Percent Composition of Swiss Miss Hot Chocolate Mix By: Jessica, Lexie, Conor, Caitlyn, and Michelle Framing The Investigation Purpose: Find the percent composition of Swiss Miss hot chocolate mix. Hypothesis: If we find out the percent composition of Swiss Miss hot chocolate mix then sugar will be 57% of the mixture, non fat milk will be 15%, modified whey will be 11%, cocoa will be 6%, corn syrup will be 5%, and hydrogenated coconut oil will be 4% because this is the order the ingredients are listed in the label therefore the percentages will decrease in order and our sugar percentage is based on the nutritional facts label shown on the next slide. Framing the Investigation: Swiss Miss Nutrition Facts Swiss Miss Hot Cocoa Serving Size 1 envelope (28g) - Servings Per Container 60 Amount Per Serving Calories Calories from Fat with 6 oz Water 120 20 with 6 oz2% Milk with Vit. A 210 60 Total Fat Saturated Fat Trans Fat Cholesterol Sodium Total Carbohydrate Dietary Fiber % Daily Value* 2g 4% 2g 10% 0g 0mg 0% 160mg 7% 23g 8% <1g 4% 6g 5g 0g 20mg 10% 230mg 10% 31g 10% <1g 4% Sugars 16g 24g Protein Vitamin A Vitamin C Calcium Iron 1g % Daily Value* 10% 25% 7g 0% 0% 30% 4% 6% 0% 50% 4% *Percent Daily Values (DV) are based on a 2,000 calorie diet. SWISS MISS HOT COCOA INGREDIENTS: SUGAR, NON FAT MILK, MODIFIED WHEY, COCOA, CORN SYRUP, HYDROGENATED COCONUT OIL LESS THAN 2% OF: SALT, DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, MONO- AND DIGLYCERIDES, ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR, CARRAGEENAN. CONTAINS: MILK. http://www.discountcoffee.com/SwissMissHotChocolate.htm Framing the Investigation: SEM Background: SEM Vocabulary Charging - charging is when electrons do not fade in to the atmosphere, which results in white spots in the image. Sputter coat - a sputter coat is a small layer of “paint” (conductive coating) that coats the sample and serves as a conductor for the electrons to transfer in to the sample. Mounting - mounting happens when you place a small part of the sample on to the specimen stub. Samples - a sample is the substance you are charging and trying to examine. Optical overview image - an optical overview image is the initial image you see on the computer screen of your substance when it is being charged. Raster scan - a raster scan is the way the electrons are being shot at the specimen. it produces an image of the different particles that the substance consists of at very high magnifications. www.Phenom-world.com/product-information/phenom.php Tour of The Scope Uses electrons instead of light to form an image A beam of electrons is produced at the top of the microscope by heating a metallic filament Electron beam follows a vertical path through the microscope column Goes through electromagnetic lenses which focus and direct the beam towards the sample When it hits the sampler, secondary electrons and ejected from the sample Detectors collect the secondary electrons and convert them to a signal that is sent to a viewing screen, producing an image http://mse.iastate.edu/microscopy/path2.html More Specifically… The SEM shoots electrons through the electron beam (broad) The electron beam is condensed by the anode The magnetic lenses are positively charged, therefore repelling the electrons into a more focused beam (refined) When the electrons hit the sample, other electrons from the sample bounce off and are transmitted by the scanning coils, electron detector, and secondary detector. These electrons help produce the image of the sample which shows up on the viewing screen. http://mse.iastate.edu/microscopy/college.html Our Sample 20X NIKON SMZ800 using Canon Rebel XT Our Technique In order to find the percent composition of each (identifiable) ingredient in the Swiss Miss mixture, we took magnified pictures and made scale boxes (squares) at “random” areas within the picture. We mentally divided the boxes into fourths, each worth 25% of the sample, and visually evaluated the % of the ingredients. Then we averaged each data set. Cocoa Powder Vs. The Mix Phenom Microscope Box is a 312.5 micrometers squared Cocoa is a fine powder that coats some of the ingredients of the mix. It is a grainy-looking substance. Sugar Crystals Vs. The Mix Phenom Microscope Box is a 300.0 micrometers squared Unidentifiable magnification http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3168/2604572 382_0611520835_m.jpg Unidentifiable magnification http://images.dpchallenge.com/images_portf olio/7000074999/71121/800/Copyrighted_Image_Reus e_Prohibited_653226.jpg Milk Vs. The Mix Phenom Microscope http://www.nestle.com/NR/rdonlyres/5629B5D53A3B-4523-8A228FCE0AFED400/0/microscope_milk.jpg Unidentifiable magnifications Milk http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.magma.ca/~ pavel/science/bu-mi10.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.magma.ca/~pavel/science/Milk.htm &usg=__xBqptmRQlzeIWpYVDru5XxD0z9A=&h=133&w=200&s z=15&hl=en&start=3&um=1&tbnid=rUJ1CkFmhwMfLM:&tbnh=69 &tbnw=104&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmilk%2Bunder%2Bmicrosc ope%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IESearchBox%26rlz%3D1I7TSNA%26um%3D1 Box is a 200.0 micrometers squared The Data (1/2) Sugar- 50% Milk- 25% Cocoa- 13% ?- 12% The Data (2/2) 2 Phenom Microscope 1) Box is a 300.0 micrometers squared 2) Box is a 312.5 micrometers squared 3) Box is a 200.0 micrometers squared 1) Sugar- 60% Milk- 25% Cocoa- 15% ?- 10% 2) Sugar50% Milk- 25% Cocoa6% ?- 19% 1 3) Sugar60% Milk- 23% Cocoa13% ?- 14% 3 Data Comparison With Our Hypothesis Sample Pic 1 2 3 Average Sugar 50% 60% 50% 60% 55% Milk 25% 25% 25% 23% 25% Cocoa 13% 10% 6% 13% 11% ? 12% 5% 19% 4% 10% Percentages in average column add up to 101% because of sig figs Hypothesis Sugar 57% Milk 11% Cocoa 5% ? 27% Various Other Components Some of the larger proportion ingredients were unidentifiable because we could not find comparison images to set by the side of our found images. We, therefore, can not assume that certain common items in the mix are any of the ingredients we have not identified. We can assume that the items we could not identify in the hot chocolate mix are any of these things which together compose about 2% of the total mixture: salt, dipotassium phosphate, mono- and diglycerides, artificial flavors [chocolate?], and carrageenan. Conclusion Our data of the percent composition of Swiss Miss hot chocolate mix mostly disproves our hypothesis. Although our estimate of 57% of the mixture being sugar, our data showed 55%, which is very close. However, our other estimates were not quite as close: 11% milk to the actual 25%, 5% cocoa versus the 11% in the mix, and 27% of undiscoverable ingredients to the 10%. Errors It was difficult to find a comparison picture to all of the ingredients in Swiss Miss so we were unable to identify exact composition percentages and all ingredients. Although we found some pictures of certain ingredients that were magnified online, they did not say the level of magnification. This makes any comparison to verify an object difficult. Also, because SEMs are a relatively new technology, it is hard to find images online. In a few years (maybe as little as one), there should be many more pictures that can be used as resources. Our “random” samples were not exactly random. Though our pictures were taken semi-randomly (at points where we touched the screen and the Phenom would allow us to capture clear images or the manual microscope showed a decent image) finding the percent composition in each was in a chosen “representative” position by us. Estimating the percent composition by grid/visual assessment is not accurate and is completely arbitrary and a 2-D image does not allow us to see what is under any particle found in the mix. Other Comments What amazed us is that you can easily sea the Sugar, Milk and Cocoa at a slight microscopic level. Also, once you know what you’re looking for, you can see it with the naked eye. We’re curious where the flavor mostly comes from and how much of the product is manufactured and how that could affect the texture of the mix when dissolved and dry. Next Time… We know that it would be ideal to have images of each ingredient of Swiss Miss and other components we may find in the mixture. It would be ideal to understand the reactions of the different ingredients together for a better understanding of what certain objects on an image plate may represent. More trials and data would aid in the accuracy of percent composition of Swiss Miss. More quality images would be helpful in collecting data. Having more experiences on both microscopes would have aided in having the most precise data.