Surgical Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer Yao Kai Indications for radical cystectomy Infiltrating muscle-invasive bladder cancer without evidence of metastasis or with low-volume, resectable locoregional metastases (stage T2-T3b) Superficial bladder tumors characterized by any of the following: Refractory to cystoscopic resection and intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy Extensive disease not amenable to cystoscopic resection Invasive prostatic urethral involvement Stage-pT1, grade-3 tumors unresponsive to intravesical BCG vaccine therapy CIS refractory to intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy Palliation for pain, bleeding, or urinary frequency Primary adenocarcinoma, SCC, or sarcoma Radical cystectomy: evolution More than removing just the bladder (simple cystectomy) First performed in 1800s for bladder cancer 1948, landmark report showed a 47% incidence of local recurrence within 1 year and 33% mortality after recurrent disease within 1-2 years Overall outcomes of patients undergoing simple cystectomies were poor. Modern Radical Cystectomy Radical Cystectomy Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Removal of bladder with surrounding fat Prostate/seminal vesicles (males) Uterus/fallopian tubes/ovaries/cervix (females) + Urethrectomy More is better Urinary Diversion Ileal conduit Continent cutaneous reservoir Orthotopic neobladder Radical Cystectomy OUTCOMES • 35-40% will develop a recurrence after surgery • Most recur within first 3 yrs after surgery • Usually at a distant site • Almost all will eventually die from their disease Stein JP, et al. J Clin Oncol 19:666, 2001 Radical Cystectomy OUTCOMES Stein JP, et al. J Clin Oncol 19:666, 2001 Impact of Surgical Technique on Outcomes More extended lymph nodes dissection = better outcomes More lymph nodes removed = better outcomes Lower positive margin rate = better outcomes More experienced surgeons = better outcomes Pelvic Lymphadenectomy common iliac vessel bifurcation Standard LND Extended LND Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ~25% have LN involvement at cystectomy Accurate staging Assessment of prognosis Adjuvant therapies (chemotherapy, clinical trials) Therapeutic benefit Removal of micrometastatic disease Bladder Cancer-specific Survival Probability 100 All Patients 90 80 No. lymph node removed ≥12 n=613 70 60 50 40 No. lymph node removed <12 n=113 30 20 10 3 yr. ± SE 7 yr. ± SE 10 yr. ± SE No. LN removed ≥12 78.1 ±1.9% 71.8 ±2.4% 63.6 ±3.6% No. LN removed <12 59.2 ±5.1% 44.9 ±6.3% 44.9 ±6.3% Log rank test P<0.0001 0 4 6 8 10 12 Years after Radical Cystectomy 14 16 18 Number of Nodes Sampled Affects Survival in Both Node Negative and Node Positive Patients Node negative Node Positive Herr Urology 61:105, 2003 Two consecutive series of patients treated with radical cystectomy and limited PLND (336; Cleveland Clinic) and extended PLND (322; University of Bern) were analyzed All cases were staged N0M0 prior to radical cystectomy (without treatment of neoadjuvant therapy) Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Urol 179, 873-878, March 2008 Using the limited template and with submission as a single packet from each side, a median of 12 nodes were reported per CC patient. Median number of positive nodes was 1 Using the extended template and submission of 6 packets, a median of 22 nodes were reported per Bern patient. Median number of positive nodes was 2 The overall lymph node positive rate was 13% for patients with limited and 26% for those who had extended PLND Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Urol 179, 873-878, March 2008 Recurrence-free survival After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended PLND for pT2+3pN+ Limited PLND Extended PLND Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Urol 179, 873-878, March 2008 Recurrence-free survival After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended PLND for pT2+3pN0 Limited PLND Extended PLND Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Urol 179, 873-878, March 2008 Overall survival After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended PLND for pT2pN0-2 and pT3pN0-2 Limited PLND Extended PLND Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Urol 179, 873-878, March 2008 Urinary Diversion Use of intestinal segment to bypass/ reconstruct/ replace the normal urinary tract Goals: Storage of urine without absorption Maintain low pressure even at high volumes to allow unobstructed flow of urine from kidneys Prevent reflux of urine back to the kidneys Socially-acceptable continence Empties completely “Ideal” diversion has yet to be discovered Types of Urinary Diversion ILEAL CONDUIT (incontinent diversion to skin) CONTINENT CUTANEOUS RESERVOIR (continent diversion to skin) ORTHOTOPIC NEOBLADDER (continent diversion to urethra) Ileal Conduit 15-20 cm of small intestine (ileum) is separated from the intestinal tract Intestines are sewn back together (reestablish intestinal continuity) Ileal Conduit Ureters are attached to one end of the segment of ileum Natural peristalsis of intestine propels urine through the segment Other end is brought out through an opening on the abdomen Ileum ureter ureter Ileal Conduit ADVANTAGES Simplest to perform Least potential for complications No need for intermittent catheterization Less absorption of urine DISADVANTAGES Need to wear an external collection bag Stoma complications Parastomal hernia Stomal stenosis Long-term sequelae Pyelonephritis Renal deterioration Continent Cutaneous Reservoir Many variations (same theme) All use various parts of the intestine ileum, right colon most commonly Reservoir Indiana Pouch, Penn Pouch, Kock Pouch… “Detubularized” intestine- low pressure storage Continence mechanism Ileocecal valve (Indiana) Flap valve (Penn, Lahey) Intussuscepted nipple valve (Kock) Continent Cutaneous Reservoir INDIANA POUCH Appendix removed Right colon and distal ileum isolated Right colon is opened lengthwise and folded down to create a sphere Continent Cutaneous Reservoir INDIANA POUCH Ureters attached to back of reservoir (not shown) catheter RESERVOIR EFFERENT LIMB (to skin) Continence maintained by ileocecal valve Continent Cutaneous Reservoir INDIANA POUCH Continent Cutaneous Reservoir ADVANTAGES No external bag Stoma can be covered with bandaid DISADVANTAGES Most complex Need for regular intermittent catheterization Potential complications: Stoma stenosis Stones Urine infections Orthotopic Neobladder Currently the diversion of choice Hautmann, Studer, T-Pouch,etc. COMPONENTS: Internal reservoir – detubularized ileum Connect to urethra (“efferent limb”) Urethral sphincter provides continence “Antirefluxing” – ureteral connection Antirefluxing uretero-intestinal anastomosis(Hautmann ) Low pressure isoperistaltic limb (Studer) Orthotopic Neobladder ADVANTAGES No external bag Urinate through urethra May not need catheterization DISADVANTAGES Incontinence (10-30%) Retention (5-20%) Risk of stones, UTI’s Need to “train” neobladder Choice of Urinary Diversion Disease Factors Urethral margin Patient Factors Kidney function / liver function Manual dexterity Preoperative urinary continence/ urethral strictures Motivation Surgeon Factors Familiarity with various types of diversions Urinary Diversions Enterostomal therapist is CRITICAL for success Urinary diversions require lifelong follow-up Imaging (kidneys/ureters/diversion) Labs (electrolytes, acid-base, B12 levels) Cancer follow-up (surveillance imaging, cytology) Conclusions Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for invasive bladder cancer Accurate staging (after surgery) is the most important determinant of prognosis A properly performed lymph node dissection makes a difference Choice of urinary diversion must be individualized for optimal outcomes Conclusions Limited PLND is associated with suboptimal staging, poorer outcome for patients with node positive and node negative disease with comparable pT stage and a higher rate of LP Extended PLND appears not only to allow for more accurate staging but also for improved survival of patients with organ confined, nonorgan confined and LN positive disease Thank you