CHAPTER 8 Cost-Benefit Analysis McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Projecting Present Dollars into the Future R0 = $1000 R1 = $1000*(1+.01) = $1010 R2 = $1010*(1+.01) = $1020.10 R2 = $1000*(1+.01)2 = $1020.10 RT = R0*(1+r)T 8-2 Projecting Future Dollars into the Present R0 = $1000 R1 = $1000*(1+.01) = $1010 R2 = $1010*(1+.01) = $1020.10 R2 = $1000*(1+.01)2 = $1020.10 RT = R0*(1+r)T Present Value R0 = RT/(1+r)T discount factor discount rate 8-3 Present Value of a Stream of Money R1 R2 RT PV R0 ... 2 T (1 r ) (1 r ) (1 r ) 8-4 Inflation (1 ) R1 (1 ) 2 R2 (1 ) T RT PV R0 ... 2 2 (1 )(1 r ) (1 ) (1 r ) (1 ) T (1 r ) T 8-5 Private Sector Project Evaluation B2 C2 B3 C3 BT CT PV B1 C1 ... 2 T 1 r (1 r ) (1 r ) Annual Net Return PV Admissible Year R&D Advertising R= R&D Advertising 0 $1,000 -$1,000 0 $150 $200 Preferable Present Value Criteria 1 600 0 0.01 128 165 2 0 0 0.03 86 98 3 550 1,200 0.05 46 37 0.07 10 -21 8-6 Internal Rate of Return B2 C2 B3 C3 BT CT PV B1 C1 ... 0 2 T 1 (1 ) (1 ) Project Year 0 Year 1 ρ Profit PV X -$100 $110 10% $4 3.77 Y -$1,000 $1,080 8% $20 18.87 8-7 Benefit-Cost Ratio B1 B2 BT B B0 ... 2 T 1 r (1 r ) (1 r ) C1 C2 CT C C0 ... 2 T 1 r (1 r ) (1 r ) Benefit-cost ratio = B/C 8-8 Problems with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method B C B/C I $250 $100 2.5 II $200 $100 2.0 I: Subtract $40 mistake from B I: Add $40 mistake to C $210 $100 2.1 $250 $140 1.79 8-9 Discount Rate for Government Projects • Returns in Private Sector • Social Discount Rate – Paternalism – Market Inefficiency • Discounting and the Economics of Climate Change • Government Discounting in Practice 8-10 • Market Prices • Adjusted Market Prices – Shadow price • Monopoly • Taxes • Unemployment • Consumer Surplus Price per pound of avocados Valuing Public Benefits and Costs $2.89 $1.35 e b d Sa c g Sa’ Da A0 A1 Pounds of avocados per year 8-11 Inferences from Economic Behavior • The Value of Time • The Value of Life – Lost earnings – Probability of death 8-12 Valuing Intangibles • Subverting cost-benefit exercises • Reveal limits on intangibles • Cost-effectiveness analysis 8-13 Games Cost-Benefit Analysts Play • The Chain-Reaction Game • The Labor Game • The Double-Counting Game 8-14 Distributional Considerations • Hicks-Kaldor Criterion – a project should be undertaken if it has positive net present value, regardless of distributional consequences • Government costlessly corrects any undesirable distributional aspects • Weighted benefits 8-15 Uncertainty Project Benefit Probability EV X $1,000 1.00 $1,000 0 0.50 Y $2,000 0.50 $1,000 Certainty Equivalent 8-16 Are Reductions in Class Size Worth It? • • • • Discount rate Costs Benefits The Bottom Line and Evaluation 8-17 Use (and Nonuse) by Government • Using Cost-Benefit Analysis • Not Using Cost-Benefit Analysis – Clean Air Act – Endangered Species Act – Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 8-18 Utility Calculating the Certainty Equivalent Value U U(E + y) U* U(E) Certainty Equivalent Expected income E C I* E+y Income per year 8-19