Clark Wheeler - Montana Association of Land Trusts

advertisement

Montana Land Trends

In The Re-emerging Market

Looks Like We’ve Weathered The Storm

Norman C Wheeler & Associates

Bozeman & Missoula, Montana

May, 2014

Please Note:

Opinions

Ideas

Observations

Shameless Projections

Values or Scenarios

These are of a small minded appraiser and may not be coherent or representative of those who govern over us.

The Land Ranch market is re-emerging

What is the Market Rewarding?

Productivity

&

Good Buys

Not Speculative Development or Values

Not the best environment for beneficial

Conservation Easement valuation.

Historically

One Market

The “Other

Market”

State Project

Average Land Sale Values Per Year

$2 500

$2 000

$1 500

$1 000

$500

$505

$655

$960

$874

$785

$1 135

$1 361 $1 325

$1 909

$1 795

Annual Land Report - Norman C.

Wheeler & Assoc. - Summary of data compiled from annual ranch study of land sales > 640 acres in MT recreational land market

$880

$610

$798

$776

$1 164

$-

Note – this is the Western Land Survey

2004 verses 2013

500 000

450 000

400 000

350 000

300 000

250 000

200 000

150 000

100 000

50 000

-

Annual Land Report - Norman C.

Wheeler & Assoc. - Summary of data compiled from annual ranch study of land sales >640 acres in

MT recreational land market

Deeded Acres Sold Per Year

Sale Year

464 074

Lowest Price Point on

Average since 1990s

Volume of Sales & Land Sale Values Per Year

$610

500 000

450 000

400 000

350 000

300 000

250 000

200 000

150 000

100 000

50 000

-

$505

$655

$960

$874

$785

$1 135

$1 361

$1 325

$1 909

$1 795

$880

$798 $776

$1 164

Annual Land Report -

Norman C. Wheeler &

Assoc. - Data compiled from annual ranch study of land sales > 640 acres in MT recreational ranch market

Average Land Value

Deeded Acres

Also a factor of Supply & Demand

Later

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 sub 2012

2013

Larger Ranch Sales Annually - Western Market Bifurcated

Rural Land Sales 640 acres or greater in deeded acres within primary recreational influenced markets - Volume

Norman C Wheeler of confirmed sales - Land Value Expressed as

& Associates - 2013

Year Sales

Unimproved

Deeded Acres Sale Value land survey

Average

Acres

Average

Land Value

1990 10 22,300 $ 11,053,890 2,230 $ 505

33 101,541 $ 68,032,470 3,077 $ 655 1995

2001

2002

2003

61

51

52

320,861

217,546

200,379

$ 313,160,336

$ 192,310,664

$ 159,100,926

5,260

4,266

3,853

$ 960

$ 874

$ 785

Average Per Acre

$899 up 30% up 37%

54 265,394

83 323,895

53 174,229

46 159,061

31 91,999

$ 309,184,010

$ 459,283,110

$ 237,996,000

$ 319,715,000

$ 172,040,000

4,915

3,902

3,287

3,458

2,968

$ 1,135

$ 1,361

$ 1,325

$ 1,909

$ 1,795

Average Per Acre

$1,476 up 64%

17 66,822

41 464,074

47 323,779

46 327,029

$ 60,125,004

$ 291,405,710

$ 273,994,314

$ 258,632,689

37 88,793

34 114,804

$98,254,689

$ 147,851,010

3,931

11,319

6,889

7,109

$ 880

$ 610

$ 798

$ 776

Average Per Acre

$748 down 49%

Average Per Acre

2,400 $1,107

3,376 $ 1,164 $1,135

Up 52% or up 5%

$1 600

$1 400

$1 200

$1 000

$800

$600

$400

$200

$-

$899

2001 to 2003

Average Land Value

$1 476

Annual Land Report - Norman C.

Wheeler & Assoc. - Summary of data compiled from annual ranch study of land sales >640 acres in MT recreational ranch market

$1 135

$748

2004 to 2008

Sale Period

2009 to 2012 2012 to 2013

Bifurcation Analysis 2012 vs. 2013

2012 was $776 per acre overall

Year Sub Class Acres Sale Volume

2012 sub class one 88,793 $ 98,254,689

2012 sub class two 238,236 $ 152,570,205

Land Per

Acre

$ 1,107

$ 640

Sale sample

37

5

73% of market

2013 sub class one 64,753

2013 sub class two 50,051

$ 81,829,548

$ 42,006,210

$ 1,264

$ 839

2013 was $1,164per acre overall

12 up 23%

20 up 31%

Strong Value Influence Based on Commodity Prices

Listings:

Quick Sample over

640 Deeded Acres

194,603 Acres

$1,920 Per Acre

Less IX Ranch

134,603 acres

$2,309 on Average

Overall

$ 16,349

$ 8,699

$ 8,455

$ 8,954

$ 7,619

$ 7,061

$ 6,916

$ 4,659

$ 4,788

$ 4,026

$ 3,839

$ 3,511

$ 4,053

$ 3,339

$ 3,328

$ 2,967

$ 2,368

$ 2,361

$ 2,467

$ 1,839

$ 1,724

$ 1,766

$ 1,759

$ 1,433

$ 1,492

$ 1,224

$ 1,075

$ 1,011

$ 950

$ 962

$ 818

$ 655

Deeded

734

1,138

2,661

1,396

1,050

5,665

2,964

5,366

731

934

1,068

1,965

950

1,782

2,930

3,017

6,291

1,652

1,125

10,605

4,640

9,600

5,060

12,910

2,011

9,800

60,000

4,750

10,000

7,539

5,870

8,399

Imps

$ 2,500,000

$ 750,000

$ 1,500,000

$ 2,000,000

$ 500,000

$ 500,000

$ 5,000,000

$ 1,000,000

$ 300,000

$ 500,000

$ 400,000

$ 450,000

$ 750,000

$ 500,000

$ 1,500,000

$ 500,000

$ -

$ 700,000

$ 750,000

$ 1,000,000

$ -

$ 1,500,000

$ 1,250,000

$ 750,000

$ 500,000

$ 500,000

$ 1,500,000

$ 200,000

$ 400,000

$ 500,000

$ -

List Per

Acre

$ 12,943

$ 8,040

$ 7,892

$ 7,521

$ 7,143

$ 6,973

$ 5,229

$ 4,473

$ 4,378

$ 3,490

$ 3,464

$ 3,282

$ 3,263

$ 3,058

$ 2,816

$ 2,801

$ 2,368

$ 1,937

$ 1,800

$ 1,744

$ 1,724

$ 1,609

$ 1,512

$ 1,375

$ 1,243

$ 1,173

$ 1,050

$ 968

$ 910

$ 895

$ 818

$ 655

Land

$ 9,500,000

$ 9,150,000

$ 21,000,000

$ 10,500,000

$ 7,500,000

$ 39,500,000

$ 15,500,000

$ 24,000,000

$ 3,200,000

$ 3,260,000

$ 3,700,000

$ 6,450,000

$ 3,100,000

$ 5,450,000

$ 8,250,000

$ 8,450,000

$ 14,900,000

$ 3,200,000

$ 2,025,000

$ 18,500,000

$ 8,000,000

$ 15,450,000

$ 7,650,000

$ 17,750,000

$ 2,500,000

$ 11,500,000

$ 63,000,000

$ 4,600,000

$ 9,100,000

$ 6,750,000

$ 4,800,000

$ 5,500,000

2013 Average

$1,164 Per Acre

194,603 $ 373,735,000 $ 1,920 overall Avg

134,603 $ 310,735,000 $ 2,309

Overall Less IX

Ranch

January

2014

2013 Market

Average

$1,164 Per Acre

And Then There’s Demographics

• Who’s next behind the Boomers?

– GenX’ers: born between roughly 1965 and ’82

….now 31 to 48 yrs old.

– Millennials: those following, now 18-30 yrs old

Millennials

GenX

Source: BabyBoomer

HeadQuarters – www.bbhq.com

So when looking at Montana’s Rural Land Markets now, post-RESET….

GenX

Millennials

Location and

Highest & Best Use

(Really) Matter

Changing Matrix – Buyers

Desires – Land Ethic

Native Range

$600

CE – Historically changes to H&B Use- Greater

Mountain Pasture

$850

Irrigated –

Pivot - $4,000

CE – Historically

Limited Change

Productivity

Riparian

$6,500

Features

Typical Matrix s e s

L e a

Native Range

Mountain Pasture

Irrigated –

Pivot -

Riparian

Buildings

Western Markets

Land Class

Pivot Irrigated

Wheel Move

Flood

Irrigated Meadow

Sub Pasture

Dry Crop

Dry Crop - North Central

Mountain Pasture

Native Range

General Value Range Per acre - Land

$ 3,250

$ 2,250

$ 1,500

$ 1,000

$

$

$

$

4,500

3,250

2,500

1,800

$ 500

$ 550

$ 700

$ 600

$ 550

$

$

1,500

$

$

$

800

1,050

900

650

Typical

$ 4,000

$ 3,000

$ 2,500

$ 1,500

$ 750

$ 800

$ 900

$ 800

$ 600

FCS -

Medium

Irrigated

$ 3,000

Dry Crop

$ 715

Dry Pasture

$ 700

Eastern Market

Land Class

River- Irrigated

Flood Haylands

Dry Crop

Timber/Rec Pasture

Native Range

General Value Range Per acre - Land

$ 2,500

$ 800

$

$

3,500

1,500

$ 400

$ 350

$ 275

$

$

$

750

650

500

$ 3,200

$ 1,200

$ 650

$ 600

$ 425

FCS -

Medium

$ 3,200

$

$

715

494

2013

Irrigated

Dry Crop

Dry Pasture

State Of

Montana

$ 2,800

$ 710

$ 580

Avg Rent

Per Acre

$ 86

$ 24

$ 6

Return

3.1%

3.4%

1%

2013

Irrigated

Crop

Dry Crop

Dry Pasture

FCS - All

Montana

$ 3,150

$ 715

$ 475

2013 – Small Lands Analysis

• 100 to 320 Deeded

Acres – 24 Sales

• $12,846,000

• 4,430 Deeded Acres

• $2,900 per acre

Improved

• $2,348 Per Acre

Unimproved

• 321 to 1,000 Deeded

Acres – 25 Sales

$24,167,843

14,076 Deeded Acres

• $1,717 per acre

Improved

$1,394 Per Acre

Unimproved

Appears to be an upside to selling smaller parcels

Based on averages – averages Good

2013 Sales

Water Amenity Properties

5,546 Deeded Acres -

$20,550,000

$7,135 per acre - Improved

$5,425 per acre - Unimproved

Average 504 Deeded Acres

Water Class Values - 2013

Class One Water

• Land Value Per Acre- Overall

• $5,877

• Non CE - $6,460

• CE Encumbered - $3,958

• 38.73% Property Rights

Adjustment

Class Two Water

• Land Value Per Acre-

Overall

• $4,227

• All Non CE Encumbered

Southwestern Montana

River Trending

• Madison County

Madison Only - Riparian Trending

2003 2004-’05

$3,056 $4,301

2006-’07

$8,432 No Sales

2010-’13

$8,536

• Beaverhead County

Beaverhead Only - Riparian Trending

2003

$1,150

2004-’05

$2,385

2006-’07

$3,858 No Sales

2010-’13

$5,896

Not Appreciation – Changing

Property Features Spring Creeks

Averages Good

Recent River Site Data Trends

2011 to 2013

• Average Site - 78.86 acres

• Average Site - $810,000

• $10,272 per acre

Unimproved

• High Amenity

• $914,000

• Lower Amenity

• $595,000

2013 River Sites

$20,550,000

15 Sales – 1,427 Deeded Acres

95.13 acres per site

$1,370,000 Per Site - Improved

$14,401 per acre overall

Average $960,000 Site/Land Value Only

$10,091 Per Acre

Unimproved

FCS –Southeastern Montana Ranches

2012 2013

• Sales Volume

$81,000,000

• Sales Volume

$51,000,000

• Deeded Acres

208,000

• Deeded Acres

117,000

• $390 Per Acre - Deeded

• $436 Per Acre – Deeded

(11.8% Increase)

Eastern Montana – “The Other Market”

Predominately Agricultural H&B Use

2005: $175 to $225 Per Deeded Acre

2010: $225 to $275 Per Deeded Acre

2010 - Emergence of N Bar Sale & Expanding Western Market

Mid State - Spanning Two Market Areas

More Recreational Influence - $400 to $500 Per Acre

2012: $350 to $400 Per Deeded Acre

2013: $435 to $496 Per Deeded Acre

Effect of Transitional Market On Animal Unit Values - 2010

Avg AU Rec Influence

Avg AU Grass Ranch

$ 11,730 Per AU Unimproved

$ 8,043 Per AU Unimproved

Effect of Transitional Market On

Animal Unit Values - 2012

Avg AU Rec Influence

Avg AU Grass Ranch

$ 15,000 Per AU Unimproved

$ 11,000 Per AU Unimproved

What's Up with Appraisers

Regulation began in 1990

Grandfathering

Lack of Mentorship

(intelligence)

IRS Enforcement ( Intimidation) 2006

Overstatement Penalties - Sanctions

Lack of Effective Support or Pushback

By Appraisal Organizations

Report Formats

USPAP

YELLOWBOOK

(One hand tied behind your back)

QUAILIFIED IRS APPRAISAL

(Two hands Tied behind your back)

Pushback was Limited

Errors and Misleading

Reports Flagged - Bad

No Logical Defense

No Real Standards in Place

IRS Walk Over Appraisers & Land Trusts

Subsequently Decreed Rules

“Standard Procedures”

Property Rights Adjustment Gutted for CE Valuation

But Still Fully Acceptable for any other Damages Measurement

Access

Fire

Environmental

Virtually Whole Appraisal Practice is based on Property Rights

Adjustment

USPAP

(Follow the rules)

5 Standards of Practice & Incorporated Rules

10 Statements on Appraisal Standards

32 Advisory Opinions

316 Frequently Asked Questions

USPAP

Report Credible Results in a

Non

Misleading Manner

Based on Standard of your Peers

No Review – Until?

Maybe Never

As dictated By Your Experience/Ethics

Review and acceptance by a qualified reviewer based on a statement of work

Yellowbook

Report all undeniable elements

In a Supportable Format

IRS Qualified

Appraise As Ordered

Based on Non Regulated Rules

Radom –based on unlicensed IRS Engineer

Only Federal Agency that has not adopted USPAP

1-Larger Parcel Issues

2-Highest and Best Use

3-Valuation

4- Trends

Unity of

1-Ownership

2-Location

3-Unity of Use

4- Highest and

Best Use

Larger Parcel

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

640 Acres

Unity of

1-Ownership

2-Location

3-Unity of Use

4- Highest and

Best Use

Larger Parcel

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

640 Acres

Mom and Pop

160 acres No CE

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

640 Acres

Mom and Pop

160 acres No CE

USPAP

640 CE Subject - Encumbered

Yellowbook

Before 800 acres

After 640 Encumbered

160 Non – different H&B Use

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

640 Acres

Mom and Pop

160 acres No CE

IRS – 800 acres Partially Encumbered

With Analysis of Benefit to Remainder and Enhancements

Unity of

1-Ownership

2-Location

3-Use

Ex Son

In-law

Larger Parcel

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

640 Acres

Daughter

Mom & Pop – No CE

Larger Parcel- USPAP

Unity of

1-Ownership

2-Location

3-Use

Ex Son

In-law

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

Daughter

640 Acres

Mom & Pop – No CE

Unity of

1-Ownership

2-Location

3-Use

Ex Son

In-law

Larger Parcel- IRS

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

Daughter

640 Acres

Mom & Pop – No CE

Now for IRS

920 acres Partially

Encumbered Larger Parcel

640 encumbered

Benefits

Enhancements

Unity of

1-Ownership

2-Location

3-Use

Ex Son

In-law

Larger Parcel- IRS

Mom & Pop

CE Subject

Daughter

640 Acres

Son

Mom & Pop – No CE

Now for IRS

920 acres Partially

Encumbered Larger Parcel

640 encumbered

Benefits

Enhancements

Highest & Best Use

Before Easement

Legally Permissible

Physically Possible

Financially Feasible

Maximally Productive

Legally Permissible

Zoning

Prior Easements

Floodway

Governmental Restrictions

Physically Possible

Topography

Access

Floodway

Size/Shape

Soils

Financially Feasible

What Economic Use

Supports Market Value

KEY

Probable

Measurable

Predictable

Probable

Foreseeable

Future

Agriculture

Productivity

Recreation

Features

Investment

Quality

Interim

Bullshit

Subdivision - Really

Subdivision- OK

Value Analysis

Discounted Cash Flow

NO-NO

Bulk Sale

Unhappy Client

Joe Bag of Doughnuts

Buys a 320 acre tract

At market - say $1500 per acre

Or $480,000

Based on Buyer Logic:

A = $100,000 - 20 Acre Lot

Then regardless of input costs

My 320 acres = 16 times $100,000

Or B - $1,600,000

$5,000 per acre

CE Reserves 2 build sites and no division

So

After Value

2 times $100,000 = C- $200,000

D- (duh)= CE value $1,400,000

320 acres – assuming zoning and all that:

Infrastructure - $10,000 per lot- $160,000

Cost of Sale at 12% - $192,000

Retail less $352,000 – net $1,248,000

After – “IRS” two enhanced build sites at $150,000

280 acres of permanently restricted pasture

At $500 = $140,000

After Value - $440,000/ $1375 per acre

CE Value - $808,000

But wait - What about

Financial Feasibility?

Demand-?? Why of course.

Supply – not like this.

Absorption – It is “red”hot.

Cost of Money – Who cares.

Discounted Cash Flow

Typically a six to seven year window.

Based on:

Extraordinary Assumptions

Remember: There is no mythical development market out there.

Maximally Productive

Rural Recreational Investment with

Agricultural Influences in

Anticipation of Appreciation

Based on value and use measured by

Non Economic

Intrinsic Personal Use Benefits

And is that improved or unimproved

Oh Yea

Measure the Effects of Super Adequate Buildings

On land values within CE sale Analysis

Average $960,000 Site/Land Value

Only

Real World –H&B Use

Remember average River Class One

504 acres at $6,400 per acre

$3,225,000

So CE allowing 2 sites within 504 acres

Two 78 acre sites at $960,000 each

$1,812,000

$10,091 Per Acre

Unimproved

Average 78 acres

Take Down $21,000

Yea so you can’t divide to capitalize on two sites -

But do I have any sales to go down that roador is it an Extraordinary Assumption

Remainder 348 acres restricted at CE Value of $4000 per acre

$ 1,392,000

After Value - $3,204,000

Sites $1,812,000

Open Space - $1,392,000

Lets Go To Real World

Assume Identical CEs – No Splits- No Homes

Assume water/ systems /productivity - similar

Irrigated Cropland

Bozeman Proper

$10,000 Per Acre

Irrigated Cropland

Holland Settlement

$5,500 Per Acre

Irrigated Cropland

Toston

$3,500 Per Acre

Consider Change in H&B Use

Highest and Best Use a Function of:

Irrigated Cropland

Bozeman Proper

$10,000 Per Acre

LOCATION

PRODUCTIVITY

SUPPLY

DEMAND

Irrigated Cropland

Holland Settlement

$5,500 Per Acre

Consider Change in H&B Use

Irrigated Cropland

Toston

$3,500 Per Acre

Remember

Financial Feasibility

Maximally Productive

Assume Identical CEs – No Splits- No Homes

Irrigated Cropland

Bozeman Proper

$10,000 Per Acre

LOCATION

PRODUCTIVITY

SUPPLY

DEMAND

Irrigated Cropland

Holland Settlement

$5,500 Per Acre

Irrigated Cropland

Toston

$3,500 Per Acre

Consider Change in H&B Use

Do we even have a sale of encumbered irrigated cropland?

Well I have sales that contain lands including irrigated cropland.

Those sales say 30% property rights adjustment - overall.

Oh yea – those are at Dillon and they are 4 years old.

I have non comparable pasture sales in this area that show a

Property Rights adjustment of 40%.

I have county and NRCS purchases of CEs on Irrigated cropland that were funded at 20 % of market value.

Oh yea

IRS and courts can try to default to established Programs.

Highest and Best Use a Function of:

If This was Entitled

It would Sell at $25,000

Per Acre

Irrigated Cropland

Bozeman Proper

$10,000 Per Acre

Consider Change in H&B Use

Financial Feasibility

Maximally Productive

Simple – Entitled to Speculative

$25,000 to $10,000- 60%

But wait - $10,000 was “fee simple” and

Who really puts an entitled tract under CE?

Case solution

Based on a preponderance of the data my $10,000 speculative land could be assumed to be affected

60% bringing $10,000 per acre down to $4,000 per acre which somewhat equates to Toston irrigated sales, with some unexplainable consideration that

Toston sales are “fee land”, whatever, but considering location I have to adjust $4,000 per acre up 57% to $6,280 based on locational premium of Settlement lands as compared to

Toston lands; and by the way that ends up as a

37.2% property rights adjustment that just happens to coincide with the average of every non comparable easement sale in my database that occurred in Montana over the last 10 years, that wasn’t a riparian property sale.

Irrigated

Cropland

Semi Arid

Native

Rangeland

Dry Cropland

Highest And Best Use

Considerations

Ex Urban

Lands

River - Riparian

Buildings

Mountain

Pasture

Irrigated

Cropland

Site

Semi Arid

Native

Rangeland

Site

Dry Cropland

Site

River - Riparian

Mountain

Pasture

Highest And Best Use

Considerations

Buildings

River - Riparian

Historically Discount Based on

“Principle of Substitution”

In the Maturing Montana Market

You have to ask yourself

Is there a substitute?

And realize that for high end property

Most are Encumbered!

Parting Thought – What Drives Value in Your market?

Gallatin

Avg Site

Paradise

Avg Site

Bitterroot

Avg Site

Acres

1,592

Volume

$ 11,855,000

200 unimproved

Land Value Avg

$ 7,447

$ 7,384

3,082 $ 23,900,000

770 unimproved

$

$

7,755

6,328

1,688 $ 19,875,000

562 unimpoved

$

$

11,774

6,120

Thanks For Your Time !

Download