Midwest Business Group on Health Biologics and Specialty Pharmacy: Employer Challenges & Opportunities National Business Coalition on Health 11/13/12 Specialty Pharmacy (SP) Landscape Generics do not exist today • One exception – a generic for Hemophilia Biosimilars are a copy of a biologic drug… • But they are not identical • FDA approval pathway still under development • Only a few biosimilars are likely to be available with cost savings at about 20% less Biobetters represent improvements to the original product • Typically offering an easier route of administration or less frequent dosing Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 2 Economic Impacts to Employers Specialty drugs are the fastest growing segment of overall pharmacy benefits spend Costs are growing at 2x the rate of traditional drugs with cost drivers including: Aging population with chronic conditions High cost per unit – $6,000 to $1M per year Increasing number of FDA approved drugs Fast growing pipeline – over 800 drugs Special storage, handling and administration requirements Role of diagnostics and related tests and services Three drugs account for more than half of all SP spending Cancer – Arthritis – Multiple Sclerosis Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 3 Economic Impacts to Employers Specialty drugs that work for one person may not work for another Resulting in the potential of multiple Rx fills Need for related diagnostics/devices/testing Costs account for about 17% of the average employer’s overall pharmacy costs and this number is rising fast By 2020 it’s anticipated that 40% of the pharmacy drug spend will be attributed to biologics/specialty pharmacy Approximately 50% of specialty drug spend occurs in the medical benefit making it difficult to track and manage Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 4 Midwest Business Group on Health National Employer Initiative on Specialty Pharmacy Benefits 2012 Establishing an Employer View MBGH Project Background MBGH board of directors cites biologic/specialty pharmacy as #1 priority since 2010 Coalition sees significant growth in SP products and related cost impacts to employers Partner with Randy Vogenberg, PhD, Institute for Integrated Healthcare to develop multi-year employer research project Conduct national employer surveys; multiple, national educational programs and seek out feedback from employers across the country Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 6 Addressing Employer Needs Work Stream 1 – 2011 to 2012 2011 Established Employer Advisory Councils – Chicago & Baltimore Conducted National Employer Baseline Survey Conducted Educational Outreach with employer group testing 2012 Developing Employer Toolkit Conducting 2nd National Employer Survey with expansion of survey research Next steps…..implementing Future Work Streams through 2013 Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 7 National Employer Initiative on Specialty Pharmacy 2012 Employer Survey 2012 Employer Survey MBGH partners with 15 NBCH sister coalitions from across the country More than 100 employers participate in the survey Population Size: 40% - 1,000-5,000 20% - Over 25,000 15% - 10,000-15,000 Industry Sector: 40% Manufacturing; 15% Education; 15% Government 90% of respondents are self-insured Copyright 2011 © MBGH & IIH 9 Employer – HR/Benefits Level of understanding of SP 2011: 78% - Low to Moderate Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 2012: 54% - Above Average 10 Employer – Executive Leadership’s Level of understanding of SP Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 11 Medical & pharmacy claims costs paid in 2011 (or most recent plan year) Total combined medical & pharmacy claims costs paid in 2011 Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH Per employee medical & pharmacy claims costs paid in 2011 12 Percentage of medical costs paid for SP drugs and related services 2011 Survey: 70% of Employers indicated “Don’t know” Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 13 Percentage of prescription drug costs paid for SP drugs and related services 2011 Survey: 40% of Employers indicated “Don’t know” Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 14 Increase of SP Costs Over Past 3 Years 2011 Survey: 29% of Employers indicated “Don’t know” Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 15 Three top disease states incurring the greatest SP costs Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 16 Employer level of involvement in working with SP benefits Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 17 Description of SP plan design Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 18 Description of SP plan design Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 19 Types of incentives used to encourage… (waived co-pays; co-insurance) Yes Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH No Don’t know 20 Type of reports employer receives Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 21 2012 Employer Survey Strategies & Tactics for SP Management Top three for tactics for managing SP 1. Case management 2. Prior authorization 3. Drug utilization Effectiveness of top outcomes for disease/case management support 1. 2. 3. Treatment compliance Medication adherence Management of chronic conditions Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 23 Primary service providers for SP benefits and services Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 24 Most importance factors when contracting with SP service provider • 83% Cost of services • 77% Overall importance • 64% Medication adherence • 55% Care management support • 52% Cost transparency model • 52% Trend management • 48% Step therapy edits for claims approval • 46% Prior authorization for claims approval Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 25 Working with SP service provider Top outcomes used to evaluate SP service providers Types of performance guarantees included in SP contracts 1. Cost management 2. Overall performance 3. Patient management • 68% • 53% • 47% Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH Guaranteed rebates Accurate processing Cost management 26 Providers of targeted communications to increase awareness of SP programs Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 27 Targeted communications Effectiveness of strategies to improve use of SP for past few years 52% Pharmacy networks 54% Benefits coverage options 52% Utilization management Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH Types of communication vehicles 28 Employer lessons learned – design, management, vendor partnering Work closely with PBM to identify trends early … develop appropriate action plan to manage cost and utilization Specialty is an ever increasing cost and component of total medical spend … there’s a need for strict guidelines, protocol and prior authorizations is very important Need high quality vendor to coordinate with regular drug program Make certain that the provider has robust reporting tools to drill down into the data Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 29 Employer lessons learned – management of at-risk population Step therapy and prior authorization Communicate the cost and special needs around specialty drugs Get and use as much data as possible Consistency is important Communication is key; provide incentive in wellness program for active disease management program participation Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 30 Biologics & Specialty Pharmacy National Employer Initiative 2012 Employer Toolkit Employer Specialty Pharmacy Toolkit • Launch Winter 2012 • Developed with input from employer advisors, feedback from educational program participants and staff expertise • Toolkit includes resources, best practices and employer case studies • Key areas include: – Understanding Specialty Pharmacy Benefits and tools for the C-Suite – Innovation in Benefit Plan Design and Service Partner Contracting – Managing At-Risk Populations; Communications and Resources Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 32 Section 1: Specialty Pharmacy 101 www.specialtyrxtoolkit.com Insert home page here • • • • Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH • Understanding the Basics Specialty pharmacy landscape – No single definition for specialty drugs – Market view: Who are the key stakeholders? – Delivery, distribution & dispensing – Generics & other biologic drugs The Employer as Key Stakeholder – From the research: the employers’ perspective – The value proposition Future Trends & Impacts on Employers List of Recommendations 33 Section 1: Specialty Pharmacy 101 www.specialtyrxtoolkit.com Insert inside page here Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH • Edit Economics of specialty pharmacy • Shifting Rx marketplace • Current trends & cost drivers • Future growth trends • Dose forms & Diagnostics • Education for C-Suite 34 Sections 2 & 3 Planning & Contracting • Innovation in Benefit Plan Design and Service Partner Contracting • Employer as the plan sponsor • Vendor contract language • Plan design best practices Managing At-Risk Populations; Communications and Resources • Employer health care management priorities • Employee satisfaction • Benefit design and its management • Communicating with covered population • PBM RFP Checklist Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 35 Biologics & Specialty Pharmacy National Employer Initiative Future Work Streams Project Work Streams Address market need to understand employer perspective and claims experience in the use of specialty pharmacy drugs and services. Conduct employer pilot programs to test value-based benefit design concepts and measure their effectiveness. Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH Research and develop innovative value-based benefit design coverage approaches. Work Stream 1 2011 to 2012 Work Stream 2 2012 to 2013 Work Stream 3 2012 to 2014 Work Stream 4 2012-2014 Deliver education on outcomes to all key stakeholders, including reporting, presentations and publications. 37 Biologics & Specialty Pharmacy National Employer Initiative Stakeholder Meeting July 2012 Stakeholder Representation Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 39 What did the employers say? • Health Care Reform: – Government may put controls in place if prices stay where they are or go up – Need to look at what other environmental changes they need to work through – Not dropping coverage but need to look at benefit design for SP • Don’t assume that employers know what they’re doing –we need to trust the vendors– but not sure we can • So many variables…..Co-insurance; max out-of-pocket-hit after two doses; physician mark-up; can’t track via j-codes Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 40 Top trends in the next 2 to 5 years • Specialty meds becoming the main driver of overall cost trend • Required use of specialty pharmacies with intensive case management • Mandatory specialty pharmacy utilization driven by benefit design • More dosage forms (e.g. oral and IV) within therapeutic categories • More Biogenerics; Biosimilars • Continued mergers and acquisitions of specialty pharmacies and PBM’s Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 41 Top trends in the next 2 to 5 years • Continued increase in power and influence of employer groups/ coalitions • Vendors going at risk to drive outcomes, clinical utility and quality of life measures • Incremental increase in treatment populations as oral dosage forms replace injectables in some therapeutic classes • Increase in state level regulatory mandates for specialty benefit designs that are at parity with non-specialty benefits. • Greater interoperability of systems to improve communications across transitions of care Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 42 MBGH Initiative Summary • Critically important to address knowledge gaps currently among most stakeholders in marketplace • Innovation and performance is desired but lacking in market today—an important area to inspire action • Market change or shifts will continue into 2015 while technology growth escalates over next 2-5 years – Doing nothing is no longer an option • Employer resources to empower all stakeholders is essential • Ongoing stakeholder collaboration is critical to success Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 43 Project Contacts Cheryl Larson, Vice President Midwest Business Group on Health clarson@mbgh.org www.mbgh.org MBGH is one of the nation's leading not-for-profit business coalitions of private and public employers. Members are represented by human resources/health benefits professions for approximately 110 large self-insured public and private employers, who represent over 3 million lives and spend more than $3 billion on health care benefits annually. F. Randy Vogenberg, PhD, Principal Institute for Integrated Healthcare, Sharon, MA Strategic Pharmaceutical Advisor, Business Group Pharmaceutical Collaborative randy@vogenberg.com The Institute for Integrated Healthcare, an organization that provides integrated pharmaceutical benefits consulting and education to self-insured employers and business coalitions. Copyright 2012 © MBGH & IIH 44