Wellbeing pharmacy and the Global Better Sex Survey Mark Davis Health Living and Citizenship Roundtable Meeting, Monash Prato Campus, 25-26 June 2009 Overview • Introduce Pfizer’s sex surveys and how these address ‘satisfaction’ • Put Pfizer’s surveys in context of previous surveys • Reflect on unorthodox uses of Viagra • Consider tensions in Pfizer’s use of sexual satisfaction Pfizer’s surveys: GSSAB • Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors • “. . . subjective sexual well-being” (Laumman et al 2006: 146) During the past 12 months, how physically pleasurable did you find your relationship with your partner to be? During the past 12 months, how emotionally satisfying did you find your relationship with your partner to be? Pfizer’s surveys: GBSS • Global Better Sex Survey, 2005/6 • ‘The GBSS was commissioned to quantify levels of sexual satisfaction whilst gaining a unique insight into the unmet sexual needs and aspirations of couples throughout the world.’ cornerstone-msc.net/GBSS1/gbss_survey.htm • http://www.menshealth.com.my/ed_11.htm • www.viagra.com National sex surveys • • • • Kinsey, US, 1948 and 1953 ‘Little Kinsey’, late 1940s, UK, (Stanley, 1995) Hite Reports, 1976 & 1981 National Survey of Family Growth, US, 6 surveys between 1973 to 2002/3 • National Health and Social Life Survey, US, 1992 • National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, UK, 1990/91 & 2000 • Sex in Australia, 2000/1 Features of Pfizer’s sex surveys • ‘Not biased like Kinsey’ Justify themselves through public health (sexual satisfaction) Use random survey methods to ensure credibility • Satisfaction (genital sex) • Privatised To summarise: • The Pfizer surveys show what private capital can do when the state cannot act: creative use of method traverse the globe, effortlessly and trouble free provide unprecedented information • Appear to have opened up questions of satisfaction in novel ways BUT • Implicitly and explicitly join satisfaction with Viagra (and therefore privilege sex as penetration) Viagra cultures • Self-prescibers (Fox and Ward, 2006) • Poly-drug users (Fisher et al, 2006) and gay men (Mansergh, 2006) • What can a Viagra body do? (Potts, 2004) Wellbeing pharmacy • Pfizer’s sex surveys: Eclectic mix of scientific credibility, sexual subjectivity and private consumption Render satisfaction calculable, purified, globalised Help establish Viagra orthodoxy and chase out alterities • Sexual wellbeing in a pill Attractive, necessary and banal Is this really better sex? References • • • • • • • Fisher, D., Malow, R., Rosenberg, R., Reynolds, G., Farerell, N. and Jaffe, A. (2006), 'Recreational Viagra use and sexual risk among drug abusing men', American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2, 2, 107-114. Fox, N. and Ward, K. (2006) 'Health identities: from expert patient to resisting consumer', health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10, 4, 461-479. Laumman et al 2006, Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 35, 2: 146. Mansergh, G., Shouse, R., Marks, G., Guzman, R., Rader, M., Buchbinder, S. and Colfax, G. (2006), 'Methamphetamine and sildenafil (Viagra) use are linked to unprotected receptive and insertive anal sex, respectively, in a sample of men who have sex with men', Sexually Transmitted Infections, 82, 131-134. Potts, A. (2004), 'Deleuze on Viagra (Or, What can a 'Viagra-body' do?)', Body & Society, 10, 1, 17-36. Reumann, M. (2005), American sexual character: Sex, gender and national identity in the Kinsey Reports, (Berkeley: University of California Press). Stanley, L. (1995) Sex surveyed 1949-1994: From Mass-Observation's 'Little Kinsey' to the National Survey and the Hite Reports (London: Taylor & Francis)