Agroecosystems on the American Frontier: Material and Energy Systems and Sustainability Fridolin Krausmann Institute of Social Ecology Klagenfurt University Austria fridolin.krausmann@uni-klu.ac.at Geoff Cunfer Department of History University of Saskatchewan Canada geoff.cunfer@usask.ca 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 1600 1810 1800 [1000 P] US immigration 1200 800 400 0 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 1810 1800 [1000 t] 5000 Cereal exports 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 George Thir and Elizabeth Demmer migration from Austria-Hungary to Kansas, 1880s Gols, Zurndorf, Ragendorf, Kaltenstein homestead in Decatur County, 1884 built a family, a farm, and an agro-ecosystem, 1885-1940 Q. How did the farm system that the Thirs left behind compare with that which they found (and created) on the Great Plains frontier? Comparative case studies: Theyern, Austria, 1829 Finley Township, Decatur County, Kansas, 1885-1940 Social metabolism approach Key socio-ecological indicators Metabolic relationships in agricultural production systems Local socio-ecological system Agroecosystem Woodland Grassland Production Population Work Work Livestock Draft power Biomass Cropland Manure Material / energy Farmsteads and infrastrcture Machines and tools Food Energy Import / export Human population with certain characteristics: Age structure Fertility Mortality … Work / migration Village farm settlement, Theyern, Lower Austria, 2002 Franciscean Cadastre, Theyern, Austria, 1829 land use & land cover map land ownership textual description of farm system and productivity quantitative data yields livestock demography taxes Theyern land use, 1829 Land use, Theyern 1829 Pasture, meadows and fruit gardens Cropland Woodlands All other land Area: 225 ha Population: 102 Farms: 17 300 0 N 300 600 Meters Theyern 3-field rotation & dispersed fields, 1829 Three field rotation system, Theyern 1829 Field A (Hochgeit/Kleinfeld/Ortsried) Field B (Fahrenfeld/Mittelfeld) Field C (Bodenfeld/Taubenfeld) Woodland Dispersed fields of Gill Farm 300 0 300 N 600 Meters Consolidated farms Finley Township Decatur County Kansas 1921 Rural farm settlement in Finley Township, 2004 Census Manuscripts, Kansas, 1885-1940 9 snapshots of farm and family Land use crop acreage & production livestock fencing, irrigation, tractors Demography name, age, sex, literacy birthplace, parents’ birthplace, mother tongue Nested scales farm township county Key socio-ecological indicators People and Space population density land availability Farm Productivity grain yield area productivity labor productivity marketable crop production Livestock and Nutrient Management livestock density nitrogen return People and Space: Population Density 50 Finley Tow nship Thir farm population density [cap/km²] 40 Theyern community 30 20 10 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 0 Theyern: land was scarce, but labor was abundant. Finley Township: labor was scarce and land was abundant People and Space: Land Availability 100 [ha farmland/cap] 75 50 25 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 0 Theyern: shortage of arable land Finley Township: shortage of labor to work the land Farm Productivity: Grain Yield 1800 Finley Tow nship Thir farm grain yield [kg/ha] Theyern community 1200 600 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 0 Theyern: considerable yields, rising through 19th century Finley Township: very high yields, falling sharply 8 6 4 2 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 0 1820 Food output per unit of farm land [GJ food / ha] Farm Productivity: Area Productivity Similar area productivity in Theyern and Finley Township. Large fluctuations in Kansas due to variable rainfall. 400 300 200 100 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 0 1820 Food output per agricultural laborer [GJ food / cap] Farm Productivity: Labor Productivity Theyern: 1 laborer fed 2.5 people Finley Township: 1 laborer fed 100 people (1930) Farm Productivity: Marketable Crop Production [% of biomass extracted (tons dry matter)] 100 75 50 25 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 0 Finley Township’s excess production was exported to urban, industrializing parts of the eastern US, UK, & western Europe. Livestock & Nutrient Management: Livestock Density livestock density [animal units/km²] 30 20 10 Finley Tow nship Thir farm Theyern community 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 1820 0 Theyern: multi-use animals—food, waste recycling, power, manure Finley: specialized animals—power (horses), grazing (cattle) Livestock & Nutrient Management: Nitrogen Return 75 50 25 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 0 1820 nitrogen return [% of extracted N returned to soil] 100 Theyern: near 100% N return, using livestock manure Finley Township: 20-40% N return: soil mining Long term trends in grain yield: Austria and Kansas, 1830-1940 300 Kansas 250 [t/km²] 200 150 100 Austria 50 1940 1930 1920 1910 1900 1890 1880 1870 1860 1850 1840 1830 0 Austria: Yield increases: optimization of low input farming Kansas: Declining yields: stock depletion; large fluctuations Conclusions Resource efficiencies Theyern: labor abundance for long-term subsistence (risk minimization) Finley Township: fertile land abundance for market production (improved standards of living) Both efficient in own way 19th century trajectories Theyern: increasing yields Finley Township: declining yields (soil crisis by 1930s) 20th century convergence: replacing soil with oil fossil fuels solved soil crisis in Kansas yields skyrocketed in both places by 2000