STRUVITE CRYSTALLISATION IN SLUDGE DEWATERING SUPERNATANT USING AIR STRIPPING: THE NEW-FULL SCALE PLANT AT TREVISO (ITALY) SEWAGE WORKS. P. Battistoni*, R. Boccadoro*, P. Pavan**, and F. Cecchi*** (*)Engineering Faculty, Institute of Hydraulic, University of Ancona, Via Brecce Bianche, 60123 Ancona, Italy idrotre@popcsi.unian.i (**)Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Venice, Calle Larga S.Marta 2137, 30123 Venice, Italy (***)Scientific and Technological Department, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie, 37134 Verona, Italy ABSTRACT The paper presents the full-scale struvite crystallization plant of Treviso (Italy) to remove phosphate from anaerobic supernatants of sludge line. The plant was designed according to the mathematical model of the process, previously tested in a half scale pilot plant working with real anaerobic supernatant produced by a A2O process. Two main sections are provided to treat up to 2 m3 h-1 of supernatant flowrate; the stripping section assures the operative pH (8.3-8.7) through carbon dioxide stripping with air, to precipitate or crystallize struvite or hydroxyapatite on sand grains on a fluidised bed reactor. No filtration section for fines particles is required, while a pre-precipitation of suspended solids lost by belt press station is performed. Preliminary results on stripping tests, natural ageing of supernatant and runs at different pH are also discussed. KEYWORDS Anaerobic fermentation (AF), calcium phosphate, organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OF-MSW), struvite crystallisation process (SCP), struvite (MAP), hydroxyapatite (HAP). INTRODUCTION Following the indications given by the EC 271/91 Directive, for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) standards in treated wastewater discharges, the planning and upgrading of wastewater treatment plants in European countries must be more and more oriented towards biological nutrient removal (BNR) approaches. A global approach to wastewater and OFMSW treatment was proposed after a long time pilot scale experimentation (Cecchi et al. (1994), Pavan et al., 1998). According to this hypothesis the liquid phase, rich in VFA, from the anaerobic fermentation (AF) process of OFMSW is added to BNR plants inlet in order to promote the denitrification and the biological phosphorus removal processes. This requires to fix phosphorus released in sludge line considering that the production of a recyclable material in the form of phosphate pellets which can be used either as slow release fertilizer or other industrial products, should be desirable. In this way the costs of operating effective and appropriate wastewater treatment to remove phosphorus could be balanced by the gain of a recyclable phosphate product and the reduction of sludge disposal costs, due to decreased sludge amount and volume. However it is necessary to bring under control the formation of very small particles, the so called fines, as these cannot be recovered and/or generate a non-manageable sludge and the plant configuration becomes more complex. In an AF-BNR plant both the supernatants from the gravitational thickening and anaerobic co-digestion of sludge and the solid residue of the fermented effluent are treated considering the struvite crystallization process (SCP) (Pavan et al.; 2000).The paper presents the new full scale plant for struvite crystallization process from anaerobic supernatants, its design and the preliminary results obtained in the start up phase. The full scale plant of Treviso City (Italy). The necessity of increasing the wastewater treatment capacity from 7.000 to about 20.000 m3/d, and to reach the target of nutrient removal imposed by the EC 271/91 Directive, are the basis that lead to the new wastewater treatment plant of Treviso. The plant (Fig. 1) was designed considering the tests regarding biological phosphorus removal and struvite crystallisation process from anaerobic supernatants (Cecchi et al., 1994; Pavan et al., 1998, Battistoni et al.; 1998a). This approach allows to consider both the need of a readily biodegradable carbon (RBCOD) source to improve the BNR process yields and the OFMSW treatments as an alternative solution to the conventional disposal (Lötter and Pitman, 1992; Kristensen et al., 1992b; Isaacs & Henze, 1995). The process scheme is reported in Figure 1. Figure 1. Configuration of Treviso plant. Wastewater inlet Pretreatment Biological Treatment (N-P removal) Secondary Settler Final Treatment: chlorination outlet WAS OFMSW Preparation Anaerobic sludge co-digestion Dewatering and phosphorus precipitation Sludge Fermentation demonstrative section Struvite Struvite demonstrative section Wastewater headworks Wastewater treatment (BNR). The upgrading of the old conventional wastewater treatment plant (30.000 PE) was carried out adopting a modified Johannesburg configuration, avoiding the primary sedimentation to preserve more COD for the N and P removal steps. The relative volumes of the new line, which has a 50.000 PE capacity, can be changed since the whole plant is planned with modular characteristics, such that the anaerobic and anoxic tank volume can be varied depending on the requirements (Table 1). Furthermore, during the whole process, it is possible to vary both the single flows and their final destination. Table 2 reports plant specifications. The plant, whose biological compartment has a total volume of 9000 m3, is composed by: Pre-anoxic zone (400-1200 m3) to remove nitrates from the return activated sludge (up to 23760 m3/d); Anaerobic (700–1200 m3) and anoxic (1600–2200 m3) zones where the fermenter effluent is added. The mixed liquor recycle can be performed up to 37440 m3/d (about 2.5 Qin) in the anoxic zone; Oxidation/nitrification tank (5500 m3), divided into two basins; Two secondary settlers (1300 m2), 28 m diameters each; Contact tank for disinfection (250 m3); A first pre-thickener for waste sludge prior to the anaerobic digestion process and a second thickener (210 m3) fed with residual solid from anaerobic fermentation of OFMSW and waste activated sludge; Single phase anaerobic digester (2200 m3) in mesophilic conditions working at an HRT of 23 d and with an organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.75 KgTS/m3. Anaerobic fermentation process (AF). The OFMSW anaerobic fermentation takes place in a controlled 50 m3 CSTR fermenter. The substrate, after a pre-treatment to eliminate bulky and packaging wastes, is sent to a feedstock tank, closed (in order to reduce odour impacts) and mixed. Two on-line shredder pumps are used also for size reduction and mixing. The sludge is sent to the fermenter by a screw pump. The fermenter operates with an HRT within 3 and 6 days, depending from the substrate availability and the yields to be obtained. The fermenter effluent is treated in a screw-press, which extracts the liquid fraction to employ as RBCOD and the solid residue, sent after mixing with waste activated sludge before to the thickener and after to anaerobic digester. Struvite Crystallisation Process (SCP). The anaerobic supernatants produced thickening the blend between activated sludge and AF residual solid or belt pressing digested sludges can be used to feed the plant. They has been choose forecasting that two main points of phosphorus release will be provided according to anaerobic conditions and volatile fatty acids availability. The SCP plant, as sketched in Figure 2, is constituted of a pre-treatment and two operative sections: a stripping tank and a fluidised bed reactor (FBR). The pre-treatment section is composed by a suspended solid apparatus and a reservoir tank to manage the FBR in continuous mode notwithstanding the dewatering section runs only two or three days per week. A stripper and a connected deareation column compose the stripping section. Table 1. Volumes and operative conditions Old line New line Wastewater line Screening and degritting, m3 181 Pre-treatments, m3 360 628 3 Pre-anoxic zone, m 400-1200 Anaerobic zone, m3 700-1200 3 Recycled settled sludge, m /d 12000 23760 3 Anoxic zone, m 1600-2200 RAS, m3/d 37440 3 Aerobic zone, m 3080 5500 MLSS, kg/ m3 3.08 3.47 F/M, kg BOD/kg MLSS d 0.130 0.125 Total reactor volume, m3 3080 9000 2 Secondary settler surface, m 530 1300 Settler surface loading rate, 0.52 0.45 3 2 m /m h Disinfection, m3 115 250 Sludge line Dewatering belt volume, m3 160 210 Anaerobic digester volume, 2,200 OLR, kg TS/ m3d HRT, d Table 2. Base planning data for Treviso wastewater treatment plant Total New line Pop. Equiv. (PE) 70000 50000 3 Q, m /d 19600 14000 Q max, m3/h 1225 BOD, kgO2/d 4770 3570 SS, kgTS/d 4900 3500 Ntot, kgN/d 843 602 Ptot, kgP/d 118 84 Old line 20000 5600 1200 1400 241 34 Q = flow rate; BOD = biological oxygen demand; SS = suspended solids. 1.75 23 RAS = return activated sludge. Fig. 2 SCP plant Decanter Stripper Deareation column Mixer Stocking tank FBR P1 P2 The anaerobic supernatant after pre-treatment, as supplied from the reservoir tank, is sent to the stripper, together with the recycle flowrate from FBR. The air flowrate needed for CO2 stripping is pumped from bottom using ceramic aerators, while the effluent exits from the deareation column together with the recycle flowrate. The system stripper+deareation column can work at three different levels (H= 1.7, 2.2, 2.7 m), allowing different hydraulic heads and hydraulic retention times. In Table 3 the volumetric characteristics of FBR system are reported. The reactor is a steel column (in =0.6 m, height 3 m) filled with 700 kg of virgin silica sand (0.21-0.35 mm, m=0.265 mm) to obtain a compress bed 1.5 m height. At the bottom of the column a steel cylinder (in =0.6 m, height 1.0 m), filled with gravel with decreasing size distribution, work as a filter, avoiding sand return to the pump, and allowing an homogeneous distribution of the stream to the reactor. At the top of the column an expansion tank is provided in order to prevent the loss of sand from the reactor. Table 3. Volumetric characteristics of FBR. Apparatus Characteristics and material Volume, geometry and flowrate Pre-treatment Mixer tank Volume 1.1 m3 Cylindrical (i 0.9 m) steel tank Decanter Volume 4.1 m3 , Max.flowrate 9 m3 h-1 Cylindrical (i 1.6 m) steel tank Feeding tank Concrete tank Variable volume up to 48 m3 Stripping section Inner diameter 1.0 m Hydraulic head 1.7, volume 1.33 m3 Stripper (V1) Height 3.0 m Hydraulic head 2.2, volume 1.73 m3 Steel column Hydraulic head 2.7, volume 2.12 m3 Inner diameter 0.5 m Hydraulic head 1.7, volume 0.33 m3 Deareation column Height 3.0 m Hydraulic head 2.2, volume 0.43 m3 (V2) Steel column Hydraulic head 2.7, volume 0.53 m3 FBR reactor FBR reactor Expanded bed height: 3.0 m i 0.6 m, Height 3 m; Steel column free volume 0.85 m3 Expansion tank Steel Volume 0.28 m3 Gravel filter i 0.6 m, Height 1.0 m; Steel column Volume 0.28 m3 Recycle pumps (1+1) P1 Type: Progressive cavity Flowrate 3.2-15 m3/h Power max. 3.0 kW Feeding pumps (1+1) P2 Type: Progressive cavity Flowrate 0.8-4.9 m3/h Power max. 1.5 kW Tair, T stripper, pH and ORP stripper Signal to PC Qair, Qfeeding, Qrecycle, Process parameters and design of SCP On the basis of average values given from the analysis of SCP influent and effluent, the following quantities can be calculated: Nucleation Efficiency (%) Phosphate Conversion (X%) (PO 4 totin PO 4 totout) η% 100 (1) PO 4 totin PO 4 solout PO 4 totin X % η% L% 100 (3) PO 4 totin Precipitation Efficiency (L %) Crystallization of PO4-MAP on total removed PO4 (PO 4 totout PO 4 solout) L% 100 (2) (Mg in Mg out ) mol PO 4 totin PO 4 MAP% 100 (4) (PO 4totin PO 4totout ) mol Crystallization of PO4-HAP on total removed PO4 PO 4 HAP % PO 4 totin PO 4 totout mol (Mg in Mg out ) mol (PO 4 totin PO 4 totout ) mol 100 (5) In the FBR plant four hydraulic retention times can be identified, referring to Figure 2 and Tab. 3 (eq. 6-9), where Qi is the feed flowrate, QRIC the recycle flowrate, V1 the stripping section volume, V2 the volume of the quiet zone, V3 the FBR free volume (including tube, expansion tank and filter volumes), VEXP the volume of the fluidised bed and the bed porosity. In the upward movement of the liquid inside the FBR, the number of passages (n) is defined as the ratio between the mean hydraulic retention time in the plant (HRTT) and the time spent in the FBR reactor, while the contact time (tc) on sand grains depends on the number of cycles and the time needed for one single passage (eq. 11); tc can be also defined as a function of bed porosity and if Qi and Vtot are constant. Where is a dimensionless constant used to express the column free volume (V3) as a function of expanded bed volume (Vexp). : HRT T (V1 V2 V3) Qi (6) HRT EXP (V1 V2) Qi (7) n HRT stripp HRT FBR V3 Q RIC (8) V EXP Q RIC ε (9) HRTT HRT FBR tc n HRT EXP (10) Vtot Qi (11) Bed porosity is defined as the vacuum volume of the expanded bed. Since FBR pilot plant operates at a fixed VEXP, the porosity decreases while the operating time of pilot increases, due to the growth of sand grains. To calculate the bed porosity, a weighted average sample of bed, bottom, top and medium, is collected after every run and porosity measured according to Battistoni et al.; 2001b. Efficiency is strongly related to the operative pH, both for experiments carried out on laboratory scale (Battistoni et al., 1998a) and for experiments on a half scale (Battistoni et al., 2001a-b) but, as already showed, a saturational model is not sufficiently adequate to describe the dependence of nucleation efficiency on process parameters, since a strong dependence of , not only on pH, but also contact time (tc), does exist. Therefore a double saturational model, taking into account both pH and tc, was devised (eq. 12, 44 runs on bench and half scale FBR pilot plant, Battistoni et al., 1998a + Battistoni et al., 2001a-b). The expression is the following: η % 100 pH 7.325 t c pH 7.325 0.371 t c 0.0196 (12) The values of R2 and of S.E. using this approach raise up to 0.99 and 4.9 respectively. As regards the precipitation efficiency, L, as defined in Eq. 3, it is given by the difference between X and . The precipitation process is obviously undesired, since it enhances particulate phosphorus escapes with fines and a complex plant is necessary, because a filtration step is needed, thus decreasing the value of . Using all experimental runs the following equation is obtained, that describes the behaviour of X as a function of pH, by using a saturational model: X % 100 pH 7.21 pH 7.21 0.38 (13) for which R2=0.99, S.E.=5.2 and n= 44 (Battistoni et al.; 2001b). The physical meaning of semi-saturational constant (0.38, Eq. 13) is given by the fact that at pH 7.59 (7.21+0.38), a 50% of conversion can be obtained, while a pH value of 8.73 is needed for a conversion of 80%. Furthermore, the conversion and the nucleation must be considered as concomitant phenomena, thus the phosphorus removal cannot be optimized considering only the nucleation process on the basis of double saturational model (Eq. 12); in fact if the conversion is sensibly higher than the nucleation efficiency, a meaningful loss of fines is observed. This aspect is highlighted in Fig. 3, where the dependence of X on pH is shown as a continuous line. Moreover the same figure illustrates the dependence of on pH for different contact times; it can be observed that to obtain a loss of fines less than 5%, the nucleation must be performed with a contact time higher than 0.4 h and a pH higher than 8.0 (Battistoni et al.;2001b). This information underlines the fact that greatly different results are obtained using only Eq. 12. As a matter of fact, taking into account only the mathematical model for nucleation efficiency, a contact time equal to 0.1 h is necessary (not considering the effect of pH), to gain a nucleation efficiency of 80%. 100 8,30 90 140 8,20 80 120 8,10 70 8,00 40 X tc=1.0 30 pH Test1 pH Test2 7,70 20 10 PO4-P Test3 PO4_P Test2 7,50 tc=0.1 7,40 tc=0.05 7,30 60 PO4-P Test1 7,60 tc=0.8 tc=0.4 80 pH Test3 7,80 40 20 7,20 8.0 9.0 pH Figure 3. The dependence of % on pH for different tc. PO4-P (mg l-1) 50 0 7.0 100 7,90 pH 60 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (d) Fig. 4 Natural ageing tests Preliminary results in SCP plant The chemical-physical characteristics of anaerobic supernatant of Treviso plant were periodically performed in stocking tank of SCP plant (see Fig.2). The supernatant is used without the mixing of the belt washing waters. They reveal (Tab.4) that not enough phosphorus was present mainly because the anaerobic digester is now managed at environmental temperature for technical problems. It is confirmed by the contents of ammonia (averagely 118 mgN/l), alkalinity (1028 mg CaCO3/l) lower than those normally found. However, Mg and Ca ions concentration is enough to guarantee the stoichiometric demand to precipitate up to 110 mg l-1 of PO4-P as MAP (magnesium ammonium phosphate) or HAP (hydroxyapatite). Waiting to manage the digester in mesophilic conditions for obtaining medium high phosphate concentration, the supernatant was used as matrix enriched using (NH4)2 HPO4 to increase the phosphate content and simulate the real contents of a thickener supernatant with the aim to investigate the SCP optimum positioning. In fact in the future plan managing the use of AF-OFMSW section will generate a residual solids stream to add to waste activated sludge to thick. This scenario surely will provide fermentation and P release during thickening and the need to treat, in SCP plant, this supernatant together that from belt pressing. Table 4. Chemical-physical characteristics of anaerobic supernatant, statistical parameters pH CODs TSS Alkalinity Ptot PO4-P NH3-N K Mg mg/l mg/l F mg/l M mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l Average 7.5 123 66 0 1028 11.3 8.5 118 28 40 Min 7.4 48 60 0 960 9.2 6.6 105 26 37 Max 7.8 224 76 0 1090 16.6 10.3 136 30 42 s.d. 0.2 79 8 0 43 3 1 16 2 2 Ca mg/l 129 120 137 6.3 Natural ageing of the supernatant at different phosphate contents was investigated (Fig.4). As previously reported (Battistoni et al.; 1998b) the test is able to provide the behaviour of the supernatant during its slow air equilibrium; the results show that a consistent P precipitation happens only in four six days, contemporary to a pH increase. The slope of phosphate curve is function of initial P concentration and a P pH conversion up to 83% was obtained. On the basis of P, Mg and Ca molar losses it is possible to suggest the formation of MAP and HAP both. Preliminary Tests to evaluate the effect of hydraulic head on 8,80 stripper-deareation system at H3, Qair 40 m3 h-1) different air flowrates and 8,60 H2 Qair 40 m3 h-1 constant feeding flowrate (Qi H3 Qair 10 m3 h= 1 m3 h-1) were performed 8,40 1 (Fig. 5). The methodology adopted was firstly to use only 8,20 H2, Qair 10 m3 h-1 FBR ON the stripping section fed 8,00 continuously, than to start also STRIPPER ON the FBR reactor. In this way 7,80 the hydraulic time changes from HRT strip (eq. 7) to 7,60 HRTt (eq. 6). Results show as 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 to obtain an operative pH Time (min) 8.3 a higher head level (h3) must be used at a minimum air Fig. 5 pH increment in different operative conditions of FBR flowrate (10 m3 h-1) or lower head one ( h1 or h2) at higher air flowrate (40 m3 h-1). Tab. 5 Preliminary performances results Ptot PO4-P NH3-N Ca Mg K HCO3 CO3 Operative Qr parametersQin Qair T pH h (head) HRTt effluent Ptot PO4-P Ca Mg K AlkM AlkF Removal PO4-P Ca Mg Influent X n L tc -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l 3 -1 m h 3 -1 m h 3 -1 m h °C m h -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mg l -1 mmol l -1 mmol l -1 mmol l 1 23,8 23,1 132 137 41 29 1035 0,0 4 1 40 9,7 8,7 2,7 4,1 8,5 5,8 93,8 31,5 30,7 585 60 0,6 1,1 0,4 Test 2 24,7 21,0 100 133 42 31 1130 0,0 4 1 20 8,1 8,4 2,2 0,0 11,1 10,3 93,1 32,5 29,8 800 3 28,6 23,3 105 131 42 29 1048 0,0 4 1 20 8,5 8,1 1,7 0,0 12,9 10,8 93,8 32,5 30,7 940 0,5 1,0 0,4 0,6 0,9 0,4 Performances of experimental results Test1 Test2 Test3 % 75,7 58,4 62,1 % 64,3 55,0 54,8 % 11,4 3,4 7,2 h 1,6 0,0 0,0 The supernatant shows 8.7 as maximum pH, lower than that in the stripping of a classical anaerobic supernatant but, in this case, explained with the low alkalinity content ( quite 1000 mg l1 ) . Three tests were performed with the strategy to observe the behaviour of SCP plant using a low P content (25 mg l-1) and different operative conditions (Tab. 5). The pH in the FBR plant ranges from 8.1 to 8.7 according to Qair and hydraulic head employed, respectively from 20 to 40 m3 h-1 and from 1.7 to 2.2m. It determines a maximum P conversion of 76% and good P removal on grains (% from 55 to 64 %, see Tab. 5) also if it must be improved. The type of salt precipitated can be calculated, assuming that magnesium can only precipitate as MAP, while calcium ions saturate firstly the phosphate removal, then the calcite formation. In this way the main formation of MAP is provided (67-80% mol) but a consistent amount of calcite is also precipitated. The comparison with previous results (Battistoni et al.;2001b) suggests to conclude that the calcite formation is always coupled with a consistent loss of fines; furthermore, the calcite formation is characteristic in supernatant at low phosphate concentration independently by the alkalinity concentration (1000-2500 mg l-1). CONCLUSIONS The struvite crystallization process is investigated in a full scale plant in Treviso (Italy). The plat was designed according to a process modelling previously tested indicating the air stripping of carbon dioxide as the only way to obtain the operative pH ( pH 8.3-8.7) to precipitate or crystallize struvite or hydroxyapatite, according to anaerobic supernatant composition, without any addition of chemicals. The preliminary results obtained can be resumed as follows: Air stripping is a feasible way for the process also in supernatant at low alkalinity, like those produced in the gravitational thickening where fermentation can take place; A maximum hydraulic head allows energy saving for a lower air flowrate; Calcite is coupled with MAP and HAP formation at low phosphate concentration; A loss of fines higher of 5% is obtained if calcite is formed. REFERENCES Battistoni P., Pavan P., Cecchi F., Mata-Alvarez J. (1998a). Phosphate removal in real anaerobic supernatants: modelling and performances of a fluidised bed reactor. Wat. Sci. Tech., 37(1), 275-283. Battistoni P., Pavan P., Cecchi F., and Mata-Alvarez J., (1998b). Effect of composition of anaerobic supernatants from an anaerobic, anoxic and oxic (A2O) process on struvite and hydroxyapatite formation. Annali di Chimica, 88, 761-772. Battistoni P., Pavan P., Prisciandaro, M., and Cecchi F., (2000). Struvite crystallization: a feasible and reliable way to fix phosphorus in anaerobic supernatants. Wat. Res., 34, 3033-3041. Battistoni P., Pavan P., Prisciandaro, M., and Cecchi F., (2001a). Phosphorus removal from a real anaerobic supernatant by struvite crystallization. In press on Wat. Res. Battistoni P., De Angelis A., Prisciandaro M., Boccadoro R. and Bolzonella D., 2001b, P removal from anaerobic supernatants by struvite crystallization: long term validation and process modelling. Submitted for publication. Cecchi F., Battistoni P., Pavan P., Fava G., Mata-Alvarez J. (1994). Anaerobic digestion of OFMSW and BNR processes: a possible integration. Preliminary results. Wat. Sci. Tech., 30(8), 65-72. Kristensen G.H., Jørgensen P.E., Strube R., Henze M. (1992b). Combined pre-precipitation, biological sludge hydrolysis and nitrogen reduction – A pilot demonstration of integrated nutrient removal. Wat. Sci. Tech., 26(5-6), 1057-1066. Isaacs S.H., Henze M. (1995). Controlled carbon source addition to an alternating nitrificationdenitrification wastewater treatment process including biological P-removal. Wat. Res., 29(1), 77-89. Lötter L.H., Pitman A.R. (1992). Improved biological phosphorus removal resulting from the enrichment of reactor feed with fermentation products. Wat. Sci. Tech., 26(5-6), 943-953. Pavan P., Battistoni P., Traverso P., Musacco A., Cecchi F. (1998). Effect of addition of anaerobic fermented OFMSW on BNR process: preliminary results. Wat. Sci. Tech., 38(1), 327-334. Pavan P., Battistoni P., Bolzonella D., Innocenti L., Traverso P. and Cecchi F., (2000). Integration of wastewater and OFMSW treatment cycles: from pilot scale to industrial realization. The new full scale plant of Treviso (Italy). Wat. Sci. Techn., 41 (12), pp 165-173