PowerPoint - The University of Texas of the Permian Basin

advertisement

The Ancestral Salt Flat Graben.

Alternative Paleozoic History of the

Sierra Diablo and Apache Mountains,

Trans Pecos, West Texas.

Robert C. Trentham

CEED/Univ. Texas of the Permian

Basin

“Thus, the present

Sierra Diablo appears to have been a positive through much of its history.”

P. B. King, 1942, p. 614

Acknowledgements

 University of Texas of the Permian Basin

 Bob Lindsay, Chevron – Consultant

 Bob Ward

 Al Smith

 Hughes Family – Apache Ranch

West Texas Physiographic Features

After King (1965)

Salt Flat Graben

After King (1965)

An Ancestral Salt Flat Graben

Can Explain:

 The location of the western boundary of the Tobosa Basin

 Wolfcampian and Leonardian shelf margins in the Sierra Diablo’s

 A lack of Siliciclastics in the upper

Guadalupian in the Apache Mountains

 The location of the Ochoan “Western

Marine Channel”

 The presence of a separate Apache

Platform

Issues

 The Salt Flat Graben is not solely a

Basin and Range Feature.

 The eastern boundary faults of the

Sierra Diablo, Beach, Carrizo and

Van Horn Mountains have had a complex history and were active periodically during the Paleozoic.

 The Ancestral Graben controlled regional deposition throughout the

Paleozoic.

Lack of Evidence

 The position of the Guadalupian

Shelf Margin between the

Guadalupe and Apache Mountains is unknown

 The exact location of the Ochoan age western channel connecting the Delaware Basin and the Marfa

Basin/Permian Ocean is unknown

Evidence

 Western margin of the Tobosa Basin is coincident with the eastern boundary fault of the Sierra Diablo Uplift.

 The eastern boundary fault of the Sierra Diablo Uplift was active during lower Hueco (l. Wolfcampian) as there is evidence of thick Powwow Conglomerate in the Basin

 The Wolfcampian in the Sierra Diablo Range appears to have been composed of a series of isolated platforms which shed debris in the Basin

 The location of the Leonardian shelf margins, at the north end of the Sierra Diablo Range, appears to have been controlled by the position of the Sierra Diablo Fault and

Babb Flexure

Evidence

 There is a lack of thick siliciclastics in the

Guadalupian section in the Apache

Mountains which needs to be explained.

 The presence of Super Mature sand in the upper Munn in the Apache Mountains indicates the presence of a local Ordovician source

 Fault trends in the Baylor Mountains are different than in the surrounding ranges

Lower Paleozoic of West Texas u. Mississippian l. Mississippian

Devonian u. Silurian l. Silurian u.Ordovician

m. Ordovician l. Ordovician

Cambro-Ord

Trans Pecos Delaware

Basin

Helms Fm.

Miss. Lime

Barnett Fm.

Miss Lime

Percha Shale

Siluro-Devonian

Woodford Shale

Thirtyone Fm.

Siluro-Devonian

Fusselman Fm.

Wristen Fm.

Fusselman Fm.

Montoya Fm.

Montoya Fm.

[ Simpson Group ] Simpson Group

El Paso Group Ellenburger Group

Bliss SS.

Wilberns SS.

Tobosa Basin

 Defined by the limits of

Simpson Group sediments

 125’ of Simpson Group sediments are present in the Baylor

Mountains.

 Simpson has been assumed to feather out between the Baylor and

Beach Mountains.

Galley (1956)

Tobosa Basin Margin

 The Simpson is missing in the Beach and Sierra

Diablo Mountains where

Montoya overlies El Paso

 There are facies changes in the Montoya from the

Beach to the Baylor

Mountains (King, 1965)

 Tobosa Basin margin could be controlled by the Sierra

Diablo Fault Zone.

BEG, 1983

Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy

Apache / Sierra Diablo Delaware Basin

Ochoan Castile u. Guadalupian m. Guadalupian

Tansill

Yates

Seven Rivers

Goat Seep u. Munn (Queen) l. Munn (Grayburg) l. Guadalupian San Andres

Salado/Castile

Lamar Lime

Bell Canyon

Cherry Canyon

Brushy Canyon u. Leonardian Cutoff Fm.

Victorio Peak Fm.

m. Leonardian Clear Fork l. Leonardian Abo u. Wolfcamp u. Wolfcamp

Hueco

Powwow

Cutoff Fm.

Victorio Peak Fm.

Bone Springs

Bone Springs

Hueco

Powwow

Powwow Conglomerate Thickness

OPERATOR

McBay

WELL POWWOW SUBCROP

#1 Strasser 2280 PCMB

Davis, Armour & West #1 Davis

Gulf #1 Grisham

570 to >2450

742

???

BARNETT

LaGloria

Humble*

#1 Stansberry 40

#1-B Reynolds 50

MONTOYA

SIMPSON

Gulf

Sunray*

#1-C Foster 160'

#1 J.B.Foster

210'

Continental #1 Foster

Canter, Hamm & O'Brien #1 Foster

230'

230'

Cosden

Outcrop

#1 Cockrell 280'

0 - 300'

WRISTEN

MONTOYA

MONTOYA

WOODFORD

PCMB

VARIOUS

In outcrop and subsurface, the Powwow Conglomerate (lower Hueco) is nowhere thicker than 300’

Powwow Conglomerate

 Except in the three wells which penetrate the

Hueco in the Graben:

McBay #1 Strasser

Davis, Armour & West

#1 Davis

Gulf #1 Grisham in these wells, there are from 742 to >2450’ of debris.

 Conclusion: The only three wells in the Graben indicate Permo-Penn movement on the Graben

Margin

Wolfcampian – Leonardian

Carbonate shelves

 Recent work by the BEG has concluded that the Sierra

Diablo's were a series of isolated platforms capped by carbonate banks shedding debris into an Ancestral Salt Flat

Graben during Wolfcampian. The Kriz Lens is now believed to be composed of a series of carbonate debris flows.

 Conclusion: The

Graben existed during the lower Permian

Wilde, 1995

Wolfcampian – Leonardian

Carbonate shelves

 The location of the Leonardian shelf margin, at the north end of the

Sierra Diablo Range, appears to have been controlled by the position of the Sierra Diablo Fault and Babb Flexure

Fitchen 2000

Sierra Diablo –

A Low Relief Highland

 There is evidence of a Sierra Diablo positive/Salt Flat Graben negative during middle and upper Ordovician, Wolfcampian and Leonardian

 During the Guadalupian where was the shelf margin? The only Guadalupian in the range is “back reef” Goat Seep north of the

Babb Flexure (King,1965). Was there ever any Guadalupian present in the Sierra

Diablo's?

 and Ochoan…

Guadalupian Siliciclastics

 The thick sections of

Grayburg and Queen siliciclastics, present in the

Guadalupe Mountains, are missing in the Apache

Mountains

 Sands are assumed to be brought into the basin thru channels in the Guadalupe

Mountains, the Salt flat area

 It appears that some was deflected into the basin north of the Babb Flexure – Brushy

Canyon channel directions

 “Back Reef” Goat Seep is present north of Babb Flexure

Beaubouef et. al. 1999

Simpson age sand grains in the lower Munn/Grayburg

(upper Guadalupian)

Ochoan Evaporites

 There was a western channel between the

Delaware Basin and the Marfa Basin /

Permian Ocean. However,

 The location of the channel is conjectural

Adams (1967) Hill

(1999)

Western Ochoan Channel

 If the Salt Flat graben system was active during Ochoan, the egress would most logically be to the south thru the Van Horn area with the Sierra Diablo –

Beach – Van Horn

Ranges as low relief highlands to the west and the Apache and

Wylie Mountains to the east

A Separate Apache Platform

 The lack of siliciclastics in Apache Mountains

 Periodic rejuvenation of the eastern boundary faults of the Sierra

Diablo – Beach – Van

Horn Mountains and subsequent graben development

 Ochoan outlet to Marfa

Basin

Summary

 Evidence of an Ancestral Salt Flat

Graben is found throughout the

Paleozoic in:

 Simpson and Montoya age Tobosa

Basin margin

 Powwow Conglomerate

 Wolfcamp and Leonard shelf margins

 Guadalupian siliciclastics

 Ochoan Channel

Thank You

Download