Monopoly Demand Curve The industry and the firm are the same The demand curve is downsloping Supply Curve There is no supply curve for a pure monopoly It is possible for different demand conditions to bring about different prices for the same output Marginal Revenue MR is less than P for a monopoly except for the 1st unit They can increase sales only by charging a lower price Price and Marginal Revenue Marginal Revenue is Less Than Price • A Monopolist is Selling 3 Units at $142 • To Sell More (4), Price Must Be Lowered to $132 • All Customers Must Pay the Same Price • TR Increases $132 Minus $30 (3x$10) $142 132 122 112 Loss = $30 D 102 Gain = $132 92 82 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Price Maker The monopolist sets the price of its product by controlling the supply They will set prices in the elastic range of demand (TR test---as price declines, TR increases) Profit Maximization MR = MC rule still applies Draw a vertical line up from where MR = MC to the D curve to find P Profit Maximization Price, Costs, and Revenue $200 175 MC 150 Pm=$122 125 100 75 Economic Profit ATC A=$94 D MR=MC 50 25 0 MR 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quantity 7 8 9 10 Price, Costs, and Revenue Loss Minimization By A Pure Monopolist MC A Pm ATC Loss AVC V D MR=MC MR 0 Qm Quantity Economic Effects of Monopoly Price, Output, and Efficiency Pure Monopoly Purely Competitive Market S=MC MC Pm P=MC= Minimum ATC Pc b c Pc a D D MR Qc Qm Qc Pure Competition is Efficient Monopoly P is >MC And Is Inefficient- make too little at too high a cost Misconceptions About Monopolies 1. Not highest price- seek maximum profit, not price. Some high prices would reduce sales and total revenue 2. Seek maximum total profit not unit profit 3. Possibility of loss- monopolies are not immune to escalating resource costs or changing tastes X inefficiency When a firm produces output at a level higher than the lowest possible cost of producing Reasons: 1. Poorly motivated workers Bad management- looking to expand their power, nepotism etc ***competitive firms avoid x inefficiency because of competition Rent-Seeking Behavior Any activity designed to transfer income or wealth to a particular firm or resource supplier at someone else’s or even society’s expense- increases costs without making a better product Problems with Monopolies 1. Charge higher than competitive prices 2. Stifle innovation 3. Engage in rent-seeking behavior 4. X inefficiency Government Actions 1. if the monopoly is obtained through anti-competitive means, the government can apply anti-trust laws 2. Regulate prices 3. Can ignore it if the monopoly appears short-lived Price Discrimination The practice of selling a specific product at more than one price when the price differences are not justified by cost differences 3 Types of Price Discrimination 1. Charging each customer in a single market the maximum price he is willing to pay 2. Charging each customer one price for the first set of units purchased and a lower price for the subsequent units purchased 3. Charging some customers one price and other customers another price Conditions for Price Discrimination 1. Monopoly Power 2. Market segregation- separate buyers into different classes 3. No resale Examples of Price Discrimination 1. Golf and movie theatres- different age and time costs (seniors, weekend)more expensive on the weekend 2. Airlines charge higher rates on big business travel days Figure 8a: Price Discrimination (a) Dollars per Ticket MC $120 E ATC 80 MR 30 D Number of Round-trip Tickets Figure 8b: Price Discrimination (b) Dollars per Ticket Additional profit from price discrimination MC $160 120 MR 10 30 D Number of Round-trip Tickets Figure 8c: Price Discrimination (c) Dollars per Ticket MC $120 100 G Additional profit from price discrimination F H MR 30 40 D Number of Round-trip Tickets Using the Theory: Price Discrimination at Colleges and Universities Most colleges and universities give some kind of financial aid to a large proportion of their students Financial aid has been used as an effective method of price discrimination Designed to increase revenue of the college Colleges have long been in an especially good position to benefit from price discrimination, because they satisfy all three requirements Face downward-sloping demand curves Able to identify consumers willing to pay more Able to prevent low-price customers from reselling to high- price customers Socially Optimal Price P = MC Regulated price set as a price ceiling (maximum cost) Fair Return Cost P = ATC At times the socially acceptable cost causes the firm to “lose” Governments can subsidize the difference or allow the firm to charge enough to have “fair returns” Regulated Monopoly Perfectly Discriminating Monopoly Unregulated Perfectly Discriminating