Investigating a Role for DNA Mismatch Repair in Signaling a PAH

advertisement

Investigating a Role for DNA

Mismatch Repair in Signaling a

PAH-Induced DNA Replication

Arrest

Jacki L. Coburn

Mentor: Dr. Andrew B. Buermeyer

Cancer affects us all

Lifetime risk for men: 1 in 2 Lifetime risk for women: 1 in 3

Excess risk factors:

Mismatch repair deficiency (Lynch Syndrome)

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure

Mismatch Repair

• Highly conserved pathway primarily focused on the repair of replication errors

• Conserved MMR specific constituent proteins include Mut Sα (MSH2-MSH6) and Mut Lα

(MLH1-PMS2)

• MMR deficiency has significant impacts on human health (Lynch Syndrome)

PAHs – they’re everywhere

Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)

Best known and most studied of PAHs

Volatilized during combustion of organic compounds

Detected in air, water, food and soil

Highly mutagenic and carcinogenic

B[a]P is converted to a diol epoxide (BPDE) through enzymatic action

Benzo[a]pyrene

CYP1A1

Epoxide

Hydrolase

(+)-benzo[a]pyrene-7,8dihyrodiol-9,10- epoxide

BPDE bonds to DNA and forms a bulky adduct

BPDE Lesion on DNA

Image courtesy of Zephyris

B[a]P-Adducted Guanine

Image courtesy of Peter Hoffman

Consequences of BaP-Derived Adducts

A

T

C

Pol δ

C

NH

G

T

A

Pol κ

S-Phase Checkpoint Signaling

DNA Adducts

Stalled

Replication

Forks

AT

R

AT

R

P

Chk

1

Chk

1

P

Apoptosis

Inhibition of

Firing at Origins of Replication

DNA Repair

Hypothesis:

MMR participates in signaling S-phase checkpoint in response to BPDE exposure.

(MMR may participate in recruitment of ATR)

Alternate Hypothesis:

MMR helps turn off S-phase checkpoint.

(MMR may promote resolution of stalled replication forks)

Predictions

• MMR deficient cells will show less activation of S-phase checkpoint in response to BPDE exposure.

– MMR deficient cells will display lower levels of

PChk1.

– PChk1 can be measured using semi-quantitative immuno-blotting.

Model System: MMR deficient and proficient cell lines

HCT116 – 2 defective copies of MLH1 (Chr. 3)

WT MLH1 Chr. 3 + neomycin resistance gene

HCT116+3 – 2 defective copies of

MLH1 (Chromosome 3) + 1 copy of

WT MLH1 + neomycin resistance gene

DLD1 – 2 defective copies of MSH6 (Chr. 2)

WT MSH6 Chr. 2 + neomycin resistance gene

DLD1+2 – 2 defective copies of

MSH6 (Chromosome 2) + 1 copy of

WT MSH6 + neomycin resistance gene

MW

(kDa)

250

37

25

75

50

150

100

Cultured cells:

HCT 116

HCT116+3

DLD1

DLD1+2

Experimental procedure

BPDE (test)

DMSO (control)

Chemical treatment Whole cell lysates

MMR - Cell Lines MMR + Cell Lines

DMSO BPDE DMSO BPDE

Protein immunoblot to detect PChk1

Gel electrophoresis and transfer to PVDF membrane

Assessing S-phase checkpoint activation: anticipated results

MW

(kDa)

250

37

25

75

50

150

100

MMR - Cell Lines

DMSO BPDE

MMR + Cell Lines

DMSO BPDE

PChk1

Results

Immuno-blot probed with anti-PChk1 (S345) polyclonal antibody

MW (kDa) -/100/24

75

50

37

25

250

150

100

Possible PChk1 signal

GAPDH

MMR proficient and deficient cells show similar activation of Sphase checkpoint (dose dependent increase in PChk1 signal)

Surprisingly, MMR-deficient cells show prolonged accumulation of PChk1, suggesting prolonged activation of checkpoint signaling

Confirming the identity of the signal as

PChk1

Positive controls:

HeLa cells treated with UV radiation

HeLa cells treated with etoposide

Negative controls:

Chk1 knockdown cells

Immunodepleted cell lysates

Purified Chk1

Future Research

Investigate other markers of S-phase checkpoint activation and duration

Analyzing downstream effects of prolonged checkpoint activation

Acknowledgements

Dr. Kevin Ahern

Dr. Andrew B. Buermeyer

Frances Cripp Scholarship Fund

Peter Hoffman

Casey Kernan

Fatimah Almousawi

Kimberly Sarver

HHMI

URISC

Dr. Anthony C. Zable

Download