ATI Annual Report 10/11 System-wide Success Indicator Details for
Instructional Materials
Introduction
This report provides:




The reported median* status level** for each top level Instructional Materials Goal for
AY 10-11 across all 23 campuses compared to last year.
The reported median* status level** for each Success Indicator under each top level
Instructional Materials Goal for AY 10-11 across all 23 campuses compared to last
year.
Areas where improvement has been made over last year (indicated by a plus (+) sign).
Areas where the Success Indicator has been downgraded from last year (indicated by
a minus ( – ) sign).
* The median of a data set is the “value” that separates the top half of the data from the
bottom half after the data has been sorted. From a positional standpoint, in a list of
responses ordered from 1 to 23 (one per campus), the response in position 12 represents
the median.
** See Appendix A for a description of the Status Level Criteria.
Accessibility information: This document has been designed to be accessible for persons
with disabilities. Specifically, headings and lists are used to convey document structure, table
rows that contain header cells are denoted, and visual information conveyed via graphs is also
presented in text form via tables immediately following the graphs. If you encounter any
accessibility difficulties with this document, please contact the ATI at ati@calstate.edu.
Top Level Instructional Materials Goals with Reported Median Status Levels
for AY 10-11 and Compared to AY 09-10
Top Level Goal
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
1.0 Timely Adoption: The campus has implemented a
comprehensive plan to ensure the timely adoption of textbooks
and other instructional materials.
Established
Established
2.0 Identification of IM for Late-Hire Faculty: The campus has
implemented a comprehensive plan to ensure that textbooks have
been identified for courses with late-hire faculty.
Defined+
Initiated
3.0 Early Identification of Students with Disabilities: The
campus has implemented a comprehensive plan to ensure that
students with disabilities are identified and able to request
alternate media materials in a timely manner.
Managed
Managed
4.0 Faculty Use of LMS (or non-LMS) Course Websites: The
campus has implemented policies and procedures to promote the
posting of all required curricular and instructional resources
(including print-based and multimedia materials) in a central,
accessible electronic location.
Defined
Defined
IM SI Details AY 10/11
1
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
5.0 Accessibility Requirements for Multimedia: The campus
has implemented policies and procedures to ensure that
accessibility requirements have been incorporated into the
adoption process for all multimedia-based instructional resources.
Defined+
Initiated
6.0 Accessibility Requirements for Curricular Review and
Approval: The campus has implemented policies and
procedures to ensure that accessibility requirements have been
incorporated into the curricular review process.
Initiated
Initiated
7.0 Supporting Faculty Creation of Accessible IM: The
campus has implemented policies and procedures to support
faculty in selecting, authoring, and delivering accessible
instructional materials.
Defined
Defined
8.0 Communication Process and Training Plan: The campus
has implemented a broad-based ATI awareness campaign,
supported by a comprehensive training infrastructure to increase
technological accessibility across the campus.
Established+ Defined
9.0 Process Indicators: The campus IMAP committee has
sufficient breadth, resources, and authority to effectively
implement a comprehensive IMAP initiative.
Defined
Top Level Goal
IM SI Details AY 10/11
Defined
2
Instructional Materials Top Level Goals Status – Reported AY 10-11
Number of Campuses at each Instructional Materials Goal Status Level AY 10-11
Goal
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Optimizing
0
0
5
0
0
Managed
7
2
9
3
Established
11
5
6
Defined
5
7
Initiated
0
Not Started
Totals
Status
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
0
1
2
0
4
4
2
3
4
4
6
3
6
7
5
2
8
6
4
7
6
4
8
1
6
6
9
6
4
7
0
1
0
2
1
3
1
1
3
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
Goal 1.0 – Timely Adoption
The campus has implemented a comprehensive plan to ensure the timely adoption of
textbooks and other instructional materials. Top level goal median = Established.
IM SI Details AY 10/11
3
Goal 1.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
1.1
1.2
1.3
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Campus has formally documented (e.g. Policy, Resolution
or Procedure) a process to ensure the timely adoption of
textbooks and other instructional materials. [Commitment]
Established
Established
Campus has developed capacity (e.g. established practices,
specified staff time, educational/training resources, and/or
technology) to achieve compliance with timely adoption.
[Ability]
Established
Established
Campus has developed milestones or specific measures of
success for timely adoption compliance (e.g. percentage of
timely adoptions) and implemented a system to track these
measures. [Measurement]
Established
Success Indicator Description
+ Defined
Goal 1.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
Optimizing
IM SI Details AY 10/11
1.1
1.2
1.3
2
0
1
4
Managed
6
7
6
Established
9
8
8
Defined
6
5
3
Initiated
0
3
1
Not Started
0
0
4
Goal 2.0 – Identification of IM for Late-Hire Faculty
The campus has implemented a comprehensive plan to ensure that textbooks have been
identified for courses with late-hire faculty. Top level goal median = Defined+.
IM SI Details AY 10/11
5
Goal 2.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
2.1
2.2
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
All academic units have implemented specific procedures
for late hire or adjunct faculty members for the timely
adoption of curricular materials. [Ability]
Initiated
Campus has developed specific measures of success for
late-hire faculty (e.g. percentage of late-hire adoptions
completed by campus deadline) and implemented a system
to track these measures. [Measurement]
Initiated
+
Initiated
Not Started
Goal 2.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
2.1
2.2
Optimizing
0
0
Managed
0
0
Established
5
5
Defined
6
5
Initiated
8
2
Not Started
4
11
IM SI Details AY 10/11
6
Goal 3.0 – Early Identification of Students with Disabilities
The campus has implemented a comprehensive plan to ensure that students with disabilities
are identified and able to request alternate media materials in a timely manner. Top level
goal median = Managed.
Goal 3.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Managed
3.1
Campus has implemented a system to provide early
registration for alternate media-eligible students. [Ability]
Managed
3.2
Campus has implemented a system to track early
registration usage by alternate media-eligible students
(intended to provide alternate media programs with
sufficient time to produce alternate media as well as to
document student conformance with alternate media
submissions procedures). [Measurement]
Managed
Campus has implemented a system that allows alternate
media requests to be submitted without appearing in-person
during regular business hours (e.g. web-based forms,
integration with student registration portal). [Ability]
Established
3.4
Campus has implemented a system to track the timeliness
of alternate media requests. [Measurement]
Established–
3.5
Campus has developed specific measures of success for
early identification of students with disabilities (e.g.,
percentage of eligible students who utilize early registration)
and implemented a system to track these measures.
[Measurement]
3.3
+
Defined
Established
+ Defined
Managed
Defined
Goal 3.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
IM SI Details AY 10/11
7
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Optimizing
10
6
2
5
4
Managed
9
7
5
5
2
Established
3
6
7
6
4
Defined
1
1
3
2
6
Initiated
0
0
5
3
2
Not Started
0
3
1
2
5
Goal 4.0 – Faculty Use of LMS (or non-LMS) Course Websites
The campus has implemented policies and procedures to promote the posting of all required
curricular and instructional resources (including print-based and multimedia materials) in a
central, accessible electronic location. Top level goal median = Defined.
Goal 4.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Campus has formally documented (e.g., Policy, Resolution
or Procedure) a process to promote or require the posting of
IM to the campus LMS. [Commitment]
Initiated
Initiated
Campus has screened its LMS to determine whether it
conforms to Section 508 accessibility standards and
established a plan to address (or work-around) identified
gaps. [Ability]
Established
Established
Campus has established specific guidelines and procedures
for submitting course and curricular materials hosted in
campus LMS. [Commitment]
Defined
Defined
Campus has implemented procedures to accelerate the
delivery of alternate media materials to improve timeliness
(e.g. electronic delivery via campus LMS or FTP). [Ability]
Defined
Initiated
Campus has implemented mechanisms to provide alternate
media production staff with access to instructional materials
on LMS course sites for purposes of evaluating and
converting materials. [Ability]
Defined
Defined
Campus has established specific measures of success
(e.g., number of course sites with posted syllabi) for faculty
posting of curricular materials in the campus LMS.
[Measurement]
Initiated
Initiated
IM SI Details AY 10/11
+
8
Goal 4.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Optimizing
0
3
1
3
4
0
Managed
1
5
2
4
4
0
Established
7
7
5
1
3
2
Defined
2
4
6
6
4
4
Initiated
9
3
6
9
5
10
Not Started
4
1
3
0
3
7
Goal 5.0 – Accessibility Requirements for Multimedia
The campus has implemented policies and procedures to ensure that accessibility
requirements have been incorporated into the adoption process for all multimedia-based
instructional resources. Top level goal median = Defined+.
IM SI Details AY 10/11
9
Goal 5.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Campus has developed and implemented accessibility
requirements for selecting and adopting multimedia
curricular materials (e.g. requirements for captions,
transcripts, audio description, accessible web players).
[Commitment]
Defined
Campus has established a strategic process, based on
available resources, for prioritizing the remediation of
inaccessible multimedia materials. [Commitment]
Defined
Initiated
Campus has gathered survey information from media
libraries regarding multimedia usage and format types (e.g.
most frequently utilized titles and formats) to aid in tool
selection and prioritization decisions. [Measurement]
Initiated
Initiated
Campus has built capacity (e.g. established practices,
specified staff time, budget, tools, and/or work space)
necessary to address the accessibility of existing and
planned multimedia content and its delivery. [Ability]
Defined
Defined
Campus has established measures of success related to
multimedia accessibility (e.g. percent of new materials that
are accessible, percent of existing materials that have been
remediated). [Measurement]
Not Started
Not Started
+
Defined
Goal 5.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
IM SI Details AY 10/11
10
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
Optimizing
0
0
1
1
0
Managed
3
1
1
2
2
Established
7
5
4
8
2
Defined
4
6
3
4
2
Initiated
8
8
7
6
4
Not Started
1
3
7
2
13
Goal 6.0 – Accessibility Requirements for Curricular Review and Approval
The campus has implemented policies and procedures to ensure that accessibility
requirements have been incorporated into the curricular review process. Top level goal
median = Initiated.
Goal 6.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
6.1
6.2
6.3
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Accessibility requirements have been developed and
integrated into the academic curriculum review process for
new course adoptions and existing course reviews.
[Commitment]
Initiated
Initiated
Campus has established accessibility standards or
guidelines for selecting and authoring curricular materials.
[Commitment]
Initiated
Initiated
Campus has established specific measures of success
(e.g., number of courses that have undergone accessibility
review) for incorporating accessibility into the curricular
review and approval process. [Measurement]
Initiated
IM SI Details AY 10/11
+
Not Started
11
Goal 6.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
6.1
6.2
6.3
Optimizing
1
0
0
Managed
3
2
0
Established
4
4
1
Defined
2
3
1
Initiated
10
9
10
Not Started
3
5
11
Goal 7.0 – Supporting Faculty Creation of Accessible IM
The campus has implemented policies and procedures to support faculty in selecting,
authoring, and delivering accessible instructional materials. Top level goal median =
Defined.
IM SI Details AY 10/11
12
Goal 7.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Campus has formally documented (through Policy,
Resolution or Procedure) the nature of faculty responsibility
for selecting and authoring accessible curricular materials.
[Commitment]
Defined
Campus has established specific mechanisms to encourage
faculty authoring and adoption of accessible instructional
materials (e.g. recognition in article or letter of appreciation).
[Ability]
+
Initiated
Defined
+
Initiated
Campus has developed and disseminated examples of
accessible curricular materials and practices (e.g.
accessible syllabus template, faculty exemplars). [Ability]
Defined
Defined
Campus has specified technology (e.g. workstations,
software, scanners) and personnel resources (e.g. student
assistants, lab technicians) necessary to support faculty
creation of accessible instructional materials. [Ability]
Established
Established
Campus has implemented mechanisms to provide content
distributors with access to tools or practices that allow
accessibility testing of curricular materials (e.g. text-tospeech, voice recognition, keyboard-only navigation,
Document Map view). [Ability]
Defined
Campus has established specific measures of success for
faculty creation of accessible instructional materials (e.g.
improving quality of course reader and/or e-reserve material
submissions). [Measurement]
Initiated
+
Initiated
+
Not Started
Goal 7.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
IM SI Details AY 10/11
13
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
Optimizing
0
0
2
2
1
1
Managed
5
2
2
5
3
0
Established
2
5
4
7
5
2
Defined
6
6
9
4
3
1
Initiated
5
5
6
3
8
9
Not Started
5
5
0
2
3
10
Goal 8.0 – Communication Process and Training Plan
The campus has implemented a broad-based ATI awareness campaign, supported by a
comprehensive training infrastructure to increase technological accessibility across the
campus. Top level goal median = Established+.
Goal 8.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Campus has developed a formal awareness campaign to
increase knowledge of accessibility issues and
responsibilities. [Commitment]
Established
Campus has built capacity (e.g. specified staff time,
technology, and/or materials) in support of this awareness
campaign. [Ability]
Defined
Campus has developed and disseminated a variety of
training materials, both in content and modality (e.g. quick
use guides, workshops, FAQ), for selecting, authoring, and
distributing accessible materials. [Ability]
Established
Campus has disseminated training materials for faculty
regarding methods to post curricular materials to the
campus LMS course site or equivalent (see Section 4).
[Ability]
Established
Campus is tracking participation in training activities and
usage of training materials for accessible authoring,
conversion, and delivery of curricular materials (e.g. number
of workshop attendees, number of users who download
templates, or watch training videos) . [Measurement]
Defined
Initiated
Campus is tracking the effectiveness of training activities
and materials for accessible authoring, conversion, and
delivery of curricular materials. (e.g., user satisfaction
levels, decreased demand for alternate media conversion).
[Measurement]
Initiated
Initiated
IM SI Details AY 10/11
+
+
Defined
Defined
+
Defined
Established
14
Goal 8.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
Optimizing
0
2
1
0
1
1
Managed
5
5
6
6
3
1
Established
7
3
7
7
4
1
Defined
5
7
6
8
6
4
Initiated
6
6
2
1
7
9
Not Started
0
0
1
1
2
7
Goal 9.0 – Process Indicators
Campus IMAP committee has sufficient breadth, resources, and authority to effectively
implement a comprehensive IMAP initiative. Top level goal median = Defined.
IM SI Details AY 10/11
15
Goal 9.0 – Success Indicators with Medians – This Year Compared to Last
Number
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
Success Indicator Description
Median
Median
This Year
Last Year
(10-11)
(09-10)
Campus IMAP committee membership consists of
stakeholders from all key units (Student Affairs, Academic
Senate, Curriculum Committee, Academic Technology,
Library) as well as faculty, staff and student. [Commitment]
Established
Campus IMAP committee has suitable authority to ensure
effectiveness of IMAP effort as well as to resolve issues and
challenges. [Ability]
Initiated –
Defined
Campus IMAP committee has established a system to
effectively track its task delegations and overall project
management. [Measurement]
Initiated
Initiated
Campus has established a formal administrative review
process by campus executive leadership for all IMAP
components. [Verification]
Initiated
Initiated
+
Defined
Goal 9.0 – Results Chart Success Indicators AY 10-11
Campus Counts for each Success Indicator AY 10-11
Status Level
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
Optimizing
1
0
0
1
Managed
6
5
1
2
Established
7
4
1
0
Defined
1
2
5
3
Initiated
5
9
9
8
Not Started
3
3
7
9
IM SI Details AY 10/11
16
Appendix A – Description of Status Level Criteria
Success Indicators were determined using the following criteria:
Status
Level
Description for
Resources
Description for Procedures
Description for Documentation
Optimizing
The campus has a mature
practice. Additional
procedures are in place to
conduct regular administrative
reviews of success indicators
to gauge effectiveness and
implement improvements.
Documentation is continually
revised to reflect the managed
practice. Periodic administrative
review of documentation is
conducted.
Resources have been
both identified and
allocated. Periodic
administrative review of
resource allocations is
conducted.
Managed
Campus has a mature
practice. Additional
procedures are in place to
track and capture success
indicators (milestones and
measures of success).
Documentation is complete and
fully reflects the standard practice.
Resources have been
both identified and
allocated.
Established
Campus has a standard
practice. Procedures are
consistent and formal.
Documentation is complete and
fully reflects the standard practice.
Resources have been
both identified and
allocated.
Defined
Campus has a common
practice. Any procedures in
place are consistent but
informal.
Documentation, if present, is in
working draft form.
Resources have been
firmly identified but not
yet allocated.
Initiated
Campus has an ad hoc or
developing practice. Any
procedures in place are
generally ad hoc.
Documentation is generally
absent.
Resources have been
tentatively identified but
not yet allocated.
Not Started
No action has yet been taken.
No documentation has yet been
generated.
No resources have yet
been allocated.
IM SI Details AY 10/11
17