IPG Photonics

advertisement

IPG PHOTONICS

Matt Briggs, Yosha Huang, Lukas Vlahos

Outline

Company Overview

Industry Overview

Technological Advantage

Growth Opportunities

Variant Perception

Valuation

IPG Company Overview

• World’s Leading developer and manufacturer of high-performance fiber lasers, fiber amplifiers, and diode lasers that are used for diverse applications.

• Vertically integrated business model has led to industry leading margins.

Diverse Global Customer base

• Largest customer accounted for 11% of sales in 2013

Sell to OEMs, System Integrators, and End

Users

Numerous applications and industries that use IPG products

• Offers low, mid, and high power lasers

IPG Photonics Key Stats

Market Cap

2013 Revenue

2013 Net

Income

Operating

Margin

Net Margin

$3.54 Billon

$648 Million

$156 Million

34%

24%

Revenue by Region

Europe:

• $205,426

• 31.8% of Rev

North America:

• $116,935

• 18% of Rev

Asia:

• $324,461

• 50.1% of Rev

Laser Applications

Materials Processing

• Cutting and Welding

• Micro-processing

IPG’s largest Source of Revenue

Medical

• Surgery

• Skin and Tissue Resurfacing

• Kidney Stone Treatment

Advanced Applications

Communication

• Source in fiber Optic Communications

Industry Overview

Global Laser Market

Revenue, $2.6bn (2013)

IPG

($648m)

Other

$345m

Total

Fiber

$823m YAG

$330m

CO2

$1,100m

Global Laser Market Revenue,

$3.4bn (2018P)

Other

$830m

CO2

$842m

IPG

($1.2b)

Total

Fiber

$1.49b

YAG

$287m

Who are the End Users?

Fiber Lasers - Function

Electrons excited by pumping into excited state.

Specialized material settles into meta excited state.

All atoms in meta excited state release photons at once; released gradually through from mirrored chamber.

Utilize fiber optic cables doped with rare minerals to store excited electrons.

Initial pump energy provided by Diode pump laser

Beam can be more finely controlled with gratings at release point.

Value Proposition of Fiber Lasers

Efficiency – dissipates heat over the entirety of the cable, reducing energy loss.

Precision – fiber lasers offer straight, focused beams, increasing power and accuracy.

Maintenance – mirrors used in other lasers require frequent, extremely complicated alignment; fiber lasers avoid this problem entirely.

Convenience – lighter and smaller due to the removal of large mirrored chambers.

Vertical Integration

Occurs when a company expands into areas at different points along the same production path.

A company that controls its suppliers has backward integration.

A company that controls its distributors has forward integration.

Lowers costs and improves margins.

Additional competitive advantage.

Banana Phones

Vertical Integration

Components

Complete control over manufacturing process.

Patents on diode pumps, special fibers, optical components, amplifiers, and gratings.

Diodes and other components more reliable and powerful than others on the market.

Applications

Extensive application testing facilities – offers process development services.

Does further R&D on new applications of more powerful lasers.

Investment Thesis

• Conventional lasers are getting older (20+ years)

• Companies looking to replace older lasers

• Market is mostly concentrated with conventional lasers

• Fiber lasers are a cheaper, more powerful, and more reliable alternative

• IPG is the leader of the fiber laser space.

• Great opportunity for

IPG to steal market share from competitors and further innovate its products

• Recent insider sales have lead to an overreaction from the market, driving the prices down.

The Street is concerned about adoption rates of the disruptive technology.

The Street is overly concerned about increased competition from low-cost producers due to temporary slowdowns in bookings from key market sectors, like

China.

Breakdown by Product Line

Product line % revenue Forecast assumptions

High Power 54%

Pulsed 17%

Medium Power 11%

QCW

Low Power

4%

2%

• Forecast strong growth in material processing.

• Difficult for first generation lasers to compete in pricing since efficiency of fiber lasers allows high wattages

• UV Lasers will add additional product line for more precise machining and memory usage.

• Revenue will decline due to increased Chinese competition

• Revenue will increase in material processing (correlated to high power growth)

• Revenue will increase in fine welding applications as they replace Nd:YAG

• Decrease in revenue due to stronger competition in Asia and from established gas laser producers which can manufacture low power lasers at a lower price point

Market Penetration by Application

Highest projected growth Non-metal

$273m

High power applications

(cutting and welding)

Marking

Fine Processing

Micro-processing

(semiconductor, packaging, flat panel display, solar)

Non-metal processing

Microprocessing

$935m

2% pen.

High power

$1.2bn

23% pen.

Slowest projected growth

Fine processing

$316m

24% pen.

Marking

$407

48% pen.

New products will be able to address unpenetrated markets.

Growth Opportunities

Comparables

Market Cap

P/E (TTM)

ROA

Operating

Margin

Net Margin

Revenue

Growth (q/q)

IPG

Photonics

3.45B

20.02

14%

34%

Coherent

1.62B

24.05

4.9%

9.7%

ESI Newport Corp Rofin-Sinar

Technologies

222.5M

717.6M

649.2M

--

-4.4%

-12%

26.04

5.4%

8.7%

26.57

3.1%

6.4%

24%

14.3%

7.5%

-8.1%

-25%

-4.5%

4.6%

-3.5%

4.3%

-3.5%

Valuation

Case Assumptions

Bear 20% Competitors are able to break into high power market (16% q/q); Chinese competition forces greater than expected decline in other segments (-14% q/q)

Base 50% IPG maintains technological advantage, high power growth is strong (22% q/q); Chinese impact limited to smaller segments (-10% q/q)

Bull 30% High and medium power growth is stronger than expected (26% q/q); Chinese impact reduced (-7% q/q)

P/E Multiple Price Target

17 $63.45

20

21

$80.52

$89.50

Current Price - $66.86

Price Target - $79.80 (19.35% return)

Industry Share Valuation

2013

4,480 Total Laser Industry Revenue

% Growth

Total Fiber Laser Revenue

% Growth

Market Share

911

2014

4,704

5%

1,093

20%

23% 20%

71%

647

69%

754

IPG's marketshare of Fiber Lasers

IPG Fiber Laser Revenue

Cost of revenue

% of Revenue

Gross profit

Gross Margin

Total operating expenses

Operating Margin

Operating income

Operating Margin

Net income

Net Margin

302

46.7%

344.7

53.3%

121.0

18.7%

224

34.6%

153

23.7%

355

47.0%

399.8

53.0%

141.8

18.8%

258

34.2%

181

24.0%

2015

4,939

5%

1,312

20%

27%

67%

879

413

47.0%

465.8

53.0%

167.0

19.0%

299

34.0%

209

23.8%

Earnings Per Share

Basic

Diluted

3.07

2.95

3.48

3.48

$4.02

4.02

Current Price - $66.86

Price target by

Market share value:

$80.46 (20.34% upside)

Q&A

Appendix

22,00%

20,00%

18,00%

16,00%

14,00%

12,00%

10,00%

IPGP Short Interest

2015 P/E

2015 EPS

Share Price

Current Price

Expected Return

20

4.03

$80.52

$67.93

18.54%

Return Sensitivity

3.63

3.73

3.83

3.93

4.026

4.13

4.23

4.33

4.43

Return Sensitivity

Analysis

17

61.64

63.34

65.04

66.74

68.44

70.14

71.84

73.54

75.24

18

65.27

67.07

68.87

70.67

72.47

74.27

76.07

77.87

79.67

19

68.90

70.80

72.70

74.60

76.50

78.40

80.30

82.20

84.10

20

72.52

74.52

76.52

78.52

80.52

82.52

84.52

86.52

88.52

21

76.15

78.25

80.35

82.45

84.55

86.65

88.75

90.85

92.95

22

79.77

81.97

84.17

86.37

88.57

90.77

92.97

95.17

97.37

23

83.40

85.70

88.00

90.30

92.60

94.90

97.20

99.50

101.80

Revenue (by product line)

% Growth (yoy)

High power laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Pulsed laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Medium power

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

QCW laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Low power laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Laser Revenue subtotal

Other products

% Growth (yoy)

% Laser Revenue

Services, parts, accessories

% Growth (yoy)

% Laser Revenue

Valuation – Base

Q1 2013 (A)

141.7

Q2 2013 (A)

166.1

Q3 2013 (A)

172.2

Q4 2013 (A)

170.6

Q1 2014 (A)

170.6

20%

Q2 2014 (A)

192.2

16%

Q3 2014 (P)

195

13%

Q4 2014 (P)

199

17%

Q1 2015 (P)

199

17%

Q2 2015 (P)

217

13%

Q3 2015 (P)

228

17%

Q4 2015 (P)

235

18%

75.1

19%

53%

85.4

38%

51%

95.8

42%

56%

100

-13%

59%

100

33%

59%

104.1

22%

54%

116.9

22%

60%

122.0

22%

61%

122.0

22%

61%

127.0

22%

59%

142.6

22%

63%

148.8

22%

63%

33.3

21%

24%

3.9

>100

3%

10.4

9%

7%

4

6%

3%

126.7

5.8

5%

9.2

7%

40

5%

24%

15.7

41%

9%

5.6

>100

3%

3.6

-14%

2%

150.3

6.2

4%

9.6

6%

34.4

-32%

20%

14.2

27%

8%

6.5

>300

4%

2.8

-28%

2%

153.7

8.6

6%

9.9

6%

28.8

67%

17%

17.5

43%

10%

5.6

43%

3%

3.8

-7%

2%

155.7

6.8

18%

4%

8.1

-13%

5%

28.8

-14%

17%

17.5

68%

10%

5.6

44%

3%

3.8

-5%

2%

155.7

6.8

17%

4%

8.1

-12%

5%

32.4

-19%

17%

21.6

38%

11%

8.1

45%

4%

3.1

-14%

2%

169.3

6.7

8%

4%

16.2

69%

10%

31.0

-10%

16%

17.9

26%

9%

8.8

35%

5%

2.5

-10%

1%

177.0

7.1

-18%

4%

10.6

7%

6%

25.9

-10%

13%

22.1

26%

11%

7.6

35%

4%

3.4

-10%

2%

181.0

7.2

6%

4%

10.9

34%

6%

25.9

-10%

13%

22.1

26%

11%

7.6

35%

4%

3.4

-10%

2%

181.0

7.2

6%

4%

10.9

34%

6%

29.2

-10%

13%

27.2

26%

13%

10.9

35%

5%

2.8

-10%

1%

197.1

7.9

18%

4%

11.8

-27%

6%

27.9

-10%

12%

22.5

26%

10%

11.8

35%

5%

2.3

-10%

1%

207.1

8.3

17%

4%

12.4

17%

6%

23.3

-10%

10%

27.8

26%

12%

10.2

35%

4%

3.1

-10%

1%

213.2

8.5

18%

4%

12.8

18%

6%

Revenue (by product line)

% Growth (yoy)

High power laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Pulsed laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Medium power

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

QCW laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Low power laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Laser Revenue subtotal

Other products

% Growth (yoy)

% Laser Revenue

Services, parts, accessories

% Growth (yoy)

% Laser Revenue

Valuation – Bull

Q1 2013 (A)

141.7

Q2 2013 (A)

166.1

Q3 2013 (A)

172.2

Q4 2013 (A)

170.6

Q1 2014 (A)

170.6

20%

Q2 2014 (A)

192.2

16%

Q3 2014 (P)

202

17%

Q4 2014 (P)

207

21%

Q1 2015 (P)

207

21%

Q2 2015 (P)

225

17%

Q3 2015 (P)

245

21%

Q4 2015 (P)

253

22%

75.1

19%

53%

85.4

38%

51%

95.8

42%

56%

100

-13%

59%

100

33%

59%

104.1

22%

54%

120.7

26%

60%

126.0

26%

61%

126.0

26%

61%

131.2

26%

58%

152.1

26%

62%

158.8

26%

63%

3.9

>100

3%

4

6%

3%

126.7

33.3

21%

24%

10.4

9%

7%

9.2

7%

5.8

5%

40

5%

24%

15.7

41%

9%

5.6

>100

3%

3.6

-14%

2%

150.3

6.2

4%

9.6

6%

34.4

-32%

20%

14.2

27%

8%

6.5

>300

4%

2.8

-28%

2%

153.7

8.6

6%

9.9

6%

28.8

67%

17%

17.5

43%

10%

5.6

43%

3%

3.8

-7%

2%

155.7

6.8

18%

4%

8.1

-13%

5%

28.8

-14%

17%

17.5

68%

10%

5.6

44%

3%

3.8

-5%

2%

155.7

6.8

17%

4%

8.1

-12%

5%

32.4

-19%

17%

21.6

38%

11%

8.1

45%

4%

3.1

-14%

2%

169.3

6.7

8%

4%

16.2

69%

10%

32.0

-7%

16%

19.2

35%

9%

9.1

40%

5%

2.6

-7%

1%

183.6

7.3

-15%

4%

11.0

11%

6%

26.8

-7%

13%

23.6

35%

11%

7.8

40%

4%

3.5

-7%

2%

187.8

7.5

10%

4%

11.3

39%

6%

26.8

-7%

13%

23.6

35%

11%

7.8

40%

4%

3.5

-7%

2%

187.8

7.5

10%

4%

11.3

39%

6%

30.1

-7%

13%

29.2

35%

13%

11.3

40%

5%

2.9

-7%

1%

204.7

8.2

22%

4%

12.3

-24%

6%

8.9

21%

4%

13.4

21%

6%

9.2

22%

4%

13.8

22%

6%

12.7

40%

5%

2.4

-7%

1%

222.9

29.8

-7%

12%

25.9

35%

11%

11.0

40%

4%

3.3

-7%

1%

229.8

24.9

-7%

10%

31.9

35%

13%

Revenue (by product line)

% Growth (yoy)

High power laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Pulsed laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Medium power

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

QCW laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Low power laser

% Growth (yoy)

% Revenue

Laser Revenue subtotal

Other products

% Growth (yoy)

% Laser Revenue

Services, parts, accessories

% Growth (yoy)

% Laser Revenue

Valuation – Bear

Q1 2013 (A)

141.7

Q2 2013 (A)

166.1

Q3 2013 (A)

172.2

Q4 2013 (A)

170.6

Q1 2014 (A)

170.6

20%

Q2 2014 (A)

192.2

16%

Q3 2014 (P)

186

8%

Q4 2014 (P)

190

11%

Q1 2015 (P)

190

11%

Q2 2015 (P)

206

7%

Q3 2015 (P)

206

11%

Q4 2015 (P)

212

12%

75.1

19%

53%

85.4

38%

51%

95.8

42%

56%

100

-13%

59%

100

33%

59%

104.1

22%

54%

111.1

16%

60%

116.0

16%

61%

116.0

16%

61%

120.8

16%

59%

128.9

16%

63%

134.6

16%

63%

3.9

>100

3%

4

6%

3%

126.7

33.3

21%

24%

10.4

9%

7%

9.2

7%

5.8

5%

5.6

>100

3%

3.6

-14%

2%

150.3

40

5%

24%

15.7

41%

9%

9.6

6%

6.2

4%

34.4

-32%

20%

14.2

27%

8%

6.5

>300

4%

2.8

-28%

2%

153.7

8.6

6%

9.9

6%

5.6

43%

3%

3.8

-7%

2%

155.7

28.8

67%

17%

17.5

43%

10%

6.8

18%

4%

8.1

-13%

5%

28.8

-14%

17%

17.5

68%

10%

5.6

44%

3%

3.8

-5%

2%

155.7

6.8

17%

4%

8.1

-12%

5%

32.4

-19%

17%

21.6

38%

11%

8.1

45%

4%

3.1

-14%

2%

169.3

6.7

8%

4%

16.2

69%

10%

30.3

-12%

16%

17.0

20%

9%

7.8

20%

4%

2.5

-10%

1%

168.8

6.8

-22%

4%

10.1

2%

6%

25.3

-12%

13%

21.0

20%

11%

6.7

20%

4%

3.2

-15%

2%

172.3

6.9

1%

4%

10.3

28%

6%

25.3

-12%

13%

21.0

20%

11%

6.7

20%

4%

3.2

-15%

2%

172.3

6.9

1%

4%

10.3

28%

6%

28.5

-12%

14%

25.9

20%

13%

9.7

20%

5%

2.6

-15%

1%

187.5

7.5

12%

4%

11.3

-31%

6%

9.4

20%

5%

2.1

-15%

1%

187.5

26.6

-12%

13%

20.4

20%

10%

7.5

11%

4%

11.2

11%

6%

8.1

20%

4%

2.7

-15%

1%

192.9

22.3

-12%

11%

25.2

20%

12%

7.7

12%

4%

11.6

12%

6%

Cost of revenue

% increase

Gross profit

% Growth

Gross Margin

Operating expenses

Research and development

% of Revenue

Sales and Marketing

% of Revenue

General and Administrative

% of Revenue

Loss (Gain) on foregin exchange

% of Revenue

Total operating expenses

% of Revenue

Operating income

% Growth

Operating Margin

Interest Expense

% of Revenue

Other income (expense)

% of Revenue

Income before taxes

% Growth

Provision for income taxes

Tax Rate

Net income from continuing operations

% Growth

Other

% of Revenue

Net income

% Growth

Net Margin

Valuation – Operating Expenses

53.3%

-0.3%

26.0

18.3%

49.5

8.8

6.2%

5.9

4.1%

11.8

8.3%

(0.5)

35.0%

0

0.0%

0

0%

49.5

14.5

29.3%

35.0

66

76

35.0

24.7%

-0.1%

30.0

18.1%

58.8

19%

35.4%

10.5

6.3%

6.8

4.1%

12.8

7.7%

(0.1)

77

17%

89

18%

53.5%

0

0.0%

0

0%

58.8

19%

17.9

30.4%

40.9

0.9%

32.7

19.1%

56.6

-5%

33.2%

10.9

6.4%

7.2

4.2%

13.0

7.6%

1.6

81

3%

89

-4%

52.3%

0.0

0.0%

-1.5

-1%

55.1

-6%

17.7

32.1%

37.4

0.9%

33.0

19.2%

59.8

2%

34.7%

11.5

6.7%

6.8

3.9%

13.2

7.7%

1.6

79

3%

93

4%

53.9%

-0.1

-0.1%

-1.3

-1%

58.3

-1%

17.7

30.4%

40.6

-0.8%

31.5

18.5%

57.7

2%

33.8%

12.8

7.5%

7.2

4.2%

12.9

7.6%

(1.4)

81

0%

89

0%

52%

0.1

0.1%

1.7

1%

59.6

8%

17.5

30.1%

42.1

20%

40.9

24.6%

40.6

23.6%

37.4

21.9%

42.1

20.3%

24.7%

0.2

0.1%

0

0%

64.8

-5%

19.5

30.0%

45.4

12%

0.5%

37.6

19%

64.6

-6%

33.2%

15.6

8.0%

7.8

4.0%

13.2

6.8%

1.0

92

5%

102

53%

0.5%

35.5

18.5%

68.7

19%

35.7%

13.4

7.0%

8.0

4.2%

13.1

6.8%

0.9

88

8%

104

17%

54%

0.2

0.1%

-0.7

0%

68.2

14%

20.7

30.0%

47.5

16%

47.5

16.0%

24.7%

45.4

11.7%

23.3%

0.2

0.1%

0

0%

67.5

1%

20.2

30.0%

47.2

12%

0.5%

37.2

19%

67.3

1%

33.8%

15.9

8.0%

7.4

3.7%

12.9

6.5%

1.0

95

0%

104

53%

0.2

0.1%

0

0%

66.7

3%

20.0

30.0%

46.7

25%

0.5%

38.0

19%

66.5

3%

33.4%

15.9

8.0%

7.6

3.8%

13.5

6.8%

1.0

95

2%

104

53%

46.7

24.8%

23.5%

47.2

12.2%

23.7%

0.2

0.1%

0

0%

77.7

5%

23.3

30.0%

54.4

20%

0.5%

42.1

19%

77.5

5%

34.0%

18.2

8.0%

8.0

3.5%

14.8

6.5%

1.1

108

5%

120

53%

0.2

0.1%

0

0%

73.9

10%

22.2

30.0%

51.8

9%

0.5%

40.1

19%

73.7

10%

34.0%

17.3

8.0%

7.6

3.5%

14.1

6.5%

1.1

103

9%

114

53%

0.2

0.1%

0

0%

80.0

3%

24.0

30.0%

56.0

20%

0.5%

43.4

19%

79.7

3%

34.0%

18.8

8.0%

8.2

3.5%

15.2

6.5%

1.2

111

3%

123

53%

51.8

9.0%

23.9%

54.4

19.8%

23.9%

56.0

20.0%

23.9%

Cost/power comparison

Download