From CARS to armored CARS

advertisement

CARs and armored CARs

Lymphoma and Myeloma 2014

New York NY

October 23, 2014

Renier Brentjens MD PhD

Associate Member

Leukemia Service

Chief, Cellular Therapeutics Center

Department of Medicine

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Renier Brentjens MD PhD

• Stockholder: Juno Therapeutics (scientific cofounder)

• Royalties: Juno Therapeutics

• Honoraria: none

• Reserch Funding: Juno Therapeutics

• Consultant fees: Juno Therapeutics

• Discussion of off-label drug use: Tocilizumab

Generation of a tumor targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)

α-TAA mAb

TCR complex

α-TAA scFv—CD8-ζ

5 ’ LTR

SD

ψ

SA

α-tumor scFv

V

H

V

L

CD8 ζ chain

CAR retroviral vector

3 ’ LTR

Generation of TAA-targeted

T cells for treatment of Cancer

TAA CAR

Native TCR

αTAA scFv

1. Construct a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)

CD8

CD3 ζ

3. Transduce and expand patient T cells ex vivo

TAA CAR

2. Subclone CAR gene into a retroviral vector (SFG)

5 ’ LTR

SD

ψ αTAA scFv

V

H

V

L

SA

SFG-CAR

CD8 ζ chain 3 ’ LTR

4. Infuse transduced

T cells to eradicate

TAA + tumor cells

TAA

Advantages of CAR T cell therapy

• HLA-independent antigen recognition, therefore universal application

• Active in both CD4 + and CD8 + T cells

• Target antigens include proteins, carbohydrates and glycolipids

• Rapid generation of tumor specific T cells

• Minimal risk of autoimmunity or GvHD

• A living drug, single infusion

Expression of CD19 and other B cell markers on B lineage cells

preB-ALL

B cell lymphomas and leukemias myelomas

Stem Cell

CD19 pro B

CD22

CD20 pre B immature B mature B plasma cell

Evolution in CAR design

Clinical trials using CD19 targeted T cells in relapsed or refractory B-ALL

Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes

Sci Transl Med. 2013 Mar 20;5(177):177ra38

Clinical Efficacy Outcomes

(n=22)

Characteristics No. of Patients %

Overall Complete Response to salvage chemotherapy

Overall Complete Response to 19-28z CAR T cells (n=21)

In patients with morphologic residual leukemia (n=12)

Complete Remission

(CR)

Complete Remission with incomplete count recovery

(CRi)

Molecular Complete

Remission (CRm) (n=21)*

Time to CR/CRi (days)

8

18

10

14

4

15

22.1

83

36

86

64

18

72

Post CAR T Allo-SCT**

(n=12 eligible patients)

8 67

* mCR or MRD- as determined by flow cytometry and/or deep sequencing for

the index IgH clonotype and/or qPCR for the bcr-abl transcript

** Four patients had medical contraindication to allo-SCT, two patients

in CR have declined potential allo-SCT, one is inevaluable and one is being

evaluated for an allo-SCT

UPenn studies of relapsed B-ALL

• 25 pediatric and 5 adult relapsed or refractory

B-ALL patients treated

• 19-4-1BBz CAR design

• 90% CR

• 6 month EFS 67%

• 6 month OSR 78%

Maude et al N Engl J Med. 2014, 371:1507-17

NCI studies of relapsed B-ALL

• 20 pediatric and young adult relapsed or refractory B-ALL patients treated.

• 19-28z CAR design

• 70% CR (14/20)

• 60% MRD- CR

• 5 month EFS 78% in MRD- patients

Lee et al Lancet. Published online October 13, 2014

The Problem

Clinical trials using CD19 targeted T cells in low grade B cell malignancies

UPenn clinical trial results

Patient

1

2

3

Prior Chemotherapy Conditioning

Chemotherapy

Bendamustine Fludarabine, Rituximab,

Alemtuzumab, R-CVP,

Lenolidomide, PCR

Alemtuzumab Bendamustine/Rituximab

Response

CR (3+ years)

PR (7 months)

Rituximab/Fludarabine,

Rituximab/Bendamustine.

Alemtuzumab

Pentostatin/

Cyclophosphamide

CR (3+ years)

Kalos et al Sci Trans Med 2011

Updated UPenn Trials in CLL

(ASH 2013)

• Abstract 4162

– CD19 CAR T cells treating relapsed/refractory CLL

• Utilizing a 4-1BBz CAR construct, 14 CLL patients treated

• 3/14 patients obtained CR (21%), 5/14 patients obtained PR (36%), 6/14 patients with no response (43%)

• 6/14 patients with persistent detectable CAR T cells (5-35 months)

• No CR patients with reported relapsed disease

• No dose response reported

• Abstract 873

– Dose randomized dose optimization trial of CLL patients with either high or low dose CAR T cell infusions

• Utilizing a 4-1BBz CAR construct, 27 CLL patients treated

• Patients randomized to either low dose (5 x 10 7 CAR T cells) or high dose (5 x 10 8

CAR T cells)

• No dose response benefit seen in these treated patients

• Overall response rate (CR + PR) was 40%

• No correlation with CRS and RR was observed

MSKCC clinical trial results: CLL

No

Cyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide

Brentjens et al Blood. 2011 Nov 3;118(18):4817-28

CAR questions

• What is the etiology of differential responses by CAR T cell therapy to relapsed B-ALL versus

CLL?

• What is the role of bulky disease and CAR T cell anti-tumor efficacy?

• The role of the hostile tumor microenvironment and CAR T cell function

• How to build a better T cell?

The hostile tumor microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment contains multiple inhibitory factors designed to potentially suppress effector T cells.

– CD4 + CD25 hi FoxP3 + regulatory T cells (Tregs)

– MDSCs

– TAMs

– Expression of inhibitory ligands by tumor (PD-L1)

– Tumor secretion of T cell suppressive cytokines (TGF-β and

IL-10)

The solution?

Armored CAR T cells

Moving Forward: Armored CARs

IL-12

• A heterodimeric cytokine secreted by activated APCs, neutrophils and macrophages.

• Induces Th1 CD4 + T cell response enhancing IL-2 and

IFNγ secretion

• Enhances T cell clonal expansion and effector function in concert with TCR signaling (signal 1) and CD28 costimulation (signal 2), serving as a signal 3.

• Avoids/reverses T cell anergy

• May overcome Treg mediated effector T cell inhibition

• Recruits and activates NK cells

• Clinical trials in cancer using systemic IL-12 therapy has been limited by severe inflammatory side effects

Syngeneic EL4(hCD19) tumor model

EL4(hCD19)

53%

IV injection

Assess T cell eradication of tumor

Assess T cell homing to tumor

Assess longterm survival of T cells

Assess memory T cell response to rechallenge with tumor mCD19 -/hCD19 +/-

Assess T cell proliferation in vivo

Assess the efficacy of suicide vectors

Determine the side effects of therapy

IV injection

Retroviral transduction with chimeric receptor

Harvest splenocytes mCD19 -/hCD19 +/-

Lymphodepletion enhances anti-tumor efficacy of 19z1 + T cells

100

80

60

40

20

0

0

Cytoxan + 19z1

No Cytoxan + 19z1

Cytoxan Pz1

1Élive cells

10

4

24.3

10

3

10

2

24.3%

0.11

6Élive cells

10

4

2.07

10

3

0.02

2.07%

10

2

10

1

10

0

10

0

97.6

10

1

10

2

FL1-H: mCD19

10

3

0.29

10

4

10

1

10

0

10

0

75.5

10

1

10

2

FL1-H: FL1-Height

10

3

0.063

10

4

60 10 20 30 40

Tim e ( d)

Days since tumor cell injection

50

19z1IRESIL-12 modified T cells secrete biologically active IL-12 and exhibit enhanced targeted cytotoxic function and resistance to Tregs

B

A

C

40

30

20

10

0

*

*

*

*

1:1 2.5:1 5:1

E:T ratio

19mzIRESIL-12

19mz

10:1

D

Pegram et al Blood 2012

Syngeneic IL-12 secreting CD19 targeted

T cells induce B cell aplasias and tumor eradication

A B

Pegram et al Blood 2012

IL-12 secreting CAR T cells in vivo efficacy

IL-12 genetically modified T cells: Armored

CAR T cells

Targeted tumor cytotoxicity

NK cell

NK cell

Recruitment and activation

IL-12 secretion

Tumor cell

Targeted tumor cytotoxicity

Targeted tumor cytotoxicity Activated

TIL

Reversal of anergy

Anergic

TIL

CAR-IRES

IL-12

IL-12 secretion

IL-12 secretion

Enhanced CM phenotype, enhanced cytotoxicity, enhanced persistence

Resistance to Treg and TGF β inhibition

Conclusions

• Autologous CD19 targeted CAR modified T cells have demonstrated very promising anti-tumor efficacy in B cell ALL with more modest responses in patients with low grade B cell malignancies.

• Etiologies of CAR T cell resistance may be related to the hostile tumor microenvironment.

• Application of CAR T cell therapy for low grade B cell malignancies as well as moving forward towards application to solid tumor malignancies requires

“armored” CAR T cells designed to both overcome the hostile tumor microenvironment and exhibit enhanced anti-tumor efficacy and long term persistence.

• “Armored” CAR T cells appear to have enhanced anti-tumor efficacy based on pre-clinical tumor models.

• Future studies using “armored” CAR T cell technology will focus on translation of these armored CAR T cells to the clinical setting both in the context hematological as well as solid tumor malignancies.

Renier Brentjens

Hollie Pegram

Mythili Koneru

Sarwish Rafiq

Swati Pendharkar

Eric Smith

James Lee

Yan Nikhamin

Jae Park

Kevin Curran

Peter Chang

Michel Sadelain

Marco Davila

Michael Gong

Jean Baptiste Latouche

Leukemia Service

David Scheinberg

Jae Park

Martin Tallman

Mark Frattini

Peter Maslak

Mark Heaney

Joe Jurcic

Nicole Lamanna

Marco Davila

Dan Douer

Cell Therapy and Cell

Engineering Facility

(Isabelle Riviere, Director)

R&D, Manufacturing

Xiuyan Wang

Jolanta Stefanski

Malgorzata Olszewska

Oriana Borquez-Ojeda

Teresa Wasielewska

Jinrong Qu

QA/QC

Shirley Bartido

Yongzeng Wang

(Mark Przybylowski)

James Hosey

Domenick Pirraglia

(Vanessa Capacio)

Clinical Research

Yvette Bernal

Lymphoma Service

Craig Moskowitz

Ariela Noy

GYN service

Samith Sandadi

Roisin O ’ Clearbhail

Adult BMT Service

Sergio Geralt

Craig Sauter

Department of Clinical

Laboratories

Lillian Reich

David Wuest

Kathy Smith

Biostatistics

Glenn Heller

Funding

CA59350 (MS) ; P30 CA-008748 (CT); 3RO1CA138738-02S1(RJB); Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy ; Terry Fox Run for Cancer Research; William H. Goodwin and Alice

Goodwin, and the Commonwealth Cancer Foundation for Research and the ETC of MSKCC; Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award (RJB); William Lawrence &

Blanche Hughes Foundation (RJB); CLL-Global Research Foundation (RJB)

Brentjens’ Lab Members

Download