Katie Seymore Two different aquatic fungi Leaf breakdown and fungi Bacteria and fungi relationship The essential role of leaf conditioning Aquatic hyphomycetes and aero-aquatic fungi Form-class fungi Most Ascomycetes, fewer Basidiomycetes, one Oomycete Secondarily adapted to aquatic life Convergent evolution events Similar ecological roles Leaf breakdown First described by Ingold in the 1940’s Produce and release spores underwater Mostly in streams- moving, oxygenated water Conidia Described by Beverwijk 1950’s Amphibious Propagules trap air and float for dispersal Mostly in temporary waters, low oxygen Fall- conidia germinating Winter/spring- grow Summer- make propagules Trap air Hydrophobic encrustation Many different forms Important ecological role Release nutrients to aquatic ecosystems Increase leaf’s N content Lowers leaf mass Amount of lignin (polymer in cells walls) content controls how fast leaf decomposes available carbon Tannins amounts also big deal (phenol compounds) Overall generalists Can specialize Combined exoenxzymes of all fungi on a leaf help speed breakdown Linked mycelium Two different leaves Help by Sharing Harm by sending incorrect cues to healthy mycelium Bacteria are often talked about, but have only a small role Bacteria cannot penetrate leaf, only on outside Fungi are 95% of microbial biomass Fungi perform better without bacteria Bacteria has little growth without the presence of fungi secondary compounds Key links in the food web Breakdown tough compounds in the leaves Different leaves condition at different times Make leaves suitable for detritivores, like caddisflies Caddisflies consume leaf parts but really, the fungi in the leaf is more nutritious then the leaf itself Caddisflies taste test leaves Will avoid unconditioned parts, eat only the best spots Leaves can be over conditioned by fungi Out of nutrients Fungi dead Mycotoxins Instead of conditioning the leaf, some fungi make it less palatable Defense against getting eaten Allochthonous material very important for aquatic food webs Organisms in vernal ponds have limited time to grow before ponds dry out, so any increase in food quality helps! Fungi play a role in food availability throughout the year with different conditioning times for different leaves Two main forms of aquatic fungi Awesome convergent evolution Important for food supply in aquatic ecosystems Key to nutrient release and detrital breakdown http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/mycology/images/Poster Oslo.jpg footage.shutterstock.com http://ww2.coastal.edu/vgulis/conidia.htm http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm www.thinklongislandfirst.com http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/VernalPool_Ecolog y.aspx http://fungi.life.illinois.edu/about/mitosporic_fungi http://super-marioworld.webnode.com.br/products/random-images-4/ Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1984. Leaf Processing Capabilities of Aquatic Hyphomycetes: Oikos, 42(2): 144-154. Interspecific Differences and Influenceon Shredder Feeding Preferences. Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1985. Selective Feeding by Stream Caddisfly (Trichoptera) Detritivores on Leaves with Fungal-Colonized Patches. Oikos, 45(1): 50-58. Butler S.K. and K, Suberkropp. 1986. Aquatic Hyphomycetes on Oak Leaves: Comparison of Growth, Degradation and Palatability. Mycologia, 78(6): 922-928. Chung, N. and K. Suberkropp. 2009. Contribution of fungal biomass to the growth of the Biology, 54: 2212–2224. shredder, Pycnopsyche gentilis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Freshwater Cohen, J. S., S. Ng and N. Blossey. 2012. Quantity Counts: Amount of Litter Determines 46(1): 85–90. Tadpole Performance in Experimental Microcosms. Journal of Herpetology Duarte, S., C. Pascoal, F. Cássio and F. Bärlocher. 2006. Aquatic Hyphomycete Diversity and 658-666. Identity Affect Leaf Litter Decomposition in Microcosms. Oecologia, 147(4): Gessner M.O. and E. Chauvet.1994. Ecology Importance of Stream Microfungi in Controlling Breakdown Rates of Leaf Litter., 75(6):1807-1817. Golladay, S. W., J. R. Webster and E. F. Benfield. 1983. Factors Affecting Food Utilization by a Ecology 6(2): 157-162 Leaf Shredding Aquatic Insect: Leaf Species and Conditioning Time. Holarctic Gulis V. and K. Suberkropp. 2003. Effect of Inorganic Nutrients on Relative Contributions of Microbial Ecology, 45(1): 11-19. Fungi and Bacteria to Carbon Flow from Submerged Decomposing Leaf Litter. Hutchens, J. J., E.F. Benfield and J. R. Webster. 1997. Diet and Growth of a Leaf-shredding Contrasting Disturbance History. Hydrobiologia 346: 193–201. Caddisfly in Southern Appalachian Streams of Inkley, M.D., S.A. Wissinger, and B.L. Baros. 2008. Effects of drying regime on microbial Freshwater Biology 53: 435–445. colonization and shredder preference in seasonal woodland wetlands. Maerz, J.C., J. S. Cohen and B. Blossey. 2010. Does Detritus Quality Predict the Effect of Native Biology 55: 1694–1704. and Nonnative Plants on the Performance of Larval Amphibians? Freshwater Markovskaja S. 2012. Aero-Aquatic fungi Colonizing Decaying leaves in woodland swampy Pools of Aukstadvaris Regional Park (Lithuania). Botanica Lithuanica, 18(2): 123–132. Premdas P. D. and B. Kendrick. 1991. Colonization of Autumn-Shed Leaves by Four AeroAquatic Fungi. Mycologia, 83(3): 317-321.