TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY Frank R. Ebert, MD Union Memorial Hospital Baltimore, Maryland Total Knee Arthroplasty Goal —Restore mechanical alignment —Restore joint line Normal Knee Anatomy Position in single leg stance Mechanical axis valgus 3º Femoral shaft axis valgus 6º Proximal tibia varus 3º Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic Evaluation —Standing full length – AP —Standing AP —Extension/Flexion laterals —Tunnel view —Sunrise view Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic Evaluation Weight Bearing X-rays —Extent of joint space narrowing —Ligament stretch out —Subluxation of femus on tibia Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic Analysis Anatomic Axis – Femur —Line that bisects the medullary canal of the femur —Determines the entry point of the femoral medullary guide rod Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic Analysis Mechanical Axis – Femur (MAF) —A line from center of femoral head to center of distal femur Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic Analysis Anatomic Axis Tibia (AAT) —A line that bisects the medullary canal of the tibia —Determines the entry point of the guide rod Total Knee Arthroplasty Radiographic Evaluation Mechanical Axis – Tibia (MAT) —Line from center of proximal tibia to center of ankle —Proximal tibia is cut perpendicular to (MAT) Issues with Surgical Techniques Traditional Joint Line Orientation Tibial cut perpendicular to the MAT Femoral shaft at a valgus angle 5º to 8º valgus based off the ong standing x-ray Surgical Technique Incision — straight longitudinal incision Tissue handling key Avoid flaps Preserve soft tissue flap about the patella Surgical Technique Remember 7cm Rule between incisions Issues with Surgical Techniques Exposure options — Subvastus / midvastus u Routine knee replacements z Quicker rehab — Medial parapatellar / midline u Difficult total knee — obese patients u Revisions MIS vs MINI TKA Capsulotomy only? Mid vastus? Sub vastus? MIS MIS vs MINI TKA Mid vastus? Sub vastus? Quad MIS Anatomic Variations of VMO Insertion Type I-High Insertion Type II-Pole Insertion Type III-Low Insertion Area of Variation Type I- High VMO Insertion Muscle Insertion Area of extended retinaculu m Retinacula r Incision Type II-Pole Insertion Muscle Insertion Capsular or Retinacul ar Incision Type III-Low VMO Insertion Muscle Insertion Area of Extended VM Issues with Surgical Techniques Alignment — Extramedullary vs Intramedullary u Accuracy vs increased PE risk u Femur – Intramedullary z Overdrill opening and insert slowly IM guide z Caution with bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty u Tibia – Extramedullary Issues with Surgical Techniques Femoral Rotation — Landmarks Posterior femoral condyles Epicondyles 5º external rotation to the posterior condyles Issues with Surgical Techniques Femur — Measured resections: equal bone distally and posteriorly — Tensioning devices & ligament releases — Do not alter bone resection for ligament tightness Issues with Surgical Techniques Tibial Component Rotation — Transmalleolar axis — Posterior tibial plateau — Tibial tubercle — lies lateral Malalignment Tibial Component Internally Rotated Tubercle Too Lateral Management of Deformity 1. Release the tight side of the deformity 2. Tighten the loose side 3. Accept some residual soft tissue imbalance 4. Combination Surgical Techniques Varus Knee 1. Pes anserinus 2. Joint Capsule 3. Deep Tibial Collateral 4. Semimembranosus 5. Posterior Medial Capsule Varus Knee Varus Knee Varus Knee Varus Knee Surgical Techniques Valgus Knee 1. Iliotibial Band 2. Popliteus Tendon 3. Posterior Lateral Capsule 4. Lateral Head of Gastroc 5. Biceps Femoris Surgical Techniques Valgus Knee — Peroneal nerve palsy – valgus / flexion deformity — Treatment u Release dressings or flex the knee Surgical Techniques: Flexion Contracture 1. Posterior capsule 2. Gastroc origins 3. Posterior cruciate 4. Distal femur Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Complex Combinations: — musculotendinous contracture — ligamentous contracture — capsular contracture — osteophytes of posterior condyle Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Biomechanics — increased quadriceps force for knee stabilization during weight bearing — increased forces transmitted to the patellofemoral joint Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Biomechanics — increased forces are placed on posterior tibial plateau — femoral condyles sink into the tibial plateau — contact between intercondylar notch and tibial eminence form a boney block Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Associated deformity — varus deformity 40% - > 5º range 5 to 30º varus — valgus deformity 30% - > 5º range 5 to 22º valgus Firestone et al COOR ‘92 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Incidence of Problem – Review of 700 TKA & Revision TKA’s — 60% before primary TKA — 21% before revision TKA Tew & Forster JBJS (B) 87 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Soft tissue release — Varies with angular deformity Firestone et al COOR ‘92 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Surgical Treatment Soft tissue release Additional bone resection Combination Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Postoperative Correction — the more severe the deformity must consider the pros and cons of additional bone resection and/or soft tissue release Volz COOR ‘89 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Additional bone resection – pros — joint line is positioned slightly more proximal — functionally lengthens the collaterals and posterior capsule forward extension — doesn’t compromise flexion stability Firestone et al COOR ‘92 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Additional bone resection — cons (excessive) • • • • Collateral ligament laxity Quadriceps redundancy Hyperextension Bone quality can be compromised McPherson et al ‘94 Additional Femoral Resection Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Surgical Treatment for Deformity < 10º FFC Soft tissue release – only necessary — posterior capsule — possibly PCL — posterior osteophytes Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Surgical Treatment for Deformity 10-20º FFC — consider distal femoral resection 3 to 5 mm — Posterior capsule — PCL resection posterior osteophytes Firestone et al COOR ‘92 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Surgical Treatment for Deformity 20-30º FFC — distal femoral resection 3 to 5 mm — posterior capsule — PCL resection posterior osteophytes Firestone et al COOR ‘92 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Surgical Treatment for Deformity > 30º FFC — consider pre-op casting ≠ — distal femoral resection 5 mm — proximal tibial resection — PCL resection — posterior osteophytes Firestone et al COOR ‘92 et al J of Arthro ‘99 Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA Peroneal Nerve Palsy Vascular Insufficiency Anterior Pressure Ulcers Manipulation Fixed Flexion Deformity in TKA No formula is exact for treatment of the problem Consider a balance between soft tissue release vs bone resection Issues with Surgical Techniques Stiff Knee Remove osteophytes Insall Turn Down Osteotomize the tibial tubercle Rectus snip Issues with Surgical Techniques Stiff Knee u Epicondylar osteotomy for large flexion / contracture u Lateral release to evert the patella Issues with Surgical Techniques Patellar resurfacing — Recommended for all RA patients — Without resurfacing 4% to 6% incidence of anterior knee pain — With resurfacing increased incidence of fracture Issues with Surgical Techniques Patellar resurfacing — Thickness shouldn’t exceed 25 mm — For every 1 mm thicker reduces flexion by 3º Issues with Surgical Techniques Patellar Baja • • • Proximal tibial osteotomy Tibial tubercle shift Prior fracture Issues with Surgical Techniques Patellar Baja • • Don’t raise joint line Consider lowering joint line — Distal femoral alignment • Trim anterior tibial poly to avoid impingement of patella Issues with Surgical Techniques Patellar Clunk Syndrome — Seen at 35º-40º knee flexion — Treatment is arthroscopic or open resection Issues with Surgical Techniques Sagittal Plane Balancing Situation Problem Cut Tight Symmetrical in extension gap Cut Tight in flexion Cut Tight in extension Cut Loose in flexion Solution – cut more proximal tibia Asymmetrical – Release PCL; gap Posterior capsule Consider PCL substituting prosthesis – Resection distal femur AVOID recurvatum Issues with Surgical Techniques Sagittal Plane Balancing Situation Problem Cut Good in extension Asymmetrical gap Cut Loose in flexion – Resection additional tibia – May need to release PCL – Ensure posterior slope of tibia Cut Tight in flexion Cut Good in extension Solution Asymmetrical gap – Need femoral augmentation – Adjust to larger femoral component Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fractures Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Supracondylar Fractures of the Femur After Total Knee Arthroplasty Supracondylar Fractures After TKR l Notching of the femoral cortex l Osteoporosis l Prolonged steroid use l Preexisting neurologic disorders Supracondylar Fractures After TKR OSTEOPOROSIS Bogoch, et al, CORR 1986 Supracondylar Fractures After TKR l Major trauma is not required to produce fractures in many TKA patients l Alignment not correlated with fracture l Weight not a significant Fractures After TKA Neer Classification of Supracondylar Fractures l Type I - Minimal displacement l Type IIA - Medial displacement of condyles l Type IIB Lateral displacement of condyles l Type III - Supracondylar and shaft fractures Supracondylar Fractures After TKR TREATMENT Type 1 – Nondisplaced Supracondylar Fractures After TKR Type 1 fractures 83% success rate Chen, et al, 1994 Supracondylar Fractures After TKR Type 2 fractures 69% success rate Chen, et al, 1994 Supracondylar Fractures After TKR Non Operative Method l Casting l Traction followed by rest Supracondylar Fractures After TKR Type 2 fractures 67% success rate Chen, et al, 1994 Supracondylar Fractures After TKR Operative Method l l l l l l Plates / Screw fixation Intramedullary rods Rush pins External fixation Primary arthrodesis Revision arthroplasty Supracondylar Fractures After TKR Type 2 Considerations l Patients’ ability to tolerate traction l Ability of bone to hold screws l Ability of the surgeon Intercondylar Distances of Commonly Used Femoral Prostheses Manufacturer Model Intercondylar Distance (Smallest Size) (mm) Biomet, (Warsaw, IN) AGC Universal 18 18 DePuy, (Warsaw, IN) AMK 20 Dow Corning Wright, Howmedica, Intermedics, Johnson and Johnson, (Arlington, TN) (Rutherford, NJ) (Austin, TX) (New Brunswick, NJ) Whitesides modular PCA Natural Press-fit condylar Insall-Burstein* (posterior stabilized) 20 18.5 14 20 15 Kirschner, Zimmer, (Timonium, MD) (Warsaw, IN) Performance Insall-Burstein I* Insall-Burstein II (posterior stabilized* or constrained condylar†) Miller-Galante I Small / small + ‡ Regular / regular + Large / large + Large + + Miller-Galante II 14 16 15 11 12.5 15 18 13 Supracondylar Fractures After TKR No one form of treatment gives uniformly good results Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty Complications in Arthroplasty Infection – Risk Factors l Skin ulcerations / necrosis l Rheumatoid Arthritis l Previous hip/knee operation l Recurrent UTI l Oral corticosteroids Complications in Arthroplasty Infection – Risk Factors l Chronic renal insufficiency l Diabetes l Neoplasm requiring chemo l Tooth extraction Complications in Arthroplasty l l l l Infection – Clinical Course Pain #1 Swelling Fever Wound breakdown drainage Windsor et al JBJS; 1990 Infections About TKR Early < 3 months Lab Value Mayo Series Mean 7,500 l Differential 67 PMN’s l Sed rate 71 mm/hr l Arthrocentesis Infections About TKR Late > 3 months Symptoms: 52 patients Pain 96% swelling 77% Debride 27% Active drainage 27% Sed rate 63 mm/hr Windsor et al WBC - 8300 JBJS; 1990 Complications in Arthroplasty Infection – Surgical Techniques l Avoid skin bridges l Avoid creation of skin flaps l Hemostasis l Prolonged operating time Complications in Arthroplasty Infection – Work-Up l Wound History l Physical Exam l Serial Radiographs l Lab/sed rate/CRP l Bone scan / Indium scan Complications in Arthroplasty Infection l l l l Arthrocentesis Cell count Diff > 25,000 pmn Protein – high Glucose – low Complications in Arthroplasty Infection l Host Response Glycocalyx Gristina JBJS; 1983 Micro Organisms Organisms Isolated from 71 Patients With Infected Knee Replacement Organism Staphylococcus S. aureus, penicillin sensitive S. aureus, penicillin resistant S. epidermis Gram negative Pseudomonas Escherichia coli Anærobic Other Percent 64 14 28 22 12 7 5 6 17 Complications in Arthroplasty Treatment Options l Antibiotic suppression l Aggressive wound debridement Complications in Arthroplasty Treatment Options l Antibiotic suppression Indicated in med compromised Organism - gram+ strep staphepi Complications in Arthroplasty Treatment Options l Resection arthroplasty l 2 Stage re-implant l Arthrodesis l Amputation Complications in Arthroplasty Treatment Options l Debridement with antibiotic suppression therapy Strep/staphepi -- best Avoid repeated attempts Frozen tissue section Suction drains Complications in Arthroplasty Two-Stage Reimplantation l Most successful treatment l Procedure of choice Complications in Arthroplasty Two-Stage Reimplantation Procedure l Remove components, cement, I&D l Fabricate and place spacer l 6 weeks of antibiotics l Reimplantation Complications in Arthroplasty Two-Stage Reimplantation Stage I l create antibiotic spacer impregnated with antibiotics l wound closure Complications in Arthroplasty Two-Stage Reimplantation l Spacer Antibiotic Regimen Tobramycin 2.4 gm/3.6 gm per 40 gms of PMMA Vancomycin > gm to 1 gm per gms of PMMA Complications in Arthroplasty Intra-operative Frozen Section l < 5 PMN’s per HPF – no infection l > 10 PMN’s per HPF – infection Mirra; JBJS Complications in Arthroplasty Results — Gm positive Windsor et al 92 % JBJS 1990 Insall et al 97% JBJS 1983 Complications in Arthroplasty Resection Arthroplasty l Removal all components l Remove all cement l Effective in medically compromised patient Complications in Arthroplasty Arthrodesis Indications l Extensor mechanism disruption l Resistant bacteria l Inadequate bonestock l Inadequate soft tissues l Young patient Arthrodesis Advantages Definitive treatment Little chance of recurrence Arthrodesis Disadvantages Difficulty with transfers / small spaces Increase energy requirements Infections About TKR Algorithm TKA Clinical Sepsis < 3 wks Debridement Antibiotics (6 wks) (GRAM + Organism) > 3 wks 2-Stage Replant Infections About TKR Algorithm Debridement Antibiotics Success No Success 2-stage Replant 2-stage Replant Success No Success Arthrodesis Resection Arthroplasty Thank You