Radiation damage to electronic devices for LHC and Super-LHC experiments Presented by Julien Mekki IES, University Montpellier II, France CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Seminar IPNL – Lyon – France 14th January 2011 1 Outline I. Introduction II. Packaging effect on RadFET sensors for the radiation monitoring project III. Forward biased p-i-n diodes used as dosimeters IV. Perspectives and outlook on future studies V. Conclusion 2 Who am I ? Actual position Assistant professor at University of Montpellier 2 – CERN USER. Study of silicon detector performances for LHC and Super-LHC experiments. PhD in Electronics (Nov. 2009) – (CERN, Université Montpellier 2) Characterization and performance optimization of radiation monitoring sensors for high energy physics experiments at the CERN LHC and Super-LHC Master thesis in Science and Technology (2006) (CNES, EADS Astrium) Radiation hardness of electronic components used for space applications. February 2011: Senior fellow at CERN – Emerging Energy Technologies department Project: Radiation to electronics (R2E) 3 CERN Technologies Accelerating particle beams Three keys technologies at CERN Detecting particles Balloon (30 Km) GRID CD stack with 1 year LHC data! (~ 20 Km) Large-scale computing (Grid) Concorde (15 Km) Mt. Blanc (4.8 Km) 4 The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) CMS 5 The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Mixed radiation field Hadrons (n, p, k+,k-, π+, π-) Leptons (e-, e+, μ-, μ+) Photons Intense close to the interaction point ATLAS 7 TeV General design principle Sub-detectors: 1) Inner detectors → Trackers 7 TeV 2) Calorimeters → Energy deposited 3) Muon gas chamber 6 Radiation monitoring project – Why ? The effect of radiation on electronic and detector components → Major All equipments → Affected issue by radiation damage LHC experiments are designed to operate for 10 years. → Radiation level survey needed for damage and failure analysis. Different radiation field parameters have to be monitored… Different sensitivity and range are required… Different small active devices have been investigated ! 7 Radiation monitoring project – What ? Ionization effect ATLAS TID (Total Ionizing Dose) e.g. accumulation of charge in SiO2 : damage to microelectronic components Unit Gray: 1 Gy = 1 Joule released in 1 kg of matter = 1 J/kg Non-Ionizating effect NIEL (Non Ionizing Energy Loss) causing e.g. crystal defects in semiconductor crystals: silicon detector damage Unit: 1 MeV neutrons/ cm2 “equivalent fluence” (Фeq) Luminosity: 1034 cm-2.s-1 Ideal: Measure the full radiation spectrum (particle type, energy and intensity at all locations) → Impossible (there is no such device) Dose Annual Фeq (Gy/y) (×1013(neq/cm2)) 80-90 17382 2.9 40-50 340-350 5625 2 80-90 340-350 1249 1 r (cm) Z (cm) A 20-30 B C In space (Geostationary orbit) 10-30 Gy/y 8 Radiation monitoring project – How ? Many radiation sensors tested, only few of them was selected and installed in the LHC experiments 2 major issues: Measure of the 1-MeV Фeq BPW34 Commercial Silicon p-i-n diodes Measure of the TID 2 types of RadFET: 250 nm oxyde thickness → REM,UK 1600 nm oxyde thickness → LAAS, France 9 Radiation monitoring project – How ? Many radiation sensors tested, only few of them was selected and installed in the LHC experiments 2 major issues: Measure of the 1-MeV Фeq BPW34 Commercial Silicon p-i-n diodes Measure of the TID 2 types of RadFET: 250 nm oxyde thickness → REM,UK 1600 nm oxyde thickness → LAAS, France Packaging can induce possible dose enhancement in the measurements. The only freedom remaining in the design is the chip carrier cover. 10 But, like the chip carrier, it has an effect on the TID measurement. Packaging effect on RadFET sensors for the radiation monitoring project 11 RadFETs General (1) e-/h+ pair generation; (2) e-/h+ pair recombination; (3) e- / h+ transport; (4) hole trapping; (5) Interface state. Build-up of charge in SiO2 increase of the p-MOS Threshold Voltage integrated Dose Measurement Exposure: “zero bias” Readout: iDS VGS ∝ TID 12 γ-neutron Irradiation Chip carrier was placed into the reactor core Various materials and thicknesses Measurement: dose Slight increase of TID was measured for thicknesses exceeding 1 mm. 13 Ref : F. Ravotti. Phd thesis, University Montpellier II, France. Packaging Effect on RadFET sensors How the RadFETs response is influenced by the cover ? and also …. How much dose is deposited by different particles with different energies in the RadFETs ? RadFET response studied using the simulation toolkit: 14 What is GEometry ANd Tracking C++ based / Object Oriented Toolkit for the simulation of particle interactions with matter. Geant4 provides the possibility to describe accurately an experimental setup. (Geometry and Materials) The program provides the possibility of generating physics events and efficiently track particles through the simulated detector. The interactions between particles and matter must be simulated by taking into account all possible physics processes, for the whole energy range. 15 Geant4 Model Without cover With ceramic cover Packaging REM-TOT-500 LAAS-1600 Chip carrier has been hit perpendicularly in the front side. Result of the simulation is the total energy deposited by primary and secondary particles. First set of simulation: → Full dies size are taken as sensitive volume Second set of simulation: → sensitive volume: thin oxide Layer (SiO2) 16 Packaging comparison Results for Pions: Charged hadrons are dominated by pions close to the interaction point. Most important contribution on the total energy deposited in a mixed field. Low energy pions are absorbed in the cover. Simulation have been carried out for all particles and energies present in the LHC radiation field. 17 RadFET sensors in the ATLAS detector Provide information about the TID in the LHC experiments 2 2 locations are taken as example: Inner detector (1) Liquid Argon Calorimeter (2) 260 µm cover has been investigated and compared to uncovered RadFETs 1 Estimation of the total energy deposited in the RadFETs as well as the cover effect for each particle type. 18 Results Detailed results for the Inner Detector : % of the total number Annual dose without cover in Annual dose with cover in units Dose enhancement (%) of particles units of kGy/year and of kGy/year and (260µm /no-cover) (contribution %) (contribution %) Protons 1.2 1.73×100 (26.7) 1.65×100 (22.9) -4.3 Photons 54.9 2.46×10-2 (0.4) 8.29×10-2 (1.1) 237.1 Electrons 5.9 1.13×100 (17.4) 1.34×100 (18.4) 19.4 Pions 10.8 2.89×100 (44.7) 3.39×100 (46.4) 17.2 Neutrons 25.2 3.17×10-2 (0.5) 3.72×10-2 (0.5) 17.2 Muons 1.9 6.66×10-1 (10.3) 7.42×10-1 (10.5) 11.5 Total dose enhancement: 12.1±1 % About 45 % of the energy is deposited by pions. Significant dose enhancement for photons due to secondary particles. Photons deposit less than 2 % of the overall energy. 19 Results Pions: Energy deposited in the medium (MeV.cm-2.g-1) Pions are charged hadrons: heavy particles Mass 270 times higher than e-. Energy deposited → Bragg peak Photons: Bragg peak Compton e- Alpha Depth (cm) (e-; e+) Secondary particles (e-, e+) → Compton, pair production effects → Photonuclear absorption (α) 20 Results Results for the Liquid Argon Calorimeter: Total Dose enhancement = 23.6 ± 2.4% Pions represent 0.1 % of particles → contribution to dose ≈ 7 % Protons deposit about 35% of the overall energy (represent only 0.08 % of particles, but mass 1800 times higher than e-.) Annual dose values in the covered and uncovered RadFET sensors for both locations. Inner Detector Simulated TID (SiO2) Liquid Argon Calorimeter Without cover With cover Without cover With cover 6.5 kGy/year 7.3 kGy/year 5 Gy/year 6.1 Gy/year 21 Conclusion of this study Dose enhancement as TID was simulated using Geant4 for all particles and energies present within the LHC radiation field. Understanding of each particle and energy influence. 260 µm thick Alumina cover can alter the measured dose up to 25 %. The choice of RadFET packages is thus important for measuring the TID in High Energy Physics Experiments. Study published in J. Mekki et al, IEEE TNS, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 2061-2069, 2009. 22 Forward biased p-i-n diodes used as dosimeters 23 Radiation Monitoring at the LHC Experiments 2 major issues: Measure of the 1-MeV Фeq Measure of the TID → 108 ≤ Фeq ≤ 1014 -1015 neq/cm2 for LHC BPW34 Commercial silicon p-i-n diodes 2 types of RadFET: 250 nm oxide thickness → REM,UK 1600 nm oxide thickness → LAAS, France 24 p-i-n diodes (NIEL) Displacement damage in high r Si-base Resistivity increases vs Фeq VF FORWARD BIAS Fixed IF VF Фeq iF VF = (material parameters, geometry [W], readout current [J], pulse length) BPW34 p-i-n diode: Thickness ≈ 300 µm, Area = 2.65×2.65 mm2, ρ ≈ 2.7 kΩ.cm 25 Readout protocol for LHC BPW34 diode FORWARD BIAS Fixed Readout Current IF VF Фeq IF = 1 mA with a short duration pulse F. Ravotti et al., IEEE TNS, vol. 55, no. 4,pp. 2133-2140, 2008 Hadron sensitivity range from 2×1012 to 4×1014 neq/cm2. Perspectives for the future Super-LHC: Luminosity and radiation level (×10). Detectors will be exposed to fluences up to 1016 1-MeV equivalent neutrons. 26 A solution to measure very high fluences has to be found First study New readout protocol Different current steps of 50ms pulse duration Current used: 10µA – 100µA – 1mA – 5mA – 10mA – 15mA – 25mA Increase of bulk resistivity with Фeq Thyristor - like behavior (F. Ravotti et al, IEEE TNS, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 2016-2022, 2008.) Self-heating of the diode 27 Second Study Detailed study of the detectors behavior Development of 2 tests benches for the detector characterization Modifications of the electrical properties of the material 28 Second study(1/2) I-V curves from very low voltages (=1mV), to high voltages. Up to 6.26×1015 neq/cm2 (60% of the expected Super-LHC fluences) 2 differents regimes can be distinguished: At low fluences: 1) At low voltages a linear region can be observed. Forward current (A) First regime: 2) As VF increases: linear region → sharp increase of IF. 29 Rise of IF vs Фeq increases up to ≈ 1 × 1013 neq/cm2 Second regime: Forward current (A) Second study (2/2) 1) For Фeq > 1 × 10 13 neq/cm2, I-V characteristics are linear at low voltages. 2) With further increase of the radiation level, this linear behaviour extend to higher VF. 30 New formulation (1/3) This new formulation is based on the relaxation material theory Relaxation materials have a large density of g-r centers near Eg/2. Recombination pins the fermi level at minimum conductivity Фeq Maximum resistivity: 2q(n p )1/ 2 ni Forward current (A) rmax 1 (see references in my PhD thesis) 31 http://jmekki.web.cern.ch/jmekki/2009-11-27-Thesis-Mekki.pdf New formulation (2/3) V Relaxation materials were experimentally fitted as : I G0V exp V0 Фeq = 6.3×1014 neq/cm2 Forward current (A) Forward current (A) IF ≤ 1mA Фeq = 6.3×1015 neq/cm2 IF ≥ 1mA FIT G0rmax cte IF ≤ 1mA IF ≥ 1mA FIT V0 eq For IF > 1mA, possibility to have thyristor-like behavior1 and/or self-heating effect. 1F. 32 Ravotti et al., IEEE TNS, vol. 55, no. 4,pp. 2133-2140, 2008 New formulation (3/3) At the LHC experiments, BPW34FS diodes are operated in forward bias. A new formulation to predict and monitor values of VF versus Фeq: For Фeq ≥ 1×1013 neq/cm2 For IF ≤ 1mA Based on: I F G0VF exp LambertW(x) function is the inverse function of: VF V0 IF VF V0 Lam bertW G0 V0 IF = 1 mA f ( x) x e( x) IF = 100 μA G0rmax cte IF = 10 μA V0 eq 33 Qualitative evaluation of the temperature dependence rmax 1 2q(n p )1/ 2 ni Temperature Coefficient < 0 ni increases with T°, so ρmax decreases when T° increases. 34 Conclusion of this study Effects on radiation damage up to 6.3×1015 neq/cm2 on the OSRAM BPW34FS silicon p-i-n diode have been studied. Comparison with relaxation materials. New formulation to predict VF versus Фeq for: Фeq ≥ 1×1013 neq/cm2 IF ≤ 1mA Sensitivity is increased, and Фeq measurement range can be expanded when diode is measured at lower temperature. Summary: Allow to extend the existing readout protocol. (IF = 1 mA) Permit to predict radiation response for expected SLHC fluences. Study published in J. Mekki et al, IEEE TNS, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2066-2073, 2010. 35 Perspectives and outlook on future studies 36 Perspectives and outlook BPW34 p-i-n diode can be used for monitoring LHC and Super-LHC fluences from 2×1012 neq/cm2. 2 possibility already exists: → Pre-irradiation allows to measure Фeq > 8×109 neq/cm2. → CMRP diode (Thickness = 1 mm; Area = 1.2 mm2, ρ ≈ 10 kΩ.cm): 1×108 < Фeq (neq/cm2 ) < 2×1012 With the intention to develop our specific dosimeter → An investigation on custom made devices (high resistivity silicon detector) 37 Silicon Detectors Tested devices were made from n-type FZ and MCz silicon wafers. Geometry dependence on the detector’s radiation response has been evaluated. → 2 different active area: 2.5×2.5 cm2 and 5×5 cm2 → 2 different thicknesses: 300 µm and 1000 µm Outcome: The device thickness is the main parameter which influence their radiation response. 38 Silicon Detectors Detector A Detector B (300 µm) (1000 µm) 100 µA 9.1×109 cm-2/mV 3.2×108 cm-2/mV 1 mA 4.2×109 cm-2/mV 1.9×109 cm-2/mV Readout Current Sensitivity is increased by a factor ≈ 25 Thin detector Thick detector Study published in J. Mekki et al, IEEE TNS, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3483-3488, 2010. 39 Silicon Detectors Detector A Detector B (300 µm) (1000 µm) 100 µA 9.1×109 cm-2/mV 3.2×108 cm-2/mV 1 mA 4.2×109 cm-2/mV 1.9×109 cm-2/mV Readout Current Sensitivity is increased by a factor ≈ 25 Фeq ≈ 8×1012 neq/cm2 Thick detector Фeq = 2×1012 neq/cm2 Thin detector Фeq = 2×1010 neq/cm2 Thick detector Study published in J. Mekki et al, IEEE TNS, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3483-3488, 2010. 40 General Conclusion Monitor the LHC radiation field: 2 devices → RadFET (TID) → p-i-n diodes (Фeq) RadFETs: Evaluation of packaging configurations Evaluation of the TID and package impact on a real LHC experiment. → Dose enhancement up to 25 % p-i-n diodes: New formulation for monitoring very high fluences (Super-LHC). At low temperature → expand to higher fluences Custom made devices : Sensitivity for low Фeq can be improve using thicker p-i-n diodes or detectors. 41 Thank you for your attention The Atlas Detector 42 43 Self heating effect Normal readout protocol: Self heating VF at IF = 1mA VF at IF = 25mA VF at IF = 100µA 50ms 50ms VF at IF = 10µA 50ms VF at IF = 10µA 50ms 50ms VF at IF = 10µA Wait for temperature stabilization inside the diode after each measurement: Measurement • After measurement Self heating VF2 < VF1 (self-heating) 50 ms VF1 at IF = 10µA • Wait intil VF2=VF1 VF2 at IF = 10µA Outcome: Problem for measuring at high 44 injection level due to self-heating. Summary of the relaxation materials theory (1/3) Relaxation theory occurs when the material has high resistivity, and contains defects due to impurities or damage which enhance the G-R rate. Definition of the dielectric relaxation time: Time to restore charge neutrality to a region when excess carrier are suddently introduced. When excess carriers are injected across the PN junction, at the instant of injection (t=0), there will be an excess charge (Δn,p) , so that charge neutrality is disturbed. It is assumed to be the bulk equivalent of a RC time constant : τD = ρεε0 45 Summary of the relaxation materials theory (2/3) Example: Injection of minority carriers in the n side (Δp): p(x) n(x) At t = 0 → there are excess holes but no excess e- n0 Δp p0 x x Diffusion of holes (gradient of holes) e- (Δn) are attracted in this region by drift because of the field induce by Δp. p(x) n(x) Δp Δn flow in from the contact to neutralize Δp Δn p0 This neutralization occurs in a dielectric relaxation time (τD). n0 x x While neutrality is quickly established, Δp diffuse slowly and recombine with e- so that there is still excess charges in the material : The conventionnal carrier lifetime τ0 Resistivity is decreased by the enhancement of carrier in the material. In conventionnal lifetime material, neutrality is restored before excess carrier recombine. τ0 >> τD The np product is equal to: np = ni2×exp[(Фn-Фp)/kT]; Фn and Фp are the quasi-fermi levels for e- and h+ , and is dependent on the applied voltage.(V = Фn-Фp) 46 Summary of the relaxation materials theory (3/3) For irradiated diodes, the material becomes highly recombinative do to high density of recombination centers. Minority carrier injection increases the resistivity since the concentration of minority and majority carriers is reduced by recombination. τD = ρεε0 increases. τD >> τ0 Injected minority carrier lead to a depletion of majority carriers through the g-r centers activity. Therefore the carrier equilibrium is rapidly reached → no possible to influence it by externally applied voltage. Recombination pins the fermi level at minimum conductivity (defect near Eg/2) q( p n ) qV 2 2 np ni exp n exp i kT kT n kT p kT n ln ln p q q ni ni Ei q → np = ni2 as for the steady-state condition in lifetime diode. Maxiumum resistivity of Silicon : rmax 1 2q(n p )1/ 2 ni 47