A modicum of creativity after Feist. Feist decision Feist history In 1991, Feist Publications won a landmark case in the United States Supreme Court. The court unanimously agreed that factual material could not be copyrighted, thus allowing directory publishers to print white page listings that were copied from another source. All directory publishers benefited from this decision. No longer could telephone companies withhold listing information from their competitors. This case, Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991), has since been cited in several other copyright cases. United States Supreme Court When Rural refused to license its white pages listings to Feist for a directory covering 11 different telephone service areas, Feist extracted the listings it needed from Rural’s directory without Rural’s consent. Although Feist altered many of Rural’s listings, several were identical to listings in Rural’s white pages. The District Court granted summary judgment to Rural in its copyright infringement suit, holding that telephone directories are copyrightable. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Held: Rural’s white pages are not entitled to copyright, and therefore Feist’s use of them does not constitute infringement. (Feist, 1991) Importance of the Feist decision ‘The Supreme Court dropped a bomb’. Register of Copyrights, 1991. ‘Feist is a defining event for copyright in the information age’ (Goldstein, 1991, p.118). ‘inordinately Delphic even by Supreme Court standards’ (Strong, 1994, p.39). ‘Like it or not, Feist is the law in the U.S.’ (Resnik, 2003, p.309). Perspective from information science. Specific significance of the decision Affirmed originality as a constitutional requirement. ‘constitutional requirement’ (p.346). ‘the very ‘premise of copyright law.’’ (p.347). ‘The sine qua non of copyright’ (p.345). Insistence on and depth of requirement. For compilations, originality replaced industrious collection or sweat of the brow as the basis for protection. Originality as a concept What is understood by originality? ‘Original, as the term is used in copyright, means only that the work was independently created by the author … and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity’ (p.345). Originality is to be understood by reference to the concepts it includes. A modicum of creativity within originality What is the significance of a modicum of creativity to originality? ‘independently created by the author … and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity’ (p.345). ‘… plus …’ (p.346) ‘… and …’ (pp.348, 358). Independent creation AND a modicum of creativity. A modicum of creativity is then an essential component of originality. Test for originality ‘Originality requires only that the author make the selection or arrangement independently … and that it display some minimal level of creativity. Presumably, the vast majority of compilations will pass this test’ (pp.358-359). A modicum of creativity, as a component of originality, should be testable. ‘I know it when I see it’ (Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964, p. 197). Criterion originality modicum testable. A modicum of creativity Understandings of a modicum of creativity obtainable from its invocation. ‘at least some / a minimal degree of creativity’ (pp.345, 348, 362). ‘a / the modicum of creativity’ (pp.346, 362). ‘some minimal level of creativity’ (p.358). ‘the minimal creative spark’ (p.363). All linked to original, statute, or Constitution. Common referent. A modicum of creativity Complementary meanings. Creativity as a common constituent. Modicum and minimal imply the possibility of quantification of creativity. Minimal can be understood as least sufficient (‘at least some’). Modicum as a small amount. Degree and level correlate with a certain level of sophistication. Spark implies limited duration and a degree of illumination. A modicum as including creativity, quantifiable, small amount, level, illumination. Conditions for a modicum of creativity Conditions indicated for a modicum of creativity. ‘To be sure, the requisite level of creativity is extremely low; even a slight amount will suffice. … some creative spark, ‘no matter how crude, humble or obvious’ it might be’ (p.345). Criterion modicum low level. ‘As a constitutional matter, copyright protects only those constituent elements of a work that possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity’ (p.363). Criterion modicum more than quantum. Levels of creativity Levels of creativity. ‘require no creativity whatsoever.’ (p.362) ‘end product … devoid of even the slightest trace of creativity’ (p.362) ‘nothing remotely creative’ (p.363). Extreme absence of creativity. ‘insufficient creativity’ (p.363). Insufficient creativity. Pivotal position, extent, and novelty. Criterion creativity antithesis to nothing remotely creative. Criterion creativity consistent with insufficient creativity. Creativity Creativity and creative contained as words, and, by implication, concepts, in a modicum of creativity, a quantum of creativity and in the levels of creativity distinguished. Not further directly explicated. Consistent with ordinary discourse and everyday practice. Consciousness and practice. Dominant instrument of labor in everyday practice. Criterion creativity ordinary discourse and everyday practice. Criteria established Criterion derived from originality A modicum of creativity should be testable. Criteria for a modicum of creativity Low level More than a de minimis quantum. Criteria for creativity Antithesis to the absence of creativity Insufficient creativity Consistency with ordinary discourse and everyday practice. Relations within and between categories. The absence of creativity and insufficient creativity so mechanical or routine as to require no creativity whatsoever. entirely typical … garden-variety … end-product …. devoid of even the slightest trace of creativity’ (p.362) could not be more obvious … most basic information … insufficient creativity dictated by state law … nothing remotely creative … an age-old practice, firmly rooted in tradition and so commonplace that it has come to be expected as a matter of course … practically inevitable … timehonored tradition (pp. 362–363) The absence of creativity and insufficient creativity so mechanical or routine entirely typical … garden-variety could not be more obvious … the most basic information dictated by state law an age-old practice, firmly rooted in tradition and so commonplace that it has come to be expected as a matter of course … practically inevitable … timehonored tradition Exhaustive delineation. Central ordinary discourse senses. Relation between terms. Conceptual analogy It seems that this importance [of Turing's computability] is largely due to the fact that with this concept one has for the first time succeeded in giving an absolute definition of an interesting epistemological notion, i.e., one not depending on the formalism chosen. In all other cases treated previously, such as demonstrability or definability, one has been able to define them only relative to a given language, and for each individual language it is clear that the one thus obtained is not the one looked for. Kurt Gödel. Remarks before the Princeton bicentennial conference on problems in mathematics. 1946. Correlations Specific verbal and conceptual correlations. ‘So mechanical’’ correlates with a mechanical procedure or algorithm. ‘So mechanical’ and ‘dictated by ... law’ correlates with an automatic mechanical procedure. ‘an age-old practice, firmly rooted in tradition and so commonplace that it has come to be expected as a matter of course … practically inevitable … time-honored tradition’ correlates with ‘what would naturally be regarded as computable’, intuitive. ‘no creativity whatsoever’ and ‘nothing remotely creative’ (pp.362-363). Other element of the extreme absence of creativity Other element of the extreme absence of creativity. ‘entirely typical … garden-variety … end product devoid of even the slightest trace of creativity’ (p.362). Product so ... routine. Product as the result of a process. All processes and the designated product included. The absence of creativity Combination of elements within the extreme absence of creativity. The extreme absence of creativity is manifested in an entirely typical or garden-variety end product constructed by processes which correspond to an automatic mechanical procedure or to a so … routine process. NOT-creative IF, AND ONLY, IF (automatic mechanical procedure OR so ... routine [process]) AND (entirely typical OR gardenvariety end-product)). Creativity Derived conception of creativity. Creativity is manifested in a not entirely typical or garden-variety end product constructed by processes which do not correspond to an automatic mechanical procedure or to a so … routine process. NOT-NOT-creative IF, AND ONLY, IF NOT ((automatic mechanical procedure OR so ... routine [process]) AND (entirely typical OR garden-variety end-product)). Creative IF, AND ONLY, IF NOT ((automatic mechanical procedure OR so ... routine [process]) AND (entirely typical OR garden-variety end-product)). Creativity • • • Not-automatic mechanical procedure as the primary differentiating element. Value of not automatic. Potential population of the not mechanical. Random (has an analogue in automatic procedures and in noise). Non-human intervention. Purposeful direct human intervention. Issue of potential for copyrightability. Creativity Alternative formulation for mechanical. Church’s Thesis identifies the intuitive notion of ‘effective process’ with the purely syntactic idea of string processing (Rosen, 1995, p.529). Syntactic. Alternative formulation for not-mechanical. Not-syntactic. Semantic, or meaning, as complement or opposite to the mechanical or syntactic. Strong and least sense of semantic. Creativity Explicitly registered restriction on models of the computational process. the question of whether there exist finite nonmechanical procedures not equivalent with any algorithm, has nothing whatsoever to do with the adequacy of any definition of ‘formal system’ and of ‘mechanical procedure’. … such as those which involve the use of abstract terms on the basis of their meaning. (Gödel, 1964, p.72). Creativity Information theory. Often the messages to be transmitted have meaning: they describe or relate to real or conceivable events. However, this is not always the case. In transmitting music, the meaning, if any, is much more subtle than in the case of a verbal message. In some situations the engineer is faced with transmitting a totally meaningless sequence of numbers or letters. In any case, meaning is quite irrelevant to the problem of transmitting the information (Shannon, 1956). Creativity Distinction of semantic from syntactic levels. Ordinary discourse. Deeply embedded historical contrast. Direct semantic ratification (human intervention). Semantic as direct human intervention on the basis of meaning. Can potentially give rise to copyright. Creativity Practice and discourse of creativity. Consistent with practice Choice of alternative words (mechanically or syntactically generated) by their meanings from a spell checker. Low levels of creativity. Creativity Creativity and criteria established. Criteria for a modicum of creativity Low level. Criteria for creativity Consistency with everyday practice and the instrument of labor. Antithesis to the absence of creativity. Insufficient creativity ‘Rural’s selection of listings could not be more obvious: It publishes the most basic information - name, town, and telephone number - about each person who applies to it for telephone service. … insufficient creativity to make it original’ (pp362-363)’. Insufficient creativity ‘insufficient creativity’ Below a modicum of creativity. Could include a real degree of creativity. Does not give rise to property. ‘insufficient’ as potentially denoting a range rather than a fixed quantity. Mediates between extreme absence and modicum. Insufficient creativity ‘could not be more obvious’ (p.362) Process. Distinct from ‘so mechanical or routine’ and ‘age-old practice’. Semantically more proximate to ‘so … routine’ than to ‘so mechanical’. Routine as the mediating element. Consistent with derived conception of creativity. Insufficient creativity ‘the most basic information’ (p.363). Product Raw data, data, most basic information, information as underlying subject, the precise words. Information as humanly intelligible and directly humanly produced. Use of information and the computational context. Insufficient creativity ‘could not be more obvious … the most basic information … insufficient creativity’ (p.362). Mediating role for routine (process and product). Consistent with the derived concept of creativity (some reinforcement). Criteria Insufficient creativity should be consistent with the concept of creativity. A quantum of creativity ‘As a constitutional matter, copyright protects only those constituent elements of a work that possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity’ (p.363) Existence of a quantum Quantum as implying unit level or degree and amount. Largely unaltered conception of creativity. Criteria Have provided for a quantum of creativity as less than a modicum of creativity. A modicum of creativity A modicum of creativity ‘As a constitutional matter, copyright protects only those constituent elements of a work that possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity’ (p.363). More than the absence of creativity, ‘so mechanical or routine ... entirely typical ... garden variety’, and more than insufficient creativity, ‘could not be more obvious ... the most basic information’. Fuller understanding of creativity. A modicum of creativity Criteria met. Criteria for a modicum of creativity. Low level More than a de minimis quantum. Criteria for creativity Consistency with everyday practice Insufficient creativity Antithesis to the absence of creativity. Manifestations of creativity How can the distinguished levels of creativity be directly known (from the product)? ‘end product … devoid of even the slightest trace of creativity’ (p.362). It is generally not possible to establish copying as a factual matter by direct evidence. (Nimmer, 2009). Manifestations of creativity: the absence of creativity How to determine whether an utterance was produced so mechanically or by creative activity. Mechanical production. Natural or intuitive (historically and experientially acquired) understandings of what is naturally computable. Possibility of constructing procedures which give rise to similar results, if mechanically produced. Palmer’s Index to the Times ‘Mad dogs in Sheffield’. Indexes to Internet search engines. Manifestations of creativity: insufficient creativity Oral argument. MR. CAPLINGER: Communities. We decided to include business listings within this. We decided that in some communities we only put the town where in other communities we put the full address. We also decide what name, because my full name might be a fact. But I go by several names, James, Jim, Jay, JR, et cetera. And -QUESTION: I'm not stunned by the originality so far. (Laughter.) Manifestations of creativity: a quantum of creativity A semantically transformed bibliographic record as one possible correlate to more than a de minimis quantum of creativity. Other correlates (semantically transformed indexes). Other forms of database. Manifestations of creativity: a modicum of creativity A modicum of creativity is more than a quantum of creativity. Criterion derived from originality A modicum of creativity should be testable. Manifestations of creativity Specific possibilities for creativity in bibliographic productions. Meaning irrespective of expression. Related meanings (semantic) with similar (syntactic) expressions can be both semantically and syntactically or mechanically connected. Related meanings with strongly different expressions may require direct semantic intervention and creativity for linking. Manifestations of creativity • Related meanings with strongly different expressions. Chandler, Hammett, Faulkner. Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett, William Faulkner. Film noir. Generic relations. Coordination imposed on data. Demarcated from mechanical processes. Forms of description which may be inescapably directly semantic and human. Manifestations of creativity Related meanings with strongly different expressions. Oranges and lemons say the bells of St. Clemens. Humanly simple and computationally intractable. Childhood and creativity. High levels of creativity. When a poet’s mind is perfectly equipped for its work, it is constantly amalgamating disparate experiences … falls in love or reads Spinoza … the noise of the typewriter or the smell of cooking; in the mind of the poet these experiences are always forming new wholes. (Eliot, 1921) Manifestations of creativity Added a substantive contrast to the distinction between human semantic intervention and syntactic transformations. Criterion Consistent with ordinary discourse and with the use of the dominant instrument of labor in everyday practice. Link to historically established discourse. Conclusion Criteria extracted. Criterion derived from originality A modicum of creativity should be testable. Criteria for a modicum of creativity. Low level More than a de minimis quantum. Criteria for creativity Antithesis to the absence of creativity Insufficient creativity Consistency with ordinary discourse and everyday practice (dominant instrument of labor). Conclusion Qualities as story. Simplicity and cumulative development. Narrative progression parallel to the conceptual structure of the opinion. Consistency from a strongly established correlation. Absence of further assumptions. Conclusion • • Results of the analysis. Discriminates the antithesis to creativity, creativity, insufficient creativity, a quantum of creativity, and a modicum of creativity. Consistent principle. ‘[S]o mechanical’ (p.362) or automatic as the differentiating element. Routine as the mediating element. Underlying methodology ‘[T]echnology’s involvement in human affairs could be studied in ways that allow for the abstract and general to be tied to the concrete and specific’ (Kallinikos, 2004, p.157).