Gregory Marchildon, University of Regina
Jennifer Verma, CHSRF
David Secko, Concordia University
Erik Landriault, CIHR-IHSPR
Annual CAHSPR Conference
May 30, 2012
Introduce EvidenceNetwork.ca
Writing a Snappy OpEd
OpEds as a KT vehicle
What are OpEd editors looking for?
Traditional media vs. Online publishers
Beginners’ Inventory of Popular Outlets
YOUR TURN!
1
2
3
To get your research “out”
To set the record straight
To counter a growing “belief” that is not based on, or even counter to the evidence
(myth-busting)
To exercise your “full” citizenship
4
“Opposite the Editorial Pages” (OpEd)
Key Perimeters:
◦ Focus on a single or few major points/arguments
◦ Succinct (650-750 words)
◦ Timely ( newsworthy )
◦ Compelling, convincing and conversational
◦ Draw from strong evidence ( noting, research on its own rarely changes minds )
◦ Jargon- and citation-free ( but not evidence-free!
)
◦ Provide a solution or steps toward a solution ( What needs to be done?
) along with the key players ( Who needs to do it?
)
5
THE LATEST RESEARCH SHOWS THAT
WE REALLY SHOULD DO SOMETHING
WITH ALL THIS RESEARCH
6
Knowledge translation is about:
Making users aware of knowledge and facilitating their use of it to improve health and health care systems
Closing the gap between what we know and what we do (reducing the know-do gap)
Moving knowledge into action
7
Knowledge Translation is something that most researchers are already doing, to some extent.
Researchers who: publish their research findings tell other researchers about their work present their work at conferences
……are engaged in at least one part of the process we call “knowledge translation”: disseminating the results of their work to their peers
8
Consistent evidence of failure to translate research findings into clinical practice:
• 30-45% patients do not get treatments of proven effectiveness
• 20–25% patients get care that is not needed or potentially harmful
(McGlynn et al, 2003; Grol R, 2001; Schuster, McGlynn, Brook, 1998)
Cancer outcomes could be improved by 30% with optimum application of what is currently known
10% reduction in cancer mortality with widespread use of available therapies
(CSCC 2001; Ford et al, 1990)
9
A broad spectrum of activities including:
Diffusion (let it happen)
Dissemination (help it happen)
◦ activities that tailor the message and medium to a specific audience
Application (make it happen)
◦ moving research into practice/policy in cases where the strength of evidence is sufficient
10
Some filters that editors use when considering opinion:
1.
Can the writer claim expertise on the topic?
Is the argument refreshing without being perilous
2.
3.
to the publication?
Can the argument be connected to current events or news?
Alterative structural view:
1.
Starts with a provocative statement;
2.
3.
4.
Provocative statement is contrasted against what is at stake;
Supporting information answers everything that might immediately come to a reader’s mind;
A recap elaborates on the provocative statement.
11
Multimediality, interactivity and hypertextuality
Blended journalism
Editorial Staff
Authority
Speed
Audience
Content +
Distribution +
Credibility
Secko. JPM 10(2&3): 261 (2009)
12
13
Connect with news media that report on health
(e.g.,
(e.g.,
Globe and Mail, Hamilton Spectator publish analyses, opinion and editorial content
Troy Media , Huffington Post ,
) and
The Mark )
Put a “Creative Commons” on the content – reprints in small community, rural, niche, ethnic and online media across the country
Remember Grey Literature (e.g., NGO newsletters, websites, magazines)
Get a ‘double run’ by translating
14
Form a team > Pick a theme (4)
Review materials (news article,
)
Develop key points for an OpEd
Report back
Compare EvidenceNetwork.ca expert OpEds
Wrap up and closing thoughts
15
Aging Population and its
Potential Impact
Healthcare Costs and
Spending
More Care is Not Always
Better
Health is More than
Healthcare
Private, For-Profit Solutions to Funding and Delivery
Patient Financing of
Healthcare (The Patient Pays)
Sustainability
Waiting for Care
16
17
“Explore all funding options for health care, says outgoing CMA head”
(Postmedia News, Aug 12, 2011) http://www.canada.com/business/Explore+funding+options+health+care+says+outgoing+head/528
8501/story.html
“Myth: User Fees
Would Stop Waste and Ensure Better Use of the
Healthcare System”
(CHSRF, 2001) http://www.chsrf.ca/Migrated/PDF/myth4_e.pdf
“Making patients pay won’t make our health system more affordable”
(2011-2012) by Raisa Deber and
Noralou Roos, published in the The Toronto Star and The Montréal Gazette http://umanitoba.ca/outreach/evidencenetwork/archives/4380
18
19
20
21
22
◦ Is it topical? Does it offer a new angle? How might you open and close the OpEd?
◦ What other research, evidence or sources would you like to consider?
23
◦ Is it topical? Does it offer a new angle? How might you open and close the OpEd?
◦ What other research, evidence or sources would you like to consider?
24
◦ Is it topical? Does it offer a new angle? How did they open and close the OpEd?
◦ What other research, evidence or sources did they consider?
25
THANK YOU!
NOW, IT’S YOUR TURN!
26
◦
:
“Canada’s aging population will strain the health-care system”
(Feb 6, 2012) http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/editorials/canadas-aging-populationwill-strain-the-health-care-system/article2326529/
◦
“Myth: The Aging
Population is to Blame for Uncontrollable
Healthcare Costs”
(2011) http://www.chsrf.ca/Libraries/Mythbusters/Myth_AgingPopulation_EN_FINAL_1.sflb.ashx
◦
“We can sustain our health care system—here’s how
”(2011-2012) by Neena Chappell, published in the
Hill Times, Calgary Herald and the Halifax Chronicle Herald http://umanitoba.ca/outreach/evidencenetwork/archives/4641
27
◦
: “Mammography harm 'underappreciated’
Decline in breast cancer deaths from therapy, not screening”
(Apr 2, 2012) http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/04/02/mammographyoverdiagnosis-breast-cancer.html
◦
“Myth: Early detection is good for everyone”
(2006) http://www.chsrf.ca/Migrated/PDF/myth22_e.pdf
and “Myth: Wholebody screening is an effective way to detect hidden cancers”
(2009) http://www.chsrf.ca/Migrated/PDF/11491_newsletter_en.pdf
◦
“Small benefits, substantial harms with mammography screening” by Cornelia Baines, published in The National Post and Huffington Post http://umanitoba.ca/outreach/evidencenetwork/archives/4490
28
◦
“Financer (enfin) les hôpitaux au rendement”
(01 mars 2012) http://www.cyberpresse.ca/debats/editoriaux/201202/29/01-4501135-financer-enfin-leshopitaux-au-rendement.php
and “Activity-based hospital funding: boon or boondoggle?”
(May 20, 2008) http://www.cmaj.ca/content/178/11/1407.full.pdf
◦
“Myth: Activity-Based
Funding Leads to For-Profit Hospital Care”
(2012) http://www.chsrf.ca/Libraries/Mythbusters/Myth-ABF-leads-to-profit-E.sflb.ashx
◦
“New hospital funding models not without risks”
(2012) by Jason Sutherland and M. Trafford Crump, published in the Hill
Times and the Calgary Beacon http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/02/why-we-never-seem-tohave-enough-hospital-beds-in-canada/
29
◦ News:
“Generic Drugs vs. Brand Name Drugs”
(Sept, 2011) http://www.readersdigest.ca/health/sickness-prevention/generic-drugs-vs-brand-name-drugs
◦ Research Summary:
“Myth: Generic Drugs are Lowerquality and Less Safe Than Brandname Drugs”
(2007) http://www.chsrf.ca/Libraries/Mythbusters/Myth_Generic_drugs_are_lower_quality_EN_FINAL.sflb.a
shx
◦ Op-Ed:
“Designer drugs: You’re really paying for the name”
(2012) by Alan Cassels, published in the Huffington Post and the Hill Times http:
//umanitoba.ca/outreach/evidencenetwork/archives/4764 and “The $2-billion extra price tag of brand-name drugs in
Canada”and “Our Surprisingly Expensive Pharmaceuticals”
(2011) by Marc-André Gagnon, published in the Hill Times and The Mark News (respectively) http://www.themarknews.com/articles/4789-our-surprisingly-expensive-pharmaceuticals
30