ChE 551 Lecture 05 Analysis Of Data From A Batch Reactor 1 Background: Kinetic Data After Measuring Pressure, x2, torr 100 Figure 3.8 Typical batch data for reaction (3.7). Data of Tamaru[1955]. 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Time, Hours Indirect method – a method where you measure some other property (i.e. concentration vs time) and infer a rate equation. 2 Objective For Today: Analysis Of Rate Data Derive basic equations Essen’s method Van’t Hoff’s method 3 Derivation Of Performance Equation For A Batch Reactor For A B, the moles of A reacted/volume/time will equal the reaction rate, i.e. dC A =rA dτ (1) CA is the concentration of A, is time, and rA is the rate of reaction per unit volume. Figure 3.11 A batch reactor 4 Integration Yields The Following C0A CfA dCA =τ (-rA ) (3.31) Memorize this equation 5 For A First Order Reaction rA = -k1CA (3.38) Substituting equation (3.38) into equation (3.31) and integrating yields: C0A 1 Ln f k1 C A Memorize this equation (3.39) Derivation 6 For An nth Order Reaction: rA k n C A n (3.41) Substituting equation (3.41) into equation (3.31), integrating, and rearranging yields: 1 o n 1 n 1k n C A C o n -1 A 1 C fA (3.42) Memorize this equation Derivation 8 Plots Of Equations 10 8 Time 6 4 Second Order 2 0 0% First Order 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% conversion 10 Table 3.4 Rate Laws For A Number Of Reactions Rate Laws for a number of reactions Reaction Rate Law Differential Equation Integral Equation A Products A+B Products rA=kA dXA kA d kA A Products A+B Products rA=kA[A] dXA k AXA d 1 1 k A Ln 1 XA A Products A+B Products rA=kA[A]n dXA k A (CnA )n 1X nA d 1 n 1 1 kA 0 n 1 1 X (n 1)(CA ) A A+B Products rA=kA[A][B] dXA k A (1 X A )(C0BA C0A X A ) d C0B (1 X A ) kA Ln 0 0 0 0 (CA CB CB X A CA A+2B Products rA=kA[A][B] dXA k A (1 X A )(C0B 2CA X A ) d AB rA=k1[A]k2[B] dXA k A (1 X A ) k 2X A d XA 1 1 C0B (1 X A ) kA Ln 0 0 0 0 (2CA CB CB 2X A CA 1 1 1 (k1 k 2 ) Ln Xe X A 11 Fitting Batch Data To A Rate Law Steps • Start with a batch reactor and measure concentrations vs time. • Fit those data to a first order and a second order rate law and see which equation fits better. • Whichever rate equation fits best is assumed to be the correct rate equation for the reaction. 12 Key Challenge: First And Second Order Data Does Not Look That Much Different 1 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 0 . Thir dO rder Sec ond Ord er 4 Fir st 0 0 Same k(CA0)n-1 CA /C A 0 CA /C A 1 . 8 0 . 6 0 . Third Orde r 4 Or de r Fir st Ha lf O rd er 2 0 Vary k to fit data 0 . 2 Ha lf 0 Or de 0 0 0 . 5 Time 1 1 . 5 0 0 . 5 1 Second Order Or de r r 1 . 5 Time 13 Essen’s Method First order C0A 1 Ln f k1 C A (3.39) nth order 1 o n 1 n 1k n C A C o n -1 A 1 C fA (3.42) 14 Essen’s Method 1 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 2 r de r O ird h T 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 2 First Orde Sec r ond Th Ord er ird O rd er 0 nd o c Se er d r O Half O rder 8 Firs tO rde r . (C A0/C A) - 1 ln(CA0/C A ) 0 Half Ord er 1 0 0 0 . 5 1 1 . 5 0 Time 0 . 5 1 1 . 5 Time Figure 3.15 15 Example: The Concentration Of Dye As A Function Of Time CA,m , Min moles /Lit 1 0 0.91 1 0.83 2 0.77 3 0.71 4 0.67 5 Table 3.5 CA CA 0.63 6 0.45 0.59 7 0.43 0.56 8 0.42 0.53 9 0.40 0.50 10 0.38 0.48 11 0.37 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 Essen Plot For Example: 1 6 1.5 5 0.8 (C A /C A ) 2 - 1 0.6 0.4 r2=.984 3 0 (C A0/C A) - 1 ln(CA0 /CA ) 4 1 r2=.999 0.5 2 r2=.981 0.2 1 0 0 0 5 10 Time, Mins 15 0 0 5 10 Time, Mins 15 0 5 10 15 Time, Mins Figure 3.16 No statistically significant difference between results. 17 Example Shows Essen’s Method Does Not Distinguish Between Models In the literature, Essen’s method is often used. Useful for impressing your boss since it always fits with good r2 (given good data) It often gives the incorrect answers. 18 Van’t Hoff’s Method • • • Take batch data as before. Calculate kone (first order rate constant) ktwo (second order rate). kone should be constant for a first order reaction, ktwo should be constant for a second order reaction. (Use f test to check). 19 Equations For kone And ktwo Follow From Before 0 1 C Ln A k1 C A (3.39) Derived previously Solve for k1 C o n -1 1 A 1 o n 1 C f n 1k n C A A (3.42) Derived previously 0 1 CA k1 Ln C A (3.51) 0 n 1 1 CA kn 1 0 n 1 CA (n 1) CA Solve for kn (3.52) 20 Easy Solution: Define A VB Module In Microsoft Excel Public Function kone(ca0, ca, tau) As Variant kone = Log(ca0 / ca) / tau End Function Public Function ktwo(ca0, ca, tau) As Variant ktwo = ((1# / ca) - (1# / ca0)) / tau End Function Public Function kthree(ca0, ca, tau) As Variant kthree = ((1# / ca) ^ 2 - (1# / ca0) ^ 2) / tau End Function 21 Microsoft Excel/Visual Basic Return Types As Variant As Single General return type (can be an integer, real, vector, matrix, logical or text) Single precision real As Double Double precision real As Integer Integer 22 The Formulas In The Spreadsheet For Van’t Hoff’s Method B C 1 2 D E Ca0= 3 4 time conc 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 Essen's Method first ln(Ca0/Ca) 1 =kone(ca0,C5,B5) 0.91 =kone(ca0,C6,B6) 0.83 =kone(ca0,C7,B7) 0.77 =kone(ca0,C8,B8) 0.71 =kone(ca0,C9,B9) F 1 second (Ca0/Ca)-1 third (CA0/CA)^ 2-1 =ktwo(ca0,C5,B5) =kthree(ca0,C5,B5) =ktwo(ca0,C6,B6) =kthree(ca0,C6,B6) =ktwo(ca0,C7,B7) =kthree(ca0,C7,B7) =ktwo(ca0,C8,B8) =kthree(ca0,C8,B8) =ktwo(ca0,C9,B9) =kthree(ca0,C9,B9) 23 The Numerical Values For Van’t Hoff’s Method B C 3 Time conc 4 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 D E k1 F k2 k3 1 ln(1/Ca ((Ca0/C ((CA0/CA) )/t a)-1)/t ^2-1)/t/2 0.91 0.094 0.099 0.104 0.83 0.093 0.102 0.113 0.77 0.087 0.1 0.114 0.71 0.086 0.102 0.123 0.67 0.08 0.099 0.123 0.63 0.077 0.098 0.127 24 Van’t Hoff Plot 0.2 Rate Constant Oxidation of Red Dye K 3 0.15 K 0.1 K 2 1 0.05 0 5 10 Time, Mins 15 Figure 3.18 Van’t Hoff plot of the data from tables 3.5 and 3.6 Van’t Hoff’s method is much more accurate than Essens’ method. Essen’s is more common! 25 Discussion Problem: Use Van’t Hoff’s Method To Determine The Order For The Following Data Table 4.1 Buchanan’s [1871] data for the reaction: CICH2COOH + H2COOH + HCI at 100º C Time Hours [CICH2COOH] gms/liter 0 2 3 4 6 10 13 19 28 34.5 43 48 4 3.80 3.69 3.60 3.47 3.10 2.91 2.54 2.26 1.95 1.59 1.39 26 Solution: Ca0= 4 Van't Hoff's time 0 Conc first ln(ca0/Ca) second (Ca0/Ca)-1 third (CA0/CA)^21 4 =kone(cao,B5 =ktwo(cao,B5 =kthree(cao ,A5) ,A5) ,B5,A5) 2 3.8 =kone(cao,B6 =ktwo(cao,B6 =kthree(cao ,A6) ,A6) ,B6,A6) 3 3.69 =kone(cao,B7 =ktwo(cao,B7 =kthree(cao ,A7) ,A7) ,B7,A7) 4 3.6 =kone(cao,B8 =ktwo(cao,B8 =kthree(cao ,A8) ,A8) ,B8,A8) 6 3.47 =kone(cao,B9 =ktwo(cao,B9 =kthree(cao ,A9) ,A9) ,B9,A9) 27 Solution Continued: ca0= 4 Van't time 0 2 3 4 6 10 13 19 25 34.5 43 48 conc Hoff's first second third ln(ca0/ Ca) (Ca0/Ca )-1 (CA0/CA )^2-1 4 #VALUE! 3.8 0.026 3.69 0.027 3.6 0.026 3.47 0.024 3.1 0.025 2.91 0.024 2.54 0.024 2.26 0.023 1.95 0.021 1.59 0.021 1.39 0.022 #VALUE! 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.01 #VALUE! 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.008 0.009 28 Van’t Hoff Plot 0.05 Rate Constant Hydration of Chloracetic Acid K 3 0.04 K 2 0.03 K 1 0.02 0 10 20 30 Time, Mins 40 50 Figure 3.18 Van’t Hoff plot of the data from tables 3.5 and 3.6 29 Discussion Problem 2 Ammonium-dinitramide, (ADN) NH4N(NO2)2, is a oxidant used in solid fuel rockets and plastic explosives. ADN is difficult to process because it can blow up. Oxley et. Al., J. Phys chem A, 101 (1997) 5646, examined the decomposition of ADN to try to understand the kinetics of the explosion process. At 160º C they obtained the data in Table P3.20. Table P3.20 Oxley's measurements of the decomposition of dinitramide at 160 C time, fraction of time, fraction of time, fraction of seconds the AND seconds the AND seconds the AND remaining remaining remaining 0 1.0 900 0.58 300 0.84 1200 0.49 600 0.70 1500 0.41 2400 0.24 30 Discussion Problem 2 Continued: a) Is this a direct or indirect measurement of the rate? b) Use Van’t Hoff’s Method to fit this data to a rate equation. c) If you had to process ADN at 160° C, how long could you run the process without blowing anything up? Assume that there is an explosion hazard once 5% of the ADN has reacted to form unstable intermediates. 31 This Is An Indirect Measurement! Use Same Spreadsheet As Before To Fit Data Ca0= =b5 Van't Hoff's time 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 2400 Conc first 1 ln(ca0/Ca) 0.84 =kone(cao,B5 ,A5) 0.7 =kone(cao,B6 ,A6) 0.58 =kone(cao,B7 ,A7) 0.49 =kone(cao,B8 ,A8) 0.41 =kone(cao,B9 ,A9) 0.24 =kone(cao,B1 0,A10) second third (Ca0/Ca)-1 (CA0/CA)^2-1 =ktwo(cao,B5 ,A5) =ktwo(cao,B6 ,A6) =ktwo(cao,B7 ,A7) =ktwo(cao,B8 ,A8) =ktwo(cao,B9 ,A9) =ktwo(cao,B1 0,A10) =kthree(cao, B5,A5) =kthree(cao, B6,A6) =kthree(cao, B7,A7) =kthree(cao, B8,A8) =kthree(cao, B9,A9) =kthree(cao, B10,A10) 32 Solution Cont. Ca0= 1 Van't Hoff's time Conc first second third ln(ca0/Ca) (Ca0/Ca)-1 (CA0/CA)^2-1 0 1 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 300 0.84 0.000581 0.000635 0.001391 600 0.7 0.000594 0.000714 0.001735 900 0.58 0.000605 0.000805 0.002192 1200 0.49 0.000594 0.000867 0.002637 1500 0.41 0.000594 0.000959 0.003299 2400 0.24 0.000595 0.001319 0.006817 33 Solution Cont. c) from equ 3.39 1 CoA Ln f k1 CA k k1=0.0006/sec (from spreadsheet) CoA =1 (given) CfA =0.95 (what's left if 5% converted) 1 CoA 1 1 Ln f Ln 85 k1 CA 0.0006 0.95 sec 34 Summary: Two Methods To Fit Rate Data • Essen’s Method • Most common method • Plots look the best • Gives great looking results even with incorrect rate equation • Van’t Hoff’s Method • • • • More accurate than Essen Rare in literature Plots noisier Highlights weaknesses in rate equations 35 Class Question What did you learn new today? 36