Defining Service Standards for the Service Desk Models Pilot Updated: February 21, 2014 Background In May 2013, a year-long pilot to explore service desk models was undertaken in the Porter and Davis locations of the University of Waterloo Library. The decision was made to test an integrated/on-call service desk model in Davis that would bring circulation desk staff and information service providers together at one desk and in Porter to continue the status quo of an information desk and a circulation desk that are separate. A main goal of this project is to provide high quality service to library users and part of the pilot is to assess service quality being provided in the various modes of the pilot. In order to assess service quality, the first step is to identify measurable service standards. Once these standards have been established, associated metrics can be used to evaluate if and how the service desk models are meeting user needs. Service Standards related to Service Desk activity1: In the context of this project, three service standards have been identified that relate to the delivery of Library services. As the mandate for the Service Desk Pilot Group is to focus on the quality of service associated with the information/circulation/integrated desks in Porter and Davis, the quality of service assessed in relation to these standards will focus on service desk activity. The service standards that have been identified are: Discovery The service standards and measurable outcomes have been developed using the ACRL Standards for Libraries in Higher Education Outcomes assessment-based model. This model provides a framework for identifying outcomes and evidence that can be used in the process of developing and assessing service standards. (http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/standardslibraries) 1 1 Self Sufficient Use of Physical and Virtual Spaces User Centered Service Design Underlying these service standards is a commitment to excellence in the quality of service that is in keeping with the values and goal expressed in the Library Mission statement2. Discovery Discovery in this context is how the Library staff members assist users in discovering the information and services required to: Identify and meet information needs Enhance learning, teaching and research Create new knowledge Heighten intellectual curiosity At the service desks, users are made aware of services and resources and staff members are trained to support discovery activities. Service is accurate, reliable and promotes learning and skills development. Measurable Service Desk Outcomes related to Discovery: We will meet the service standard of Discovery if: I. II. III. IV. Students, faculty and staff are appropriately aware of service desk services and resources3 Desk staff are trained to support discovery activities at the service desks Library users are assisted using face to face services that: are accurate are reliable promote learning and skills development Library users are referred, as needed and as appropriate, to liaison librarians and service specialists/experts within the Library Summary of Activities related to Discovery: To meet our desired outcomes related to Discovery, our actions will be: 2 http://www.lib.uwaterloo.ca/info/Mission/MissionSt.html 3 Library Review Campus Consultation document p.8 2 To undertake targeted promotional activities to increase user awareness of desk services and to decrease the number of directional inquiries recorded To train integrated desk staff in enhanced directional training/circulation training so they will be able to respond to the most common desk inquiries To implement and modify training as needed: o To increase user satisfaction with desk interactions o So that users feel that the information given in response to the inquiry is accurate and reliable o So that students learn something as part of the interaction To make business cards for liaison librarians available at the service desks To document procedures for referring questions to librarians To have subject guides available as a resource to service providers at the desks and to help identify liaison librarians who can provide additional assistance To encourage desk staff to initiate email contact with liaison librarian and user via their subject guides Summary of Assessment and Evidence related to Discovery: The evidence we will gather to determine if our actions have been successful: Do users access the correct service desk the first time? Do users know about the services available? We will use service statistical data to identify the most common desk inquiries and desk staff will be surveyed to determine if the training has provided them with the information they need to respond to the most common desk inquiries We will gather user feedback on their experiences and staff feedback on their training and experience Service statistical data will be reviewed for referral statistics Librarian feedback on their experience with referrals will be collected Users will be surveyed about their experience with referrals Self-sufficient use of Virtual and Physical Spaces Self-sufficient, effective use of virtual and physical spaces is supported as a way to develop proficient and productive library and information users. Encouraging users to be aware of, and take advantage of in person and self service options facilitates their use of services and service points appropriate to their needs. Measurable Service Desk Outcomes related to Self-sufficient use of Virtual and Physical Spaces We will meet this standard if: 3 I. II. III. IV. Appropriate self-service options exist Library users identify service points that are appropriate to their needs Library users use signage to determine where to find appropriate services/locations Library users consult the Library website to access physical building information Summary of Activities related to Self-sufficient use of Virtual and Physical Spaces: To meet our desired outcomes related to self-sufficient use of virtual and physical spaces, our actions will be: To undertake targeted promotional activities to increase user awareness of self service options in physical and virtual environment (self check out, scanners, printing, “how to” handouts/signs to find call numbers, campus maps) To move self check machines to more visible locations To encourage desk staff to promote self service options To provide more visible promotion of self service options (both print & online) “Theme – do it yourself” To review signage and standardize look for wayfinding signs to improve/focus on key self services To review website information and previous surveys to see if physical building information is presented in an accessible, intuitive and user friendly structure Summary of Assessment and Evidence related to Self-sufficient use of Virtual and Physical Spaces: The evidence we will gather to determine if our actions have been successful: We will survey our users to: assess student knowledge of self service options assess actual use of self service options determine if the self service options offered are the ones that students want Self check statistics will be reviewed for use Service statistical directional questions related to self service options will be gathered and reviewed Library website stats for pages describing where to find physical locations and , hours, will be reviewed Use stats for the “Where is it” feature in Primo will be reviewed 4 User Centered Service Design The Library commits to a user centered approach and demonstrates the centrality of users in all aspects of service design and delivery in virtual and physical environments. Service points, including self-service points, are optimized to enhance the user and staff experience4, and universal design principles are used to ensure usability and accessibility of services and service/self service points. Evidence based assessments and user trends inform decisions to adapt services. Measurable Service Desk Outcomes related to User Centered Service Design We will meet this standard if: I. II. III. IV. Service points and self-service points are optimized to enhance user and staff experience5 Universal design principles are used to ensure usability and accessibility of services and service/self service points Evidence based assessments and user trends inform decisions to adapt services Existing and proposed services are reviewed to ensure they meet a strategic need Summary of Activities related to User Centered Service Design: To meet our desired outcomes related to user centered service design, our actions will be: 4 5 To modify the Davis desk as needed/possible for the pilot to support short and medium length interactions and desk staff make appropriate use of all parts of the desk To determine if the layout and positions of desk components make sense to users To investigate the need for improvements to serve persons of varying physical abilities. To develop signage that is clear and intuitive to users To support evidence based assessment, we will develop standard reports for making longitudinal comparisons encourage staff to use service statistical collection tool consistently offer service statistical collection tool refreshers more frequently Literature on ref/circ desk trends, issues, innovations, and assessment will be reviewed Library Review Campus Consultation document p. 10 Library Review Campus Consultation document p. 10 5 Campus data will be reviewed to contextualize library data and trends Review/assessment working groups will create report with recommendations Feedback from all involved will be sought (staff, users, experts) Summary of Assessment and Evidence related to User Centered Service Design The evidence we will gather to determine if our actions have been successful: We will survey our users to assess: o if the physical set up of the service desk(s) suits their needs o satisfaction with desk services o the student’s perception of outcomes of their most recent interaction at the service desk(s) o students awareness of the services available at the desk o student perceptions of the impact of one desk or two desks/service points Assess the physical desk and surrounding area to ensure it meets existing accessibility expectations/requirements Evaluate service statistics for changes in user needs or query types etc. We will survey our staff to assess if they are using user centered design/user centered learning design principles and tools 6