Targeting HER family receptors in breast cancer Prof. Sabino De Placido Dip. di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Molecolare e Clinica Università Federico II --- Napoli, Italia Targeting HER2: Key points HER2 gene amplification and/or overexpression occurs in about 20% of breast cancers and is associated with more-aggressive disease and, until the advent of HER2-targeted agents, a worse outcome The monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab (which targets HER2), and the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lapatinib (which targets HER1 and HER2), have considerable efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer Adjuvant Setting What we know Trastuzumab has changed the natural history of early HER2+ BC Adjuvant Trastuzumab predicted to prevent recurrence in almost 28,000 patients over a 10-year period in the 5 major EU countries Patients, 20,000 n 18,000 No. of patients prevented from developing metastases Incidence of MBC without Herceptin Herceptin introduced 16,000 14,000 27,737 12,000 10,000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Weisgerber-Kriegl et al, ASCO 2008 More than 14.000 patients were recruited in 4 international clinical trials HERA (ex-USA) BCIRG 006 (global) Observation IHC / FISH (n=5,090) FISH (n=3,222) 1 year 1 year 2 years 1 year NCCTG N9831 (USA) IHC / FISH (n=3,505) NSABP B-31 (USA) 1 year IHC / FISH (n=2,030) 1 year 1 year Standard CTx Doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide IHC, immunohistochemistry FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation CTx, chemotherapy Docetaxel Docetaxel + carboplatin Trastuzumab Paclitaxel Piccart-Gebhart et al 2005 Romond et al 2005; Slamon et al 2006 Neoadjuvant setting What we know Adjuvant setting What we do not know Small, node negative tumors are under represented in clinical trials Studies investigating clinical outcome of pT1pN0 tumors by HER-2 and hormone receptors (HRs) status. Results • Overall 7,164 pts. with pT1pN0 tumors – median follow-up 4.5 - 12.4 yrs.) – 600 pts. with HER-2 + tumors • % HER-2 + disease – ranging between 7 and 10% • Absolute risks of distant relapse HER2+ – 5 yrs. ± 10-15% – 10 yrs. 22-28% • Increased risk of disease relapse if HER-2 + – hazard ratios ranging between 2.4 and 8.99 Reviewed by Oakman C et al, Educational book – ESMO meeting, Milan – October 2010 Studies investigating clinical outcome of pT1pN0 tumors by HER-2 and hormone receptors (HRs) status. Caveats and Conclusions • Caveats - heterogeneity in adjuvant therapies - HRs status not always centrally revised - in 3 out of 7 studies pT1c tumors were eligible - only 2 out of 7 studies evaluate outcome by combination of HER-2 and HRs status • “Take-home” messages - there is a substantial degree of concordance in considering HER-2 + patients with pT1pN0 tumors at increased risk of relapse compared to the HER-2 negative population (2 to 9 fold increase) Reviewed by Oakman C et al, Educational book – ESMO meeting, Milan – October 2010 Key question Is proportional benefit from adjuvant systemic therapies dependent on disease stage ? Potential options for adjuvant treatment of endocrine-resistant pT1b pN0 tumors HER-2 + • Docetaxel-Cyclophosphamide (TC) x 4 + Trastuzumab* Trastuzumab (lack of phase III data) • Docetaxel-Carboplatin-Trastuzumab (TCH) x 6 (BCIRG 006 data) * concomitant trastuzumab > sequential trastuzumab Trastuzumab Treatment decision: a multi-factorial process Tumor* : Size Patient : Co-morbidities Vascular invasion Ki-67 Patient : Expectations Age Preferences Treatment decision Adjuvant setting What we do not know Duration of Trastuzumab Adjuvant trials with different duration of trastuzumab administration • HERA (PI M. Piccart): sample size ~34001 – 12 vs 24 months of H following adjuvant CT • Phare (PI X. Pivot): sample size ~34002 – 6 vs 12 months of H following adjuvant CT • Persephone (UK-NCRI): sample size ~40003 – 6 vs 12 months of H following adjuvant CT • Hellenic Oncology Group (Greece): sample size 4784 – 6 vs 12 months of H with ddDoc after FEC • SOLD (PI H. Joensuu): sample size ~30006 – HD 3-wkly x3 ->FE75C x3 vs – HD 3-wkly x3 ->FE75C x3 -> H 3-wkly x14 • ShortHER (PI PF. Conte): sample size ~12505 – D 3-wkly x3 + H weekly x 9 -> FE60C x3 vs – AC or EC x 4 -> HD or HP 3-wkly x4 -> H 3-wkly x14 Metastatic Disease Overall Survival by Trastuzumab Treatment Groups Overall Survival Probability 1.0 Negative No Trastuzumab Trastuzumab HER2+ / Herceptin 0.8 0.6 HER20.4 HER2+ / 0.2 No Herceptin 0.0 0 12 24 36 Months from Diagnosi 48 60 What we Know The first line HERNATA Study HERNATA study : results Time to Progression Overall Survival Andersson JCO 2010 HERNATA study: results Time to Treatment Failure Andersson JCO 2010 HERNATA study : safety profile Andersson JCO 2010 What we Know The second line Tyverb plus capecitabine: significantly longer TTP in difficult to treat population (EGF100151, independent assessment) Cumulative progression-free (%) Tyverb + capecitabine Capecitabine HR: 0.57 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.77) p=0.00013 18.6 wks 27.1 wks (4.3 mos) (6.2 mos) 1. Cameron et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;[Epub ahead of print]. Figure Adapted from Cameron D, Casey M, Press M et al. A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008 Epub ahead of print, with kind permission of Springer Science and Business Media. What we Know Beyond the second line Lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab significantly prolonged PFS compared with lapatinib alone (EGF104900) Cumulative progression-free (%) 100 Lapatinib Lapatinib + trastuzumab n=145 n=146 Progressed or died, n 128 127 Median, wks 8.1 12.0 80 60 HR (95% CI) 0.73 (0.57, 0.93) p value 40 0.008 6-month PFS 28% 20 13% 0 0 10 Subjects at risk: Lapatinib 148 53 21 13 5 0 73 42 27 8 2 Lapatinib + 148 trastuzumab 20 30 40 Time from randomisation (weeks) 50 60 Updated overall survival in ITT Cumulative % alive without progression (EGF104900) 100 80% Died, n (%) 80 Median, months Hazard ratio (95% CI) 70% 60 L n=145 L+T n=146 113 (78) 105 (72) 9.5 14 0.74 (0.57, 0.97) Log-rank p value .026 56% 6 month OS 40 41% 20 L+T L 12 month OS 0 0 Patients at risk L 148 L+T 148 5 10 121 102 88 65 15 20 25 Time from randomization (months) 64 47 43 28 25 13 30 1 35 Lapatinib effect on ErbB2 accumulation at cell membrane: novel mechanism for enhanced effects of combined anti-ErbB2 therapy Lapatinib has been shown to enhance antitumour effect of trastuzumab in vitro and in clinical studies This study explored the mechanism for this effect by investigating impact of lapatinib and trastuzumab on receptor expression and signalling Treatment: lapatinib, trastuzumab, or both ErbB2-positive BC cells (SKBR3 and MCF7-HER2) In vitro assays: Receptor expression, phosphorylation, signalling, tumour growth Mouse xenograft Scaltriti et al., J Clin Oncol ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 2008; 26(Suppl.): Abstract 3594 and poster Scaltriti et al., Oncogene 2009; www.nature.com/onco What we Know HER2+ and HR+ HER2 and hormone receptor-positive BC Clinical trials to assess therapy Cortes Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010 HER2 and hormone receptor-positive BC Clinical trials to assess therapy Overall response rates (%) 100 Combination with chemotherapy 80 60 H0648g M77001 Combination with Aromatase inhibitors 40 EGF30008 TAnDEM 20 0 Trastuzumab + anastrozole Lapatinib + letrozole Trastuzumab Trastuzumab + + paclitaxel docetaxel Drug regimen Figure 1: Overall response rates in HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Anti-HER2 therapy was combined either with chemotherapy or aromatase inhibitors in four pivotal trials. The combination with chemotherapy showed higher overall response rates. 8.10-12 Cortes Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010 What else we Know The Future Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 Pertuzumab and trastuzumab have complementary mechanisms of action Pertuzumab HER2 HER1/3/4 Trastuzumab Subdomain IV Dimerization domain Trastuzumab: Pertuzumab: • Inhibits ligand-independent HER2 signaling • Inhibits ligand-dependent HER2 dimerization and signaling • Activates ADCC • Activates ADCC • Prevents HER2 ECD shedding ADCC, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; ECD, extracellular domain Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 35 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 CLEOPATRA: a Phase III trial of trastuzumab + pertuzumab in the 1st-line setting n=406 Patients with HER2-positive MBC centrally confirmed (N = 808) Placebo + trastuzumab PD Docetaxel* ≥6 cycles recommended 1:1 Pertuzumab + trastuzumab n=402 PD Docetaxel* ≥6 cycles recommended • Randomization was stratified by geographic region and prior treatment status (neo/adjuvant chemotherapy received or not) • Study dosing q3w: − Pertuzumab/Placebo: − Trastuzumab: − Docetaxel: 840 mg loading dose, 420 mg maintenance 8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg maintenance 75 mg/m2, escalating to 100 mg/m2 if tolerated * <6 cycles allowed for unacceptable toxicity or PD; >6 cycles allowed at investigator discretion MBC, metastatic breast cancer; PD, progressive disease Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 36 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 Primary endpoint: Independently assessed PFS Progression-free survival (%) n = 433 PFS events 100 Ptz + T + D: median 18.5 months 90 Pla + T + D: median 12.4 months ∆ = 6.1 months 80 70 60 50 40 HR = 0.62 95% CI 0.51‒0.75 p<0.0001 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (months) n at risk Ptz + T + D 402 345 267 139 83 32 10 0 0 Pla + T + D 406 311 209 93 42 17 7 0 0 D, docetaxel; PFS, progression-free survival; Pla, placebo; Ptz, pertuzumab; T, trastuzumab Stratified by prior treatment status and region Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 37 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 Overall survival: Predefined interim analysis Median follow-up: 19.3 months, n = 165 OS events 100 Overall survival (%) 90 80 70 HR = 0.64* 95% CI 0.47‒0.88 p = 0.0053* 60 50 40 30 Ptz + T + D: 69 events 20 Pla + T + D: 96 events 10 0 0 5 10 15 25 30 35 40 45 31 4 0 0 Time (months) n at risk Pertuzumab + T + D 402 20 387 367 251 161 87 Placebo + T + D 406 383 347 228 143 67 24 2 0 0 * The interim OS analysis did not cross the pre-specified O’Brien-Fleming stopping boundary (HR ≤0.603; p ≤0.0012) D, docetaxel; OS, overall survival; Pla, placebo; Ptz, pertuzumab; T, trastuzumab Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 38 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 Cardiac tolerability Placebo Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) (n = 407) Investigator-assessed 1.8% 1.0% Independently adjudicated symptomatic LVSD* 1.0% 1.0% Fall in LVEF to <50% and by ≥10 percentage points from baseline 6.6% 3.8% symptomatic LVSD* * LVSD was defined as NYHA class III/IV LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 39 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 Adverse events (all grades) ≥25% incidence or ≥5% difference between arms Placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 397) Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel (n = 407) Diarrhea 184 (46.3) 272 (66.8) Alopecia 240 (60.5) 248 (60.9) Neutropenia 197 (49.6) 215 (52.8) Nausea 165 (41.6) 172 (42.3) Fatigue 146 (36.8) 153 (37.6) Rash 96 (24.2) 137 (33.7) Decreased appetite 105 (26.4) 119 (29.2) Mucosal inflammation 79 (19.9) 113 (27.8) Asthenia 120 (30.2) 106 (26.0) Peripheral edema 119 (30.0) 94 (23.1) Constipation 99 (24.9) 61 (15.0) Febrile neutropenia 30 (7.6) 56 (13.8) Dry skin 17 (4.3) 43 (10.6) Adverse event, n (%) Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 40 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UT Health Science Center – December 6-10, 2011 Summary and conclusions • CLEOPATRA met its primary endpoint and demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS (HR = 0.62) in patients with HER2-positive MBC – Median PFS increased by 6.1 months from 12.4 to 18.5 months – The PFS improvement was consistent across subgroups and supported by the secondary endpoints of ORR and OS (immature) • The combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel increased rates of diarrhea, rash, mucosal inflammation, febrile neutropenia, and dry skin – These adverse events were primarily grades 1‒2, manageable, and occurred during docetaxel therapy – There was no increase in cardiac adverse events or LVSD • This new regimen may be practice-changing in HER2-positive first-line MBC Copyrights for this presentation are held by the author/presenter. Contact them at JBASELGA@PARTNERS.ORG for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 41 What else we Know The Future T-DM1 Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): the firstin-class HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate Target expression: HER2 Monoclonal antibody: trastuzumab Cytotoxic agent: DM1 Highly potent chemotherapy (maytansine derivative) Linker T-DM1 Systemically stable Breaks down in target cancer cell 43 Study Design TDM4450g: ongoing Phase II study of T-DM1 vs trastuzumab + docetaxel in first-line HER2-positive MBC Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose; 6 mg/kg q3w IV HER2-positive, recurrent locally advanced breast cancer or MBC (N=137) 1:1 PDa + Docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 q3w Crossover to T-DM1 (optional) (n=70) T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg q3w IV PDa (n=67) • Randomized, phase II, international, open-label studyb • Stratification factors: World region, prior adjuvant trastuzumab therapy, disease-free interval • Primary end points: PFS by investigator assessment, and safety • Data analyses were based on clinical data cut of Nov 15, 2010 prior to T-DM1 crossover • Key secondary end points: OS, ORR, DOR, CBR, and QOL aPatients bThis were treated until PD or unacceptable toxicity. was a hypothesis generating study; the final PFS analysis was to take place after 72 events had occurred. 44 Progression-Free Survival by Investigator Randomized Patients Median PFS, mos Proportion progression-free 1.0 Trastuzumab + docetaxel (n=70) 9.2 T-DM1 (n=67) 14.2 Hazard ratio 95% CI 0.594 0.364– 0.968 Log-rank P value 0.0353 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 2 4 Number of patients at risk T+D 70 66 63 T-DM1 67 60 51 6 8 10 Time (months) 12 14 16 18 20 53 46 43 42 12 22 4 15 2 6 2 3 0 0 27 35 Hazard ratio and log-rank P value were from stratified analysis. 45 Duration of Response by Investigator Patients with Measurable Disease at Baseline with an Objective Response Median DOR, mos Proportion progression-free 1.0 Trastuzumab + docetaxel (n=40) T-DM1 (n=43) 9.5 NRa 95% CI 6.6–10.6 – 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 2 Number of patients at risk T+D 40 40 T-DM1 43 41 4 38 38 6 8 10 12 Duration of objective response (months) 32 33 19 27 8 19 2 12 Kaplan-Meier estimates are shown. aNR, not reached; longer follow-up is needed to estimate the duration of response in the T-DM1 arm. 14 16 18 1 6 1 3 0 0 46 Incidence of Nonhematologic Adverse Events: ≥30% (All Grade) and/or ≥5% (Grade ≥3) of Patientsa All grade, n (%) AE Alopecia Fatigue Nausea Diarrhea Peripheral edema Increased AST Pyrexia Headache Back pain Increased ALT Pneumonia Trastuzumab + docetaxel c (n=66) T-DM1 c,d (n=69) 44 (66.7) 30 (45.5) 29 (43.9) 30 (45.5) 29 (43.9) 4 (6.1) 15 (22.7) 12 (18.2) 20 (30.3) 4 (6.1) 1 (1.5) 3 (4.3) 34 (49.3) 33 (47.8) 11 (15.9) 7 (10.1) 27 (39.1) 27 (39.1) 25 (36.2) 18 (26.1) 16 (23.2) 6 (8.7) b Grade ≥3 , n (%) Trastuzumab + docetaxel c (n=66) T-DM1 c,d (n=69) e e 3 (4.5) 0 2 (3.0) 3 (4.5) 0 1 (1.5) 0 3 (4.5) 0 0 3 (4.3) 2 (2.9) 0 0 6 (8.7) 0 0 1 (1.4) 6 (8.7) 4 (5.8) Green represents those AEs with ≥20% difference between treatment arms. aIn either treatment arm. adverse events listed were grade 5. cTwo patients mistakenly received a dose of T-DM1 and were thus included in the T-DM1 arm for safety analyses. dIncludes 3 patients who received at least 1 dose of trastuzumab alone or trastuzumab plus docetaxel. eNational Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 only categorizes alopecia as grade 1 or grade 2; there is no grade ≥3 for this AE. bNo 47 Cardiac Safety • Cardiac function was assessed locally and centrally based on cardiac ECHO/MUGA • Prior anthracycline in the adjuvant setting was 44.8% and 48.6% in the T-DM1 and trastuzumab + docetaxel arms, respectively • Asymptomatic LV dysfunction Trastuzumab + docetaxel T-DM1 Patients assessed 65 67 Patients with post-baseline LVEF ≤40% 2a 0 Patients assessed 60 65 Patients with post-baseline LVEF ≤40% 1b 0 LVEF assessment Local assessment Central assessment • There were no clinically significant cardiac events reported aBoth patients had prior anthracycline therapy in the adjuvant setting; 1 patient received prior trastuzumab therapy in the adjuvant setting. bThis patient did not receive prior treatment with an anthracycline. 48 Summary and Conclusions • This is the first randomized study to evaluate an antibody-drug conjugate for HER2positive MBC • First-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC with T-DM1, compared with trastuzumab + docetaxel was associated with: – A significant improvement in PFS (14.2 vs 9.2 mos; HR=0.594; P value=0.0353) – Similar ORR but more durable responses (64.2%, median duration not reached vs. 58.0%, median duration 9.5 months) – A lower rate of grade ≥3 AEs (46.4% vs 89.4%) • These results validate the hypothesis that the unique properties of T-DM1 may lead to an improved therapeutic index – Improved PFS with T-DM1 may result from improved tolerability/duration of treatment/response and intrinsic potency of HER2-targeted DM1 • T-DM1 is being evaluated in phase III randomized clinical trials for HER2-positive MBC 49 TDM4370g (EMILIA) Phase III Study: T-DM1 vs Capecitabine + Lapatinib in HER2-Positive MBC • HER2-positive LABC or MBC (N=980) • Previously received trastuzumab-based therapy • • • • T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg) q3w 1:1 Lapatinib (1250 mg/day, days 1–21) + capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1–14) q3w Multicenter, randomized, open-label study Treatment continues until progressive disease/unacceptable toxicity Primary end points: PFS by IRF, OS, 1-y and 2-y survival rates, Safety Secondary end points: PFS by INV, ORR, CBR, DoR, QOL, TTF www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT00829166. MARIANNE: Trastuzumab + taxane (n=364) HER2-positive progressive or recurrent locally advanced BC or previously untreated MBC (n=1092) T-DM1 + pertuzumab (n=364) T-DM1 + placebo (n=364) • Primary efficacy objective: – PFS assessed by an independent review facility • Primary safety objective: – To compare the safety of T-DM1 + pertuzumab or T-DM1 + placebo vs trastuzumab + taxane BC = breast cancer; MBC = metastatic breast cancer; PFS = progression-free survival 51