advertisement

Non-equilibrium Gas Dynamics

Guest lecturer

Harvey S. H. Lam

November 16, 2010

On

**C**

omputational

**S**

ingular

**P**

erturbation

*Computational Singular Perturbation*

Perturbation analysis takes advantage of a small parameter to obtain

*simplified models*

and

*insights*

.

When the usual perturbation analysis fails, the perturbation analysis which succeeds is called

*singular perturbation*

.

Paper and pencil singular perturbation analysis is a collection of tricks. Experience and good judgments about the subject matters are crucial.

Computational singular perturbation is a programmable procedure to general simplified models and insights for a (large) set of first order (non-linear) ordinary differential equations.

No experience or good judgments about the subject matters are needed.

How to find x given

How about

How to find y(t) given:

How about

Chemical Kinetics

The equations: where

**y**

is a vector of N dimensions, and there are R chemical reactions.

Both N and R may be large integers.

Usually R>N.

To obtain a

*simplified model *

with K ODEs and N-K algebraic equations:

Want K as small as possible!

Paper and pencil

N=R=2.

Original Eqns Rewritten…

Can we do the same thing for large N and very complicated

**F**

(

**y**

) without knowing what the small parameter

is?

How does one extract physical insights from a mess of computer generated numbers?

For example, what insights are provided when some of the differential equations can be replaced by algebraic equations…

The questions…

What species are unimportant and can be ignored?

What reactions are unimportant and can be ignored?

Which (important) reaction rate constants must be known accurately?

Which (important) reaction rate constant need not be known accurately?

Who is doing what to whom and when?

“Old methods…”

Conservation of atomic elements

(also something else may be

*nearly*

conserved…)

The

*quasi-steady approximation*

“radicals”.

(need to guess who the radicals are…) on

The

*partial equilibrium approximation*

on fast reactions.

(need to guess which reactions are fast)

*Rewriting the original equations.*

Initial choice of basis vectors

When you begin, you have all the stoichiometric vectors of all the reactions. You may use N linearly independent stoichiometric vectors for you

**a**

n

’s.

A better idea: use the N right eigenvectors of the NXN

**J**

matrix at t=0.

Order the eigenmodes in decreasing eigenvalue

*magnitudes.*

If the problem were linear…

The eigenvectors that diagonalize the

Matrix will continue to diagonalize the

matrix.

But we are interested in

*non-linear*

problems. So after t=0, the

**y**

matrix with constant basis vectors will have offdiagonal terms.

The CSP idea

CSP provides a

*refinement algorithm *

to improve the quality of any set of basis vectors.

The quality of a set of basis vectors is the avoidance of fast-slow mode mixing in the solution. A good set has a

*block diagonal*

*J*

matrix. CSP refinement makes the off-diagonal blocks smaller.

Notations…

CSP refinement algorithm:

Subscript/superscript means

*refined*

:

The CSP procedures

CSP radical pointers

CSP radical corrections

Output of CSP--

Some closing comments

On validation of models

On the effects of diffusion

On what predictions are unreliable

On usefulness of “slow manifolds”

Quasisteady vs partial equilibrim…

ILDM

Applications to control theory…

For limited time, these notes are available for downloading at: http://www.princeton.edu/~lam/documents/CSPmae555.ppt

These notes do not place emphasis on the mathematical details of

CSP which can be found in the published papers.