REASONS FOR DECISION TO EXERCISE POWER OF INTERVENTION UNDER SECTION 20(4) OF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 MORELAND PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C152 The Planning and Environment Act 1987 (the Act), the Heritage Act 1995 and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 provide for the intervention of the Minister for Planning in planning and heritage processes. In exercising my powers of intervention, I have agreed to: Make publicly available written reasons for each decision; and Provide a report to Parliament at least every twelve months detailing the nature of each intervention. REQUEST FOR INTERVENTION 1. Moreland City Council has requested approval of Amendment C152 under section 20(4) of the Act to revise the Local Planning Policy Framework (LPPF) including the Municipal Strategic Statement at Clause 21 and the Local Planning Policies at Clause 22. WHAT POWER OF INTERVENTION IS BEING USED? 2. I have decided to exercise my powers to exempt myself from all the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act and the regulations in respect to Amendment C152 to the Moreland Planning Scheme. 3. Section 20(4) of the Act enables the Minister for Planning to exempt an amendment which the Minister prepares from any of the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act or the regulations. 4. In seeking to exercise this power, section 20(4) of the Act requires that the Minister must consider that compliance with any of those requirements is not warranted or that the interests of Victoria or any part of Victoria make such an exemption appropriate. BACKGROUND 5. Moreland City Council undertook a review of its Planning Scheme as required under section 12B of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (the Act) in 2012. 6. As a result of this review an amendment to the LPPF was proposed to incorporate updated state and local policies that have occurred since the LPPF was put in place in 2000. 7. The drafting of the updated LPPF was undertaken over three years, with extensive consultation on the draft undertaken during the two months from early September to late October 2013. 8. The consultation program included a mailout to all properties and landowners in the municipality and key stakeholders, newspaper advertorials, social media and a website. This was followed by a number of community and stakeholder forums and workshops as well as mail back, on-line and telephone surveys. BENEFITS OF EXEMPTION 9. The amendment updates the existing LPPF to remove inconsistencies, repetition and ambiguities as well as an update to ensure consistency with adopted local and state government policy. 10. The amendment by updating the LPPF to reflect current policy implements the objectives of section 4 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 by providing the fair, orderly, economic and sustainable use and development of land. 11. Exemption from sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act will ensure a prompt decision on the amendment and will prevent consultation that has already been undertaken from being repeated when the views of affected parties is already known. EFFECTS OF EXEMPTION ON THIRD PARTIES 12. Extensive notification of the amendment was provided including a letterbox drop to all residents, letters and brochures sent to stakeholders such as residents and industry groups, newspaper ads, social media etc. A number of surveys and workshops were also undertaken. 13. Due to the extensive and targeted consultation process it is unlikely that the amendment outcome would be different if it were to go through a formal amendment and Planning Panel process. 14. The consultation was undertaken together with the new Residential Zones and the Activity Centre Framework in order to make it easier for people to understand the impact of the changes proposed in the broader context. For the purpose of the forums and workshops Council provided attendees with maps and concepts that are tangible, such as shopping centres and neighbourhoods, in order to logically explain how the changes will affect them. ASSESSMENT AS TO WHETHER BENEFITS OF EXEMPTIONS OUTWEIGH EFFECTS ON THIRD PARTIES 15. Given the extensive consultation program the views of all affected parties are known and any further consultation would provide no benefit. 16. Accordingly I consider that the benefits of exempting myself from sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act outweigh any effects of the exemption on third parties. DECISION 17. I have decided to exercise my power to exempt myself from all the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act and the regulations in respect of Amendment C152 to the Moreland Planning Scheme. REASONS FOR INTERVENTION 18. I provide the following reasons for my decision to exercise my power under section 20(4) of the Act. 19. I am satisfied that Compliance with any of the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act and the regulations is not warranted because the view of all affected parties is known and if the amendment were to undergo a formal amendment process the outcome would unlikely change. SIGNED BY THE MINISTER ROBIN SCOTT MP Acting Minister for Planning Date: 31 December 2014