Cancer and thrombosis – a complex relationship Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Cancer may increase the risk of thrombosis through multiple mechanisms1 – tumour-induced hypercoagulability, both direct and through expression of tissue factor2 – damage to the endothelium – venous stasis caused by immobility or bulky tumour Idiopathic (no known cause) venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be a sign of occult malignancy3 VTE is more likely to recur in cancer patients than in those without malignancy4 1Prandoni et al (1999) et al (1995) 3Prandoni et al (1992) 4Levitan et al (1999) 2Kakkar Activation of coagulation in cancer patients Control (n=72) Tissue factor (pg/mL) Factor VIIa (mU/mL) 600 120 p=0.0006 500 100 400 80 Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Cancer (n=106) TAT* complex (µg/L) 10 p=0.0002 8 p=0.0001 6 300 60 200 40 100 20 2 0 0 0 4 *TAT = thrombin-antithrombin Kakkar et al (1995) Thrombosis in cancer patients: the risk varies with tumour type Rate/10,000 patients 140 120 117 120 100 80 Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Ovary Brain 110 98 Pancreas 81 Lymphoma 76 61 60 Leukaemia Colon 40 Lung 20 0 Rate of VTE by cancer type Levitan et al (1999) Incidence of newly diagnosed malignancy in patients with VTE Incidence of overt cancer during 2-year follow-up (%) 20 18 16 14 12 p=0.043 10 8 6 4 1.9 2 0 Secondary venous thrombosis (n=105) Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis p=0.008 17.1 7.6 Idiopathic venous thrombosis (n=145) Recurrent idiopathic venous thrombosis (n=35) Prandoni et al (1992) Registry data Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Two large cohort studies have shown an increased risk of cancer in patients admitted for VTE – Swedish study: incidence of cancer 4.4* x higher than expected within the first year1 – Danish study: incidence of cancer 3* x higher than expected over the first 6 months and 2.2* x higher at 1 year2 *SIR, standardised incidence ratio = ratio of observed to expected number of cancers 1Baron 2Sørensen et al (1998) et al (1998) In-hospital mortality rates from pulmonary embolism: cancer vs non-cancer Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Mortality (%) 16 p=0.05 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Non-cancer Cancer Shen and Pollak (1980) Role of therapeutic interventions Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Therapeutic interventions may increase the risk of VTE in cancer patients1,2 The risk of VTE in cancer patients undergoing surgery is higher than in patients with nonmalignant disease2,3 Chemotherapy increases the risk of VTE, especially when combined with hormone therapy2 Thrombosis rates in patients with indwelling central venous catheters but no thromboprophylaxis are typically 37–62%2,3,4 1Kakkar et al (1970) 2Kakkar et al (1998) 3Kakkar et al (1999) 4Levine (1997) Therapeutic interventions Chemotherapy Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Adjuvant breast cancer Total thromboembolic events Post-menopausal 39 of 53 events occurred during chemotherapy Rate of thrombosis (%) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Tamoxifen (n=352) p=0.0001 CMF=cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil Tamoxifen + CMF (n=353) Pritchard et al (1996) Therapeutic interventions Chemotherapy Stage IV breast cancer 159 patients 1971–1980 Five-drug regimen (CMFVP) Overall incidence = 17.6% Number of patients 30 Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis p=0.05 25 20 15 10 5 0 Thrombosis on regimen Thrombosis off regimen CMFVP=cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil/vincristine/prednisone Goodnough et al (1984) Therapeutic interventions Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Central venous access Port-A-Cath Thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin 2,500 U vs no therapy 90 day venography Thrombosis (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Dalteparin (n=16) Control (n=13) Monreal et al (1996) Therapeutic interventions Surgery – rate of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing surgery Rate of fatal PE (%) 1.6 1.6 Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis p=0.05 1.4 4-fold increase 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 Patients with cancer (n=491) Patients without cancer (n=1585) International Multicentre Trial (1975) Rahr and Sørensen (1992) The risk of recurrence of VTE is increased in cancer patients Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Probability of hospital readmission with DVT/PE within 183 days of initial hospital admission Probability of readmission DVT/PE and malignant disease Malignant disease 0.25 0.20 Nonmalignant disease DVT/PE only 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 40 80 120 Number of days 160 Levitan et al (1999) Concurrent VTE and cancer increases the risk of death Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Probability of death within 183 days of initial hospital admission Probability of death DVT/PE and malignant disease Malignant disease Nonmalignant disease 1.00 0.80 DVT/PE only 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 40 80 120 Number of days 160 Levitan et al (1999) Survival rate for patients with a diagnosis of cancer at the time of VTE Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Survival (%) 100 Cancer without VTE Cancer at the time of VTE 80 p<0.001 60 40 20 0 0 5 10 15 Years after diagnosis 20 Sørensen et al (2000) Survival rate for patients with a diagnosis of cancer within 1 year after VTE Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Survival (%) 100 Cancer without VTE Cancer within 1 year after VTE 80 p<0.001 60 40 20 0 0 5 10 Years after diagnosis 15 20 Sørensen et al (2000) FRONTLINE – Rationale Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis The association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignant disease was first recognised by Trousseau in 1865 Yet VTE continues to be a major clinical problem in cancer patients There is a lack of international consensus on the prevention and treatment of VTE in cancer patients FRONTLINE will help to collect data on perceptions and practice and further our understanding FRONTLINE – The first comprehensive global survey of thrombosis and cancer Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis FRONTLINE will provide a unique insight into: – the perceived risk of VTE in cancer patients, including those with therapeutic interventions, such as surgery, chemotherapy and central venous lines – patterns of practice for thromboprophylaxis and management of VTE – possible national and regional variations in practice The results of FRONTLINE may help to stimulate further research in this important area FRONTLINE participation Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis All medical specialists treating cancer patients are invited to participate in FRONTLINE – surgical oncologists – medical oncologists – radiation oncologists – palliative care specialists – haematologists – oncology nurses FRONTLINE – Key dates 2001 Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis 2002 May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May ASCO 2001 12/5 Pilot survey LAUNCH and survey roll-out ISTH 2001 6/7 ECCO 2001 21/10 Data analysis ASCO 2002 Survey results FRONTLINE – The first comprehensive global survey of thrombosis and cancer For further information, or to register for participation in the FRONTLINE Survey: FRONTLINE Secretariat: Medical Action Communications PO Box 56 Egham Surrey TW20 8BR UK Tel: + 44 (0) 1784 220 220 Fax: + 44 (0) 1784 220 221 Email: frontline.survey@mac-uk.com or visit: www.frontlinesurvey.net Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis References Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis Baron JA et al. Lancet 1998; 351: 1077–80. Goodnough LT et al. Cancer 1984; 54: 1264–8. Kakkar AK et al. Lancet 1995; 346: 1004–5. Kakkar AK et al. BMJ 1999; 318: 1571–2. Kakkar AK et al. Baillieres Clin Haematol 1998; 11: 675–87. Kakkar VV et al. Am J Surg 1970; 120: 527–30 . Levine MN. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 133–36. Levitan N et al. Medicine 1999; 78: 285–91. Monreal M et al. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 251–3. Prandoni P et al. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1128–33. Prandoni P et al. Haematologica 1999; 84: 437–45. Pritchard KI et al. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2731–7. Rahr HB, Sørensen JV. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1992; 3: 451–60. Shen VS, Pollak EW. Southern Med J 1980; 73: 841–3. Sørensen HT et al. New Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1169–73. Sørensen HT et al. New Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1846–50. An international multicentre trial. Lancet 1975; 2: 45–51.