Joint Distribution of X and S2, Normal Distribution*
Proposition: Let X1, X2, …, Xn be a mutually independent r.v.’s having, respectively, normal
distributions with mean i and variance i2 for i = 1, 2, …, n. Let k1, k2, …, kn be real constants.
n
Then the r.v. Y k i X i has a normal distribution with mean
i 1
n
k i i and variance
i 1
n
k
i 1
2
i
i2 .
Proof: Since X1, X2, …, Xn are mutually independent, then the m.g.f. of Y is
n
1
t ki X i
n
i t i2t 2
tki X i
tki X i
tY
i 1
. But we also have X i t E e
Y t E e E e
E e
e 2 . Hence,
i 1
n
n
n
1
Y t exp k i i t k i2 i2 t 2 , the m.g.f. for a normal distribution with mean k i i and
2 i 1
i 1
i 1
n
variance
k
i 1
2
i
i2 . For k i
1
.
, for i = 1, 2, …, n, we find that X ~ Normal ,
n
n
#
Proposition: Let X1, X2, …, Xn be a random sample from a normal distribution with mean
X
n
and variance 2. Then
n 1S
2
2
i 1
X
2
i
2
has a 2(n-1) distribution. Also, X and S2. are
independent random variables.
Proof: Let X1, X2, …, Xn be i.i.d. Normal(, ) r.v.’s, and let Y1 X , Y2 X 2 , …, Yn X n .
The corresponding inverse transformation
x1 ny1 y 2 ... y n , x2 y2 , …, xn y n has Jacobian n. Since
n
n
i 1
i 1
2
2
2
xi xi x nx , the joint p.d.f. of X1, X2, …, Xn can be written as
n
xi x 2
2
1
n x
. Using the transformation,
f X1 , X 2 ,..., X n x1 , x2 , ..., xn
exp i 1
2
2
2 2
2
we find that the joint p.d.f. of Y1, Y2, …, Yn is
n
yi y 2
n
2
2
ny y 2 ... y n y1 i 2
n y1
1
f Y1 ,Y2 ,..., Yn y1 , y 2 , ..., y n n
exp 1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
n
.
The quotient of this joint p.d.f. and the p.d.f. f Y1 X y1
the conditional p.d.f. of Y2, Y3, …, Yn, given Y1 = y1,
n y1 2
exp
of Y1 X is
2 2
2
n
1
f Y2 ,...,Yn |Y1 y1 y 2 , ..., y n n
2
n 1
q2
exp 2 , where
2
n
q ny1 y 2 ... y n y1 y i y1 . Since this is a joint conditional p.d.f., it must be,
2
2
i 2
for all > 0, that
1
n 2
n 1
q2
exp
dy 2 dy 3 ...dy n 1 .
2
2
Now consider
n 1S 2 X i X 2 nY1 Y2 ... Yn Y1 2 Yi Y1 2 Q .
n
n
i 1
n 1S
The conditional m.g.f. of
Ee
tQ / 2
2
1
n
2
| y1
n 1
2
i 2
2
n 1
Q
2
, given Y1 = y1, is
1 2t q
exp
dy 2 dy3 ...dy n
2 2
n 1
1
1 2t 2
1 2t q
exp
dy 2 dy3 ...dy n , where 0 < 1 – 2t, or t < 0.5.
n
2
2 2
1 2t 2
However, this latter integral is exactly the same as that of the conditional p.d.f. of Y2, Y3, …, Yn,
given Y1 = y1, with replaced by
2
m.g.f. of
( n 1) S 2
2
Q
2
2
1 2t
0 , and thus must equal 1. Hence the conditional
, given Y1 = y1, is E e
conditional distribution of
n 1S 2 , given
2
tnS 2 / 2
1
|x
1 2t
n 1
2
, t < 0.5. That is, the
X x , is 2 n 1 . Moreover, since it is clear that
this conditional distribution does not depend on x , the random variables X and
n 1S 2
2
be independent, or equivalently, X and S 2 are independent.
* This proof is from Hogg, R. V. and Craig, A. T. (1978). Introduction to Mathematical
Statistics, Fourth Edition, New York, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
#
must