ecosystem services research (Research Res:1)
25. Wilderness protection, societal engagement, canoe area (Conserv:1, W:5)
26. Knowledge systems, enhanced ecosystem governance (Gov G:1)
27. Biodiversity, climate change, European forest ecosystem (B:2, C:3, F:2)
28. US Index for relating human wellbeing and ecosystem services (A:6)
29. Energy consumption, sustainability, central and eastern Euope (E:2, S:2)
30. Community wellbeing, health, urban lake ecosystem (U:3, Community Comm:1, lake
Lak:1, W:6)
31. Biodiversity indicators, estuarine system (B:3)
32. Impacts of ecosystem services, Europe’s top 10 invasive species
33. Benefits of biodiverse environments for health and wellbeing (B:4)
34. Climate change, socio-ecological network, Spain (C:4)
35. Children, environmental change, tropical forests (F:3)
36. Planning and valuing ecosystem services, urban planning (U:4, Pl:2)
37. Governance, legal recognition, forest ecosystem services, Mozambique (Gov G:2)
38. Marine ecosystems, modelling socio-ecological scenarios (M:4)
39. Water quality, coastal-based ecosystem services, U.S. (M:5, W:7)
40. Climate change, biodiversity, tropics (C:5, B:5)
41. Restoration efforts, ecological processes, arid regions (Restoration Rest:2)
42. Managing The Commons: land, water, climate (C:6, W:8)
43. Ecosystem services, ethics
44. Evaluating human wellbeing,realtive importance values, ecosystem services example
(A:7)
45. Cultural ecosystem services, ecological restoration, forest, Brazil (Rest:3, F:4)
46. Ecosystem properties, integrity, indicators, interactions (A:8)
47. Land use, climate regulation services, impacts, human wellbeing (LU:2, C:7)
48. Ecology, marine planning, human wellbeing (M:3)
49. Soundscapes (bird)
50. Economic indices, human dimension, coastal marine ecosystem services, Florida (A:9,
W:9, Economics Ec:1))
51. Landscape service, planning, human wellbeing (L:3)
52. Landscape, cutural dimension, ecological research (L:4, Res:2)
53. Peri-urban woods, health, management, England (N:2)
54. Land use changes, human wellbeing, ecosystem provisioning services (LU:3)
55. Review of cultural ecosystem services indicators (CES:1, A:10)
56. Seagrass meadows, fisheries, human wellbeing (M:4, W:10)
57. Indigenous knowledge, ecosystem services, Burkina Faso (Comm:2)
58. Sustainable biomass energy, indigenous models of wellbeing, forests, Alaska (E:3,
Comm:3, S:3))
59. Evaluating projects and policies using ecosystem services framework (A:11)
60. Assessing, mapping, quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level
(CES:2, Comm:4, A:12)
61. Impact of conservation on human wellbeing (Conserv:2)
62. Measuring ecosystems services, social-ecological approach, human wellbeing (A:13)
63. Sustainable ocean management (M:5, W:11)
64. Poverty alleviation, sustainable livelihoods, China (Po:2)
65. Poverty alleviation research, ecosystem services (Po:3)
66. Bee pollination, crop quality
67. Restoration, rivers, economic aspects, cost effectiveness (Rest:4, W:12)
68. Economics and ecosystem services (Ec:2)
69. Solution scanning, policy, maintaining and enhancing regulating ecosystem services
(Gov:3)
70. Urban green spaces, Afrian countries, ecosystem services (U:5)
71. Assessing the value of natural land areas, a human wellbeing approach (A:14, Values
V:1)
72. Environmental sustainability, stewardship, Net Ecosystem Service Analysis (S:3)
73. Human health, social deprivation, ecosystem services, Wales
74. Nature, health (N:3)
75. Value of ecosystem services in Bhutan (V:2)
76. Human population, climate change, Papua New Guinea (C:8)
77. Managing cultural ecosystem services, Hawaii (CES:3)
78. Water-use, economic growth (W:13)
79. Diversity, agriculture, Malaria
80. Riparian ecosystems, climate change, Australia (C:9)
81. Green economy, consumption, wellbeing (Ec:3)
82. Ecological protection, wellbeing (Conserv:3)
83. Community-based landscape planning, wellbeing-based approach (Comm:5, pl:2)
84. Anthropocentric, biocentric conservationists (Conserv:4)
85. Agricultural landscapes, farmers, Australia (L:5)
86. Sustainable landscapes, social-ecological systems, research (L:6, S:4)
87. Civil ecology, cities (U:6)
88. Newspaper representations of ecosystem disservices
89. Wetland ecosystem services, urban case studies (U:7)
90. Cultural landscapes, futures of ecosystem services, scenario development, Germany
(CES:4, L:7)
91. Determining value of multiple ecosystem services, community wellbeing (Comm:6,
V:3)
92. Multiple values of ecosystem services, environmental worldviews, spatial analysis
(V:4)
93. Adaption policies to increase terrestrial ecosystem resilience (Gov:4)
94. Ecological constraints on multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity (B:6)
95. Marine ecosystems, fisheries, conservation (M:6)
96. Fluvial ecosystems, social indicators, Spain (W:14)
97. Cost-benefit analysis, marine protected area (M:7)
98. Ecological restoration in urban landscapes, interactions between people and nature,
planning (Rest:5, U:8)
99. Ecosystem service trade-offs, human wellbeing
100.
Biodiversity and human health (B:7)
Most Common Themes in the Analysed Articles
Assessment:14
Water:14
Climate:9
Urban:8
Biodiversity:7
Marine:7
Communities:6
Restoration:5
Values:4
Governance:4
CES:4
Conservation:4
Planning:4
Poverty:4
Forests:4
Economics:4
Sustainability:4
Energy:3
Word Cloud of Most Common Themes (Size indicates importance)
Most Relevant Articles to the Working Group Interests (so far)
These were selected from the review of 100 articles and a further 100 out of 977
Theory/Concepts
Duraiappah, A.K.; Asah, S.T.; Brondizio, E.S.; Kosoy, N.; O'Farrell, P.J.; Prieur-Richard, A.-H.;
Subramanian, S.M.; Takeuchi, K. (2014) Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem
services for human well-being: A conceptual framework for understanding the new
commons. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, April, 7, pp. 94-100
Assessment/Indicators/Indices
King, M.; Renó, V. and Novo, E. (2014) The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment
of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review.
Social Indicators Research. May, Vol. 116, Issue 3, p.681-698.
Maynard, S., James, D., Davidson, A. (2014) Determining the value of multiple ecosystem
services in terms of community wellbeing:Who should be the valuing agent? Ecological
Economics (in press).
Petrosillo, I., Costanza, R.; Aretano, R.; Zaccarelli, N.; Zurlini, G. (2013) The use of subjective
indicators to assess how natural and social capital support residents’ qualityof life in a small
volcanic island. EcologicalIndicators. Jan, Vol. 24, p.609-620.
Ringold, P. L.; Boyd, J.; Landers, D.; Weber, M. (2013) What data should we collect? A
framework for identifying indicators of ecosystem contributions to human well-being.
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment. Mar2013, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p.98-105.
Sijtsma, F.J; van der Heide, C.M; van Hinsberg, A. (2013) Beyond monetary measurement:
How to evaluate projects and policies using the ecosystem services framework.
Environmental Science & Policy, Oct, 32, pp.14-15.
Smith, L.M.; Case, J.L.; Smith, H. M.; Harwell, L.C., Summers, J.K. (2013) Relating ecoystem
services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index, Ecological Indicators,
Vol. 28, May, Pages 79–90
Smith, L.M.; Harwell, L.C.; Summers, J.K.; Case, J.L.; Smith, H.M. (2013) Development of
Relative Importance Values as Contribution Weights for Evaluating Human Wellbeing: An
Ecosystem Services Example, Human Ecology, August, 41(4):631-641.
Smith, L. M. & Case, J. L. & Harwell, L. C. & Smith, H. M. & Summers, J.K. (2013) Development
of Relative Importance Values as Contribution Weights for Evaluating Human Wellbeing: An
Ecosystem Services Example, Hum. Ecol., 41, pp. 631-641.
Yang, W.; Dietz, T.; Liu, W.; Luo, J.; Liu, J. (2013) Going Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment: An Index System of Human Dependence on Ecosystem Services
PLoS ONE. May, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p.1-9.
Research
Musacchio, L.R. (2013) Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into
the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology. Jul, 28; 6; p.1025-1038.
Yongmin, Z.; Shidong, Z.; Rongchao, G. (2014) Recent Advances and Challenges in Ecosystem
Service Research. Journal of Resources & Ecology, Mar, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p.82-90.
Nature and Health
Jackson, L. E., • Daniel, J. McCorkle, B., Sears, A., Bush, K. F. (2013) Linking ecosystem
services and human health: the Eco-Health Relationship Browser, Int J Public Health, 58,
pp.747–755
Tait, P. W.; McMichael, A. J.; Hanna, E. G. (2014) Determinants of health: the contribution of
the natural environment. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health. Apr, Vol. 38
Issue 2, p.104-107.
Landscapes
Bieling, C.; Plieninger, T.; Pirker, H.; Vogl, C. R. (2014) Linkages between landscapes and
human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews.
Ecological Economics. Sep Vol. 105, p.19-30.
Liu, J.•, Opdam, P. (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape
planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landscape Ecol , 29, pp. 1347–1360.
Musacchio, L. R. (2013) Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into
the cultural dimension of ecosystem services, Landscape Ecol., 28, pp. 1025–1038.
Vallés-Planells, M., Galiana, F., and Van Eetvelde, V. (2014) A classification of landscape
services to support local landscape planning, Ecology and Society 19(1), p. 44.
Villamagna, A. and Giesecke, C. (2014) Adapting Human Well-being Frameworks
forEcosystem Service Assessments across Diverse Landscapes. Ecology & Society. March, Vol.
19, Issue 1, p.283-300.
Wu, J.G. (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being
in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, Jul, 28; 6; p.999-p.1023.
Cultural Ecosystem Services
Andersson , E., Tengö, M., McPhearson, T., Kremer, P. (2014) Cultural ecosystem services as
a gateway for improving urban sustainability, Ecosystem Services, (in press).
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S. Oteros-Rozas, E., Bieling, C. (2013) Assessing, mapping, and
quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level, Land Use Policy, 33, pp. 118–
129.