ASPIRE

advertisement

EFFECT OF THE DIRECT RENIN INHIBITOR

ALISKIREN ON LEFT VENTRICULAR REMODELING

FOLLOWING MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH

LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION

Scott D. Solomon, MD, FACC, Sung Hee Shin, MD, Amil Shah, MD, Lars

Kober, MD, Aldo P. Maggioni, MD, Jean Rouleau, MD, FACC, John J. V.

McMurray, MD, FACC, Roxzana Kelly, Allen Hester, Marc A. Pfeffer, MD,

PhD, FACC for the Aliskiren Study in Post-MI Patients to Reduce

Remodeling (ASPIRE) investigators

Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Rigshospitalet Copenhagen

University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; ANMCO Research Center, Firenze,

Italy; University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Western Infirmary, Glasgow,

Scotland; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ

Disclosures

• Dr. Solomon, Kober, Maggioni, Rouleau,

McMurray and Pfeffer have received research support from and have consulted for Novartis.

• Ms. Kelly and Dr. Hester are employees of Novartis

• The ASPIRE trial was funded by Novartis.

Background

• Despite major therapeutic advances acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality

• In post-MI patients, reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function is associated with increased risk of LV remodeling, heart failure and mortality

• Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) decrease the risk of death or chronic HF in patients with AMI 1,2,3 and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are an established alternative to

ACE-i 4

1 Pfeffer et al. SAVE Invest. NEJM 1992; 2 AIRE Invest. Lancet 1993; 3 TRACE Invest. NEJM 1995

4 Pfeffer et al. VALIANT invest NEJM 2003

The direct renin inhibitor aliskiren blocks the RAAS proximally and may attenuate ACE or ARB induced compensatory rise in PRA and further RAAS activation

Angiotensinogen

Non-ACE Pathways

(e.g., chymase)

Negative Feedback

 Vasoconstriction

 Cell growth

 Na/H

2

O retention

 Sympathetic activation

Aliskiren renin

Cough,

Angioedema

Benefits?

Angiotensin I ARBs AT

1

Angiotensin II

ACE-Inhibitors

ACE

Bradykinin

Aldosterone

Inactive

Fragments

AT

2

 Vasodilation

 Antiproliferation

(kinins)

Gradman et al. Circulation , 2006; McMurray et al. Circulation, 2004

Hypothesis

Adding aliskiren to standard therapy, including a proven inhibitor of the

RAAS, would result in greater attenuation of adverse LV remodeling in patients after high risk acute myocardial infarction

Methods

• International multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial

• Primary Endpoint: Change in LVESV (baseline to week 36)

• 80% power, alpha=0.05, to detect 3.1mL difference in LVESV reduction: Estimated sample size ~ 800 patients

Key Secondary endpoints:

CV death, hospitalization for heart failure, or a reduction in ejection fraction greater than 6 units

CV death, hospitalization for heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or resuscitated sudden death overall safety and tolerability in combination with standard therapy in patients post acute myocardial infarction other echocardiographic assessments of cardiac size and function

Methods

Inclusion criteria

>18 years-old

AMI and LV systolic dysfunction within 7-42 days

Stable doses for 2 weeks of: antiplatelet, statin, beta-blocker, ACE-i or

ARB

Qualifying echo: quality, LVEF< 45%, infarct size>20%

Key exclusion criteria

On both ACE-I and ARB

Severe refractory hypertension

Cardiogenic shock eGFR<

30ml/min/1.73m2

K > 5.0 mEq

Design and titration

Background Rx: antiplatelet, statin, beta-blocker, ACE-I or ARB

75 mg 150 mg aliskiren 300 mg once daily

75 mg 150 mg placebo 300 mg once daily

2-8 weeks

1 week 1 week

Total Follow-up: 36 weeks

Echocardiograms evaluated in core laboratory

Endpoints adjudicated by blinded central committee

ASPIRE Patient Flow

Patients Screened Post MI N=1074

Enrolled/Randomized N= 820

Placebo n=397

Aliskiren n=423

Received Aliskiren n=422

Died (8), withdrew consent (10), Echo of insufficient quality or other (50)

Paired Evaluable

Echocardiograms n=329

Paired Evaluable

Echocardiograms n=343

Died (17), withdrew consent (11), echo of insufficient quality or other (52)

Baseline Demographics

Characteristic

Male Gender (% )

Age (Years ± SD)

Age ≥65 years

Baseline eGFR

(mL/min/1.73m^2) eGFR< 60

Diabetes

Hypertension

Prior MI

Prior HF

Q wave MI

Anterior MI

Killip Class ≥ 2

Reperfusion Therapy

Placebo

N=397

85%

59 ± 12

34%

81 ± 19

13%

22%

50%

18%

4%

71%

79%

42%

76%

Aliskiren

N=423

81%

61 ± 12

40%

80 ± 20

17%

23%

55%

22%

6%

68%

79%

45%

73%

P value

0.22

0.26

0.13

0.58

0.17

0.93

0.27

0.27

0.23

0.36

0.91

0.85

0.36

Concomitant Medications at Baseline

Baseline Meds

Anti-platelet agents

ACE-i

ARB

“Optimal” dose ACE-i or ARB*

Beta-Blocker

Statin

Aldosterone Blocker

Placebo

N=397

98%

91%

9%

43%

95%

98%

24%

Aliskiren

N=423

98%

89%

10%

44%

96%

97%

29%

•Optimal dose of ACE-I or ARB defined as daily doses of captopril 150mg, enalapril 20mg, lisinopril 20mg, perindopril 8mg, ramipril

10mg, candesartan 32mg, valsartan 320mg, losartan 100mg, irbesartan 300mg

P value

0.72

0.62

0.17

0.72

0.45

0.57

0.12

Baseline Echo parameters

LVESV (mL)

LVEDV (mL)

LVEF (%)

Infarct Length (%)

WMSI placebo

N=374

86.1 ± 29.9

135.7 ± 36.2

37.5 ± 5.8

25.0 ± 10.6

1.8 ± 0.2

aliskiren

N=403

P value

82.4 ± 26.0

0.03

130.5 ± 32.9

37.6 ± 5.3

25.7 ± 10.6

1.8 ± 0.2

0.02

0.57

0.46

0.99

Mean Sitting Blood Pressure

Throughout Trial

140

130

120

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

Placebo

Aliskiren

Placebo 124.2 ± 14.9

Aliskiren 122.4 ± 16.3

Placebo 76.5 ± 9.4

Aliskiren 74.2 ± 9.3

2 4 6

Visit

8 10

LVESV

(mL)

86,0

Primary Outcome:

Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume at Baseline and Final Echo visit

Baseline and Final LVESV Delta LVESV placebo aliskiren

84,0

84,4

82,0

82,4

80,9

80,0

78,0

76,0

78,0

Baseline LVESV Final LVESV

Difference

0.90 (-1.6, 3.4)

P = 0.44

Echocardiographic Measures

Placebo

N= 329

LVESV(mL)

LVEDV (mL)

Baseline Change

84.2 ± 25.5

133.5 ± 31.6

-3.5 ±

16.3

-1.7 ±

19.6

LVEF (%)

Infarct

Length (%)

EF drop >

6%

37.8 ± 5.5

2.3 ± 4.1

Aliskiren

N=343

Baseline

82.5 ± 26.6

131.2 ± 33.9

Change

-4.4 ±

16.8

-3.2 ±

19.3

24.5 ± 10.4

-4.8 ± 9.5

25.0 ± 10.4

-5.6 ± 9.0

0.27

2 (0.6%)

37.9 ± 5.1

6 (1.8%)

P

0.44

0.26

2.5 ± 4.5

0.80

0.17

Secondary Efficacy Variables: composite endpoints of echo and adjudicated outcomes

Secondary endpoints

Placebo

N=397 n (%)

Aliskiren

N=423 n (%)

HR 95% CI

Composite of CV death, hospitalization for HF, LVEF reduction by>6 units

Composite of CV death, hospitalization for HF, recurrent MI, stroke, resuscitated sudden death

24 (6%) 29 (7%) 1.06

(0.60, 1.8)

34 (9%) 39 (9%) 1.01

(0.62, 1.63)

P-value

0.85

0.98

All cause death 8 (2%) 17 (4%) 1.83

(0.79, 4.3) 0.16

Cardiovascular Outcomes

Endpoint

CV Death

Resuscitated Sudden Death

HF Hospitalization

Myocardial Infarction

Stroke

Any of the above

Placebo n=397 n (%)

6 (1.5)

4 (1.0)

17 (4.3)

16 (4.0)

2 (0.5)

34 (8.6)

Aliskiren n=423 n (%)

13 (3.1)

1 (0.2)

12 (2.8)

11 (2.6)

7 (1.7)

39 (9.2)

No Significant between group differences

Posthoc Subgroup Analysis:

Difference in primary endpoint (delta LVESV) between placebo and aliskiren

P for interaction

Male (n=565)

Female (n=107)

No DM (n=524)

DM (n=148)

No HTN (n=327)

HTN (n=345) age<65 (n=427) age>65 (n=245)

No Aldo Blockers (n=499)

Aldo Blockers (n=173)

LVEF<35% (n=495)

LVEF>35% (n=177)

0.77

0.06

0.60

0.82

0.91

0.93

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Difference in change in LVESV (placebo - aliskiren) placebo favors aliskiren

Adverse Events

Total AEs and SAEs

AEs

SAEs

Placebo (n = 397) Aliskiren (n = 422*)

268 (67.5)

92 (23.2)

316 (74.9)

107 (25.4)

Renal Dysfunction

AEs

SAEs

Hypotension

AEs

SAEs

Hyperkalemia†

AEs

SAEs

3 (0.8)

1 (0.3)

18 (4.5)

3 (0.8)

5 (1.3)

0 (0)

10 (2.4)

2 (0.5)

37 (8.8)

1 (0.2)

22 (5.2)

0 (0)

Based on MEDRA codes * Based on safety set

† reported only, not based on laboratory values p-value

0.02

0.51

0.09

>0.99

0.02

0.36

0.001

-

Biochemical abnormalities

Biochemical abnormalities

Urea

 > 14.3 mmol/L (40mg/dL)

Placebo n=397 n (%)

18 (4.5)

Creatinine

 > 176 & <265  mol/L (> 2 & < 3 mg/dL)

 > 265  mol/L (3 mg/dL)

Potassium

 < 3.5 mmol/L

 >5.5 &< 6.0 mmol/L

 ≥ 6.0 mmol/L

4 (1.0)

1 (0.3)

11 (2.8)

16 (4.0)

10 (2.5)

Aliskiren n=422 n (%)

52 (12.3)

13 (3.1)

2 (0.5)

10 (2.4)

32 (7.6)

23 (5.5)

Conclusions

• In high risk post-MI patients with LV systolic dysfunction, the addition of aliskiren to a standard optimal medical regimen, including an ACE-I or an ARB, did not result in benefit with respect to ventricular remodeling compared to placebo and was associated with more adverse events

• Although ASPIRE utilized a surrogate endpoint, and was not powered to assess hard clinical outcomes, these results do not provide support for testing the use of aliskiren in a morbidity and mortality trial in the high-risk post-MI population

• Ongoing outcomes trials with aliskiren in patients with heart failure and diabetic kidney disease are well underway and will further assess the role for direct renin inhibition in these populations

Download