MODULE SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE MODULE DETAILS Module title General Linguistics 3: Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics Module code LN434 Credit value 20 Level Level 4 X Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8 Mark the box to the right of the Level 0 (for modules at foundation appropriate level with an ‘X’ level) Entry criteria for registration on this module Pre-requisites Specify in terms of module codes or equivalent Co-requisite modules Specify in terms of module codes or equivalent None Module delivery Mode of delivery Taught Other X Distance Placement Pattern of delivery Weekly X Block Other Online When module is delivered Semester 1 Semester 2 X Throughout year Other Brief description of module This module is an introduction to the study of meaning in linguistics. It content and/ or aims explores the key concepts in semantics – the study of word and sentence meaning – and pragmatics – the study of language in use. These Overview (max 80 words) concepts include: the nature of context and the difference between context-dependent and context-independent meaning; the notions of sense and reference; truth-conditions; lexical semantics; ‘saying versus ‘implicating’. The module is designed to provide a solid foundation for students who wish to study these aspects of linguistics at a more complex level. Module team/ author/ Dr Jelena Timotijevic, Dr Tim Wharton coordinator(s) School School of Humanities Site/ campus where Falmer delivered Course(s) for which module is appropriate and status on that course Course BA (Hons) Linguistics Module descriptor template: updated Aug 2012 Status (mandatory/ compulsory/ optional) Compulsory MODULE AIMS, ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT Aims The aims of this module are set into the context of the QAA Framework for Higher Education Qualifications and they relate to the SEEC level descriptors for level 4 study: Learning outcomes To provide students with the foundational building blocks in semantics and pragmatics necessary for further, more complex linguistic study To develop students’ understanding of key terminology and key concepts related to the study of meaning in language and language use To develop students’ ability to apply key notions in semantics and pragmatics to natural language examples In relation to the QAA Framework for Higher Education Qualifications and the SEEC level descriptors for level 4 study, by the end of the module students should be able to: 1. Describe a range of basic and key concepts specific to the study of semantics and pragmatics 2. Understand key differences between different levels of meaning and how these inform the study of word and sentence meaning on the one hand and utterance meaning on the other 3. Demonstrate ability to describe and explain different phenomena specific to semantics and those specific to pragmatics using natural language examples Content Learning support Students will explore and examine the following essential linguistic concepts: Sentences vs. utterances, Semantics vs. pragmatics, Ambiguity, Linguistic meaning and sentence meaning, Cognitivism, internalism, intension, Sense relations: homonymy, polysemy, synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, Lexical composition, Speech acts, Sentences, utterances, propositions, Truth-conditions and truth-conditional semantics, Entailment, Logical vs. natural languages. Aitchison, J. (2003) Words in the Mind. Oxford: Blackwell. Blakemore, D. (1992) Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell. Brown, P. & S. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some Universals on Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carston, R. (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Chierchia, G. & S. McGonnell-Ginet (1990) Meaning and Grammar: an introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cruse, A. (2000) Meaning in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cutting, J. (2008) Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. 2nd edn. London: Routledge. Davis, S. (ed.) (1991) Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Green, G. (1996) Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. 2nd Module descriptor template: updated Aug 2012 edn. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Grice, P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. Grundy, P. (2000) Doing Pragmatics. 2nd edn. London: Arnold. Kasher, A. (ed.) (1998) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, vols. I-VI. London: Routledge. Horn, L. and G. Ward (eds.) (2004) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell: Oxford. Larson, R. & G. Segal. (1995) Knowledge of Meaning: an introduction to semantic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mey, J. (1993) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. Saeed, J. (1997) Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell. Verschueren, J. (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold. Wharton, T. (2009) Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Teaching and learning activities Details of teaching and learning activities Contact Time: Tutor-led weekly lectures, and seminars in which the tutors’ presentation is designed to promote themed student discussion around the area covered. Tutorial support is given for assessment. Non-contact Time: Students’ independent study is guided by lists of questions, bibliographies and specified tasks. Allocation of study hours (indicative) Where 10 credits = 100 learning hours Study hours SCHEDULED This is an indication of the number of hours students can expect to spend in scheduled teaching activities including lectures, seminars, tutorials, project supervision, demonstrations, practical classes and workshops, supervised time in workshops/ studios, fieldwork, external visits, and work-based learning. 40 GUIDED INDEPENDENT STUDY All students are expected to undertake guided independent study which includes wider reading/ practice, follow-up work, the completion of assessment tasks, and revisions. 160 PLACEMENT The placement is a specific type of learning away from the University that is not work-based learning or a year abroad. Module descriptor template: updated Aug 2012 TOTAL STUDY HOURS 200 Assessment tasks Details of assessment for this module General criteria for assessment are framed by the SEEC descriptors for level 4. Against specific criteria, credit will be awarded for: 1. Successful description of a range of basic and key concepts specific to the study of semantics and pragmatics 2. An ability to describe key differences between different levels of meaning and show how these inform the study of word and sentence meaning on the one hand and utterance meaning on the other 3. Successful explanation of different phenomena specific to semantics and those specific to pragmatics using natural language examples Task: Written Exam (100%) (LOs 1-3) Types of assessment task1 Indicative list of summative assessment tasks which lead to the award of credit or which are required for progression. % weighting (or indicate if component is pass/fail) WRITTEN Written exam 100% COURSEWORK Written assignment/ essay, report, dissertation, portfolio, project output, set exercise PRACTICAL Oral assessment and presentation, practical skills assessment, set exercise EXAMINATION INFORMATION Area examination board English language and Linguistics Refer to Faculty Office for guidance in completing the following sections External examiners Name Position and institution Date appointed Date tenure ends Professor Maggie Tallerman Professor of Linguistics, Newcastle University Sept. 2011 Aug. 2015 1 Set exercises, which assess the application of knowledge or analytical, problem-solving or evaluative skills, are included under the type of assessment most appropriate to the particular task. Module descriptor template: updated Aug 2012 QUALITY ASSURANCE Date of first approval Date of last revision n/a Date of approval for this version Version number 1 Modules replaced Specify codes of modules for which this is a replacement n/a Available as free-standing module? Module descriptor template: updated Aug 2012 Yes X No