Agricultural Offset Program Presentation

advertisement

Agricultural Water

Offset Program

1

Background

County Planning Department contracted the RCD to design a water use offset program for agriculture users in Paso Basin.

• developed in response to the urgency ordinance which requires NEW irrigated Ag to offset their total projected water use

. 2

SLO

More Background

1. Reason for ordinance: Severe

Decline

2. What is considered “new irrigated Ag?” *

• Crop conversions

• Increased crop density

• New installations on previously un-irrigated lands

*Per urgency ordinance language

3

Phase I – Technical Analysis

• RCD assembled a multidisciplinary project team

• Hydrogeologist

• Hydrologic engineer

• UC Cooperative Extension staff

• Cal Poly ITRC department faculty

• NRCS Conservationist

• GIS specialist

• Agricultural manager

• Biological Expertise

Analysis of potential for offset credits within regional areas

GIS mapping and verification of crop layer data

• Data and methodology review of water use by crop type

• Master Water Report

• UC Extension input

4

Draft program Standards

• Framework Provisions

• Crop Conversions

• New irrigated acreage

• Increased crop density

• Rootstock conversions

• Rural groundwater uses not included in domestic program

5

Process Overview

Crop Conversion

Project Type

New Irrigation Ag

Crop Conversion

Type of Credit

Fallowed Land/Create Credit

Same Property

Offset Location

Adjacent or Different Property

6

Flow of Program

Determine amount of Water Credit

(current crop acreage x water use factor)

Determine Potential Acres of New Crop

(water credit amount / water use factor)

Same

Property,

Same Well

Same

Property,

Different

Well

Contiguous

Parcel

Noncontiguous

Parcel

7

Master Water Report http://www.slocountywater.org

8

Crop Groups MWR/Offsets

Table 1. Crop Group and Commodities Used for the Agricultural Demand Analysis

Alfalfa

Nursery

Crop Group

Pasture

Small Grains

Citrus

Deciduous

Strawberries

Vegetables

Vineyard

Primary Commodities

Alfalfa

Christmas trees, miscellaneous nursery plants, flowers

Miscellaneous grasses, mixed pastures, sod/turf, sudangrass

Oats, barley, wheat

Avocados, grapefruits, lemons, oranges, olives, kiwis, pomegranates (nondeciduous)

Apples, apricots, berries, peaches, nectarines, plums, figs, pistachios, persimmons, pears, quinces, strawberries

Strawberries

Artichokes, beans, miscellaneous vegetables, mushrooms, onions, peas, peppers, tomatoes

Wine grapes, table grapes

9

Crop Water Calculations

Annual Crop Specific Applied Water

(AF/Ac/Yr)=

ETc − ER

1 − LR 𝑥 IE

+ FP where:

ETc = crop evapotranspiration = ETo x Kc

ETo = reference evapotranspiration

Kc = crop coefficient

ER = effective rainfall

FP = frost protection

LR = leaching requirement

IE = irrigation efficiency

10

Crop Water Average #’s

Table 2. Existing Crop-Specific Applied Water (AF/Ac/Yr) by Crop for the Salinas/Estrella

WPA

Crop Group

Alfalfa

Citrus

Applied Water

(AF/Ac/Yr)

4.5

2.3

Deciduous

Strawberries

Nursery

Pasture

3.5

2.3*

2.5

4.8

Small Grain

Vegetables

1.7*

1.9

Vineyard 1.7

*Information obtained from Current Cost and

Return Studies, UCCE, UC Davis (Small grains

2013 data, Strawberries 2011 data)

11

Flow of Program

Determine amount of Water Credit

(current crop acreage x water use factor)

Determine Potential Acres of New Crop

(water credit amount / water use factor)

Same

Property,

Same Well

Same

Property,

Different

Well

Contiguous

Parcel

Noncontiguous

Parcel

12

Same Property,

Same Well

Same Property,

Different Well

Contiguous

Parcel

Non-contiguous

Parcel

Proximity Analysis

Meets

Standard

Neighboring Well Impact analysis

Meets

Standard

Deed Restriction Recorded & Well Meter Installed

Annual Verification (3rd Party reporting)

13

Neighboring Well Criteria

• Applicant must identify one domestic and one ag well adjacent to property

• Increased pumping cannot significantly impact neighboring irrigation and domestic wells

• Domestic wells – 15 feet additional drawdown

• Irrigation wells – 30 feet additional drawdown

• Simple calculator is used to compute water level drawdown at various distances

• Notice sent to well owners so well-specific information can be considered

14

Proximity of Credit

Must define acceptable distance where credit will likely offset the impact

Simple Calculator is used to determine this distance

Must be similar water bearing zone and depth 15

16

Same Property,

Same Well

Same Property,

Different Well

Contiguous

Parcel

Non-contiguous

Parcel

Proximity Analysis

Meets

Standard

Neighboring Well Impact analysis

Meets

Standard

Deed Restriction Recorded & Well Meter Installed

Annual Verification (3rd Party reporting)

17

Decline Map Sample – Paso Basin

Credit cannot be used to increase pumping within severe groundwater level decline area as defined by SLO County

• Proposed 50’ water decline level

• Reviewed annually

• Annual map of decline published

18

Phase II – Public Outreach

RCD collaborating with local stakeholders

• Paso Robles Wine Alliance

• Ag Liaison Committee

• Farm Bureau

• Cattlemans Association

• Vineyard Team

• Olive Growers Association

• Pro Water Equity

• Town Hall meetings

19

Conclusion

• Groundwater basin(s) are natural features that change over time and the program is designed with flexibility and adaptation in mind.

• Issue is complex in nature, and program tries to encompass multiple layers of operational complexity.

• Program designed to be flexibly tiered, simplified, and user-friendly.

20

Questions?

Contact Email

Devin Best, Executive Director devin@us-ltrcd.org

Jeff Barry, Hydrogeologist

Ben Burgoa, Ag Engineer

JBarry@gsiws.com

Ben.Burgoa@rcdmonterey.org

Kelly Gleason, Policy Specialist kelly@us-ltrcd.org

Laura Edwards, Program

Director laura@us-ltrcd.org

Thank You

21

Download