- DairyMD.com

advertisement

Managing Reproduction in a Modern Dairy Herd

Gregory M. Goodell, DVM

The Dairy Authority, LLC

Transitioning a cow properly through the post partum period

Heat Detection/Timed AI

Pregnancy Diagnosis

Monitoring the reproductive process

Components of Establishing

Pregnancy

Extremely important

Large impact

Multifactorial

Transition through post partum period

Michael W. Overton, DVM, MPVM

University of Georgia-College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA

Heat Detection

◦ Observe for signs of estrous

◦ Advantages:

 Less expensive and easier to implement

◦ Disadvantages

 Time consuming, more skill required

Heat Detection: How do I find cows that are ready to breed?

Marking Crayons/Chalk

Pressure-sensitive pads

Pedometers

Rumen boluses

Heat Detection Aides

Pressure Sensitive Pads

HeatWatch Pressure Pad

Pedometers

Train personnel on signs of estrous

Cannot cut corners here!

Excellent tools for vets from stud services and breeding companies

Review numbers often as a program starts to evaluate heat detection numbers.

Implementing Heat Detection on a

Dairy

Many different programs

Success depends on management/style of the dairy

Labor intensive

Compliance a must

Timed Artificial Insemination

(TAI)

TAI Programs

CIDRSync Programs with CIDRs

Veterinarian should couple the management ability of the dairy with the

TAI program

A producer will almost always go for the program with the best published rates but demand the most convenient program

In general the more intense the program the better the rates

Which TAI Program is Best?

Same time every day of week and time

(including Christmas day and July 4 th !)

All cows MUST be found.

◦ Missed injections primary cause of compliance failure.

Compliance to TAI Programs

Preg rate = Heat detection X Conception rate

TAI programs force 100% heat detection

If a TAI program requires 6 visits to the cow and we miss 5% of the cows at all visits then we’ve reduced effective heat detection rate from 100 to

70%. If conception rate is 40% then we’ve reduce preg rate by 12%

Example of Compliance

TAI Program

CoSync 72

OvSync 48

OvSync 56

PreSync 12/OvSync 56

PreSync 14/OvSync 56

G6G

Double OvSync

Cow Visits Preg Rate

4

6

3

4

6

6

7

28-33%

28-33%

30-35 %

32-38%

32-38%

40-50%

40-50%

Cost per

Cow

$7.22

$7.38

$7.38

$11.90

$11.90

$11.80

$13.96

Preg Rates and Costs

TAI Program Cow Visits Preg Rate

CoSync 72

OvSync 48 *

OvSync 56 *

PreSync 12/OvSync 56 *

PreSync 14/OvSync 56 *

G6G

Double OvSync

4

6

3

4

6

6

7

* If CIDR used add another $9.00

28-33%

28-33%

30-35 %

32-38%

32-38%

40-50%

40-50%

Preg Rates and Costs

Cost per

Cow

$7.22

$7.38

$7.38

$11.90

$11.90

$11.80

$13.96

Rectal Palpation

Ultrasound

Blood Test

Milk Test

Pregnancy Diagnosis

Most common form of pregnancy diagnosis for cattle

Conducted between 30-50 days after breeding

Sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 96% when conducted between 35 and 45 d post AI

Chronic Trauma to shoulder

Rectal Palpation

Usually performed between 28-35 days

Sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of

87.7% when conducted between 26 and

33 d post AI (Pieterse et al., 1990)

Skills vary among ultrasonographers

Rechecks still must be done

Reduced shoulder trauma if extension arm used.

Ultrasonography

Current controversy regarding stage to preg check

Research shows no difference in economics when preg check between 32 and 39 days (Silva, et al 2009 )

At 39 days U/S not required and neither is early P2

Ultrasonography

Detection of early pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs)

Pregnancy-Specific Protein B (PSPB)

Proteins only produced by the placenta of the growing fetus

Blood Tests for Pregnancy

Sensitivity reported to be between 96-99%

Specificity reported to be between 97-99%

Lay personnel can pull the sample

Often combined with other modalities of pregnancy diagnosis allowing for coverage of more animals or larger herds

Decrease physical wear and tear of shoulder

Advantages of Blood Testing

Requires minimum of 24 hours to achieve result

Does not provide any fetal staging

Half life of some PAGs may be as long as

90 day postpartum

Disadvantages of Blood Testing

 bioTracking

Idexx

Conception

Commercially Available Tests

Test name is BioPryn

Located in Moscow, Idaho

Characteristics

◦ Se/Sp is 100/87.8 at 30-36 days post breeding

◦ Used as early as 28 days post breeding

◦ Must wait until 90 days postpartum

Cost is $2.50-$3.50 per sample

bioTracking

Idexx Bovine Pregnancy Test

Serum or milk

Located in Westbrook, Maine

Characteristics

◦ Se/Sp is 99.3%/95.1% at 30 days post breeding

◦ Used as early as 28 days post breeding

◦ Must wait 60 days post partum before using

Cost between $2.50 and $3.00 per sample

Idexx

Test name is DG29

Located in Québec, Canada

Characteristics

◦ Se/Sp is 99.4/100 at 29 days post breeding

◦ Used as early as 29 days post breeding

◦ Must wait 90 days post partum before using

Cost between $3.20 and $4.00 per sample

Conception

Reproduction Analysis

Case Definitions!!

Pregnant Cows/Exposed Cows

Pregnancy Rate, DIM, DOPN, etc.

◦ Include cows in EWP?

◦ Include Dead/Sold Cows?

◦ Include Dry Cows?

◦ Frequency of preg checks

Basic Concepts

40-45% of milking herd pregnant

180-200 Average DIM

Cull rate less than 35% (???)

High Production Herd

Characteristics

# milking cows pregnant/total # of cows milking.

30-50% is the goal (moves with DIM)

Dry cows not included

In DC305 …

◦ Sum by rc for rc=1-5 Lact>0\B

% of the Milking Herd Pregnant

Days in milk at first breeding (DIMFB)

Days Open (DOPN)

Days in milk (DIM)

Herd Averages

Days in milk at first breeding (DIMFB)

Days Open (DOPN)

Days in milk (DIM)

Count AvDIMFB Av DOPN Av DIM

------ ------- ------- -------

2851 62 119 180

Herd Averages

Days in milk at first breeding (DIMFB)

Days Open (DOPN)

Days in milk (DIM)

Count AvDIMFB Av DOPN Av DIM

------ ------- ------- -------

2851 62 119 180

4412 63 146 200

Herd Averages

Need to be certain of where CLEANUP parameters are set

Commands like COUNT, SUM and PCT do

NOT look at sold/died cows unless told to

Switches in DC305

◦ \B, \D, \L

Using DC305 for Repro Analysis

# milking cows preg and >150 DIM /

#cows milking and greater than 150 DIM

In DC305…

◦ Sum by RC for DIM>150 RC=1-5 Lact>0

Goal 50-70% (moves with DIM)

Dry cows not included

% Milking Herd Preg and >150

DIM

Calendar Month

Times Bred

Tech

Breeding Code

Interval Analysis

Day of the Week

Specific Areas of Monitoring

By Calendar Month for past 12 months

Month 95% CI %Conc #Preg #Open Other Abort Total %Tot SPC

==================== ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====

2012 January 35-45 40 142 214 72 41 428 4 2.5

2012 February 35-44 40 179 271 79 46 529 5 2.5

2012 March 35-43 39 204 319 108 47 631 6 2.6

2012 April 37-45 41 251 358 134 62 743 8 2.4

2012 May 36-44 40 220 336 110 47 666 7 2.5

2012 June 28-35 31 178 392 74 46 644 7 3.2

2012 July 13-19 16 100 531 117 20 748 8 6.3

2012 August 8-12 10 83 742 134 8 959 10 9.9

2012 September 14-18 16 158 837 203 11 1198 12 6.3

2012 October 27-32 29 314 754 310 19 1378 14 3.4

2012 November 37-44 41 333 487 166 6 986 10 2.5

2012 December 30-38 34 192 373 * 144 2 709 7 2.9

2013 January 0 0 93 * 141 0 234 2

TOTALS 28-30 29 2354 5707 1792 355 9853 100 3.4

1002 non-AI breedings were omitted

By Times Bred

Bred Number 95% CI %Conc #Preg #Open Other Abort Total %Tot SPC

==================== ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====

1 27-40 33 62 124 4 0 190 32 3.0

2 30-46 37 51 86 0 1 137 23 2.7

3 22-42 31 25 55 4 1 84 14 3.2

4 18-40 27 17 45 2 1 64 11 3.6

5 18-47 31 11 25 1 0 37 6 3.3

6 22-56 37 10 17 1 0 28 5 2.7

7 12-55 29 4 10 2 0 16 3 3.5

8 15-58 33 5 10 1 0 16 3 3.0

OTHERS 6-38 16 3 16 3 0 22 4 6.3

TOTALS 29-37 33 188 388 18 3 594 100 3.1

35 non-AI breedings were omitted

By Technician

Technician 95% CI %Conc #Preg #Open Other Abort Total %Tot SPC

==================== ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====

Efrain 19-31 25 50 153 5 1 208 35 4.1

Luis 17-35 25 21 64 4 0 89 15 4.0

Alfonso 35-46 41 117 171 11 2 299 50 2.5

TOTALS 29-37 33 188 388 20 3 596 100 3.1

35 non-AI breedings were omitted

By Breeding Code

Breeding Code 95% CI %Conc #Preg #Open Other Abort Total %Tot SPC

==================== ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====

CIDR 12-49 26 5 14 0 1 19 3 3.8

Thur PM 40-63 52 33 31 3 1 67 11 1.9

Normal 31-44 37 85 142 8 1 235 39 2.7

TAI 20-30 25 65 199 9 0 273 46 4.1

OTHERS 0-66 0 0 2 0 0 2 0

TOTALS 29-37 33 188 388 20 3 596 100 3.1

35 non-AI breedings were omitted

By Day of the Week

Week Day 95% CI %Conc #Preg #Open Other Abort Total %Tot SPC

==================== ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====

Monday 24-55 38 13 21 0 0 34 6 2.6

Tuesday 36-70 54 15 13 0 1 28 5 1.9

Wednesday 25-51 37 17 29 5 0 51 9 2.7

Thursday 33-52 42 45 62 3 1 110 18 2.4

Friday 22-32 26 81 225 11 1 317 53 3.8

Saturday 14-44 27 8 22 0 0 30 5 3.8

Sunday 20-55 36 9 16 1 0 26 4 2.8

TOTALS 29-37 33 188 388 20 3 596 100 3.1

35 non-AI breedings were omitted

Survival Analysis on DOPN

DC305 command…

◦ Graph DOPN for Lact>0 RC=1-5\S

◦ Survival Curve

DIM for 25, 50 and 75% Preg.

Rate

GRAPH DOPN\S

GRAPH DOPN FOR TID=3 WITH

TID<>3\S

Caveats

◦ Interpret results with other repro parameters

◦ There is a lag in reproduction data equal to days till preg check post breeding

◦ Should also apply monitoring techniques to parity groups

DOPN Cohort Analysis

Know the case definition

Record the data often

Look at the data often

Check data against other criteria

Conclusion

Download