Parasitic consumption of corrosion inhibitor at the surface of emulsion droplets in multiphase flow Competence building project with user participation (KMB). Cooperation between IFE and NTNU Organisation • Cooperation IFE – NTNU - IFE Materials and Corrosion Technology • Kjell Ove Kongshaug, Research Scientist • Egil Gulbrandsen, Research Scientist (project leader) - NTNU Ugelstad laboratory • Magne Knag, Dr.student • Johan Sjøblom, Professor Funding - Budget: 6 MNOK Duration: 2002-2005 - Funded by: • Research Council of Norway (80%) • ChevronTexaco • Clariant Oil Services • Conoco • Dynea Oil Field Chemistry • EniAgip • Norsk Hydro • Ondeo Nalco • Saudi Aramco • Statoil • TotalFinaElf Background • Internal corrosion of carbon steel pipelines - Produced water + CO2 ( + H2S) - Worst case corrosion rates can be many mm per year • Solutions: • • • • corrosion inhibitors corrosion product films “pH stabilisation” corrosion resistant materials Properties of CO2 corrosion inhibitors • Blends of different compounds - Commonly amphiphilic molecules with nitrogencontaining polar head groups (cations) • E.g. amines, quarternary ammonium salts, imidazolines • In some cases anionic head groups (e.g. phosphates) • Hydrocarbon chains C12-C20. - Surfactants - Inorganic salts - Solvents Distribution of corrosion inhibitor • Hydrocarbon phase • Water phase • Pipe wall • Other surfaces/interfaces - Emulsions (dispersions) - Solid particles (fines) - Bubbles / foam • Chemical conversion “Parasitic consumption” by surfaces etc. • Potential corrosion risk by reducing inhibitor concentration in water phase - Corrosion failure: • Safety and environmental issue • Company reputation • Replacement cost and lost production • Excessive dose rates • Emission of corrosion inhibitor important contributor to “Environmental Impact Factor” in many fields Accumulation of corrosion inhibitor at oil water interface • Water phase • Hydrocarbon phase Factors determining how much inhibitor accumulates at surfaces • Affinity for surface/interface • Surface area available (m2/litre) - Area per particle / droplet - Number of particles / droplets Formation and breakdown of emulsions • Formation by shear forces - Choke valves, pumps, turbulent flow • Shear rate, viscosity differences, interfacial tension etc. • Breakdown mainly by - Flocculation Coalescence - Temperature and salt content important factors • Sedimentation / creaming Minimum half-life of emulsions Fast flocculation theory – Brownian motion Droplet radius (um) Volume fraction 0.1 % 1% 10% 0.1 760 ms 76 ms 7.6 ms 1 760 s 76 s 7.6 s 10 210 h 21 h 2.1 h Emulsions can thus have substantial life-time even if it is ”unstable” Example calculation • Inhibitor blend: 30 % actives, 350 g/mole • 1 m2 surface area per litre • 50 Å2 / molecule (typical range 20-100 Å2 / molecule) • Depletes ca. 3 ppm of inhibitor blend - Typical dose rates: 30-50 ppm in water phase Thus: potential problem when surface area exceeds 1 m2 surface per litre (order of magnitude) Volume fraction of oil in water How much inhibitor accumulates at oil droplets ? 1E+0 1E-1 1E-2 1E-3 30 ppm 1E-4 10 ppm 3 ppm 1E-5 1E-7 1E-6 1E-5 Oil droplet radius / m 1E-4 Objectives of the project • Identify the factors that control the parasitic consumption of corrosion inhibitor at the surface of emulsion droplets • Generate fundamental experimental information on the subject • Increase our competence on the interaction between corrosion inhibitor and emulsions • Increase our competence on the effect of crude oil components on CO2 corrosion and its inhibition • Contribute to long-term development of competence (Ph.D. study) Challenges • Development of experimental apparatus for testing inhibitor consumption at emulsion surfaces. • Controlled production of emulsions & characterisation • Sampling and analytical techniques for determination of inhibitor residuals • Inhibitor performance testing • Determine the parasitic consumption of inhibitor • Order of magnitude – potential inhibition problem or not • Effect of x, y z …. Scope of work - NTNU • Ugelstad laboratory NTNU: - Fundamental surface science of corrosion inhibitors at oil-water and water-steel interface: • Model inhibitor compounds (quaternary ammonium salts) • Tensiometry • Quarts crystal microbalance (Fe and Fe3C) • Atomic force microscopy - Emulsion characterisation • Model oil - Retention model: oil / water / o-w interface / steel Example results – NTNU Quarts crystal microbalance – Fe substrate Example results – NTNU Quarts crystal microbalance – Fe3C substrate Scope of work - IFE • Electrochemical studies • Electrochemistry with inhibitor at Pt, Fe and Fe3C • Model inhibitor compounds and commercial products • Corrosion inhibitor performance studies in presence of emulsions • Emulsification technique • Model oil and real crude oils • Inhibitor performance test method Inhibitor performance tests at IFE Emulsion formation by CO2 gas driven spray nozzle • Advantages: - Simple, no rotating parts - Prevents O2 ingress - Ex-proof • Disadvantages: - Poorly characterised emulsion. - Loss of solution (fog) • Further work: - Membrane emulsification technique Example results – IFE Test no. Inh PCO2 (bar) pH % NaCl Oil (oC) T % Oil 60 0.8 4.5 1.0 Shellsol D70 10 Inh x 8 50 70 Corrosion rate (mm / y) 7 100 ppm Tros F 6 5 microcor 4 Spray nozzle (10 min) LPR 3 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time /h 120 140 160 Example results – IFE Test no. Inh I1 10 Corrosion rate / (mm/y) T (oC) 60 0 PCO2 (bar) 0.8 pH % NaCl 1.0 4.5 Oil % Oil 10 Shellsol D-70 30 ppm Inh I1 (water dispersed) 1 Spray nozzle (10 min) Spray nozzle (10 min) 0.1 0.01 0 20 40 60 80 Time / h 100 120 140 160 Corrosion / inhibition tests with emulsions - Impinging jet apparatus Flowmeter Rotameter O2 CO2 pH Ref. CO2 3 mm ID 316 L pipe Luggin capillary Jet Centrifugal pump (tor) D:/IFE/KIP/JET.DSF Counter electrode Jet nozzle specimen Corrosion rate vs. Time with Inhibitor F (o/w emulsion) Corrosion rate / (mm/y) 100 jet velocity 5 m/s no oil oil no oil 10 1 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time / h 30 35 40 45 Corrosion rate vs. Time with Inhibitor E (o/w emulsion) 10 Corrosion rate / (mm/y) 3 m/s No oil oil no oil 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0 20 40 60 Time / h 80 100 120 Benefits to the industry • The information may support and simplify: - the analysis of inhibition failure cases - interpretation of laboratory test results - the identification of potential inhibition problem areas in advance - the selection of materials (through documentation of critical factors for inhibitor performance) - the development of improved inhibitor products - optimisation of inhibitor dose rates - understanding chemicals material balance of production