The Role of Risk Information in Product Labeling Catherine Gray, PharmD Management Advisor Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications Center for Drug Evaluation and Research IMMPACT Annual Meeting June 17, 2011 Objectives Explore FDA’s role in regulating prescription drug promotion and advertising. Discuss the impact of product labeling in advertising and promotion. Review several examples of false or misleading promotion of prescription analgesic drug products. Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC) Protect the public health by assuring prescription drug information is truthful, balanced and accurately communicated. Accomplished through a comprehensive surveillance, enforcement and education program, and by fostering better communication of labeling and promotional information to both healthcare professionals and consumers. FDA Structure Food and Drug Administration CDER Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CBER Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CDRH Center for Devices and Radiological Health CFSAN Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition CVM Center for Veterinary Medicine CTP Center for Tobacco Products ORA Office of Regulatory Affairs What Does DDMAC Regulate? Written and printed prescription drug promotional materials made by the company which include: TV and radio commercials Sales aids, journal ads, and patient brochures Drug websites, e-details, webinars, Epocrates, and email alerts Oral Presentations made by representatives of the company which include: Sales Reps Hired Spokespeople Medical Science Liaisons Total # of Promotional Pieces 100000 80000 61,013 60000 47,040 43,235 71085 68,288 45712 78466 76631 45663 45571 40000 20000 10,901 6877 12,616 8,632 2006 2007 15998 14456 6223 14970 15930 16965 0 Mixed 2008 Consumer 2009 Professional 2010 Total What does DDMAC do? Advice to industry Advice within FDA Surveillance and Enforcement Guidances and Policy Development Research Advice to Industry Provide comments on DRAFT promotional materials (VOLUNTARY in most cases) Launch materials for new drugs or new indications Direct-to-consumer (DTC) broadcast ads Non-launch materials Pre-submission required for certain drugs (e.g., Subpart H “accelerated approval”) Advice within FDA Provide consultation on: Draft labeling Cartons and product labels Medication Guides Patient Package Inserts (PPIs) Dear Doctor letters Pharmacoeconomics, health-related patientreported outcome protocols Surveillance Review materials submitted to DDMAC at the time of initial dissemination Conferences Complaints Healthcare professionals Consumers Lawyers Competitors Enforcement Action – Letters Pertain to pieces in the public domain Public letter Untitled Letter versus Warning Letter WL issued for more egregious or repeat violations Impact Expect immediate cessation of violative claims and presentations Corrective message expected for WL How Does the PI Affect DDMAC? Primary reference for the evaluation of a promotional piece Content in the PI cannot be restricted from use in promotional materials No role for promotion in the PI Consistency Within a single PI and across a drug category Language in Highlights, Warnings & Precautions, and Adverse Reactions Sections Framing Risk Important not to minimize the data “Is associated with…” “There were reports of…” “Causes…” Theoretical versus reported risks Hierarchy of risk Maintaining a risk to benefit balance Conveying Risk in Broadcast Advertising Major Statement Information relating to the major side effects and contraindication Adequate Provision Provides for dissemination of the PI Recognizes the inability of broadcast advertisements of reasonable length to present and communicate this information effectively Currently acceptable adequate provision Conveying Risk in Professional and Consumer Directed Promotion Expect material context in direct conjunction with claims as necessary to qualify such claims Important safety information (ISI) section Incorporating risk information throughout a promotional piece Common Violations Omission of Risk Minimization of Risk Broadening of Indication Overstatement of Efficacy Superiority Claims Omission of Risk Information Promotional materials that make product claims must also provide risk information Risk information should include Contraindications, Warnings, Precautions, pertinent Adverse Events Complete or partial omission of risk Minimization of Risk Information Omission of material information about a risk described in the approved labeling Inclusion of non-risk information in a risk section, or vice versa Risk information as a benefit Framing Layout/prominence Sequence Enforcement Example – Embeda™ (morphine sulfate and naltrexone HCl) Warning Letter Video news releases Indication Extended-release oral formulation of morphine sulfate and naltrexone HCl for the management of moderate to severe pain REMS due to its potential for abuse, misuse, overdose and addiction Embeda - Risks Number of serious risks, many of which are potentially fatal Risk profile mimics that of morphine and naltrexone, despite the unique PK characteristics Boxed Warning – potentially fatal overdosing if capsules are chewed, crushed, dissolved, or coingested with alcoholic beverages “Embeda can be abused in a manner similar to other opioid agonists, legal or illicit.” Embeda – Risks (continued) Respiratory depression Respiratory arrest Apnea Circulatory depression Cardiac arrest Hypotension Shock Embeda - Pharmacodynamics Clinical significance of the degree of reduction in drug liking and euphoria reported in clinical trials has not been established NO evidence that the naltrexone in Embeda reduces the abuse liability of Embeda Embeda – Violative Claims “EMBEDA™ is the first opioid approved by the FDA with pharmacological properties developed in response to the need for opioid analgesics that could reduce drug liking and euphoria when tampered with by crushing or chewing.” “If crushed or chewed, the naltrexone within EMBEDA™ is released and absorbed with the morphine. Naltrexone reverses the subjective and analgesic effects of morphine…” Embeda’s ISI Each promotional piece contained a section of important safety information, but it failed to disclose the potential for FATAL risks associated with Embeda. Stated that Embeda should not be crushed Failed to mention that such action results in a rapid release and absorption of a potentially fatal dose of morphine Embeda - Outcome Given the acute public health hazard, rare action of calling the sponsor prior to issuing the letter These and all promotional pieces with same or similar claims discontinued Press release removed from website Corrective news release Distributed to similar number of media outlets and distribution lists Enforcement Example – Cymbalta (duloxetine HCl) Capsules Untitled Letter Direct-to-consumer print advertisement Indicated for the management of fibromyalgia Risks include a Boxed Warning for suicidality, contraindications for concomitant use with MAOI and patients with narrow-angle glaucoma Does This Ad Have a Risk Problem? Numerous efficacy claims for Cymbalta No risk in the main body of the ad Risk presentation separated by magazine break Paragraph format of risk presentation in reduced font size quite distinct from the efficacy claims What’s the Issue with Indocin®? Indocin® - The Fine Print It’s in the Details… Omission of additional risks described in the approved labeling Includes information from the Boxed Warning, but fails to include any other risks Other risks are serious and potentially FATAL Material facts regarding dosing and administration to prevent serious, irreversible and potentially fatal adverse reactions Tools of the Trade in Evaluating Risk in Promotion Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Code of Federal Regulations Guidances The PI The Competitor’s PI Contact Information DDMAC’s website http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/ CDER/ucm090142.htm Phone and Fax Numbers Phone: (301) 796-1200 Fax: (301) 847-8444 or (301) 847-8445 Questions