Symptom-triggered Vs Fixed Dosing Schedules in the Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Jay Murdoch Alcohol Nurse Specialist Background The number of dependant drinkers in England stands at 1.6 million The cost to the NHS is £2.7 Billion every year and is set to rise to £3.7 Billion Alcohol withdrawal often causes significant management problems and complicates the management of a wide variety of concurrent conditions The number of hospital admissions was 1.1 million in 2009/2010, a 100% increase since 2002/03. Background Continued Although alcohol use and abuse are common among inpatients, many patients are inadequately assessed and treated for alcohol withdrawal Excessive drinking is currently the second greatest risk to public health in developed countries Although most of that risk is avoidable the risk is clearly apparent with the large number of hospital admissions every year The Project Is commissioned as part of Manchester’s Alcohol Strategy IBA work with harmful and hazardous drinkers Work with dependant drinkers Reducing attendance rate of ‘frequent fliers’ Alcohol Withdrawal Policy Part 1 Aims Pre intervention audit Identify current practice Identify any short falls Compare current practice to national guidance Identify a need for change in practice Part 2 Aims Intervention stage Implementation of an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) Incorporating Assessment tool (CIWA score) Management pathways Standardise management of alcohol withdrawal Implementation of a symptom-triggered approach to care Part 3 Aims Post intervention audit- Complete audit cycle Has the intervention been successful? Has practice improved? Has patient care improved? Has staff satisfaction improved? Compare findings from both audits Audit Tool Was the alcohol ICP used in the management of this patient? Important to identify if the Trust guidelines are being met Number of days to complete detox? Important to compare pre ICP and post ICP to note any improvement How much Chlordiazepoxide was administered? Important to compare pre ICP and post ICP to note any improvement If ICP not commenced. Was PRN medication utilised? This will identify if predetermined dosing regimes are used are staff trying to alleviate further symptoms with as required medication If PRN medication was used was it identified in the notes why? This will highlight the need for CIWA scoring system that is part of ICP to improve assessment and documentation What drug is used in the detox process? Will see if we are using the best available pharmacology to manage this group Is there consistency with prescribing? This will identify any problems with medical prescribing. Are the medicines prescribed in proper place? Are all areas of Kardex complete? Did anyone develop delirium or seizure activity following commencement on a detox? This will help identify differences between symptom-triggered management and predetermined dosing. Sample Groups Both groups contained fifty patients Convenience sample All patients completed a detox in hospital All patients were alcohol dependent within DSMV-IV and ICD 10 classifications Discussion Pre ICP implementation Practice No consistency with prescribing No official guidelines Prophylactic dosing regimes Medication not individually tailored to patient Non-licensed medication being used No assessment scoring to measure withdrawal severity Clinical Incidents As a background Clinical incidents involving alcohol were investigated Coroners court Identified a need for change Multiple incidents involving alcohol No of days to complete a detox Pre change average number of days to complete audit was 6.36 days Post change average number of days to complete audit was 2.48 days How much Chlordiazepoxide was administered? Pre implemenation-Average number of milligrams to complete an inpatient detox was 563.3 mg. 40% were given PRN medication but in only 10% of these (2 cases) was the reason for this documented Six of the prescriptions did not use Chlordiazepoxide but used other medication. Post implementation- Average number of milligrams of Chlordiazepoxide to complete an inpatient detox was 167.2 mg. Chlordiazepoxide was the only drug used 5 patients required no Chlordiazepoxide Consistency With Prescribing Pre Intervention No uniformity Differing regimes used Multiple prescribing errors noted Administration errors noted Post Intervention All patients prescribed the same medication All prescribed appropriately All used symptomtriggered approach to care Some administration errors still Development of further withdrawal phenomena 14 patients in the pre-intervention group developed severe signs of withdrawal following commencement on a detox Compared to 3 patients in the postintervention group Staff Satisfaction A questionnaire was utilised using open and closed questions Was sent to 200 staff 138 were returned Staff satisfaction was noted to improve Staff had noted improvement in patient care Documentation Time management Confidence Documentation There are clear improvements in documentation This was needed as highlighted from Coroners Court and other clinical incidents All clinicians now documenting withdrawal symptoms in same document User friendly document allowing clinical staff to score the symptoms therefore all clinicians involved with patient can identify what signs and symptoms the patient has been portraying Much easier to rule out Wernicke’s encephalopathy or Anxiety related disorders Costing The average cost of an inpatient stay is £300 per night The average cost to complete an inpatient detox before symptom-triggered approach to care was £1,908. Compares to £744 for post intervention group. Further costing reductions could be noteed in pharmacy costs. The printing costs for 3000 booklets/ICP’s is £1191.72 Costing Cost of detox for 50 patients 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 Cost in pounds 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Cost of detox for 50 patients Pre ICP Post ICP Pre-and-post ICP Mann-Whitney Test Mann-Whitney parametric test used P-value is 0.0001 Conclusions A symptom-triggered approach is appropriate in the management of alcohol withdrawal Improves care Improves treatment duration Decrease in medication required Harmonised clinical management Improved documentation Staff satisfaction noted Significant Costing differences References Alcohol Concern (2010) Investing in Alcohol Treatments: Reducing Costs and Saving. Alcohol Concern. London. Alcohol Concern (2011) Making Alcohol a Health Priority- Opportunities to Reduce alcohol Harms and Rising Costs. Alcohol Concern. London. Foy A., Kay J., and Taylor A. (2002) The course of alcohol withdrawal in a general hospital. QJM Vol 90 pp. 253-261. Kaner E. (2010) Brief interventions against excessive alcohol consumption. In: Oxford Textbook of Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1334-1336 NICE (2010) Alcohol Use Disorders: Diagnosis and clinical management of alcohol related physical complications. London. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE (2010b) Alcohol Use Disorders: Sample Chlordiazepoxide dosing regimens for use in managing alcohol withdrawal. London. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Repper-Delisi J., Stern T.A., Mitchell M., Lussier-cushing M, Lakatose B.,Frichione G. et al. (2008) Successful Implementation of an Alcohol- Withdrawal Pathway in a General Hospital. Psychosomatics Vol 49(4) pp. 292-299. Williams S., Brown A,. Patton R., Crawford M. and Touquet R. (2004) The half-life of the ‘teachable moment’ for alcohol misusing patients in the Emergency Department. Drug and Alcohol Dependence Vol 77 pp. 205-208.