ASSESSMENT DECISION NOTICE NO BREACH OF THE CODE Reference: CCN044/12 Complainant: Mr Tony Child Subject Member: Councillor Ian Newby Person conducting the Assessment: Simon Mansell – Principal Legal Officer, Corporate Governance Date of Assessment: 18 January 2013 Complaint On 18 January 2013 the Monitoring Officer considered a complaint from Mr Tony Child concerning the alleged conduct of Councillor Ian Newby of St Agnes Parish Council. A general summary of the complaint is set out below: It is alleged Councillor Newby, by asking the Complainant in a letter dated 8 November 2012 which was addressed to all Councillors, how the Complainant had access to information coming into his personal PC. The alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct relate to: failure to treat others with respect bullying bringing their office into disrepute Decision I find that there is no breach of the Code of Conduct in relation to all elements of the allegation, as follows: failure to treat others with respect bullying bringing their office into disrepute Reasons for the Decision The complainant has provided sufficient information and the circumstances are such as to enable this complaint to be assessed and determined without seeking out further information or referring the complaint for investigation and the undertaking of interviews. Councillor Newby made this statement in a letter dated 8 November 2012 sent in response to a statement made by the Complainant, in a letter to Councillor Newby dated 5 November 2012, which stated, ‘If it were not for the emails that you have received (which mention the secret meeting) how long would this purchase have been kept secret?’ Councillor Newby responded in his letter dated 8 November 2012, ‘You make reference to a number of “emails” I have received “(which mention a secret meeting)”. Could you please let me know how you have access to such information coming into my personal PC’. The inferences which can be drawn from the statement made by Mr Child in his letter dated 5 November 2012 is that he was aware, in some way, of emails that Councillor Newby would have received on his personal PC. (It is noted that Councillor Newby uses his home email address for correspondence) Councillor Newby in his response then makes the enquiry as to how Mr Child could have access to information coming into his personal PC. At no time in his communications has Councillor Newby accused Mr Child of ‘hacking’ his personal PC he has simply enquired how he [Mr Child] could be aware of such information. While it is considered that the response to Mr Child’s accusation could have been phrased differently given the statement made by Mr Child, and in taking an objective view of this matter, the question asked by Councillor Newby is considered to be reasonable in the circumstances. As the response by Councillor Newby is, when viewed objectively, considered to be reasonable, I do not consider that the actions of Councillor Newby in dealing with this matter amount to a breach of the Code of Conduct. In reaching this decision I have had regard to the views of the Independent Person who also considers that the actions of Councillor Newby do not amount to a breach of the Code of Conduct. What happens now? This decision notice is sent to the complainant, the member against whom the allegation has been made and the Clerk to St Agnes Parish Council. Right of review At the written request of the complainant, the Monitoring Officer can review and is able to change a decision not to refer an allegation for investigation or other action. To ensure impartiality in the conduct of the review different officers to those involved in the original decision will undertake the review. We must receive a written request from the complainant to review this decision within 28 days from the date of this notice, explaining in detail on what grounds the decision should be reviewed. If we receive a request for a review, we will write to all the parties mentioned above, notifying them of the request to review the decision. Additional help If you need additional support in relation to this or future contact with us, please let us know as soon as possible. If you have difficulty reading this notice we can make reasonable adjustments to assist you, in line with the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act 2000. We can also help if English is not your first language. SJR Mansell MBE Principal Legal Officer On behalf of the Monitoring Officer Date: 23 January 2013