DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
Mountain Plover
(Charadrius montanus)
Legal Status
State: Species of Special Concern
Federal: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bird of Conservation Concern,
Bureau of Land Management Sensitive
Critical Habitat: N/A
Recovery Planning: N/A
Notes: Proposed listing as threatened species withdrawn on May 12,
2011 (76 FR 27756–27799).
Taxonomy
Mountain plover (Charadrius montanus) is a bird in the order
Charadriiformes and the Charadriidae family. There are no recognized
subspecies of mountain plover (76 FR 27756–27799).
Distribution
General
Mountain plover occurs from Canada (AB, SK) south through the
United States (AZ, CA, CO, KS, MT, ND (extirpated), NE, NM, NN, OK, SD
(extirpated), TX, UT, and WY) and into Mexico. In California, where
most birds winter, the mountain plover is known in the following
counties: Colusa, Fresno, Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Merced, San
Benito, San Luis Obispo, Solano, Stanislaus, Tulare, and Yolo
(NatureServe 2010; Knopf and Wunder 2006).
Distribution and Occurrences within the Plan Area
Historical
In California, the historical wintering range for mountain plover
included low elevation interior valleys and plains. The range extended
from the southern Sacramento Valley and the inner San Francisco Bay
area south to the southern coastal slope and east to the Imperial
1
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
Valley. According to sources from 1944 and 1957, in the southern
deserts, mountain plover historically occurred near Indio in Riverside
County, at Brawley and Pilot Hill in Imperial County, and Needles in
San Bernardino County (Hunting and Edson 2008).
There are two historical (i.e., pre-1990) occurrence records for
mountain plover and an additional eight occurrences with an
unknown date of observation in the Plan Area (CDFG 2012; Dudek
2011). Six of these occurrences are located east of Lancaster and
north of Palmdale, two are in the southwest corner of Edwards Air
Force Base, one is located in the Harper Lake area, and one is located
at the southern end of the Salton Sea (Figure SP-B14).
Recent
In California, mountain plovers continue to occupy the same broad
regions in which they have historically occurred, although they no
longer winter on the Channel Islands or the eastern fringes of the San
Francisco Bay area (Hunting and Edson 2008). In the southern desert
region, mountain plovers winter in the Antelope Valley; western
Mojave Desert, near Harper Dry Lake; the Imperial Valley; and near
Blythe in the lower Colorado River Valley (Hunting and Edson 2008).
Within the Plan Area, there are 15 recent (i.e., since 1990) documented
occurrences south of or along the eastern edge of the Salton Sea, near
Palmdale, west of Lancaster, and in the Harper Lake area (Figure SPB14) (CDFG 2012; Dudek 2011).
Natural History
Habitat Requirements
Although mountain plover is categorized as a shorebird, it is not
actually associated with margins of freshwater or marine estuaries,
and despite its name, mountain plovers do not actually nest in the
mountains (Table 1; 76 FR 27756–27799; McGaugh 2006). Suitable
breeding habitat for mountain plover includes disturbed prairie or
semidesert habitats at high elevations, from 2,000 to 8,500 feet (76 FR
27756–27799; McGaugh 2006; Knopf and Wunder 2006). This species
occupies open, flat lands or sparsely vegetated areas, including xeric
2
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
shrublands, short-grass prairie, and barren agricultural fields.
Grassland habitats where mountain plover is found often have a
history of disturbance by burrowing rodents, such as prairie dogs
(Cynomys spp.), native herbivores, or domestic livestock (76 FR
27756–27799).
Mountain plover breeding sites require short vegetation with some
bare ground. Breeding habitats for mountain plover include shortand mixed-grass prairie, prairie dog colonies, agricultural lands, and
semidesert areas (76 FR 27756–27799). Typical disturbances in
grasslands include disturbances from prairie dogs, cattle grazing, fire,
or farming. Although these forms of disturbance are usually required
in grassland habitats, breeding sites in semidesert environments may
persist without these forms of disturbance (76 FR 27756–27799).
Mountain plover wintering habitats are similar to those used for
breeding. In California, mountain plovers primarily winter on fallow
and cultivated agricultural fields, but also use grasslands and grazed
pastures (76 FR 27756–27799). Alkali playa is an important habitat
type in composition, structure, and location (County of Riverside
2003). In the Imperial Valley, where there is the largest known
concentration of wintering plovers, preferred foraging habitats
include harvested alfalfa fields that have been grazed by domestic
sheep and Bermuda grass fields that have been burned post-harvest
(Knopf and Wunder 2006). During migration, mountain plovers likely
use habitats similar to their breeding and wintering habitats (76 FR
27756–27799). Mountain plovers prefer areas with heavy,
saline/alkaline, clay soils (BLM 2002, p. N-8).
Table 1. Habitat Associations for Mountain Plover
Land Cover Type
Fallow and
cultivated
agricultural fields,
grasslands, alkali
playa, and grazed
pastures
Land
Cover Use
winter
3
Habitat
Designation
wintering
Habitat
Parameters
Short
vegetation
with some
bare ground
Supporting
Information
76 FR 27756–
27799;
McGaugh
2006; County
of Riverside
2003
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
Foraging Requirements
Mountain plovers feed on ground-dwelling or flying invertebrates
found on the ground (76 FR 27756–27799). Their diet primarily
consists of beetles, crickets, and ants, though mountain plover diets
are diverse and differ greatly by location (76 FR 27756–27799;
McGaugh 2006). Mountain plovers feed opportunistically as they
encounter prey (76 FR 27756–27799). Foraging behavior consists of
short runs and stops in which prey are captured with a lunge at the
end of a short, quick run (76 FR 27756–27799; McGaugh 2006). On
wintering grounds, mountain plovers also forage by probing into
cracks of dried loamy soils (Knopf and Wunder 2006).
Mountain plovers forage in large areas of dry, disturbed ground or
areas of short (less than 2 centimeters [0.79 inch]) vegetation with
patches of bare ground. Prey is more abundant on prairie dog towns
than adjoining habitats (Knopf and Wunder 2006).
Reproduction
Mountain plovers return north to their breeding sites in the western
Great Plains and Rocky Mountain states in spring. Males defend
territories shortly after arrival at the breeding grounds (76 FR
27756–27799). Generally monogamous, mountain plovers form pairs
and begin courtship on arrival at the breeding grounds as well. In
Colorado, mountain plovers lay eggs between late April and mid-June
in a simple ground scrape nest (Table 2; 76 FR 27756–27799).
Mountain plovers nest using what has been described as the ‘‘rapid
multiclutch system,’’ which may increase their breeding success in the
face of predation. Typically, the female produces two clutches with
three eggs each at different nest sites. The male incubates one nest
site and the female incubates the other. They may renest if nests or
broods are lost early in the breeding season (76 FR 27756–27799).
Each pair can make up to four attempts per year to raise a brood, but
only one brood is raised per adult each season (76 FR 27756–27799;
Knopf and Wunder 2006).
Mountain plovers incubate for 29 days on average, and young fledge
at approximately 33 to 34 days (76 FR 27756–27799; Knopf and
4
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
Wunder 2006). Mountain plovers can breed their first spring (76 FR
27756–27799).
Oct
Nov
Dec
Breeding
X
X
X
Migration
X
X
X
Wintering
X
X
X
Source: 76 FR 27756–27799; Knopf and Wunder 2006
Sep
Aug
July
June
May
April
March
Feb
Jan
Table 2. Key Seasonal Periods for Mountain Plover
X
X
X
X
X
Spatial Behavior
In late summer and early fall, mountain plovers migrate south across
the southern Great Plains to Texas, New Mexico, and Mexico. Several
then travel west to California (Table 3). In California, fall migrants
generally arrive in the north by mid-September and in the south by
mid-October (Knopf and Wunder 2006). During spring migration in
early March, mountain plovers travel quickly from their wintering
sites to their breeding sites, arriving in eastern Colorado by midMarch and in Montana by mid-April (76 FR 27756–27799). In
California, wintering mountain plover movement patterns are highly
variable with some birds moving more than 34 miles in one week (76
FR 27756–27799).
Table 3. Spatial Behavior by Mountain Plover
Type
Brood home
range
Dispersal
Distance/Area Location of Study
143 acres
Colorado
Supporting Information
76 FR 27756–27799
8.1 miles for
males and 6.3
miles for
females
76 FR 27756–27799
Montana
Ecological Relationships
Most egg and chick losses are to predators (County of Riverside
2003). Birds, mammals, and reptiles, including prairie falcon (Falco
5
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
mexicanus) and kit fox (Vulpes macrotis), are known to predate
mountain plover eggs and/or chicks (McGaugh 2006).
Historically, winter areas in California supported tule elk (Cervus
elaphus nannodes), pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), and kangaroo
rat (Dipodomys spp.) (McGaugh 2006). In the Carrizo Plain, winter
habitat availability is currently correlated with livestock grazing and
precipitation; mountain plovers prefer dry areas that are heavily
grazed. Annual climatic variability and abundant rainfall, in particular,
alter field conditions, which can reduce mountain plover use of
traditionally occupied wintering sites. In the Imperial Valley,
mountain plover became virtually absent from cultivated fields during
the rainy winter of 2004 to 2005 (76 FR 27756–27799).
Mountain plovers favor plowed or recently harvested agricultural
fields and habitats that have been burned because these disturbances
create the necessary sparse conditions (BLM 2002, p. N-8; 76 FR
27756–27799).
Mountain plovers prefer areas with abundant mammalian burrows
(BLM 2002, p. N-8). They tend to be associated with giant kangaroo
rat (Dipodomys ingens) colonies, especially when wet years produce
tall vegetation elsewhere (76 FR 27756–27799).
Population Status and Trends
Global: Increasing (76 FR 27756–27799)
State: Same as above
Within Plan Area: Same as above
From 2004 to 2007, the International Union for the Conservation of
Nature (IUCN) listed mountain plover as ‘‘vulnerable,’’ a higher level
of concern than ‘‘near threatened.’’ However, higher rangewide
population estimates have emerged prompting IUCN to change its
rating accordingly.
From 1966 to 1993, Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data indicate a
decline rate of 3.7% per year. Although the BBS survey routes are not
distributed evenly within the species’ habitat, the decline rate
indicates reduction in the population during that 25-year period by
6
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
approximately two-thirds (Knopf and Wunder 2006). Until 2006, a
rangewide mountain plover population estimate provided by the U.S.
Shorebird Conservation Plan was increased from 9,000 to 12,500 (76
FR 27756–27799).
Although wintering mountain plover populations in California appear
to have experienced a significant decline over previous decades, more
recent wintering numbers, from 2000 onward, have not shown a
similar trend. In 2007, 4,500 mountain plover were recorded in the
Imperial Valley, which exceeded statewide survey counts of mountain
plover from 1994, and 1998 through 2002. A statewide survey over 5
days in January 2011 recorded 1,235 mountain plover, which is
considerably fewer than found in previous statewide surveys or
recent Imperial Valley surveys. In late 2010, unusually wet conditions
due to heavy rains may have influenced the relatively low number of
mountain plover in California (76 FR 27756–27799).
Threats and Environmental Stressors
Mountain plovers are threatened by loss and degradation of breeding
and wintering habitat, predation, severe weather conditions during
nesting/fledging, and direct persecution by humans (McGaugh 2006).
Habitat loss and degradation appear to be the main factors
contributing to mountain plover population declines (Hunting and
Edson 2008). The reduction of short-grass prairie by conversion to
agriculture and the elimination of important grazers, such as bison
(Bison bison), which kept the habitat sparsely vegetated, began in the
1800s (McGaugh 2006). Currently, loss of traditional wintering sites
on grasslands and suitable agricultural cropland to urban
development, vineyards, or other incompatible land uses could
continue to reduce suitable wintering habitat for mountain plover
(Hunting and Edson 2008). In addition to allowing higher vegetation
structure that is unsuitable for mountain plover, incompatible
agricultural practices can directly kill plovers from farm equipment or
expose plovers to pesticides (McGaugh 2006). Grain fields, which have
become more popular in the last 25 years, remain fallow until early
May, after most mountain plovers have started nesting, and farm
equipment destroys many nests when fields are planted in May
7
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
(Knopf and Wunder 2006). However, plovers will successfully renest
on tilled fields, and although the transition to more grain crops was
originally thought to have a substantial impact on mountain plover
reproduction, this factor has since been dismissed as having an
additive impact beyond normal nest-predation rates (Knopf and
Wunder 2006). High levels of organochlorine residues were found in
birds collected from California’s Imperial, San Luis Obispo, and Tulare
Counties in 1991–1992 (Knopf and Wunder 2006). However, there is
no evidence that mountain plover reproductive success or survival is
affected by pesticide use (McGaugh 2006).
Predation is the main source of egg and chick loss. Mountain plovers
are susceptible to a variety of predators, such as birds, mammals, and
reptiles (County of Riverside 2003; McGaugh 2006). Reduced
populations of fossorial mammals could impact mountain plover
populations since they attract invertebrates used for forage (Hunting
and Edson 2008).
Mountain plover is also susceptible to extreme weather conditions. At
the Pawnee National Grassland in Colorado, hail and flooding caused
almost complete reproductive failure (McGaugh 2006). Climatic
conditions also influence vegetation structure with wetter years possibly
supporting fewer wintering mountain plover (76 FR 27756–27799).
Because mountain plovers tend to be unwary and form tight flocks,
they have historically been susceptible to hunters (e.g., in the late
1800s) (McGaugh 2006; Knopf and Wunder 2006). However, shootings
in more recent years have not been documented, and hunting is not a
current conservation concern (Knopf and Wunder 2006). Although
very tolerant of machinery, such as off-road vehicles, tractors, and
military aircraft, mountain plovers will flee nest sites or roost areas
when approached by humans on foot, leaving eggs susceptible to
overheating due to solar radiation (Knopf and Wunder 2006).
Conservation and Management Activities
Mountain plover is not the subject of a documented recovery plan, and
there do not appear to be any active state or local programs focused on
its conservation and management. However, it is a Covered Species in
several approved habitat conservation plans and natural community
8
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
conservation plans. Several of these are not related to the Plan Area,
but the mountain plover is also a Covered Species under the BLM’s
West Mojave Plan, which proposes possible management actions such
as subsidizing alfalfa farmers, establishing agricultural preserves, and
encouraging land-use practices that benefit mountain plovers. These
might include periodically disking and/or burning fields or controlling
the use of pesticides (McGaugh 2006).
Data Characterization
Both breeding and wintering mountain plover populations should be
monitored more carefully. Monitoring of wintering populations in
California should focus on traditional wintering sites and high-quality
habitat in the Imperial Valley, Carrizo Plain, Panoche Valley, and
Central Valley. Standardized methods should be used that sample in
order to estimate a statewide wintering population if possible. Other
data collected should include land-use changes, habitat suitability, and
annual habitat availability. Mountain plover life history and
distributional characteristics should be considered to enable the
development of population estimates at 3- to 5-year intervals
(Hunting and Edson 2008).
Additional research could focus on determining the potential effects of
mountain plover chronic exposure to agrochemicals in the Central and
Imperial Valleys and to determine whether there is a relationship
between agrochemical use and winter plover distribution in response
to changes in prey selection, availability, and abundance (Hunting and
Edson 2008).
Research can also focus on documenting the differential seasonal use
by plovers of native and non-native grasslands as opposed to
cultivated lands and determine what factors drive the shifts between
habitats. The correlations between the availability and suitability of
habitat and winter survival, movement patterns, and foraging
strategies can also be explored (Hunting and Edson 2008).
Management and Monitoring Considerations
Management should focus on protecting traditional wintering sites
and high-quality wintering habitat from urban development and
9
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
conversion to other incompatible land uses. This can be achieved by
securing conservation easements and property acquisition as part of
regional conservation planning efforts (Hunting and Edson 2008).
Furthermore, the subsidization of alfalfa farmers, establishment of
agricultural preserves, and encouragement of land-use practices that
benefit mountain plovers can also help preserve suitable habitat for
this species (McGaugh 2006).
Habitat quality for mountain plover can be maintained by management
of grasslands at low stature and density (Hunting and Edson 2008).
Periodic disking and/or burning fields or controlling the use of
pesticides can also maintain habitat for the species (McGaugh 2006).
Predicted Species Distribution in Plan Area
There are 687,074 acres of modeled suitable wintering habitat for
mountain plover in the Plan Area. Modeled suitable habitat occurs in
the southern portion of the Plan Area. Modeled suitable habitat
includes agriculture, grassland vegetation communities, and desert
playas. Appendix C includes specific model parameters and a figure
showing the modeled suitable habitat in the Plan Area.
Literature Cited
76 FR 27756–27799. Proposed Rule; withdrawal: “Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Withdrawal of the Proposed
Rule to List the Mountain Plover as Threatened.” May 12, 2011.
BLM (Bureau of Land Management). 2002. Appendix N, “Wildlife
History: Mountain Plover.” In Northern and Eastern Colorado
Desert Coordinated Management Plan and Final Environmental
Impact Statement. July 2002.
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2011. California
Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). GIS data for the Plan
Area. Sacramento, California: CDFG. May 2011.
County of Riverside. 2003. “Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus).”
In Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Vol. 2, The MSHCP Reference
10
6668
March 2012
DRAFT
March 2012
BIRDS
Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)
Document. Section B, MSHCP Species Accounts: Birds. Riverside,
California: County of Riverside, Transportation and Land
Management Agency. Accessed June 2011.
http://www.rctlma.org/mshcp/volume2/birds.html.
Dudek. 2011. “Species Occurrences–Charadrius montanus.” DRECP
Species Occurrence Database. Updated November 2011.
Hunting, K., and L. Edson. 2008. “Mountain Plover (Charadrius
montanus).” In California Bird Species of Special Concern: A
Ranked Assessment of Species, Subspecies, and Distinct
Populations of Birds of Immediate Conservation Concern in
California, edited by W.D. Shuford and T. Gardali, 293–299. In
Studies of Western Birds 1. Camarillo, California: Western Field
Ornithologists; Sacramento, California: CDFG.
Knopf, Fritz L., and M.B. Wunder. 2006. “Mountain Plover (Charadrius
montanus).” In The Birds of North America Online, edited by A.
Poole. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Accessed
June 2011. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/211.
McGaugh, C. 2006. “Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus).” BLM
Species Accounts – West Mojave Plan: Birds. Accessed June
2011. http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib//blm/ca/
pdf/pdfs/cdd_pdfs.Par.9d85f5f2.File.pdf/Mopl1.pdf.
NatureServe. 2010. “Charadrius montanus.” NatureServe Explorer: An
Online Encyclopedia of Life [web application]. Version
7.1.Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. Last updated August
2010. Accessed May 2011. http://www.natureserve.org/
explorer/index.htm.
11
6668
March 2012