The Medical Board’s Evolving Approach to Impairment Cases and the “One Bite” Rule Glenbeigh Hospital The Medical Board’s Evolving Approach to Impairment Cases and the “One Bite” Rule Glenbeigh Hospital Daniel S. Zinsmaster, Esq. Columbus, Ohio E: daniel.zinsmaster@dinsmore.com P: (614) 628-6949 F: (614) 628-6890 State Medical Board of Ohio – General 12 Board Members (7 MDs, 1 DO, 1 DPM, 3 consumer members) Staff of 80 Executive; Licensure; Enforcement / Investigations / Compliance State Medical Board of Ohio – General Board licenses 55,000 health care professionals MDs, DOs, DPMs, PAs, MTs, CTs, AAs, RAs, Acupuncturists, and Genetic Counselors Investigations 4500-5000 complaints per year Immunity to complainants No statute of limitations Confidential pursuant to R.C. 4731.22(F)(5) Investigations Board’s Secretary (Mark Bechtel, MD) and Supervising Member (Bruce Saferin, DPM) oversee entire investigative process Investigations Approximately 20 field Investigators 8 enforcement attorneys plus Chief Enforcement Attorney (Rebecca Marshall) Quality Intervention Panel Discipline R.C. 4731.22 – basis for disciplinary action Over 45 different grounds for action Ohio Administrative Code (“OAC”) – rules promulgated by Board Code of Ethics (AMA, AOA, ABPM) Discipline Sanctions include: no further action; reprimand; denial; limitation; probation; suspension; revocation (permanent and non-permanent) R.C. 4731.22(G) – summary suspension (clear and convincing evidence of violation + danger of immediate and serious harm) Impairment R.C. 4731.22(B)(26) – “Impairment of ability to practice according to acceptable and prevailing standards of care because of habitual or excessive use or abuse of drugs, alcohol, or other substances that impair ability to practice.” Definition includes an inability to practice without appropriate treatment, monitoring or supervision Impairment OAC Chapter 4731-16, Impaired Practitioners OAC 4731-16-02 – general procedures in impairment cases Impairment Primary source of Board disciplinary actions 40% of total actions for FY 2014 Impairment Evaluation Evaluation at Board-approved treatment provider Legal standard to compel – “reason to believe” Internal criteria to assist S/SM’s determination Failure to attend amounts to an admission unless circumstances beyond control Impairment Evaluation OAC 4731-16-05 – 72-hour evaluation (except for MTs) Urine screening, blood alcohol testing, or both Complete medical history and physical examination Psychiatric evaluation and mental status examination Comprehensive chemical use history Impairment Evaluation Costs borne by applicant or licensee Generally $2000 to $6000 Board chooses date, time, and location Generally, no duty to reschedule Impairment Evaluation Legal definition different from medical definition DSM vs. R.C. 4731.22(B)(26) Does chemical misuse warrant treatment, monitoring or supervision? Treatment 28 days minimum of inpatient treatment 2 year aftercare contract (compliant with OAC 4731-1610) Impairment Actions If disciplinary action sought, indefinite suspension forthcoming Pre-2013, Step I and II Consent Agreements Current approach, summary suspension pursuant to R.C. 4731.22(G) Impairment Actions Minimum suspension period for criminal conduct associated with impairment Minimum of two assessments to be reinstated 5 year probationary term following license reinstatement “One Bite” Affords impaired licensee opportunity to avoid public action if he or she seeks evaluation and treatment before and/or without Board intervention Must meet stringent and often unclear criteria “One Bite” Many common misconceptions (e.g. not a rule, but a policy) Exemption from the mandatory reporting requirements (R.C. 4731.224, R.C. 4731.25, OAC 4731-15, OAC 4731-16-07) “One Bite”– disqualifying conduct Criminal conviction related to use or abuse of a controlled substance, or criminal conviction of any type (other than DUI) at or near the time that the Board is determining whether the licensee qualifies for One Bite Treatment in lieu Relapse “One Bite”– disqualifying conduct continued Failure to complete appropriate treatment and aftercare with a Board-approved provider Criminal acts that involve the use of another’s name or involve patients, the use of another physician’s name as the issuing/authorizing physician, and/or lying to other physicians to obtain drugs Patient care known to have been compromised “One Bite”– disqualifying conduct continued Out of state action License applicants (except those who previously were granted one bite status while holding a training certificate, apply for full licensure, and otherwise qualify for continuing one bite status) “One Bite”– qualifying conduct Illegal drug use DUI conviction Taking drugs from source that does not involve patients (office supply/other stock) Issuing prescriptions for drugs for one’s own use in one’s own name or a fake name “One Bite”– Out-of-State Licensees OAC 4731-16-12(C) – a certificate holder who neither resides nor practices in Ohio who is diagnosed or treated for chemical abuse or chemical dependency outside Ohio must report that diagnosis or treatment in renewing his or her certificate But… “One Bite”– Out-of-State Licensees OAC 4731-16-02(D) – the board may forgo action if: 1. Not subject to discipline in any other jurisdiction 2. Is receiving or has completed treatment with a provider acceptable to the medical licensing agency in which he / she resides 3. No relapse 4. Is participating in or has completed monitoring or diversion program acceptable to the medical licensing agency in which he / she resides Mental or Physical Illness R.C. 4731.22(B)(19) – “Inability to practice according to acceptable and prevailing standards of care by reason of mental illness or physical illness, including, but not limited to, physical deterioration that adversely affects cognitive, motor, or perceptive skills.” Definition includes an inability to practice without appropriate treatment, monitoring or supervision “One Bite” – Mental or Physical Illness Does not exist in Ohio Deters mental health treatment and self-reporting to Board Dual diagnoses can oftentimes preclude (B)(26) One Bite “One Bite” – Proposed Changes All persons diagnosed with chemical dependency or abuse would be required to send notice to the Board Board’s Compliance Officer and S/SM would review to determine if person qualifies for One Bite If yes, gets One Bite approval letter If not, complaint filed and disciplinary action likely “One Bite” – Proposed Changes continued Board’s proposed changes would require not just new administrative rules, but legislative action to alter statutes Push back from medical community and other interested parties “One Bite” – Proposed Changes continued Chilling effect to self-referred evaluations and voluntary treatment One Bite review would be entirely internal with no recourse or right to appeal adverse conclusion “One Bite” – Proposed Changes continued (B)(19) One Bite? Suboxone Suspended licensees taking Suboxone for opioid withdrawal and maintenance will not be reinstated by the Board Suspended licensees with a history of opioid dependency or abuse and taking Suboxone for pain management will be reinstated by the Board Interesting non-Ohio Developments California Proposition 46 Would require hospitals to randomly drug test physicians as follows: Within 24 hours of adverse event, or When hospital receives report of possible impairment while on duty or failure to follow appropriate standard of care Positive results reported to California Medical Board Interesting non-Ohio Developments continued Supported by Daniel Levinson, Inspector General, United States Department of Health and Human Services Also supported by Sen. Barbara Boxer and Rep. Nancy Pelosi Polling and focus group show early approval of proposal from electorate Daniel S. Zinsmaster, Esq. Questions? Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 191 West Nationwide Blvd, Suite 300 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Direct: (614) 628-6949 Fax: (614) 628-6890 daniel.zinsmaster@dinsmore.com