CLCs Work with Asylum
Seekers in Australia
Criminal Law
Family Law
Housing Law /Homelessness
Referrals
The criminal law impacts on the success of a
Protection visa application in two key ways:
(1) Character (s501 Migration Act)
(2) Joint asylum applications and domestic
violence and/or relationship breakdown
Decision of Minister or delegate--natural justice applies
S501
(1) The Minister may refuse to grant a visa to a person if
the person does not satisfy the Minister that the person
passes the character test.
(2) The Minister may cancel a visa that has been granted
to a person if:
(a) the Minister reasonably suspects that the
person does not pass the character test; and :
(b) the person does not satisfy the Minister
that the person passes the character test.
(6) For the purposes of this section, a person does not pass the character test if:
(a) the person has a substantial criminal record (as defined by subsection (7)); or
(b) the person has or has had an association with someone else, or with a group or
organisation, whom the Minister reasonably suspects has been or is involved
in criminal conduct; or
(c) having regard to either or both of the following:
(i) the person's past and present criminal conduct;
(ii) the person's past and present general conduct;
the person is not of good character; or
(d) in the event the person were allowed to enter or to remain in Australia, there is
a significant risk that the person would:
(i) engage in criminal conduct in Australia; or
(ii) harass, molest, intimidate or stalk another person in Australia; or
(iii) vilify a segment of the Australian community; or
(iv) incite discord in the Australian community or in a segment of that
community; or
(v) represent a danger to the Australian community or to a segment of that
community, whether by way of being liable to become involved in activities that are disruptive
to, or in violence threatening harm to, that community or segment, or in any other way.
Otherwise, the person passes the character test .

(7) For the purposes of the character test, a person has a substantial criminal
record if:
(a) the person has been sentenced to death; or
(b) the person has been sentenced to imprisonment for life; or
(c) the person has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 12 months or
more; or
(d) the person has been sentenced to 2 or more terms of imprisonment (whether
on one or more occasions), where the total of those terms is 2 years or more;
or
(e) the person has been acquitted of an offence on the grounds of unsoundness
of mind or insanity, and as a result the person has been detained in a facility or
institution.
In reaching a decision on whether to refuse or cancel a visa, a decision-maker needs to
consider:
(a)
the nature of any harm that the person concerned may cause to the Australian
community; and
(b)
the risk of that harm occurring
‘Harassment’, ‘molestation’ ‘intimidation’ and ‘stalking’ are to be given their
ordinary meaning.
Note:
Section 501(11) of the Act clarifies the scope of conduct amounting to
harassment or molestation. Conduct and behaviours that may fall under this
category include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a)
conduct that could be construed as harassment or intimidation (whether
or not it breaches the terms of an Apprehended or Domestic Violence (or
similar) Order);
(b)
conduct that potentially places children in danger, such as unwelcome
and/or inappropriate approaches, including, but not limited to, approaches
made through electronic media; or
(c)
conduct that would reasonably cause an individual to be severely
apprehensive, fearful, alarmed or distressed regarding the person’s behaviour
or alleged behaviour towards the individual, or in relation to the property of
that or any other individual.
s501 Migration Act:
 Refusal to grant a visa or to cancel a visa on character grounds
under s501 is a freestanding power that can be used in any
circumstances, notwithstanding other powers in the Act.
 Where a person has a substantial criminal record as defined
under s501(7), they do not pass the character test. There is no
scope to take into account mitigating factors in order to find that
they pass the character test. However, these factors may be
taken into account when the delegate exercises the discretion to
refuse or cancel the visa.
 The general principle is that any convictions that the person may
have incurred at any time will be considered for the purposes of
the character test.
 All convictions that the person has incurred will be considered
for the purposes of the character test, regardless of how long
ago or where the convictions may have occurred.


Many asylum seekers and/or refugees are
unaware of s501 provisions.
It is imperative that a CLC client who is
intending to apply for a Protection visa, or
pending a DIAC/RRT decision, or even has
been granted a visa, is advised of the impact
of a plea on their application. As shown
earlier, even a suspended sentence or a
community service order can count as a
substantial criminal record.
Referral to a Migration Agent is a good idea!
The two main areas of concern for
asylum seekers:
-
Relationship breakdown
-
Family violence



Under the Migration Act a Protection visa can will be
awarded to either a person to whom Australia has
protection obligations under the Convention or a
member of the family unit of such a person, provided
they satisfy the health and public interest criteria.
A member of the family unit may be a spouse, a de
facto or a child. They may or may not have individual
protection claims.
Persons who claim to be members of the family unit
may lodge an application together, as a combined
application. The applicant with the strongest claims is
considered the ‘main applicant’.



If the relationship breaks down, the secondary
applicant needs to lodge a separate claim to
refugee status.
A client who is seeking advice regarding divorce
and/or separation should be advised to get
migration advice concerning the consequences of
the decision to separate if they have a protection
visa application pending.
If the secondary applicant does not have any
claims, he or she may not be entitled to continue
to remain in Australia if the separation proceeds.
Referral to a Migration Agent is a good idea!




It may be that a client is in Australia and has lodged an application for a
partner visa but, in the meantime his or her relationship breaks down be
because of violence.
The Family Violence Provisions of the Migration Act allow this individual
to make an application for a permanent visa if the applicant can
demonstrate that he or she is the victim of Family Violence and was in an
ongoing relationship with an Australian citizen.
These provisions are not available to applicants for a Protection visa. In
such cases, the victim of family violence should, if a secondary applicant,
inform the Department that the relationship has broken down and make
a separate claim for Protection.
If considering a client in this situation, it is important to also consider if
they have been the victim of trafficking and thereby consider the
possibility of a referral to the Anti-Slavery Project, run by the UTS.



Asylum seekers awaiting the outcome of a
Protection visa application are given a Bridging
Visa. This will continue to apply throughout the
appeal process.
If they have been illegal anytime prior to applying
for a Protection visa they will be given a Bridging
Visa E (“BVE”) which will mean they have no work
rights.
Asylum seekers on a BVE are entitled to apply for
a right to work if they can establish a ‘compelling
need to work’ and provide a reasonable
explanation for the delay in applying for a PV.
This is a simple procedure that can be completed
at a RACS evening advice session.



Asylum seekers on any BV do not have access to
welfare. They may, however, have access to
Medicare.
As a result, a number of Asylum seekers may
become homeless or be increasingly indebted. It
is important to recognise that a number of
refugees will only assist Australian residents.
The Red Cross and the Asylum Seekers Centre
are very helpful referral centres in this regard.