University of Toronto Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor where there is no Existing Specialist or Major (This template has been developed in line with the University of Toronto’s Quality Assurance Process. Please submit in MS Word format.) This template should be used to bring forward all proposals for major modifications of this type for governance approval under the University of Toronto’s Quality Assurance Process. It is designed to ensure that all evaluation criteria established by the Quality Council are addressed in bringing forward a proposal for academic change. What is being proposed: [i.e., a new freestanding Minor in …] Department / Unit where the program will be housed: Faculty / Academic Division: University of Toronto Scarborough Faculty / Academic Division Contact: Annette Knott, Academic Programs Officer aknott@utsc.utoronto.ca Department/Unit Contact: Start date of the program: April 1, 2015 Date of this version of the proposal: Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 1 of 7 Please remove the instructions as you complete the template in order to provide a final copy that is easier for your audience to read. 1 Executive Summary Please provide a brief summary or overview of what is being proposed summarizing many of the key points found in more detail elsewhere in the proposal. This may need to be used on a standalone basis and should include: A clear statement of purpose / a description of what is being proposed A clear statement of the relationship of this to other programs (ensure that you state clearly that there is no existing Specialist or Major in the area of the proposed Minor, thus establishing that it is freestanding) The impetus for its development (including student demand /societal need) and how it fits with the Unit’s academic plans The approach used in the development of the proposal, and Any distinctive elements 2 Program Rationale Statement of purpose – Describe what is being proposed and why If relevant, describe the mode of delivery (including online) and how it is appropriate to support students in achieving the learning objectives of the program Context o Discuss how the program addresses the current state of the discipline or area of study. (Identify pedagogical and other issues giving rise to the creation of this program. Where appropriate speak to changes in the area of study or student needs that may have given rise to this development) o Describe the consistency of the program with the University’s mission and unit/divisional academic plan and priorities Distinctiveness o Identify any distinctive/innovative aspects of the proposed Minor o To what extent is what is being proposed “the norm”. As appropriate, speak to similar offerings elsewhere at the University of Toronto or at other universities Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 2 of 7 3 Need and Demand Provide a brief description of the need and demand for the proposed Minor focusing, as appropriate, on student interest, societal need, employment opportunities for prospective graduates, interest expressed by potential employers, professional associations, government agencies or policy bodies With specific reference to the impact on need and demand return to the question discussed above of how the proposed program is distinct from existing programs elsewhere 4 Admission / Eligibility Requirements Describe any specific requirements that students must meet to be eligible for the proposed minor and how these will be administered 5 Program Requirements Provide a complete and exact program description, as it will appear in the Academic Calendar Provide a complete list of the courses associated with the program; include full copy as it appears/will appear in the Academic Calendar (course code, title, description, prerequisites, etc.); indicate clearly whether the courses are existing or new* * For new courses, include the relevant New Course proposal Complete Program Description and Proposed Calendar copy: Complete List of Courses Associated With the Program, Including Full Calendar Copy: Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 3 of 7 6 Program Structure, Learning Outcomes, and Degree Level Expectations Within the reasonable limits that can be expected of a Minor program, address how the design, structure, requirements and delivery of the program support the program learning outcomes and degree level expectations Degree Level Expectations 1. Depth and Breadth of Knowledge Depth of Knowledge: is attained through a progression of introductory, core and specialized courses. Specialized courses will normally be at the C and D levels. Program Learning Outcomes – e.g. what students will know or be able to do at the completion of the program How the program design / structure supports the degree level expectations [Clearly describe how the Program Learning Outcomes will support the degree level expectations] [Clearly describe how the program design/structure will support the degree level expectations] Depth and breadth of knowledge is understood in [PROGRAM NAME] as … The program design and requirement elements that ensure these student outcomes for depth and breadth of knowledge are: This is reflected in students who are able to: Breadth of Knowledge: students will gain an appreciation of the variety of modes of thinking, methods of inquiry and analysis, and ways of understanding the world that underpin different intellectual fields. 2. Knowledge of Methodologies Students have a working knowledge of different methodologies and approaches relevant to their area of study. They are able to evaluate the efficacy of different methodologies in addressing questions that arise in their area of study. 3. Application of Knowledge Students are able to frame relevant questions for further inquiry. They are familiar with, or will be able to seek the tools with Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 4 of 7 which, they can address such questions effectively. 4. Awareness of Limits of Knowledge Students gain an understanding of the limits of their own knowledge and an appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity, and limits to our collective knowledge and how these might influence analyses and interpretations. 5. Communication Skills Students are able to communicate information, arguments, and analyses accurately and reliably, both orally and in writing. They learn to read and to listen critically. 6. Autonomy and Professional Capacity The education students receive achieves the following broad goals: It gives students the skills and knowledge they need to become informed, independent and creative thinkers It instils the awareness that knowledge and its applications are influenced by, and contribute to, society It lays the foundation for learning as a lifelong endeavour 7 Assessment of Teaching and Learning Describe how the methods for assessing student achievement are appropriate and effective relative to established program learning outcomes and degree level expectations 8 Consultation Describe the expected impact of what is being proposed on the nature and quality of the unit’s/division’s program of study and any impact on other units/divisions Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 5 of 7 Describe any consultation with the Deans of Faculties/Divisions that will be implicated or affected by the creation of the proposed program 9 Resources 9.1 Faculty requirements Brief statement to provide evidence of the participation of a sufficient number and quality of faculty who will actively participate in the delivery of the program o Discuss the role of any adjunct or contractual faculty o Comment on the provision of supervision of experiential learning opportunities, as appropriate o If relevant, describe the plan to provide additional faculty resources to support the program o Give details regarding the nature and level of TA support required by the program Table 1: Detailed List of Committed Faculty Faculty name and rank Home unit Area(s) of Specialization 9.2 Space/Infrastructure Address any unique space/infrastructure requirements including information technology, laboratory space and equipment, etc. 10 Governance Process Levels of Approval Required Departmental Curriculum Committee Decanal Sign-Off DUCC (Undergraduate) Dates Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 6 of 7 UTSC Academic Affairs Committee Submission to Provost’s Office Report to AP&P Report to Ontario Quality Council Major Modification Proposal – Type B: New Freestanding Minor Page 7 of 7