Liz Ann Sonders Senior Vice President Chief Investment Strategist Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. October, 2013 (1013-6769) “The error of optimism dies in the crisis, but in dying it gives birth to an error of pessimism. This new error is born not an infant, but a giant.” –Arthur C. Pigou 1 (1013-6769) Government shutdowns & market impacts S&P 500 performance before, during and after government shutdowns Shutdown start # of days Week before During shutdown 1 week after 1 month after 9/30/76 10 -1.6% -3.4% -0.2% -2.8% 9/30/77 12 1.6% -3.2% -0.8% 2.7% 10/31/77 8 0.8% 0.7% 2.7% 0.7% 11/30/77 8 -1.3% -1.2% -0.3% -4.2% 9/30/78 17 0.7% -2.0% -3.2% -6.7% 9/30/79 11 -1.0% -4.4% -2.8% -0.9% 11/20/81 2 0.0% -0.1% 3.7% 0.6% 9/30/82 1 -2.7% 1.3% 7.4% 11.1% 12/17/82 3 -1.5% 0.8% 1.9% 5.5% 11/10/83 3 0.6% 1.3% -0.3% -2.0% 9/30/84 2 0.3% -2.2% -0.2% 3.1% 10/3/84 1 -2.3% 0.1% 0.9% 3.6% 10/16/86 1 1.6% -0.3% -0.2% 1.8% 12/18/87 1 5.9% 0.0% -1.4% -2.6% 10/5/90 3 1.8% -2.1% -2.0% 0.3% 11/13/95 5 0.7% 1.3% 0.2% 2.0% 12/15/95 21 -0.2% 0.1% -2.4% 4.0% 3 0.3% -0.1% -0.2% 0.7% % Positive 59% 47% 35% 65% Median 1970-9/30/13. Source: www.sentimenTrader.com. 2 US & global economy: decoupling? 3 (1013-6769) GDP’s components & latest reading Federal spending now biggest (& only) drag % of real GDP 1Q13 annualized Q/Q % change 2Q13 annualized Q/Q % change Consumer spending 68.2% 2.3% 1.8% Government spending 18.5% (4.2%) (0.4%) Federal: 7.4% (8.4%) (1.6%) State/local: 11.1% (1.3%) 0.4% (0.3)* (0.1)* Net exports of goods & services (2.7%) Exports: 12.7% (1.3%) 8.0% Imports: (15.4%) 0.6% 6.9% (1.5%) 6.5% (4.6%) 4.7% 12.5% 14.2% 0.9* 0.4* 1.1% 2.5% Fixed investment Nonresidential: 15.7% 12.6% Residential: 3.1% Change in private inventories -Real GDP 2.2% (“new normal”) = average real GDP since June 2009 recession end 3.2% (“old normal”) = average private sector real GDP since June 2009 recession end As of 2Q13. *Represents contribution to percent change in real GDP. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, FactSet. 4 (1013-6769) US on best & most stable path globally Change matters more than level to markets US Japan Eurozone 14 6 13 4 12 2 11 0 10 9 -2 -4 8 -6 7 -8 6 2003 -10 2005 2007 China, US and Japan as of 2Q13. Eurozone as of 1Q13. Source: FactSet. 2009 2011 Real GDP (y/y % change) Real GDP (y/y % change) China (left) 2013 5 (1013-6769) It’s not déjà vu all over again Some weakness; but not as sinister as past 3 years a b ISI US Diffusion Index 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 1998 a 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 1998 2000 b 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 ISI Global Economic Diffusion Index 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 As of 9/13. 13-week average. Diffusion Index represents economic strength minus weakness. Gray-shaded areas indicate periods of recession. See last slide for definition of recession. Source: ISI Group. 6 (1013-6769) Economy better & policy risk lower than 2011 But the fiscal fight has only just begun US Economic Policy Uncertainty Index 260 August 2011 230 200 170 140 110 80 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Citigroup US Economic Surprise Index 100 50 0 -50 August 2011 -100 -150 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 As of 9/13. Economic Policy Uncertainty Index measures policy-related economic uncertainty using 3 types of underlying components. One component quantifies newspaper coverage of policy-related economic uncertainty. A second component reflects the number of federal tax code provisions set to expire in future years. The third component uses disagreement among economic forecasters as a proxy for uncertainty. Citigroup Economic Surprise Index measures the amount that economic activity surprised or disappointed relative to analyst expectations. Source: FactSet; Scott Baker, Nicholas Bloom and Steven J. Davis at www.PolicyUncertainty.com. 7 (1013-6769) Businesses “hoarding” cash Levels not seen since WWII & reflects heightened uncertainty Nonfinancial Corporate Business Deposits (as % of nominal GDP) Checkable Deposits & Currency MMMFs Time & Savings Deposits 10 8 6 4 2 0 1947 1957 1967 1977 As of 2Q13. MMMF represents money market mutual fund shares. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve. 1987 1997 2007 8 Fed policy: no taper … for now 9 (1013-6769) Fed’s balance sheet has ballooned But with velocity so low, inflation risk is minimal QE∞ (+$85B a month) Monetary Base ($, billions) 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 Fed has flooded system 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 M2 to Monetary Base Ratio 10 9 8 But “velocity” of money remains depressed 7 6 5 4 3 2007 2008 2009 As of 9/13. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve. 2010 2011 2012 2013 10 (1013-6769) Bank deposits soaring thanks to Fed $, billions (4-week moving average) But lending remains subdued (record gap) US Bank Deposits US Bank Total Loans 10,500 9,500 8,500 7,500 6,500 5,500 4,500 3,500 2,500 1996 As of 9/13. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve. 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 11 Public & private sector deleveraging: a report card 12 (1013-6769) Incredibly shrinking deficit Rapid improvement should help stabilize debt growth % of nominal GDP Federal Budget Deficit/Surplus 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Federal Outlays Federal Receipts % of nominal GDP 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 As of 8/13. Source: Department of the Treasury, FactSet, Ned Davis Research (NDR), Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.). 13 (1013-6769) Debt growth down, but more to go Debt servicing cost remains low but will rise even if rates don’t Public Debt as % of Nominal GDP (left) Public Debt, annual growth rate (right) 110 25 100 20 90 15 80 70 10 60 5 50 0 40 30 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 -5 Public Sector Debt Servicing Cost 20 15 10 5 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 As of 2Q13. Debt servicing cost = interest payments made on outstanding federal debt divided by total government expenditures. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve, Ned Davis Research, Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.), U.S. Department of Treasury. 14 (1013-6769) GDP’s strength waned as debt surged But, it’s a “chicken-or-egg” argument as to causality Nominal GDP (10-year % change) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Total Credit Market Debt as % of GDP 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 As of 2Q13. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, FactSet, Federal Reserve. 15 (1013-6769) Private sector deleveraging’s come a long way No longer causing economic drag Household Debt as % of Disposable Personal Income 1 130 Trend including housing bubble 110 90 70 Trend excluding housing bubble 50 30 1952 1959 1966 1973 1980 As of 2Q13. Yellow and blue chart lines represent trend lines. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve. 1987 1994 2001 2008 16 (1013-6769) Net worth takes out prior high Housing & stock market represent 2 largest components Household Net Worth ($, trillions) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1952 1962 As of 2Q13. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve. 1972 1982 1992 2002 2012 17 US manufacturing & energy renaissance: no longer a pipe dream 18 (1013-6769) Key reasons for US manufacturing renaissance Key advantages for US Restrained US labor costs Big emerging markets wage increases Abundant energy/low natural gas prices “Made in America” bias by US consumers Digitization Labor market stability Rule of law Economic & accounting transparency Demographics Deep/liquid capital markets Well-developed infrastructure Better inventory control Japan energy problem Eurozone/China economic uncertainty Source: ISI Group. 19 (1013-6769) US total cost gap narrowing significantly Not only relative to China but to other EMs, too Labor Cost Gap 60% Total Landed Cost Gap 51% 50% 38% China 40% 31% 30% 30% 23% 16% 20% 10% 0% 2005 2010 Other Emerging Markets Labor Cost Gap 2013E Total Landed Cost Gap 50% 40% 39% 37% 34% 30% 21% 20% 19% 18% 10% 0% 2005 2010 2013E As of 5/24/12. Landed Cost=total cost of a product once it has arrived at buyer’s door and includes original cost of the item, all brokerage and logistics fees, complete shipping costs, customs duties, tariffs, taxes, insurance, currency conversion, crating costs, and handling fees. Not all components are present in every shipment, but all must be considered part of the landed cost. EM=emerging markets. Source: Supply Chain Optimization Study, The Hackett Group, 2012. 20 (1013-6769) It’s not just China United States' rising cost advantage spreads United States will gain 2-3 million jobs; and $100b in annual output; from higher exports and production work shifting from China over next decade By around 2015, United States will have export cost advantage of 5-25% over Germany, Italy, France, UK & Japan in range of industries Source: “US Manufacturing Nears the Tipping Point” by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), March 22, 2012. Manufacturing unit labor costs in $ 1980 2011 Change US 92 86 -6% Germany 75 144 +92% Canada 88 179 +103% Source: Department of Labor. 21 (1013-6769) Large replacement cycle on tap Equipment & manufacturing plants oldest on record US Average Age of Equipment & Software 6.0 5.8 years 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 US Average Age of Manufacturing Plants 16 15 years 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 As of 2011. Based on historical-cost average age. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, ISI Group. 22 (1013-6769) Manufacturing workweek hit high Should be precursor to better job growth Average Weekly Hours-Manufacturing (3-month moving average) 42.0 41.5 41.0 40.5 40.0 39.5 39.0 38.5 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 As of 8/13. Source: Department of Labor, FactSet. 23 (1013-6769) Manufacturing adding most to GDP While government spending brings up rear US 2012 Contribution to % Change in Real GDP Governm ent Agriculture, forestry, fishing, & hunting Other services Educational services Utilities Arts, entertainm ent, & recreation Health care & social assistance Transportation & w arehousing Adm inistrative & w aste services Managem ent of com panies Mining Professional, scientific, & technical services Accom m odation & food services Construction Real estate, rental, & leasing Nondurable-goods m anufacturing Retail Trade Inform ation Wholesale Trade Finance & insurance Durable-goods m anufacturing -0.10 As of 12/12. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis. 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 24 (1013-6769) US manufacturing/GDP comeback First “triple” in postwar era US Manufacturing as % of Nominal GDP (y/y point change) 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008 As of 12/12. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, FactSet, Ned Davis Research, Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.). 25 Housing: boosting economy, confidence & jobs 26 (1013-6769) Housing turning up as % of GDP Long path back to “normal” but trend will help economy Residential Investment Average % of nominal GDP 7 6 5 4 3 2 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 As of 2Q13. Gray-shaded areas indicate periods of recession. See last slide for definition of recession. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, FactSet. 27 (1013-6769) New home prices at all-time high! Reflecting limited new building/record-low inventories Median Single-Family Sales Prices ($, thousands) New Home Prices Existing Home Prices 300 250 200 150 100 50 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 As of 8/13. 12-month moving average. Source: FactSet, National Association of Realtors, US Census Bureau. 2000 2004 2008 2012 28 (1013-6769) Housing inventory off historic lows Explains jump in prices % of working-age population New & Existing Single-Family Homes for Sale Average 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 As of 8/13. Source: FactSet, National Association of Realtors, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), US Census Bureau. 29 (1013-6769) Impact of spike in mortgage rates Biggest weight on refi; not as much on purchases 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rate 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2000 2002 2004 2006 MBA Refinance Index (left) 2008 2010 2012 MBA Purchase Index (right) 10,000 550 8,000 450 6,000 350 4,000 250 2,000 0 2000 150 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 As of 9/13. The Refinance Index covers all mortgage applications to refinance an existing mortgage. The Purchase Index includes all mortgages applications for the purchase of a single-family home. Source: FactSet, Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), Ned Davis Research, Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.). 30 (1013-6769) Housing affordability falling but still high Rising mortgage rates have been culprit a b Housing Affordability Index 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 1981 1985 a 1989 b 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2009 2013 Ratio of Home Prices to DPI 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 Affordability Index as of 7/13. Ratio data as of 2Q13. DPI=disposable personal income. Gray-shaded areas indicate periods of recession. See last slide for definition of Affordability Index and recession. Source: FactSet, Federal Finance Housing Board, High Frequency Economics (HFE), National Association of Realtors. 31 “Real” mortgage rates remain deeply negative (1013-6769) As long as prices continue to rise, higher rates won’t bite much Real Mortgage Rates for Existing Single-Family Homes 25 2 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 1 -15 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 3 1) 6.1% minus 16.9% = (10.8%) 2) 5.1% minus (16.7%) = 21.8% 3) 4.3% minus 14.4% = (10.1%) As of 8/13. Real Mortgage Rate represents 30-year fixed mortgage rate minus y/y % change in median sales price. Gray-shaded areas indicate periods of recession. See last slide for definition of recession. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve, National Association of Realtors. 32 Stock & bond markets: valuation/ sentiment/ rising yields 33 (1013-6769) Current bull still sub-average S&P 500 bull markets Start date End date Duration (months) 6/1/1932 3/10/1937 57 324% 4/28/1942 5/29/1946 49 158% 6/13/1949 8/2/1956 86 267% 10/22/1957 12/12/1961 50 86% 6/26/1962 2/9/1966 43 80% 10/7/1966 11/29/1968 26 48% 5/26/1970 1/11/1973 32 74% 10/3/1974 11/28/1980 74 126% 8/12/1982 8/25/1987 60 229% 12/4/1987 7/16/1990 31 65% 10/11/1990 3/24/2000 113 417% 10/9/2002 10/9/2007 60 102% 57 165% 55 149% Average 3/9/2009 *As of 9/30/13. Source: Strategas Research Partners LLC. ?* Percent change 34 (1013-6769) Market highs after long drought…now what? New all-time highs in Dow Jones Industrial Average (1900-2013) DJIA performance (%) Date of new high Calendar days since prior high One month Three month Six month One year Maximum drawdown Maximum gain 3/24/1905 1,375 2.1 -4.4 3.3 19.6 -10.0 29.9 9/28/1916 3,904 1.7 -8.8 -6.2 -18.7 -19.4 9.3 7/9/1919 959 -7.8 2.8 -2.6 -14.5 -20.9 8.3 12/31/1924 1,884 2.5 -2.0 9.3 30.0 -4.6 32.3 11/23/1954 9,211 3.8 7.5 9.8 26.1 0.0 27.4 9/15/1958 889 2.4 7.8 16.1 20.8 -0.2 29.6 11/10/1972 2,465 3.8 -1.6 -6.8 -8.7 -14.4 5.7 11/3/1982 3,582 -3.2 -0.3 13.8 14.3 -7.1 20.6 10/3/2006 2,453 2.5 6.3 6.7 19.2 0.0 20.1 3/5/2013 1,973 2.2 5.0 4.8 ? ? ? Average 1.0 1.2 4.8 9.8 -8.5 20.3 % of time positive 80 50 70 67 All period average 0.5 1.7 3.4 7.1 % of time positive 58 60 63 65 Table highlights each of the prior periods where Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) went two or more years without closing at new all-time high. Source: Bespoke Investment Group, LLC (B.I.G.). 35 (1013-6769) US outperformance of EM since ’09 low Beginning of secular shift? S&P 500 Relative to MSCI Emerging Markets Index 4.5 3.5 2.5 1.5 0.5 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 As of 9/30/13. EM=emerging markets. Source: FactSet, Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), Standard & Poor’s. 2006 2009 2012 36 (1013-6769) New secular bull market relative to gold? 3rd consecutive 13-year gold bull likely over S&P 500 Total Return Gold $100,000 $10,000 $1,000 $100 $10 $1 1912 1922 1932 1942 1952 1962 1972 1982 1992 2002 2012 As of 8/13. Source: Bloomberg, Windhaven Investment Management, Inc. 37 (1013-6769) Stocks & commodities de-linking Commodity “super cycle” likely topped in 2011 S&P 500 Index (left) CRB Index (right) 1,800 500 1,600 450 1,400 400 1,200 350 1,000 300 800 250 600 2003 200 2005 2007 2009 2011 As of 9/30/13. CRB (Commodity Research Bureau) Index based on the Thomson Reuters/Jefferies CRB Commodity Index. Source: FactSet. 2013 38 (1013-6769) Stocks & commodities typically divergent Reflects hit to economy/stocks/valuation when inflation’s high * * *Most recent shaded areas represent Liz Ann Sonders’ view of respective bull markets. 39 (1013-6769) Stocks & dollar reconnecting Dollar stronger for “right” reasons…better relative growth S&P 500 (left) US Dollar Index (right) 1,800 105 1,600 100 95 1,400 90 1,200 85 1,000 80 800 75 600 2003 70 As of 9/30/13. Source: FactSet. 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 40 (1013-6769) Comparing stock & dollar markets History shows equity returns were higher when dollar was rising Dollar bull/bear $ bull S&P 500 performance during dollar bull & bear markets Calendar US dollar index S&P 500 Dates days % change % change 10/30/1978-2/25/1985 2,310 100.7% 88.5% $ bear 2/25/1985-12/31/1987 1,039 -48.2% 37.9% $ bull 12/31/1987-6/14/1989 531 23.7% 31.1% $ bear 6/14/1989-2/11/1991 607 -23.8% 13.8% $ bull 2/11/1991-7/5/2001 3,797 50.2% 230.8% $ bear 7/5/2001-4/22/2008 2,483 -41.0% 12.9% $ bull 4/22/2008-3/5/2009 317 24.9% -50.4% $ bear 3/5/2009-11/25/2009 265 -16.7% 62.7% $ bull 11/25/2009-6/7/2010 194 19.0% -5.4% $ bear 6/7/2010-4/29/2011 326 -17.5% 29.8% Average dollar bull market 43.7% 58.9% Average dollar bear market -29.4% 31.4% 10.0% 23.3% Recent $ rally *As of 9/30/13. Source: FactSet. 4/29/2011-?* 885 41 (1013-6769) On forward earnings, stocks appear undervalued Gives market breathing room in face of slower earnings growth S&P 500 Forward P/E 35 30 25 20 15 Median = 16.5x 10 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Current S&P 500 forward P/E @ 14.7 As of 9/13. Current P/E based on estimated 3Q13 EPS. P/Es are based on forward 12-month operating earnings. Source: FactSet, Standard & Poor’s. 42 (1013-6769) Imminent acceleration in earnings coming? High correlation between earnings & ISM new orders S&P 500 Operating Earnings, y/y % change (left) ISM New Orders Index (right) 45 * 30 80 70 15 60 0 50 -15 40 -30 30 -45 1990 20 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 As of 8/13. *Earnings truncated at 40% in 2010. Data represents 12-month earnings per share. Source: BCA Research Inc., FactSet, ISM (Institute for Supply Management), Standard & Poor’s. 43 (1013-6769) Profit margins peaking? Not necessarily a problem for stocks Margin peaks & stock market performance Date when profit margins peaked S&P 500 nominal total return S&P 500 real total return Year Quarter 1-year after 2-years after 1-year after 2-years after 1950 4 24% 46% 17% 37% 1955 1 38% 31% 37% 26% 1959 2 1% 18% -1% 15% 1966 1 5% 8% 2% 1% 1973 1 -13% -19% -21% -33% 1977 3 12% 26% 3% 4% 1984 2 31% 78% 26% 68% 1988 4 32% 28% 26% 15% 1997 3 9% 39% 7% 34% 2006 3 16% -9% 13% -16% Mean 15% 25% 11% 15% Median 14% 27% 10% 15% 1950-2012. Profit Margins defined as total pre-tax corporate profits relative to corporate GDP. Source: BCA Research Inc. 44 Investors had banished stocks in favor of bonds (1013-6769) Bond funds now experiencing record outflows Net New Cash Flow Cumulative Change ($, billions) Domestic Equity Mutual Funds 1,200 800 400 0 -400 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Bond Mutual Funds (right) 6 20 4 10 2 0 0 -10 -2 -20 -4 -6 1/13 2/13 3/13 4/13 5/13 6/13 As of 9/13. Bottom chart based on estimated weekly cash flows. Source: Investment Company Institute (ICI). 7/13 8/13 -30 9/13 Net New Cash Flow ($, billions) -800 2008 Domestic Equity Mutual Funds (left) Net New Cash Flow ($, billions) Total Bond Mutual Funds 45 (1013-6769) Pension funds have de-risked Pension Funding Asset Allocation Fixed income exposure now above equity exposure Equities Fixed Income 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 As of 3/13. Data covers 100 US public companies with the largest defined benefit pension plan assets for which a 2012 annual report was released by 3/7/13. Source: Milliman 2013 Pension Funding Study. 46 (1013-6769) Endowments’ equity exposure way down Alternative strategies biggest beneficiary Endowments asset allocation (dollar-weighted average) Year Equities Fixed income Alternative strategies Cash/ other 2002 50% 23% 24% 2% 2003 49% 21% 27% 2% 2004 51% 17% 28% 4% 2005 48% 17% 32% 3% 2006 48% 15% 35% 2% 2007 47% 13% 37% 2% 2008 40% 13% 46% 1% 2009 32% 13% 51% 4% 2010 31% 12% 52% 5% 2011 33% 10% 53% 4% 2012 31% 11% 54% 4% Source: NACUBO (National Association of College and University Business Officers)-Commonfund Study of Endowments (2009-2012), NACUBO Endowment Study (2002-2008), Strategas Research Partners LLC. 47 (1013-6769) Investor confidence moves with market Sentiment now in best zone for stocks NDR Crowd Sentiment Poll 80 Extreme Optimism (Bearish for Market) 70 60 50 40 30 Extreme Pessimism (Bullish for Market) 20 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 12/1/1995-9/24/2013 We are here NDR Crowd Sentiment Poll S&P 500 annualized gain >66 -7.6% 57-66 from above -3.1% 57-66 from below 16.7% < 57 10.5% As of 9/24/13. See last slide for description of Crowd Sentiment Poll. Source: Ned Davis Research (NDR), Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.). 48 (1013-6769) Market’s emotional roller coaster Maintaining discipline = key to long-term success Euphoria Exhilaration Bull Market Ends Uneasiness Enthusiasm Denial Optimism Optimism Pessimism Panic Bear Market Ends Capitulation Relief Hope Despair 49 (1013-6769) Disclosures/definitions Disclosures The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. We believe the information obtained from third-party sources to be reliable, but neither Schwab nor its affiliates guarantee its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. The views, opinions and estimates herein are as of the date of the material and are subject to change without notice at any time in reaction to shifting market conditions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance. Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you should expect to attain. Index Definitions Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses (or "transaction fees or other related expenses"), and cannot be invested in directly. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA, “The Dow”) is a price-weighted average of 30 actively traded blue chip stocks, primarily industrials and is the oldest and most widely quoted of all the market indicators. The IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) U.S. Dollar Index is an index of the of the United States dollar relative to a basket of foreign currencies, and is a weighted geometric mean of the dollar’s compared to the Euro (EUR), Japanese yen (JPY), Pound sterling (GBP), Canadian dollar (CAD), Swedish krona (SEK) and Swiss franc (CHF) relative to March 1973. The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Emerging Markets (EM) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index consists of the following 21 emerging market country indices: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) Housing Affordability Index (HAI) measures whether or not a typical family could qualify for a mortgage loan on a typical home. A value of 100 means a family with the median income has exactly enough income to qualify for a mortgage on a median-priced home. An index above 100 signifies that family earning the median income has more than enough income to qualify for a mortgage loan on a medianpriced home, assuming a 20 percent down payment. The S&P 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks from a broad range of industries. The component stocks are weighted according to the total market value of their outstanding shares. The Thomson Reuters/Jefferies CRB (Commodity Research Bureau) Commodity Index is a global commodity index that tracks the price movement of commodity futures as a whole. Terms AAII (American Association of Individual Investors) Investor Sentiment Survey measures the percentage of individual investors who are bullish, Ned Davis Research (NDR) Crowd Sentiment Poll - Shows perspective on a composite sentiment indicator designed to highlight short- to intermediate-term swings in investor psychology. It's based on seven different individual sentiment indicators in order to represent the psychology of a broad array of investors. Recession - As per National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. ©2013 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC 50 (1013-6769) New highs…then vs. now: bad stuff 3/24/2000 10/9/2007 9/18/2013 S&P 500® index 1,527 1,565 1,726 Budget deficit (12-month sum) $138b $169b $680b Fed balance sheet $556b $858b $3,672b Gross federal debt $5,773b $9,007b $16,738b Debt as % of nominal GDP 58% 62% 100% NYSE average daily volume (millions of shares) 1,124 1,320 750 Consumer confidence 137.1 95.2 79.7 5.7 7.2 11.3 Unemployment rate 4.0% 4.7% 7.3% S&P rating of US debt AAA AAA AA+ Americans unemployed (millions) Source: Bloomberg, FactSet, Federal Reserve, Ned Davis Research (NDR), Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.), Standard & Poor’s. 51 (1013-6769) New highs…then vs. now: good stuff 3/24/2000 10/9/2007 9/18/2013 1,527 1,565 1,726 S&P 500 operating earnings $54 $89 $102e S&P 500 P/E 28.3 17.6 16.9 S&P dividends per share $17 $28 $34 AAII investor sentiment survey – bullish 66% 55% 45% 10-year Treasury yield 6.2% 4.7% 2.7% -44 52 234 % of S&P 500 above 200-day moving average NA 60% 85% % of S&P 500 with 50-day moving average above 200-day moving average NA 43% 82% 2.4% 2.2% 1.8% $6,508b $13,644b $12,971b S&P 500 index 10-year minus 2-year Treasury yield spread (basis points) Core CPI (y/y % change) Household debt See last slide for description of AAII (American Association of Individual Investors) Sentiment Survey. Source: Bloomberg, FactSet, Federal Reserve, Ned Davis Research (NDR), Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.), Standard & Poor’s. 52 (1013-6769) Bond yields settle down after no QE taper Renewed uncertainty about QE taper timing 10-Year Treasury Yield 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 10-Year Treasury Yield 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 Jul-12 As of 9/13. Source: FactSet, The Leuthold Group. Sep-12 Nov-12 Jan-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jul-13 Sep-13 53 (1013-6769) When might unemployment hit 6.5%? Fed’s unemployment rate threshold puts payrolls in spotlight Mapping payrolls to the 10-year Treasury Monthly payroll change (000s) Fed Funds (“lift-off” date) 10Y Treasury yield (%, end of 2013 est.) 230 Mar 2014 3.9% 220 Jun 2014 3.8% 210 Sep 2014 3.6% 200 Dec 2014 3.4% 190 Jun 2015 2.8% 180 Sep 2015 2.5% 170 Jun 2016 1.8% 160 Jun 2017 1.4% 150 Mar 2018 1.1% As of 2/5/13. Source: BCA Research Inc. 54 Current bull market: rising yields = rising stocks (1013-6769) S&P 500 performance during periods of rising and falling yields 10-year Treasury yield Rising/ falling Begin End Start Finish Change Days S&P 500 change Rising 3/9/2009 4/5/2010 2.89 4.01 38.8% 392 75.5% Falling 4/5/2010 10/8/2010 4.01 2.41 -39.9% 186 -1.9% Rising 10/8/2010 2/8/2011 2.41 3.75 55.6% 123 13.7% Falling 2/8/2011 9/22/2011 3.75 1.72 -54.1% 226 -14.7% Rising 9/22/2011 10/27/2011 1.72 2.42 40.7% 35 13.7% Falling 10/27/2011 1/31/2012 2.42 1.83 -24.4% 96 2.2% Rising 1/31/2012 3/19/2012 1.83 2.39 30.6% 48 7.4% Falling 3/19/2012 7/25/2012 2.39 1.43 -40.2% 128 -5.1% Rising 7/25/2012 3/11/2013 1.43 2.07 44.8% 229 16.3% Falling 3/11/2013 5/2/2013 2.07 1.66 -19.8% 52 2.7% Rising 5/2/2013 9/30/2013 1.66 2.64 59.0% 151 5.3% Average rising yields % of time positive Average falling yields % of time positive As of 9/30/13. Source: Bespoke Investment Group, LLC (B.I.G.) Federal Reserve, FactSet. 22.0% 100 -3.4% 40 55 Economic & market performance during rising rates (1013-6769) Growth tends to be above-average, at least for a while Economic & market performance during rising interest rate periods (based on monthly 10-year Treasury yield) % Gain per annum Trough Apr 1954 Peak Oct 1957 10Y Treasury yield begin 2.3% 10Y Treasury yield end 4.0% S&P 500 16.7% May 1958 Jan 1960 2.9% 4.7% 22.5% 11.6% 3.9% May 1961 Aug 1966 3.7% 5.2% 7.0% 4.9% 3.5% Mar 1967 May 1970 4.5% 7.9% -1.9% 3.0% 2.6% Mar 1971 Sep 1975 5.7% 8.4% -0.1% 2.2% 1.9% Dec 1976 Mar 1980 6.9% 12.8% 5.1% 3.6% 3.9% Jun 1980 Sep 1981 9.8% 15.3% 7.6% 2.6% 1.2% Jan 1987 Mar 1989 7.1% 9.4% 8.3% 3.7% 3.1% Oct 1993 Nov 1994 5.3% 8.0% 1.8% 4.4% 3.4% Oct 1998 Jan 2000 4.5% 6.7% 17.0% 3.8% 2.5% Jun 2003 May 2006 3.3% 5.1% 11.4% 2.4% 1.6% Median 4.5% 7.9% 7.6 3.6% 2.6% Mean 5.1% 8.0% 8.7% 4.1% 2.7% 11.2% 2.5% 1.7% Gain per annum over entire history Coincident index Nonfarm payrolls 3.3% 2.0% Table highlights periods between local troughs and peaks in the 10-year Treasury yield around Fed tightening cycles. Source: Ned Davis Research (NDR), Inc. (Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. Copyright 2013 (c) Ned Davis Research, Inc. All rights reserved.). 56 (1013-6769) Longer-term valuation stretched But largest equity inflows have come when P/E was around 20 S&P 500 P/E (5-year normalized) 40 35 30 Median = 17.6x 25 20 15 10 5 1946 1954 1962 1970 1978 1986 1994 2002 2010 Current S&P 500 normalized P/E @ 21.1 As of 9/13. The Leuthold Group calculates normalized earnings using a 5-year average of reported earnings (18 quarters of historical results combined with 2 quarters of future estimates). To adjust for legitimate write-offs, the mid point between reported earnings and operating earnings is used. Source: The Leuthold Group. 57 (1013-6769) Moderate inflation supports higher valuations Inflation in one of valuation’s sweet spots 1946-8/2013 We are here Inflation Average P/E Highest P/E Lowest P/E < 0% 12.6 17.1 9.3 0 – 1% 14.5 22.5 9.2 1–2% 19.8 32.6 9.2 2 – 3% 20.5 35.1 9.7 3 – 4% 18.7 34.4 9.7 4 – 5% 16.8 22.4 9.6 5 – 6% 15.9 19.8 7.4 6 – 7% 12.2 18.1 7.7 >7% 11.9 19.1 7.9 Current S&P 500 normalized P/E @ 21.1 1946-8/13. Current P/E as of 9/13. The Leuthold Group calculates normalized earnings using a 5-year average of reported earnings (18 quarters of historical results combined with 2 quarters of future estimates). To adjust for legitimate write-offs, the mid point between reported earnings and operating earnings is used. Inflation is y/y % change based on CPI. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, FactSet, The Leuthold Group. 58 (1013-6769) Valuation expansion could continue Historically, much higher rates before valuation suffered S&P 500 P/E (5-year normalized) 25 20 22.7 20.1 18.4 14.7 15 10 We are here 5 0 1.4%-3.0% 3.0%-4.5% 4.5%-6.5% > 6.5% 10-Year Treasury Yield Current S&P 500 normalized P/E @ 21.1 1962-8/13. Current P/E as of 9/13. The Leuthold Group calculates normalized earnings using a 5-year average of reported earnings (18 quarters of historical results combined with 2 quarters of future estimates). To adjust for legitimate write-offs, the mid point between reported earnings and operating earnings is used. Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve, The Leuthold Group. 59