Best Practices for Pain Reduction Associated with Venipuncture in Children University of Alaska Anchorage NS 400 Jennifer Crow, Dawn Reishus, Brenda (Cooper) McMillan, Char Corkery, Rachel Chesser Searchable Question: What are best nursing practices to reduce the pain of venipuncture in children? Evidence Synthesis Table Studies • • Design Sample Study Length Sponsorship Bias Finding 1 Finding 2 Cold/Vibration reduces pain & anxiety during venipuncture Randomized Control Trial (level 2 evidence) 120 children 6-12 years old February – March 2010 None External cold & vibration can reduce pediatric pain and anxiety during blood specimen collection without IV success. Vibration devices are inexpensive to operate per use. Cold/Vibration on pain & anxiety during venipuncture 81 children 4-18 year olds April – August 2008 None Cold & vibration decreased venipuncture pain without affecting procedural success Vibration devices are inexpensive to operate per use. Distracting children during blood draws: Looking through Distraction Cards Randomized Control Trial (level 2 evidence) Randomized Control Trial (level 2 evidence) 123 Children 6-12 years January 14, 2010 to February 20, 2010 None Significant finding? Children in experimental group had significantly lower pain levels than the control group Anxiety level evaluated by parent and observer report was significantly lower in experimental group EMLA and amethocaine for reduction of children’s pain associated with needle insertion Systematic review of randomized control trials (Level 1 evidence) 534 children 3 months – 15 years Varied None Comparison of adverse reactions to Amethocaine and EMLA favored EMLA suggesting it resulted in redness less often than amethocaine Comparison study of Jetdelivered lidocaine, jetdelivered placebo and no pretreatment for pain relief during needle insertion Comparison of pain reduction during needle insertion using topical xylocaine spray to no intervention Randomized control trail (level 2 evidence) 197 children 5-18 years April 1, 2007 to August 1, 2008 None Amethocaine significantly favored over EMLA (the child was 22% less likely to report pain) Self Report: child was 37% less likely to report pain with amethocaine versus EMLA Observational: Difference was not significant No significant difference between the jet delivered lidocaine and the jet delivered placebo for pain reduction in needle insertion Randomized control trail (level 2 evidence) 40 neonates under 34 weeks gestation July – November 2004 None The intervention group maintained more stable heart rates, respiratory rates, and oxygen saturation during needle insertion Xylocaine spray is fast acting and cost effective method of reducing pain Evaluating reduction in pain of newborns receiving glucose compared to EMLA cream prior to venipuncture Randomized controlled trial, double blind 201 newborns undergoing venipuncture for clinical purposes January 1999 – October 2000 None Glucose is effective in reducing pain symptoms from venipuncture in newborns Glucose is more effective than local anesthetic EMLA cream Comparing non nutritive sucking to glucose solution for reduction in pain during venipuncture Evaluation of studies looking at pain reduction of needle related procedures with sweet tasting solutions Randomized controlled trial, parallel group 105 neonates at least 32 weeks gestational June-October 2006 None NNS can effectively decrease pain during venipunctures GW can effectively decrease pain during venipunctures Systematic review of randomized controlled trials 4 studies, 330 children 12 months to 16 years Varied None Infants 0-12months have decreased pain with sweet tasting solutions Children 1-16years do not experience a reduction in pain with sweet tasting solutions Background Venipuncture is found to be a common cause of pain in children. (Inal & Kelleci, 2012) Venipuncture pain in children may lead to long term avoidance of seeking health care, immunizations, and donations. (Baxter et al., 2011) • • • • Databases Searched CINAHL Cochrane Google Scholar PsychINFO Results Critical appraisal of the literature suggests that some form of pain control during venipuncture will be beneficial for children. Comparison of jet-delivered lidocaine or placebo to no pretreatment suggested that the intervention group showed superior pain relief to the control group. Conclusion Reduction of pain in children during venipuncture will help prevent increased pain and anxiety in future procedures. Pain control methods can be achieved through various inexpensive, non-invasive means. Further education and training is advised for nursing staff regarding pain reduction techniques for children. • • • Summary of Evidence • Sweet-tasting solutions significantly reduce pain of venipuncture in infants under 1 year of age (Gradin et al., 2002; Harrison et al., 2011). • • Amethocaine cream provided significant pain relief of venipuncture compared to EMLA cream in children 3 months - 15 years old (Lander & Weltman, 2006). • • Xylocaine topical spray significant reduced pain of venipuncture in neonates under 34 weeks gestation in addition to standard care (Chen et al., 2006). • • Jet delivery of lidocaine or a placebo provided superior pain relief to no pretreatment for children 5-18 years old (Auerbach et al., 2009). • Children 6-12 years old self-reported less pain when distraction by flip-cards was used (Inal & Kelleci, 2011). • External cold and vibration significantly reduced pain and anxiety in children ages 4-18 years old versus standard care (Baxter et al., 2011; Inal & Kelleci, 2012). Suggestions for Future Research Additional qualitative studies regarding various methods of pain reduction for venipuncture in children. Additional RCT studies to support use of sweettasting solutions for children over 1 year of age. Determine whether external cold and vibration devices could offer pain relief for more invasive procedures. Research Question What are the best nursing practices to reduce the pain of venipuncture in children? Background & Significance Venipuncture procedures are found to be a common cause of pain in children. (Inal & Kelleci, 2012) Venipuncture pain in children may lead to long-term negative effects later in life such as future avoidance of medical care, immunizations, and blood donations. (Baxter et al., 2011) Topical Xylocaine Spray for Reducing the Pain of Venipuncture in Neonates (Chen, et al. 2006) Design: RCT, Level 2 Population: Newborn infants in the neonatal intensive care units with gestational age of more than 34 weeks (n=40) Sample: Purposive Sample/ Random Group Assignment Intervention: Administration of a 10% xylocaine solution pump spray applied topically before venipuncture. Findings: Infants in the study group had lower heart rate and less changes in oxygen saturations than infants in the control group. Weaknesses of the Study Strengths of the Study • Financially feasible intervention • Small population • RCT • Assumes that heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation are associated with pain. A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Study of Jet Lidocaine Compared to Jet Placebo for Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Needle Insertion in the Emergency Department (Auerbach et al. 2009) Design: RCT, Double Blind Study, Level 2 Population: Children ages of 5-18 at a pediatric hospital requiring acute needle insertion (venipuncture or peripheral venous cannulation) (n=197) Sample: Convenience Sample/ Random Group Assignment Intervention: Pretreatment with jet delivered lidocaine (n=75) or a with jet-delivered placebo 60 seconds before undergoing needle insertion. (n=75) Findings: The mean needle insertion pain score for both the jet lidocaine and the jet placebo groups were lower than the needle insertion pain scores for the no device group. Strengths of the Study • • • • RCT, Double-blind study Financially feasible intervention Large sample size Patients reported pain levels using a CAS tool Weaknesses of the Study • • • • Pain scores are subjective Parental presence or lack of was not documented for each patient Nonintervention group was smaller than the intervention groups Variations in provider’s skills could impact the study. Pain reduction at venipuncture in newborns: oral glucose compared with local anesthetic cream (Gradin et. al, 2002) Design: Experimental-controlled randomized double blind Population: 201 Newborns Interventions: Newborns receiving glucose prior to venipuncture Findings: Significantly fewer scored as having pain (19.3%) compared to EMLA group (41.7%) Strengths of the Study Weaknesses of the Study • Decreased wait time • Habituation to glucose • Easy to use • Difficult to measure pain • RCT • Effectiveness applies to newborns only • Large sample size • Unknown reason why glucose works best • Financially possible. . Using non-nutritive sucking and oral glucose solution with neonates to relieve pain: A randomized controlled trial (Liu et. al, 2010) Design: Randomized, parallel group controlled trial Population: 105 neonates at least 32 weeks gestational Interventions: Newborns receiving glucose prior to venipuncture Findings: Glucose group and non nutritive sucking group had significantly lower pain scores than control group Weaknesses of the Study Strengths of the Study • Use of NIPS • Limited generalizability • RCT • No use of double blind • Relevance to Clinical Practice Sweet tasting solutions for reduction of needle-related procedural pain in children aged one to 16 years. (Harrison et al., 2011) Design: Systematic Review of RCTs, Level I Evidence Population: 4 studies and 330 children 12 months to 16 years of age Intervention: The use of sweet tasting solutions in children over one year of age during venipuncture. Findings: Sweet tasting solutions did not show a reduction in pain with needle related proceedures in children 12 months to 16 years of age. f Strengths of the Study • High Level Cochrane Review Weaknesses of the Study • Conflicting Studies • Requires more well-conducted RCTs with larger sample sizes Distracting children during blood draw: Looking through distraction cards (Inal & Kelleci, 2012) Design: RCT, Level II Population: Children 6 – 12 years (n=123) Sample: Convenience Sample, Random Group Assignment Intervention: Flippits® Distraction Cards during blood draw procedures Findings: Children receiving intervention self-reported and were observed to have less pain and anxiety Weaknesses of the Study Strengths of the Study • • Not suitable for children with neurologic, visual, RCT, large sample or auditory deficits • Financially feasible • Effectiveness after multiple uses with one child are unclear EMLA and Amethocaine for reduction of children’s pain associated with needle insertion (Review) (Lander, Weltman, & So, 2010) Design: Systematic Review of RCT, Level I Population: 6 trials of 534 children 3 months to 15 years of age Intervention: Compared EMLA to Amethocaine in reduction of pain associated with venipuncture Findings: Amethocaine significantly reduced risk of pain when compared with EMLA Strengths of the Study Weaknesses of the Study • High-level Cochrane review • • Exhaustive database search and handsearch of reference lists and journals Some of the trials used scales that had not been properly analyzed An Integration of Vibration and Cold Relieves Venipuncture Pain in a Pediatric Emergency Department (Baxter et al., 2011) Design: RCT, Level II Population: Children 4-18 years (n=81) Sample: Convenience Sample/Random Group Assignment Intervention: The use of both cold & vibration during venipuncture Findings: Children in the device group had significantly lower pain by parent report and the observational scale than children in the standard care group Strengths of the Study Weaknesses of the Study • RCT • Small Sample • Quick-acting option vs. topical analgesics • Subjects & coders not blinded to intervention groups • Low cost ($0.09 per attempt) • No control for placebo effects Relief of Pain During Blood Specimen Collection in Pediatric Patients (Inal & Kelleci, 2012) Design: RCT, Level II Population: Children 6-12 years (n=120) Sample: Convenience Sample/Random Group Assignment Intervention: using the “Buzzy” or cold & vibration applied to the site of insertion during venipuncture Findings: Children in the device group had significantly lower pain (p<0.001) and anxiety (p<0.001) Strengths of the Study Weaknesses of the Study • RCT • Not double-blind • Quick-acting option vs. topical analgesics • No control for placebo effects • Large sample size • Nurses not randomly selected • Pain & anxiety levels not assess by researcher to limit bias Stake Holders Nurses Certified Nursing Assistants Phlebotomists Intravenous Access Team Facility Administration/Accounting Future Research Additional qualitative studies regarding various methods of pain reduction for venipuncture in children. Additional RCT studies to support use of sweet-tasting solutions for children over 1 year of age. Determine whether external cold and vibration devices could offer pain relief for more invasive procedures. Summary of Evidence Xylocaine topical spray significantly reduced the pain of venipuncture in neonates under 34 weeks gestation in addition to standard care. (Chen et al., 2006) Sweet-tasting solutions significantly reduce the pain of venipuncture in infants under one year of age. (Gradin et al., 2002; Harrison et al., 2011). Summary of Evidence Children 6-12 years old self-reported less pain when distraction by flipcards was used (Inal & Kelleci, 2011). External cold and vibration significantly reduced pain and anxiety in children ages 4-18 years old versus standard care (Baxter et al., 2011; Inal & Kelleci, 2012). Summary of Evidence Amethocaine cream provided significant pain relief of venipuncture compared to EMLA cream in children 3 months - 15 years old. (Lander & Weltman, 2006) Jet delivery of lidocaine or a placebo provided superior pain relief to no pretreatment for children 5-18 years old. (Auerbach et al., 2009) Results Critical appraisal of the literature suggests that some form of pain control during venipuncture will be beneficial for children. Implementation Create EBP quality intervention teams Provide training for staff regarding pain relief methods Implement protocol for venipuncture pain relief Evaluation Assess pain using hospital approved pain scales Document pain response to used intervention Periodic review of documentation regarding response to intervention Conclusion Reduction of pain in children during venipuncture will help prevent increased pain and anxiety in future procedures. Pain control methods can be achieved through various inexpensive, noninvasive means. Further education and training is advised for nursing staff regarding pain reduction techniques for children. References Auerbach, M., Tunik, M., & Mojica, M. (2009). A randomized, double-blind controlled study of jet lidocaine compared to jet placebo for pain relief in children undergoing needle insertion in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16(5), 388-393. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00401.x Baxter, A., Cohen, L., McElvery, H., Lawson, M., & von Baeyer, C. (2011). An integration of vibration and cold relieves venipuncture pain in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 27(12), 1151-1156. Chen, H., Tzeng, C., Liu, W., Huang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2006). Topical xylocaine spray for reducing the pain of venipuncture in neonates. Clinical Neonatology, 13(2), 38-41. Gradin, M., Eriksson, M., Holmqvist, G., Holstein, Å., & Schollin, J. (2002). Pain reduction at venipuncture in newborns: oral glucose compared with local anesthetic cream. Pediatrics, 110(6 part 1), 1053-1057. Harrison D., Yamada J., Adam-Webber T., Ohlsson A., Beyene J., & Stevens B. Sweet tasting solutions for reduction of needle-related procedual pain in children aged one to 16 years. cochrane review 2011, Issue 10 References Inal, S., & Kelleci, M. (2012). Distracting children during blood draw: Looking through distraction cards is effective in pain relief of children during blood draw. International Journal Of Nursing Practice, 18(2), 210-219. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02016.x İnal, S., & Kelleci, M. (2012). Relief of Pain During Blood Specimen Collection in Pediatric Patients. MCN: The American Journal Of Maternal Child Nursing, 37(5), 339-345. doi:10.1097/NMC.0b013e31825a8aa Lander JA, Weltman BJ, So SS. EMLA and Amethocaine for reduction of children's pain associated with needle insertion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004236. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004236.pub2. Liu, M., Lin, K., Chou, Y., & Lee, T. (2010). Using non-nutritive sucking and oral glucose solution with neonates to relieve pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 19(11-12), 1604-1611.