Primary outcome - Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

advertisement

Maternal-Fetal Surgery for

Myelomeningocele

Catherine Y Spong, MD

Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, NICHD

National Institutes of Health

• MOMS Centers

– The Children’s Hospital of

Philadelphia

– University of California-

San Francisco

– Vanderbilt University

Medical Center

• Coordinating Center

– The George Washington

University Biostatistics

Center

• NICHD

– Pregnancy & Perinatology

Branch

Management of

Myelomeningocele Study

(MOMS)

Aim : To compare the safety and efficacy of in utero repair of open neural tube defects with standard postnatal repair

Intervention: Unmasked randomized clinical trial

Outcome evaluation by blinded independent investigators

Myelomeningocele

• Most common & severe CNS congenital anomaly

• Affecting ~ 1500 fetuses in US annually

• Significant morbidity and mortality

• Life-long disabilities

• Severity correlated with levels of the spinal cord lesion

Complications

Hydrocephalus

Need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting

Motor and cognitive impairments

Bladder and bowel incontinence

Social and emotional challenges

Myelomeningocele: Fetal Sheep Model

In utero coverage of MMC

Rescues neurologic function at birth

Without prenatal coverage With prenatal coverage

Human Fetal Myelomeningocele Repair

Goal of the Trial

To compare the safety and efficacy of in utero repair of myelomeningocele (MMC) with that of the standard postnatal repair

Inclusion criteria

• Singleton

• Upper MMC boundary at T1-S1

• Evidence of hindbrain herniation

• GA 19.0-25.9 weeks at randomization

• Normal karyotype

• US residency

• Maternal age >18 years

Major exclusion criteria

• Fetal anomaly unrelated to MMC

• Severe kyphosis

• Risk of PTB (short cervix, prior PTB)

• Placental abruption

• BMI >35

• Contraindication to prenatal surgery

Central Screening at Coordinating Center

Screening at Clinical Site (2 days)

Travel & lodging arranged

Mother and support person

Paid by MOMS center

Evaluation process

If requirements met, offered randomization

Comprehensive ultrasound

MRI of fetus

Fetal echocardiogram

Psychological testing

Meetings with evaluations team

Fetal surgeon

Neurosurgeon

Nurse

Neonatologist

Social worker

Anesthesiologist

Perinatologist

Randomization to Neonatal Discharge

Moms and infants go to assigned center

Prenatal group

Admitted to MOMS center

In utero repair

Remain near center until delivery

Deliver by CD

@ 37wks if undelivered

Postnatal group

Return home

Return at 37wks to MOMS center for delivery by CD

Postnatal closure within 48h

Primary Outcome (12 months)

• Death or need for ventricular decompressive shunting at 12 months defined by objective criteria

– If shunt placed without meeting criteria – qualifies as primary outcome

• Independent committee of neurosurgeons, blinded to treatment assignment, determines whether criteria have been met

Primary Outcome (30 months)

• A composite score from the Bayley Scales of

Infant Development MDI and the difference between the motor level and lesion level

• Evaluated by independent examiners blinded to treatment assignment

• Videotapes of physical exams reviewed by independent expert

Secondary Outcomes

• Gestational age at delivery

• Hindbrain herniation

• Difference between motor function and anatomic levels

• Ambulation

• Oligohydramnios

• Blood transfusion at delivery

• Placental abruption

• Pulmonary edema

• Hysterotomy site

• Bradycardia at fetal repair

L2 –S4 Myelomeningocele

T12 L1

L2

L3

Motor Impairment: Level of Spinal Cord Injury

Secondary Outcome:

Difference between motor function and anatomic levels

(Observed motor function) – (anatomic level)

(obs S1) – (anatomic L4) =

+

2 levels

(obs L2) – (anatomic L4) = - 2 levels

Demographics

Fetal gender female — no. (%)

Gest. age at randomization (wk)

Maternal age ( yr)

Black or African American

White

Married — no. (%)

Years of schooling — no. (%)

Body mass index at trial entry

Current smoker — no. (%)

Nullipara — no.(%)

Cervical length — mm

Prenatal n=78

35 (44.9)

23.6 ± 1.4

29.3 ± 5.3

1 (1.3)

73 (93.6)

73 (93.6)

14.8 ± 1.7

26.2 ± 3.7

6 (7.7)

33 (42.3)

38.9 ± 7.3

Postnatal n=80

51 (63.8)

23.9 ± 1.3

28.8 ± 4.9

1 (1.3)

74 (92.5)

74 (92.5)

15.0 ± 1.6

25.9 ± 3.9

4 (5.0)

36 (45.0)

39.7 ± 5.7

Demographics (cont’d)

Prenatal n=78

Lesion level by sonogram

Thoracic

L1-L2

L3-L4

L5-S1

Lesion level L3 or lower

Clubfoot by ultrasound

Postnatal n=80

4 (5.1) 3 (3.8)

21 (26.9) 10 (12.5)

30 (38.5) 45 (56.3)

23 (29.5) 22 (27.5)

53 (67.9) 67 (83.8)

20 (25.6) 15 (18.8)

MOMS: Primary Outcome (12 mo)

death or need for shunt

Primary outcome

Prenatal n=78

53(68%)

Death before shunt

Shunt criteria met

2( 3%)

51(65%)

Shunt placed without criteria 0

Postnatal P value n=80 RR (95%CI)

78(98%) <0.001

0.70(0.58-0.84)

0

74(92%)

4( 5%)

Placement of shunt 31(40%)

Two perinatal deaths in each group:

Prenatal: IUFD at 26wks, NND at 23 wks

Postnatal: NND with severe symptoms of Chiari II

66(82%) <0.001

0.48(0.36-0.64)

MOMS: Primary Outcome (30 mo)

Prenatal n=64

Postnatal n=70

P value

148.6+57.5

122.6+57.2

0.007

Primary outcome

Bayley MDI

Difference between

89.7+14.0

0.58+1.94

motor function & anatomic level

87.3+18.4

-0.69+1.99

0.53

0.001

Secondary Outcome: Hindbrain Herniation

(12 months)

Secondary Outcome:

Difference between motor function and anatomic levels

P=0.002

better better worse worse

Secondary Outcome: Ambulation

Walking independently

Prenatal n=64

Postnatal P value n=70 RR (95%CI)

26/62(42%) 14/67(21%) 0.01

2.01(1.16-3.48)

Walking status

None

Orthotics/devices

Walking independently

18/62(29%) 29/67(43%)

18/62(29%) 24/67(36%)

26/62(42%) 14/67(21%)

0.03

Maternal Outcomes

Chorioamniotic membrane separation

Pulmonary edema

Modified biophysical profile < 8

Oligohydramnios

Placental abruption

Chorioamnionitis

Blood transf. at deliv

Prenatal n=78

20 (25.6)

5 (6.4)

13 (16.7)

16 (20.5)

5 (6.4)

2 (2.6)

7(9.0)

Postnatal n=80

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

6(7.5)

3 (3.8)

0(0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (1.3)

RR

(95% CI)

2.22

(0.89

– 5.55)

5.47

(1.66-18.04)

7.18

(0.90-57.01)

P

<0.001

0.03

0.08

0.001

0.03

0.24

0.03

Maternal Outcome:

Hysterotomy site

Intact, well-healed

Very thin

Area of dehiscence

Complete dehiscence

Prenatal n=76

49 (64.5)

19 (25.0)

7 (9.2)

1 (1.3)

35.5%

Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes

Bradycardia at repair

Perinatal death

GA at birth

< 30 wks

35-36 weeks

>=37 weeks

Prenatal

N=78

8 (10.3)

2 (2.6)

34.1

± 3.1

10 (12.8)

26 (33.3)

26 (33.3)

16 (20.5)

Postnatal

N=80

0

2 (2.5)

37.3

± 1.1

0 (0.0)

4 (5.0)

8 (10.0)

68 (85.0)

RR (95% CI)

15%

P

1.03 (0.14-7.10)

0.003

1.00

<0.001

Neonatal Outcomes (cont’d)

Birth weight (g)

Dehiscence at repair site

RDS

Sepsis — no. %

Prenatal

N=78

Postnatal

N=80

2383 ± 688 3039 ± 469

10 (12.8)

16 (20.8)

4 (5.2)

5 (6.3)

5 (6.3)

1 (1.3)

RR

(95% CI)

P

2.05

(0.73-5.73)

3.32

(1.28-8.63)

4.16

(0.48-36.36)

<0.001

0.16

0.008

0.20

Summary

• Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele reduces the need for a shunt or death and improves motor outcomes at 30 months but is associated with maternal and fetal risks

Summary

• Prenatal surgery is associated with other favorable secondary outcomes:

– Reduces hindbrain herniation at 12 months

No evidence of herniation in 36% vs 4%

– Doubles ability to walk without orthotics

42% vs 21%

– More likely to have a level of function that was two or more levels better than expected according to anatomic levels

32% vs 12%

Summary

• Prenatal surgery associated with maternal and fetal risks

– Preterm birth: 80% vs 15%

• RDS in 21% vs 6%

– Bradycardia

– Oligohydramnios

– Placental abruption

– Transfusion at delivery

– Uterine dehiscence at surgical site (35%)

Many thanks to:

• Radiology Review committee

: Dorothy Bulas, M.D.,

Charles Fitz, M.D. and Gilbert Vezina, M.D.

• Shunt Outcome Review Committee

: D. Douglas Cochrane, M.D., James

Drake, M.D., John Kestle, M.D. and Jerry Oakes, M.D.

• Pediatrician and psychologist examiners : Alex Espinosa, M.D., Julia

Hayes, M.D., Elizabeth Higley, Ph.D., Rita Jeremy, Ph.D., Rowena

Korobkin, M.D., David Kube, M.D., Leanne Pollard, Jonathan Rowland,

Elizabeth Saslow, Ph.D. and Toni Whitaker, M.D.

• Training and QA monitoring : Mario Petersen, M.D., Melissa Fallone,

Ph.D., Theresa Leach, M.Ed. and Susan Anderson,M.D.

• The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee

: George Macones, M.D.,

Michael Ross, M.D., Donald Stablein, Ph.D., Alessandro Ghidini, M.D.,

Michele Prince, MS, C.G.C., Barbara Schmidt, M.D., Antoine Khoury,

M.D., Sonya Oppenheimer, M.D., John McLaughlin, M.D., Reverend

Phillip Cato, Ph.D., Kellie Murphy, M.D., M.Sc., Dale Phelps, M.D.,

Keith Aronyk, M.D., William Hay, Jr., M.D., Mary E. Hannah, M.D.,

M.Sc., Jeremy Sugarman, M.D.

And at the sites, many thanks to

• The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA – Alan Flake, M.D.,

Holly Hedrick, M.D., Jamie Koh, R.N., M.S.N., Jack Rychik, M.D., David Cohen,

M.D., Natalie Rintoul, M.D., Beverly Coleman, M.D., Patrick Pasquariello, M.D.,

Enrico Danzer, M.D., Larissa Bilaniuk, M.D., Martha Hudson, M.S.W., Michael

Carr, M.D., Ph.D., Michael Bebbington, M.D., M.H.Sc., Julie Moldenhauer, M.D., and R. Douglas Wilson, M.D.

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

– Michael Harrison,

M.D., Hanmin Lee, M.D., Larry Rand, M.D., Tamara Ryan, R.N., Cindy Lazzaretti,

R.N., Rachel Perry, R.N., Stephanie Berman, L.C.S.W., Vicki Feldstein, M.D., Ruth

Goldstein, M.D., Peter Callen, M.D., Orit Glenn, M.D., Larry Baskin, M.D., Mark

Rosen, M.D., Charles Cauldwell, Ph.D., M.D., and Vilma Zarate, Ph.D.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

– Katharine Wenstrom, M.D.,

Lisa Trusler, R.N., M.S.N., Joseph Bruner, M.D., Bill Walsh, M.D., Edmund Yang,

M.D., Ph.D., Ann Kavanaugh-McHugh, M.D., Tracy Perry, Jennifer Anderson,

R.N., Mark Bliton, Ph.D. and Denise Pepin, M.S.W., L.C.S.W.

The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC

– Jessica

Ratay, M.S., C.G.C., Erin Greenbaum Musok, M.A., Kristen Holloway, Catherine

Shaer, M.D., Shanika Gregory, Julia Zachary, Lucy Leuchtenburg, Jeremy Drehmer,

M.P.H. and Megan Mitchell, M.P.H.

• The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human

Development, Bethesda, MD

– Susan Tolivaisa, Nancy Chescheir, M.D. and Marian

Willinger, Ph.D.

• MOMS Centers

– The Children’s Hospital Of

Philadelphia

University Of California-

San Francisco

– Vanderbilt University

Medical Center

• Coordinating Center

– The George Washington

University Biostatistics

Center

• NICHD

– Pregnancy and

Perinatology Branch

Thanks to:

The women, their children and families who have taken part and continue to take part in the MOMS trial

The fetal therapy community

The perinatal community

• The Society for Maternal Fetal

Medicine

Download