BILC PROFESSIONAL SEMINAR Stockholm , October 14 - 17, 2013 INNOVATIVE TEST DESIGNS AND FORMATS Testing in the time of crisis Lt.Col. F. Gratton Francesco Gratton 2013 Summary: • Past situation (up to Sept 2013) • New Course Of Actions adopted • A do-it-all software • Proposals Francesco Gratton 2013 Stanag Proficiency Test 1.0 RECEPTIVE SKILLS (Listening & Reading) 1: Multilevel test (level 1 to 4) 2: Multiple choice questions (60 for L & R) 3: No penalties for wrong answers 4: Duration: R 105’ / L 90’ 5: Separate Sections (& levels) 6: # of correct answers multiplied for a coefficient 7: Potential use of “F” factor Francesco Gratton 2013 How STANAG levels were awarded (Stanag Proficiency Test 1.0) RECEPTIVE SKILLS # of correct answers Multiplied by fixed coefficient (1,66) Francesco Gratton 2013 LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL000 LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL111 LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL222 LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL333 LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL444 CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT % % % CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT % % % CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT % % % CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT % % % CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT % % % 111 1,67 1,67 1,67 11 11 11 18,37 18,37 18,37 26 26 26 43,42 43,42 43,42 41 41 41 68,47 68,47 68,47 56 56 56 93,52 93,52 93,52 222 3,34 3,34 3,34 12 12 12 20,04 20,04 20,04 27 27 27 45,09 45,09 45,09 42 42 42 70,14 70,14 70,14 57 57 57 95,19 95,19 95,19 333 5,01 5,01 5,01 13 13 13 21,71 21,71 21,71 28 28 28 46,76 46,76 46,76 43 43 43 71,81 71,81 71,81 58 58 58 96,86 96,86 96,86 444 6,68 6,68 6,68 14 14 14 23,38 23,38 23,38 29 29 29 48,43 48,43 48,43 44 44 44 73,48 73,48 73,48 59 59 59 98,53 98,53 98,53 555 8,35 8,35 8,35 15 15 15 25,05 25,05 25,05 30 30 30 50,1 50,1 50,1 45 45 45 75,15 75,15 75,15 60 60 60 100,2 100,2 100,2 666 10,02 10,02 10,02 16 16 16 26,72 26,72 26,72 31 31 31 51,77 51,77 51,77 46 46 46 76,82 76,82 76,82 777 11,69 11,69 11,69 17 17 17 28,39 28,39 28,39 32 32 32 53,44 53,44 53,44 47 47 47 78,49 78,49 78,49 888 13,36 13,36 13,36 18 18 18 30,06 30,06 30,06 33 33 33 55,11 55,11 55,11 48 48 48 80,16 80,16 80,16 999 15,03 15,03 15,03 19 19 19 31,73 31,73 31,73 34 34 34 56,78 56,78 56,78 49 49 49 81,83 81,83 81,83 10 10 10 16,7 16,7 16,7 20 20 20 33,4 33,4 33,4 35 35 35 58,45 58,45 58,45 50 50 50 83,5 83,5 83,5 21 21 21 35,07 35,07 35,07 36 36 36 60,12 60,12 60,12 51 51 51 85,17 85,17 85,17 22 22 22 36,74 36,74 36,74 37 37 37 61,79 61,79 61,79 52 52 52 86,84 86,84 86,84 23 23 23 38,41 38,41 38,41 38 38 38 63,46 63,46 63,46 53 53 53 88,51 88,51 88,51 24 24 24 40,08 40,08 40,08 39 39 39 65,13 65,13 65,13 54 54 54 90,18 90,18 90,18 25 25 25 41,75 41,75 41,75 40 40 40 66,8 66,8 66,8 55 55 55 91,85 91,85 91,85 Francesco Gratton 2013 Proficiency Test 1.0 PRODUCTIVE SKILLS SPEAKING (holistically assessed ) 1: Functional language assessed in a global manner 2: Structured interview 3: Tailored to the candidate 4: Checks & probes 5: 1 to 2 role plays Francesco Gratton 2013 JFLT 1.0 PRODUCTIVE SKILLS WRITING (holistically assessed ) Three tasks (one for each level) Francesco Gratton 2013 Summary: • Past situation • New COAs adopted • A do-it-all software • Proposals Francesco Gratton 2013 New COAs adopted •Specifications •Cut-off score •Joint Database Francesco Gratton 2013 Francesco Gratton 2013 • PURPOSE • LEVELS OF LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE • TEST CONTENT • TEST FORMAT • VALIDATION PROCEDURES • ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES Francesco Gratton 2013 Stanag Proficiency Test 1.0 TWAS HIGH & Reading) RECEPTIVE SKILLS (Listening TIME!!! 1: Multilevel test (level 1 to 4) 2: Multiple choice questions (60 for L & R) 3: No penalties for wrong answers 4: Duration: R 105’ / L 90’ 5: Separate Sections (& levels) 6: # of correct answers multiplied by a coefficient 7: Potential use of “F” factor Francesco Gratton 2013 Stanag Proficiency Test 2.0 New Key-factors • Each section is a mini-test (L & R) • Plus levels • Percentages Francesco Gratton 2013 New COAs adopted •Specifications •Cut-off score •Joint Database Francesco Gratton 2013 JFLT 2.0: RDS (Listening & Reading) Section 1 –Stanag level 1 (questions from 1 to 15) No.Correct answ. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 Level awarded 8 9 0+ 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 Section 2 –Stanag level 2 (questions from 16 to 30) No.Correct answ. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Level awarded 8 9 1+ 10 11 12 13 14 15 2 Section 3 –Stanag level 3 (questions from 31 to 45) No.Correct answ. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 Level awarded 8 9 2+ 10 11 12 13 14 15 3 Section 4 –Stanag level 4 (questions from 46 to 60) No.Correct answ. 1 Level awarded 2 3 4 3 5 6 7 8 3+ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 4 Francesco Gratton 2013 EXAMPLE Level 1 (15 questions) Level 2 (15 questions) Level 3 (15 questions) Max score: 45 All candidates answer correctly to 30 questions With Old test they would all get the same score Francesco Gratton 2013 CORRECT LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 BIANCHI 30 10 10 10 3 ROSSI 30 11 10 9 VERDI 30 13 12 5 2+ 2 GIALLI 30 15 8 7 1+ ARANCIONI 30 15 6 9 1 CANDIDATO ANSWERS (15 Questions) (15 Questions) (15 Questions) FINAL LEVEL Francesco Gratton 2013 New COAs adopted •Specifications •Cut-off score •Joint Database Francesco Gratton 2013 NEW LISTENING & READING ITEMS JDB (JOINT DATA BASE) JOINT EFFORT HOW NOT TO MAKE JOINT EFFORTS Francesco Gratton 2013 Test-writers involved • Accustomed to military environment • Language Testing Seminar • Qualified • Norming Sessions Francesco Gratton 2013 ARMY CARABINIERI NAVY AIR FORCE Francesco Gratton 2013 2012 2013 AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAJ JUN JUL WG GdL GdL GdL Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 TIMINGS Phase 1 AUGUST 2013 60 NEW ITEMS. INTO JDB Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 1 NOVEMBER 2013 80 NEW ITEMS. INTO JDB FEBRUARY 2013 20 NEW ITEMS. INTO JDB Phase 4 Phase 2 MAJ 2013 40 NEW ITEMS. INTO JDB Phase 3 Phase 1 Francesco Gratton 2013 Summary: • Past situation • COA (specs, JDB, cut-off score) • A do-it-all software • Proposals Francesco Gratton 2013 WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE ? Francesco Gratton 2013 PC-assessment-related terminology Term Definition Stakes Any systematic method of obtaining Assessment evidence (through questions) for a purpose. Quiz Survey Test Exam … measures for the purpose of providing feedback to the student. Low … to determine needs required to fulfill a Low defined purpose. … measures knowledge for the purpose of informing the student on their current level Medium … measures knowledge for the purpose of High documenting the current level of knowledge Francesco Gratton 2013 the software is used for: • Needs analysis:(surveys) • Placement test • Any training activity • Assessment: – First level survey – Post-course – Pre-certification – Certification Francesco Gratton 2013 Software’s system Schema Create questions And organize them in tests using a windows based PC Francesco Gratton 2013 Assessment …… … allows to choose: Question Manager Assessment Manager On Windows PC • Time limits • Feedback to test-taker • Styles (Template) Questions Question Manager Assessment Manager via Browser Assessment Definitions • Jumps • Question shuffling • Instructions to testtakers Francesco Gratton 2013 Assessments • … also created with Question Manager Assessment Manager su PC Windows authoring manager by selecting Qs previously Question Manager created • Any question can be Questions Assessment Manager via Browser Assessment Definitions chosen from the database Francesco Gratton 2013 Software’s system Schema Result reports, CIA, graphs, gimmicks, you name it ….. assessment published using any browser, secure browsers, or a PC/MAC Create questions And organize them in tests using a windows based PC Set security parameters, schedule assessment and link to other (Learning Management Systems Francesco Gratton 2013 Types of Questions: Multiple Choice Francesco Gratton 2013 Likert Scale (for questionnaires) Francesco Gratton 2013 Essay Question 1. Candidate can write free text in the space provided 2. Testers will evaluate later Francesco Gratton 2013 Francesco Gratton 2013 Summary: • Past situation • COA (specs, JDB, cut-off score) • A do-it-all software • Proposals Francesco Gratton 2013 Testing in the time of crisis • Wide project • Sharing experience & capabilities • Optimization of resources • No alternative to B.A.T. Francesco Gratton 2013 Francesco Gratton 2013 COMBINED DATABASE or … A multilateral-based CDB or … A Bilateral-based CDB Francesco Gratton 2013 Francesco Gratton 2013 1 SPECS 2 3 FLOW TIME SCHEDULE Francesco Gratton 2013 Francesco Gratton 2013 canutesting@sclingue.esercito.difesa.it Thank you francesco.gratton@gmail.com Francesco Gratton 2013