7 June 2004 Original: English SAICM PrepCom2 Thought Starter on Vision, Goal and Objectives PREPARED BY THE IFCS FORUM STANDING COMMITTEE The IFCS Bahia Declaration and Priorities for Action Beyond 2000 have been endorsed as the foundation for the further development of a strategic approach to international chemicals management (SAICM), and IFCS and others have been explicitly requested to closely cooperate in the development of SAICM. IFCS provided input to PrepCom 1 in the form of a broad Thought Starter. The present Thought Starter is the IFCS Standing Committee input for PrepCom 2. It addresses two of the ten subject headings suggested by the President of the PrepCom as an aid in the Committee’s deliberations. This Thought Starter is an attempt to facilitate the SAICM PrepCom2 discussions by raising some possible options for potential approaches in considering the political strategic vision, goals and objectives and providing examples to illustrate these options. T h i s d o c u m e nt d o es n o t a t t e m p t t o p ri o r i t i z e o r c h o o s e a n o u t c o m e . -1- 7 June 2004 Original: English Political strategic vision SAICM has a time horizon of 2020, as set out in the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development Plan of Implementation. A political strategic vision for SAICM could be drafted in several different ways. It could be short and inspirational, and have a character distinct from that of the Johannesburg target for 2020 while being consistent with it. It could describe chemical safety in 2020, for example as follows: it could set out the impacts of chemicals in 2020, that is, the level or absence of impacts on human health and the environment; it could identify an intended state or condition of the environment, such as levels of chemicals found in the environment (e.g. that synthetic chemicals in particular hazard classes are not found in the wider environment and that naturally occurring chemicals such as metals are at or near background); it could describe how chemicals are managed, that is, the completeness or effectiveness of their management (e.g. concerning chemical safety institutions and practices, legislation, monitoring, information, coordination and collaboration, industry commitments, and use conditions and practices); it could set out the balance achieved in chemicals management (e.g. that decisions involving chemical safety are made with a good balance between risks and benefits). Example 1 By the year 2020, we envisage a world in which chemicals are produced and managed so that: the health of even the most vulnerable does not suffer significant adverse impacts; and there is no loss of ecosystems, biological communities or species as a result of chemical exposures. Example 2 By the year 2020, we live in a world where food, water, air and biota rarely contain chemical pollutants that might harm human health or the environment farmers, workers and communities are rarely harmed by exposure to chemicals that are used or produced in farms, factories and other facilities Example 3 Even shorter statements, such as Chemical safety for all, all for chemical safety by 2020 Chemical safety for all by 2020 A chemically safe world by 2020 A world with minimised chemical risks by 2020 -2- 7 June 2004 Original: English Other questions that might also influence how the political strategic vision should be worded include: How ambitious should the Vision be? Should it be ambitious to drive all players to achieve the best possible outcome? Should it be realistic to ensure that expectations are not unduly raised? (One option is to be more ambitious in some parts of the Vision, Goal and Objectives, and less in others, so as to achieve balance, e.g. an ambitious or idealistic Vision and a more pragmatic Goal.) How does the 2020 target set by the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation fit in with the Vision (and the Goals and Objectives)? Is it important or useful to envisage the role that chemicals will play in society, e.g. should the Vision recall the perspective that chemicals contribute to society but in some cases pose risks that must be managed? The political strategic vision could also be drafted as a broad picture of what we think the world would be like if chemicals were well managed. -3- 7 June 2004 Original: English Goal and objectives PrepCom 1 agreed “that the goal stated in the chapeau of paragraph 23 of the Johannesburg Summit Plan of Implementation, that by 2020 chemicals are used and produced in ways that lead to the minimization of significant adverse effects on human health and the environment, should be considered as the over-arching goal of SAICM. It was pointed out that the chapeau of paragraph 23 addressed two other notable aspects: advancement of the sound management of chemicals for sustainable development and enhancement of the capacity of developing countries.”( SAICM PrepCom 1 Final Report para 53. For reference the full Johannesburg wording is included as Annex 1.) Several suggestions were made at PrepCom 1 regarding objectives for the SAICM. These varied in level of generality and approach, and together they fall short of a complete ‘set’ addressing the usual aspects of chemical safety. The debate on goals and objectives at PrepCom 2 and any subsequent meetings will flesh out the ‘set’, but it may be helpful to the meeting to group them under a small number of headings to help organise delegates’ thinking. An obvious starting point would be to use the six Programme Areas from Chapter 19 of Agenda 21 (Risk assessment, Harmonisation of classification and labelling, Information exchange, Risk reduction, Capacity building, and Illegal traffic). A disadvantage of this approach is that some of the Programme Areas devised in 1992 do not have the same time horizon as others, and not all will be equally relevant in 2020. One alternative would be to group the Programme Areas more broadly under four headings: Knowledge and Information (embracing both the generation of information and its flow among interested parties) Risk management (reduction) (covering all action to reduce risks, such as regulatory action, constraints on use, protection of occupational health and safety, bans and phase-outs) Governance (including decision-making systems and processes, compliance and enforcement, cooperation and coordination, public participation, efficiency of decision-making). Capability or Capacity Building (including points relating to the skills, infrastructure and financial resources needed to deliver the goal). -4- 7 June 2004 Original: English Example of a method for constructing objectives Following the above suggested model (grouping objectives under four headings and setting them in general terms) objectives might be set out along the lines below (the suggestions are illustrative rather than exhaustive). Knowledge and information Objectives about availability of information for decision-making flow of information among countries and the community, considering issues such a balance between the public right to know and the need to protect confidential business information availability of knowledge and information to directly improve chemical safety, e.g. for the development of less hazardous substitutes for hazardous chemicals; and to classify and label chemicals Risk management (reduction) Objectives about eliminating or reducing human health risks associated with particular classes of chemicals (e.g. carcinogenic, mutagenic and reproductive toxic chemicals) protecting vulnerable groups, e.g. children, the elderly, workers reducing or eliminating risks to the wider environment from particular classes of chemicals (e.g. pesticide risks to non-target organisms) avoiding risks associated with particular activities, e.g. chemical accidents Governance Objectives about: universality and completeness of regulatory and enforcement systems use of science-based decision-making, including management of uncertainty public involvement and participation in decision-making levels of compliance with national and international law, including relating to transboundary movements of chemicals efficiency and cost-effectiveness of regulatory systems, including harmonisation of data gathering and risk assessment, management and communication integration of chemical safety considerations into other aspects of policy cooperation and coordination among bodies responsible for chemical safety mechanisms for monitoring and measuring progress Capability or Capacity Building Objectives about levels and distribution of skills and skilled people availability of physical infrastructure such as laboratories and equipment the provision of technical and financial assistance and technology transfer to developing countries and countries with economies in transition -5- 7 June 2004 Original: English Some concrete illustrations to potential objectives are given in Annex 2. There are other questions that also need to be resolved, including: At what level of generality should the objectives be pitched? How and at what level should indicators of progress be included? Many delegations raised issues at SAICM PrepCom1 about the need for measurable indicators, or for concrete targets and timeframes, and subsequent PrepComs will need to decide whether and how to take up these calls. While these issues are therefore a matter for debate by delegates, one option would be to set the objectives generally and leave the identification of measures of progress to the concrete actions. The concrete actions that will make up most of the SAICM would according to this model be framed more specifically and in a way that allows measurement of progress, so that the actions can be updated as circumstances change or new challenges arise, while the objectives remain relevant over the longer term. -6- 7 June 2004 Original: English Annex 1. WORLD SUMMITT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF IMPLEMENTATION III. Changing unsustainable patterns of consumption and production ******* 23. Renew the commitment, as advanced in Agenda 21, to sound management of chemicals throughout their life cycle and of hazardous wastes for sustainable development as well as for the protection of human health and the environment, inter alia, aiming to achieve, by 2020, that chemicals are used and produced in ways that lead to the minimization of significant adverse effects on human health and the environment, using transparent science-based risk assessment procedures and science-based risk management procedures, taking into account the precautionary approach, as set out in principle 15 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and support developing countries in strengthening their capacity for the sound management of chemicals and hazardous wastes by providing technical and financial assistance. This would include actions at all levels to: (a) Promote the ratification and implementation of relevant international instruments on chemicals and hazardous waste, including the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent Procedures for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade10 so that it can enter into force by 2003 and the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants11 so that it can enter into force by 2004, and encourage and improve coordination as well as supporting developing countries in their implementation; (b) Further develop a strategic approach to international chemicals management based on the Bahia Declaration and Priorities for Action beyond 2000 of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety12 by 2005, and urge that the United Nations Environment Programme, the Intergovernmental Forum, other international organizations dealing with chemical management and other relevant international organizations and actors closely cooperate in this regard, as appropriate; (c) Encourage countries to implement the new globally harmonized system for the classification and labelling of chemicals as soon as possible with a view to having the system fully operational by 2008; (d) Encourage partnerships to promote activities aimed at enhancing environmentally sound management of chemicals and hazardous wastes, implementing multilateral environmental agreements, raising awareness of issues relating to chemicals and hazardous waste and encouraging the collection and use of additional scientific data; (e) Promote efforts to prevent international illegal trafficking of hazardous chemicals and hazardous wastes and to prevent damage resulting from the transboundary movement and disposal of hazardous wastes in a manner consistent with obligations -7- 7 June 2004 Original: English under relevant international instruments, such as the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal;13 (f) Encourage development of coherent and integrated information on chemicals, such as through national pollutant release and transfer registers; (g) Promote reduction of the risks posed by heavy metals that are harmful to human health and the environment, including through a review of relevant studies, such as the United Nations Environment Programme global assessment of mercury and its compounds. VIII. Sustainable development for Africa 68. Achieve sound management of chemicals, with particular focus on hazardous chemicals and wastes, inter alia, through initiatives to assist African countries in elaborating national chemical profiles and regional and national frameworks and strategies for chemical management and establishing chemical focal points. 13 United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 1673, No. 28911 -8- 7 June 2004 Original: English Annex 2. Examples of potential objectives Information and Knowledge Knowledge and information are not a constraint on chemical safety information is available on all chemicals on the market and there is a free flow of safety-related information about chemicals among countries and the public research and monitoring delivers information to enable chemicals to be managed with confidence and innovation to replace risky applications with less risky ones educational methods are developed for all academic levels in chemical safety) Risk management (reduction) No chemicals presenting risks that cannot be confidently managed remain on the market; All other risks are managed so that any exposures do not result in significant adverse impacts, including from pesticide use (no poisonings; minimal impacts on non-target organisms) occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals exposures of vulnerable populations, eg children, the elderly chemical accidents Governance Sound, effective, efficient chemical safety institutions, infrastructure and practices all countries have well developed regulatory systems using science-based decision-making including management of uncertainties chemical safety considerations are routinely, cooperatively, and consistently applied in all relevant organisations, in all relevant sectors, and at all levels of government including for multilateral environmental agreements all sections of the community can access information about chemicals and participate in decisions about chemicals national and international laws on chemicals are enforced and there is a very high level of compliance with them, and with informal rules such as codes of conduct indicators have been developed and applied to provide robust measures of progress on chemical safety chemical safety is delivered cost-effectively to the community through burden sharing and cooperation risks and benefits are balanced Capability or Capacity Building Bridge the widening gap between countries' capacities for sound chemicals management Develop sustainable capacity building strategies for sound chemicals management in developing countries and countries with economies in transition -9-