“فإذا سويته ونفخت فيه من روحي فقعوا له ساجدين“ ص ۷۲ Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in ARDS Nabil Abouchala, MD Consultant Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine abouhani@yahoo.com Case presentation • A 45-year-old man develops ARDS after sustaining multiple broken bones in an automobile accident. The man weighs 70 kg. Mechanical ventilation is initiated in the AC mode with the following settings: (PEEP), 10 cm H2O; (FiO2), 70%; respiration rate, 12/min. • The most appropriate Tidal volume at this point: – – – – – (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) 1000 ml 420 ml 500 ml 560 ml 700 ml Definitions • The 1994 North American-European Consensus Conference (NAECC) criteria: – Onset - Acute and persistent – Radiographic criteria - Bilateral pulmonary infiltrates consistent with the presence of edema – Oxygenation criteria - Impaired oxygenation regardless of the PEEP concentration, with a Pao2/Fio2 ratio 300 torr (40 kPa) for ALI and 200 torr (27 kPa) for ARDS – Exclusion criteria - Clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension or a pulmonary-artery catheter occlusion pressure of 18 mm Hg. Bernard GR et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994 Stratification System of Acute Lung Injury GOCA Letter G O C A Meaning Scale Gas exchange 0 1 2 3 A B C D Pao2/Fio2 301 Pao2/Fio2 200 -300 Pao2/Fio2 101 – 200 Pao2/Fio2 100 Spontaneous breathing, no PEEP Assisted breathing, PEEP 0-5 cmH2O Assisted breathing, PEEP 6-10 cmH2O Assisted breathing, PEEP 10 cmH2O Organ failure A B C D Lung only Lung + 1 organ Lung + 2 organs Lung + 3 organs Cause 1 2 3 Unknown Direct lung injury Indirect lung injury 0 1 No coexisting disease that will cause death within 5 yr Coexisting disease that will cause death within 5 yr but not within 6 mo Coexisting disease that will cause death within 6 mo Gas exchange (to be combined with the numeric descriptor) Associated diseases 2 Definition Artigas A, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998. The ARDS Lung ARDS Focal Patchy Diffuse Chest x-ray (zero PEEP) Focal heterogeneous loss of aeration in caudal and dependent lung region Bilateral and diffuse xray densities respecting lung apices Bilateral and diffuse hyperdensities “White lungs” Chest CT scan (zero PEEP) Loss of aeration Upper lobes normally aerated despite a regional excess of lung tissue – Lower lobes poorly or non aerated Lower lobes massively nonaerated – The loss of aeration involves partially the upper lobes Massive, diffuse and bilateral non- or poorly aerated lung regions – No normally aerated lung region Response to PEEP ± PEEP <10-12 cmH2O Risk of overinflation of the aerated lung regions ++++ Recruitment of non aerated lung unit Low potential for recruitment ++++ Lung recruitment curve Open lung concept ± Rouby JJ, et al. Eur Respir J. 2003. Rouby JJ, et al. Anesthesiology. 2004. High potential for recruitment The ARDS Lung Early phases of ARDS Direct insult of the lung Primary pulmonary ARDS “Indirect” insult of the lung Secondary extrapulmonary ARDS Pathologic changes Lung tissue consolidation Severe intra-alveolar damage (Edema, fibrin, collagen neutrophil aggregates, red cells) Microvascular congestion Interstitial edema Alveolar collapse Less severe alveolar damage End-expiratory lung volume EELV Static elastance of the total respiratory system Est,rs Static elastance of the chest wall Est,w / Static lung elastance Est,L / / Intra-abdominal pressure Response to PEEP Est,rs [Est,L >> Est,w] Stretching phenomena Est,rs [Est,L Est,w] Recruitment of previously closed alveolar spaces Lung recruitment ± ++++ Gattinoni L, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998. Stress distribution: homogeneous system FT min L. Gattinoni, 2003 max Mead J et al. J. Appl. Physiol. 28(5):596-608 1970 Stress distribution: high stiffness zone min L. Gattinoni, 2003 max Mead J et al. J. Appl. Physiol. 28(5):596-608 1970 Ventilator-induced lung injury is initiated by the application of excessive stress Gattinoni, L. et al. CMAJ 2008;178:1174-1176 Copyright ©2008 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors NEJM 2000;342:1334-1349 NEJM 2000;342:1334-1349 ARDS Ventilator Strategy Ventilator-induced Lung Injury (VILI) • • • • Barotrauma Volutrauma Atelectrauma Biotrauma Collapse Over Distension Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury (VILI) Atelectrauma: Repetitive alveolar collapse and reopening of the underrecruited alveoli Volutrauma: Over-distension of normally aerated alveoli due to excessive volume delivery Biotrauma: Cytokines, complement, prostanoids, leukotrienes, O2- Proteases *Dreyfuss: J Appl Physiol 1992 Respiratory Pressure/Volume (P/V) Curve Healthy subject In normal healthy volunteers, the P/V curve explore the mechanical properties of the respiratory system (lung + chest wall) ARDS RV, Residual volume; FRC, Functional residual capacity; TLC, Total lung capacity; UIP, Upper inflection point; LIP, Lower inflection point. The critical opening pressure above which most of the collapsed units open up and may be recruited - CLIN Compliance of the intermediate, linear segment of the P/V curve Maggiore SS, et al. Eur Respir J. 2003. Rouby JJ, et al. Eur Respir J. 2003. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury (VILI) Upper Deflection point Lower Inflection point ARDS: Pressure Volume Curves Normal Early ARDS Volume Late ARDS Pressure Pinsp = 40 mbar PEEP = 5 mbar Courtesy of Dr Neil Macintyre Muscedere JG et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:1327-1334 The PEEP Effect NEJM 2006;354:1839-1841 Barotrauma Multiple Organ Failure! ARDS: Baby lungs Preventing Overdistention and Collapse Injury “Lung Protective” Ventilation V O L U M E Add PEEP Limit VT Pressure Limit Distending Pressure Lung Protective Ventilator Protective VenLung Protective Ventilator Strategies Strategies volutrauma zone of overdistension V zone of derecruitment and atelectasis "safe" window UIP DON’T EVEN THINK OF PARKING HERE LIP atelectrauma P Courtesy of Dr Neil Macintyre ARMA Trial Intervention TV (4-6 ml/Kg) PEEP 8.5 Control TV (10-12 ml/Kg) PEEP 8.6 Balancing need for support vs distending pressures/FiO2 Crs also better in the HIGH Vt group Lung-Protective Ventilation ARDS Network, 2000: Multicenter, randomized 861 patients Tidal Volume (ml/kg) Pplateau PEEP Actual PEEP Result (p<0.001) Lung-protective ventilation 6 <30 Protocol 8.1 31.0% Conventional ventilation 12 <50 Protocol 9.1 39.8% Principle for FiO2 and PEEP Adjustment FiO2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 PEEP 5 5-8 8-10 10 10-14 14 14-18 18-24 NEJM 2000; 342: 1301-1308 Lung-Protective Ventilation • Result: – Lower 22% mortality (31% vs 39.8%) – Increase ventilator-free days NEJM 2000; 342: 1301-1308 Concerns when using lungprotective strategy… • • • • • • • Heterogeneous distribution Hypercapnia Auto-PEEP Sedation and paralysis Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony Increased intrathoracic pressure Maintenance of PEEP What next? Prone position Inhaled nitric oxide ECMO High-frequency oscillation Other Ventilator Strategies • Lung recruitment maneuvers • Prone positioning • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) • ECMO Lung Recruitment • To open the collapsed alveoli • A sustained inflation of the lungs to higher airway pressure and volumes – Ex.: PCV, Pi = 45 cmH2O, PEEP = 5 cmH2O, RR = 10 /min, I : E = 1:1, for 2 minutes NEJM 2006; 354: 1775-1786 Lung Recruitment NEJM 2006; 354: 1775-1786 Lung Recruitment NEJM 2006; 354: 1775-1786 Lung Recruitment • Potentially recruitable (PEEP 5 15 cmH2O) – Increase in PaO2:FiO2 – Decrease in PaCO2 – Increase in compliance Sensitivity : 71% Specificity : 59% • The effect of PEEP correlates with the percentage of potentially recruitalbe lung • The percentage of recruitable lung correlates with the overall severity of lung injury NEJM 2007; 354: 1775-1786 Lung Recruitment • The percentage of potentially recruitable lung: – Extremely variable, – Strongly associated with the response to PEEP • Not routinely recommended Prone Position Prone Position • Mechanisms to improve oxygenation: – Increase in endexpiratory lung volume – Better ventilationperfusion matching – More efficient drainage of secretions Prone Position Improved gas exchange More uniform alveolar ventilation Recruitment of atelectasis in dorsal regions Improved postural drainage Redistribution of perfusion away from edematous, dependent regions Prone Positioning Prone Position NEJM 2001;345:568-573 Prone Position NEJM 2001;345:568-573 Prone Position • Improve oxygenation in about 2/3 of all treated patients • No improvement on survival, time on ventilation, or time in ICU • Might be useful to treat refractory hypoxemia • Optimum timing or duration ? • Routine use is not recommended High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV) HFV - the “ultimate” lung protective strategy? Over-distended Protected Under-recruit HFOV Frequency: 180-600 breaths/min (3-10Hz) Effect of HFOV on gas exchange in ARDS patients AJRCCM 2002; 166:801-8 Survival difference of ARDS patients treated with HFOV or CMV 30-day: P=0.057 90-day: P=0.078 AJRCCM 2002; 166:801-8 HFOV • Complications: – Recognition of a pneumothorax – Desiccation of secretions – Sedation and paralysis – Lack of expiratory filter • Failed to show a mortality benefit • Combination with other interventions ? Chest 2007; 131:1907-1916 Acute Lung injury • Decreased lung compliance results in high airway pressures • Low tidal volume 6-8 ml/kg ideal body weight • Maintain IPP 30 cm H2O • PEEP to improve oxygenation Conclusions • The only treatment that shows mortality benefit: – lung-protective ventilation strategy – Low tidal volume (6ml/Kg), high PEEP, adequate Pplat (<30 cmH2O) • Modalities to improve oxygenation: – Prone position, steroid, fluid treatment, steroid, HFOV, NO • Combining other treatments: – Activated protein C, antibiotics, EGDT…etc