Evaluation of DNA Whole Genome Amplification Technologies for Genotyping Genomic Variation Research Group (GVRG) WGA Kits Tested GE Healthcare illustraTM GenomiPhiTM V2 DNA Amplification Kit NuGen® Ovation® WGA System NuGEN® Ovation® WGA FFPE System Qiagen® REPLI-g® Mini Sigma-Aldrich® GenomePlex® Complete Whole Genome Amplification Kit (WGA2) Sigma-Aldrich® GenomePlex® Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit (WGA4) GE Healthcare illustra GenomiPhi & Qiagen REPLI-g NuGEN Ovation WGA System *The Ovation WGA FFPE System differs slightly. The first step is an enzymatic fragmentation of the dsDNA, followed by end-repair and a-tailing. Adaptors containing target hybridization sequences are then ligated to the end-repaired, A-tailed dsDNA to create SPIA templates. Sigma-Aldrich GenomePlex Technology Samples Tested CEPH/Utah Pedigree 1463 Trio from HapMap Project FFPE Derived Sample NA12891 (Father) NA12892 (Mother) NA12878 (Daughter) Newly extracted Extracted 2 years ago Fragmented Sample NA12891 (average fragment length: 477 bp) Kit Information Kit Req. Input Input Types Exp. Yield Exp. Product Length (in Kb) Process Time Hands on Time GenomiPhi 10 ng Purified gDNA, whole blood, mouth wash, buccal, dried blood cards 4-7 ug Average: 10 Range: 2-100 2 hours 20 min Ovation 10 ng Purified gDNA 3-6 ug Average: 0.2 Range: 0.05-1.5 ? ? Sigma Complete (WGA2) 10 ng Purified gDNA 10 ug Average: 0.4 Range: 0.1-1 3.5 hours 1 hour REPLI-g 10 ng Purified gDNA, whole blood, mouth wash, buccal, dried blood cards 10 ug Average: 10 Range: 2-100 17 hours 40 min Sigma Single Cell (WGA4) 1 cell or < 100 pg Single cell or Purified gDNA Millionfold Average: 0.4 Range: 0.1-1 3.5 hours 1 hour 100 ng Purified gDNA 3.5-5 ug Average: 0.2 Range: 0.05-1.5 8.5 hours 4 hours Ovation FFPE Quality Analysis of wgaDNA Product Yield Quantitation via PicoGreen assay and NanoDrop UV-Vis Fragment Agilent BioAnalyzer DNA 12000 Chip Allelic Size Representation Applied Biosystems Identifiler Assay Product Yield Size of Product Quality of Allelic Representation Genotyping Platforms Assessed TaqMan SNP Assays 18 assays duplicated with Infinium TaqMan Copy Number Assays Infinium Human Omni1Quad TaqMan Call Rates by Sample TaqMan Call Rates by Kit TaqMan Concordance Copy Number Call Rate By Sample Copy Number Call Rate By Kit Copy Number Call Rate By Assay and Kit Copy Number Concordance Infinium Call Rates Across All Kits Infinium Call Rates Genomic Control Infinium Call Rates GenomiPhi V2 Infinium Call Rates Ovation Infinium Call Rates Ovation FFPE Infinium Call Rates Repli-G Infinium Call Rates WGA2 Infinium Call Rates WGA4 Infinium Concordance Every sample with a completion rate above 90% had concordance rate greater than 99.8% with genomic results Mendelian Check 100% Concordant 18 Duplicated Assays Between TaqMan and Infinium: A Closer Look Infinium Call Rates Across Duplicated Assays By Sample Infinium Call Rates Across Duplicated Assays By Kit Infinium Call Rates Across Duplicated Assays Infinium Concordance Comparing TaqMan Results To Infinium Results Across Duplicated Assays TaqMan to Infinium Comparison Across 18 Duplicated Assays Breakdown of Differences Between TaqMan and Infinium Results Breakdown of Differences Between TaqMan and Infinium Results Breakdown of Differences Between TaqMan and Infinium Results Breakdown of Differences Between TaqMan and Infinium Results Breakdown of Differences Between TaqMan and Infinium Results Final Thoughts… What else could have been done… aCGH Platform for CNVs NGS Platforms Acknowledgements Corporate Sponsors Additional Thanks GE Healthcare Life Sciences NuGen Technologies Qiagen Sigma-Aldrich All generously donated the WGA kits for this study. Alex McCary from SAIC-Frederick Supriya Singh from Eurofins Bruce Kingham for supplying the FFPE samples used in this study. Current GVRG Members Amy Hutchinson Casey Dagnall Charles Nicolet Helaman Escobar Sean Blake Brian Sanderson Bruce Kingham Karen Jonscher Looking to join? We’re always looking for new members… Questions?