Supplemental information. Expression and purification of HIFs and ARNT PasB domain proteins. Expression and purification of HIF-1 R245E (947 construct) and R245E/E266H/R311H/S330L (1106 construct) mutants and HIF-2 R247E (949 construct) for ITC, SPR and NMR studies was performed as describe previously [24]. Additionally, 6xHis-GST-HIF-1 E245R construct was generated for purification and crystallization of HIF-1 R245E/ARNT E362R PasB heterodimer. Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease site was inserted after GST in this construct. To generate HIF1 and ARNT proteins suitable for AlphaScreen assay development, the Avi tag sequence (LNDIFEAQKIEWHE) and FLAG tag (DYKDDDDK) were fused to the C-terminus of HIF-1 and ARNT PasB domains after a Gly-Gly-Gly linker. For expression of HIF-1 PasB biotinylated protein, the AviTag-containing plasmid was co-transformed with a plasmid containing biotin ligase. 10 M biotin was added to the growth media 30 min prior induction of protein expression. Biotinylated protein was purified as described and its identity was confirmed by LCMS analysis. All constructs used in this study are summarized in Table S-1. Alpha-ELISA Assay development. The AlphaScreen technology is based on transfer of singlet oxygen from donor to acceptor bead types when brought into proximity from binding of compatible components immobilized onto respective bead types. We generated biotinyl-HIF-1 R245E and Flag-ARNT E362R reagents for use with AlphaScreen streptavidin-coated donor beads and anti-Flag acceptor beads, respectively. The association of biotinyl-HIF-1 R245E with Flag-ARNT E362R mediated by the AlphaScreen beads is concentration and time dependent and yields an apparent Kd for binding of ca. 5nM for each protein (data not shown). The AlphaScreen assay technology was implemented as a high throughput methodology to screen for modulators of HIF-1/ARNT PPI. Small molecules that directly prevent protein association, or HIF proteins that sequester the HIF-1 or ARNT binding partner impart a reduction in the AlphaScreen signal. The later application allowed us rapidly screen various protein constructs and protein-compound conjugates used in this study using micro scale protein expression and purification protocols. In the absence of tool compounds, HIF PasB domains were used in competition studies to validate the utility of the assay to identify PPI inhibitors. To demonstrate that the assay signal is derived from viable PPI interaction and not non-specific bead association, competition studies were done using proteins that lack capture tags for AlphaScreen beads. Protein HIF-1 R245E inhibited the AlphaScreen signal generated from 5nM concentrations of biotinyl-HIF-1 R245E and Flag-ARNT E362R with an IC50 value of 43 ± 15nM (n=6). Similarly, soluble ARNT E362R yields and IC50 of 12 ± 8nM (n=12). HIF-1 1106 protein inhibited association of biotinyl-HIF-1 and Flag-ARNT in the AlphaScreen assay. Identification of reactive compounds using Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization timeof-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The matrix employed was 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone (DHAP) prepared by dissolving 5mg DHAP in 250L ethanol and adding 80L of diammonium citrate dissolved in ultrapure water. This matrix produced protein MS data without matrix adducts that can give rise to interfering peaks, thus yielding easily interpretable protein-compound MS spectra (data not shown). Two L of protein-compound sample solution was mixed with 2L of a 2% trifluoroacetic acid solution (aq) and 0.5L of the mixture was spotted on a polished stainless steel MALDI plate. Mass spectra were acquired using an automated acquisition and spectral processing method (AutoExecute™) in linear mode with an accelerating voltage of 20kV. The instrument was calibrated with masses derived from standard protein (Bruker Protein Standard II) spectra. 500 mass spectra were summed from each sample. Nanoelectrospray liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS/MS). Compounds that demonstrated >50 % reactivity (defined as intensity of reacted protein in MS spectrum/intensity of unreacted protein peak) at the 24h time point were subjected to limited proteolysis and nanoLC-MS/MS in a linear ion trap (Thermo LTQ) to localize the fragment binding site (Table 2). Volumes of reaction mixtures corresponding to 10g protein were denatured by heat and the addition of 10% (volume) acetonitrile and digested with trypsin (1:10 enzyme:protein) overnight at 37°C. Dried digests were reconstituted in 15L 0.1% formic acid (aq) and 3L samples were analyzed by MS/MS analysis. MS/MS data were analyzed with Spectrum Mill™ software to extract the molecular features of each sample. Experimental LCMS/MS data sets were searched against the theoretical MS/MS spectra derived from predicted tryptic peptides from the protein construct sequence, with the addition of the test compound masses on Cys, His and Lys residues as possible chemical modifications. Table S-1. HIF-1 and ARNT constructs. Target Construct Domain number boundary HIF-1 900 238-349 WT AlphaScreen polyHis --- HIF-1 947 238-349 R245E SPR polyHis --- HIF-1 1383 238-349 R245E Protein polyHis- crystallization GST R245E, E266H, MS reactive polyHis --- R311H, S330L screen HIF-1 1106 238-349 Mutations Assay N-term C-term Tag Tag HIF-1 1215 238-349 R245E AlphaScreen polyHis Biotin ARNT 829 356-470 WT AlphaScreen polyHis --- ARNT 948 356-470 E362R SPR, protein polyHis --- polyHis FLAG crystallization ARNT 1102 356-470 E362R AlphaScreen Table S-2. AlphaSreen analysis of HIF-2 to HIF-1 mutants. PAS-B Protein Construct Domain Boundary Mutation AlphaScreen IC50 nM ± sem HIF-1 947 238-349 R245E 35 ± 2 HIF-1 1518 238-349 R245E , P329T 2580 ± 180 HIF-1 1519 238-349 R245E , M338V 220 ± 10 HIF-1 1520 238-349 R245E, L344V 1760 ± 200 HIF-2 949 240-350 R247E 890 ± 350 Fig.S-1. Superposition of Hif-1/ARNT (orange/green ribbons) and Hif-2/ARNT (magenta/blue ribbons). Time (min) -10 0.05 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 µcal/sec 0.00 µcal/sec Time (min) -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0.05 70 -0.05 0.00 -0.05 2.5 kcal/mole of injectant kcal/mole of injectant -0.10 3.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Molar Ratio 1.5 2.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Molar Ratio 2.0 Fig. S-2. ITC results for HIF-1-ARNT complex at 10 oC . Left: Isotherm of ARNT binding HIF-1 (947) with an observed KD of 125 nM, stoichiometry of 0.97, and H of 2.4 kCal mol-1 G -8.9 kCal mol-1 and TS of 11.3 kCal mol-1. Right: Isotherm of ARNT binding stabilized HIF-1 (1106) with an observed KD of 83nM, n = 0.97, and H of 1.1 kCal mol-1 G -9.2kCal mol-1 and TS of 10.3 kCal mol-1. The modest increase in affinity of the stabilized HIF-1-ARNT complex is the result of a lower H penalty of binding. -10 0 10 Time (min) 20 30 40 50 60 0 70 Time (min) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0.20 0.05 0.15 µcal/sec µcal/sec 0.10 0.00 -0.05 0.05 0.00 -0.05 -0.10 3.50 -0.10 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 KCal/Mole of Injectant kcal/mole of injectant 3.00 0.0 0.5 Molar Ratio 1.0 1.5 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -0.50 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Molar Ratio Fig. S-3. ITC results for HIF-2-ARNT complex at 10 oC . Left: Isotherm for ARNT binding HIF-2 (949) with an observed KD of 1400 ± 100 nM, n = 0.95, and H of 3.8 ± 1.1 kCal mol-1, G -7.6 kCal mol-1 and TS of 11.4 kCal mol-1. Right: Isotherm for ARNT binding HIF-2 M338V (1519) with an observed KD of 71 ± 35nM, stoichiometry of 0.99, and H of 2.8 ± 0.1kCal mol-1, G -9.3 kCal mol-1 and TS of 12.1 kCal mol-1. The significant increase in affinity observed for the M338V HIF-2-ARNT complex, results from a combination of less unfavorable H and more favorable S of binding. Data for the HIF-2M338V-ARNT complex at 20 and 30 oC (not shown) reveal a heat capacity change (CP) of ~ -0.18 kCal mol-1 K-1. This is consistent with the burial of significant non-polar surface area, observed in the crystal structure of the complex. Figure S-4. MS-MS spectrum for the HIF-1 1106 tryptic peptide (m/z=565.6) incorporating conjugation of COMPOUND 5 on Cys255. Full sequence coverage confirmed Cys255 conjugation, while the unmodified peptide form of Cys255 was not observed.