Mercury in Seafood An NGO perspective Kimberly A. Warner, Ph.D. C MERC Workshop September 8, 2010 Seafood Contamination Campaign: Two objectives: Reduce exposure: Control Sources: Protect at-risk populations Hg-based Chlor-alkali Landscape 2005 •Updated 2004 FDA/EPA fish advisory –First time tuna included •New proposed Hg regulations: CAMR, etc. •Push-back by industry, free-enterprise groups –Cast doubt on science on Hg fate and effects Structure of Anti-regulation Positions •There are no health problems with MeHg •If there are problems, not our fault •Regulations will do nothing to solve imaginary problem •Pushed science to respond: e.g. –METALICUS –NHANES –Mercury 2006 consensus statements Nutritionists/ Seafood Interests Pushback 2005 NOAA Seafood and Health Conference •Question MeHg RfD and uncertainty •Omega research: neurodevelopment, cardiovascular health, etc, etc. •Selenium •FDA Risk Benefit update •Launch of Fish Scam Science needed: Methylmercury risk •Update MeHg RfD; constrain uncertainty? •Cardiovascular risks nil? •Selenium modification? •Interaction of multiple contaminants •More transparent risk-benefit studies –Open, transparent dialogue between nutritionists, toxicologists, modelers –Examine specifics, not just averages Hair mercury levels positively related to fish consumption (p < 0.0001) Hair Hg (ppm) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 Fish meals per month 7-8 or more Oceana survey in 2005 found high levels of fish consumption and mercury in some popular sport fish Consumption Rates High Medium Fish Mercury levels Cobia (Ling) (8) Low King Mackerel (19) Barracuda (29) Bonito (Little Tunny) (28) Crevalle Jack (23) Spanish Mackerel (5) Blackfin Tuna (7) Amberjack (11) Black Drum (13) Wahoo (21) Gafftopsail Catfish (24) Bluefish (25) Ladyfish (30) Red Snapper (1) Grouper (all) (4) Gray Snapper (16) Gag Grouper (14) Hardtail (Blue Runner) (31) Yellowfin Tuna (2) Flounder (3) Speckled Trout (Spotted Seatrout) (6) White Trout (Sand Seatrout) (10) Dolphin (12) Gray Triggerfish (15) Vermilion Snapper(17) Sheepshead (9) Scamp Grouper (18) Blackfish (Tripletail) (26) Hg exposure Median Hair Mercury Level (ppm) Regional Differences in: 0.7 0.6 (A) Hair Mercury 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Northern AL Coastal AL 12 Seafood consumption rates Fish servings per month (B) Fish consumption 10 8 6 4 2 0 Hg levels in top consumed fish •Northern: catfish, salmon, cod •Coastal: snapper, flounder, grouper National: shrimp, canned tuna, salmon Top Fish Mercury Level mean (ppm) Northern AL Coastal AL 0.35 0.3 (C) Mercury in Top Fish 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Northern AL n= 59 Coastal AL n= 65 Science needed: Consumer protection •ID at-risk populations –Geo-, ethno-, demo- graphic differences •Effective communication strategies on seafood risk/benefit messages •Effectiveness of point of sale signs •More monitoring of nutrient/contaminant levels in seafood supply –Target harvest areas, size class, etc. Science needed: Reduce seafood contamination •Ocean –What Hg sources methylated? –Where is Hg methylated? –Food chain, location studies –Climate change effects –Multiple contaminant effects •Oil, emerging contaminants, POPs –Sustainability concerns Temporal Trends? Mean Hair Hg (ppm) 6 all 5 4 3 2 1 0 Mobile Register 2001 n= 65 Rodeo 2006 n=65 female